Chater-19: Jinhone Aise Niyan Banaye….Ke Pran Jaye Par Bachan Na Jai..!….Paris – Gaul / Pauri garhwal ….! Louis / Lawishch…!

“I die innocent of all the crimes laid to my charge; I Pardon those who have occasioned my death; and I pray to God that the blood you are going to shed may never be visited on France”.

(As reported by the English priest Henry Essex Edgeworth who accompanied the King Louis 16 of France to his execution.)

Now,We know ancient British Catuvellauni tribe and its connection wih Katyuri or ancient Kuninda Kingdom of Uttaranchal. Catuvellauni tribe of ancient Briatin can lead us further towards Lau and Kush. Because now we know that there were two set of people their. (1) Gwyddel and (2) Wales or Cymru(Cumbrian).

WE have checked one set…and that is Wales or Cumbrian. Now let us check second set Gwyddel or Gael.

Now it is clear that Cumbrian stands for Kumaon while Gwyddel , Gail or Gael stand for Garhwal.

To Search Ram …that .is Lau –kush or Surya vanshi (Suline race) …we have to search Istvaeones Germanic tribe Group of ancient Europe. Gwyddel or Gael ,Gallia come in to this group.
So now let us begin our Search for Lau ,Kush and Bharatvanshis in Europe.

Open the following link and look at Celtic tribes Map of Iron age England. The tribe map is very important . You can see Catuvellauni tribe alongwith other tribes in the map. Mean other tribes also migrated alog with Catuvelluni. Technically I found it difficult to produce this map on this Board. So site and study tribe map. It is vital clue to Lau nandan (London)


The Link says that ..

The names of the Iron Age tribes in Britain were recorded by Roman and Greek historians and geographers, especially Ptolemy, although information from the distribution of Celtic Coins has also shed light on the extents of the territories of the various groups that occupied the island.
These are also not necessarily the names by which the tribes knew themselves; for instance, “Durotriges” may mean “hillfort-dwellers”, referring to the fact that hillforts continued to be occupied in this area after they were abandoned elsewhere in Southern Britain; it is unlikely that the Durotriges themselves considered this their defining characteristic; and “Regnenses” is a Latin name meaning “inhabitants of the (client kingdom”.)

Belgic and Regnenses

Yes, Belgic and Regenses tribes are clue to Ramvanshis or more specific word is Ikshvaku or Suryavanshis (Sunline),because there was Robertian (Bharatvanshi)clan too there in this group .

Now let us connect the facts with Kafir of Hindukush.

European history ,History of Anatolia as well as Book “kafirs of Hindukush” give us clue to above mentioned direction?
How ?

Ashkun kafir trtibe is Clue

Refer the book “kafirs of Hindukush.”. Ashkun and Gour tribe mentioned in the Book lead us towards Syryavanshis. In this chapter we shall discuss only Ashkun kafir tribe. Look how this tribe reached British land and known as Regnenses” tribe in Britain .

Robertson mentions that…….


“Of the Ashkun my ignorance is
almost complete, for no Kafir was able to give me much
information about them. The small total of my know-
ledge amounts to this : that the Ashkun people speak a language somewhat similar to that of the Wai, and
are friendly disposed towards them ; that their country
is separated from the Kulam valley by a range of
mountains ; that they possess two large villages, one
(K4fir) on a river which flows into the Kti before its
junction with the Pech or Kamah, the other (Musalman)
on the banks of a torrent which falls directly into the
Pech or Kamah on its right bank. It is also said that
the Ashkun country is surrounded by thick forest, is
practically impenetrable, and is defended by a brave
people particularly well armed wdth matchlocks, who
are at war with all the other Kafir tribes, with the ex-
ception of the Wai.” ( p-81)

Book link (Kafirs of Hindukus)

Ashkun / Rhegines tribe (Raghaw ?)

I have already mentioned that the book “ Origines Celticae (a Fragment) and Other Contributions to the History of Britain “ By Edwin Guest is very usefulbook . It narrates migration path map of Kafir tribes who faught at gate way of India for 1000 years towards west.

Book link

The above mentioned book mentiones on page no 24 and 25 that “ Ashkenaz / Askhanaia /Ascanian , latter on called “Rhegines “by Greek. Book also mentions how the tribe connected to Arzawa of Anatolia. The Book also mentions them with Ligurian races of Lydia.

( My previous Article connect them with Arzawa . Link to the Article)
In previous chapters about Anatolia we had seen history of Arzawa (Luwian Kingdom). The Book mentions them as Ligures.

Ashkuns were Ikhvakuvanshi

So, above book link help us to connect Ashkuns (who faught at Gate way of India for 1000 years ) with “Regnenses” tribe of ancient Britain . You look at tribe map of ancient England. Regnenses were neighbour of Catuvellauni and Belgic tribe So here we can conclude that the tribes mentioned in tribe map of ancient Englnd left Soil of Bharatvarsha wth hand in hand. The following link give us information about Rhigenses.

Regnenses / Ashkun in Britain

The Regnenses, Regni or Regini were a British Celtic kingdom and later a Civitats of Roman Britain.. Their capital was Noviomagus Reginorum, known today as Chichester in modern West Susex..
Before the Roman conquest their land and capital appear to have been part of the territory of the Atrebates, possibly as part of a Confederation of Tribes. It has been suggested that, after the first phase of the conquest, the Romans maintained the Atrebates as a nominally independent Client Kingdom, acting as a buffer between the Roman province in the east and the unconquered tribes to the west.
After Cogidubnus’s death, the kingdom would have been incorporated into the directly ruled Roman provinc and divided into several civitates, including the Atrebates, Belgae, and Regnenses (interpreted as Latin “people of the kingdom”).
(Look Regnenses are mentioned alongwith Belgae tribe)
Link to Regnenses

Rheged (Raghav?)

Rheged kingdom is described in poetic sources as one of the kingdoms of the Hen Ogledd (“Old North”), the Brythonic-speaking region of what is now northern England and southern Scotland, during the Early Middle Ages. Its borders are not described in the poems, but some modern scholars have suggested that it included what is now Cumbria in North west England and possibly extended into Lancaire and Scotland. In the historical sources Rheged is intimately associated with the king Urien Rheged and his family. Its inhabitants spoke Cumbric, a Brythonic dialect closely related to Old welsh .

Link to Rheged

SEcond link

Regnenses / Raghav – Kushvanshi ?
Belgae Lau vanshis ?

Means Regnenses / Rheged stand for Raghava (Kushvanshis)? We know that Robertian were ruling in France .Robertian sunline kings stand for Raw Bharat . Regnenses / Rheged stand for Kushvanshis ,Then Balgae stand for Lauvanshis ? Yes, That is clue to History. Balgae tribe which enetered British land is Clue to Lau nandan and Thames. Belgae tribe is clue to Tara hill. Belgae tribe is clue to Gwyddel. How ?

To get answer we have to understand Istvaeones Germanic tribe Group.
Istvaeones were clue to Ikshvauvanshi. In previous chapter about Belgge tribe we have seen ancient facts.


Now let us understand the term Istvaeones…and their tribal group Belgae. .These tribal group is clue to Lau –kush and Bharatvanshis.

I shall try to give you path that can lead you towards Lau –Kush and Bharatvanshis (Suryavanshis- Sunline people). Look at Below link.It mentions that Belgae gave their name to Roman province of “Gallia Belgica”, that is modern day Belgium. Look they mentions Gallia (clue to Gwyddel or Gael and not wales).It was division of Low (now clearly understand that it was Lau -Son of Shri Ram they remembered) countries. In 3rd Century BC and later Belgae also reached Britain and Ireland. The Belge belong to Istvaeones (Ikshvakuvanshi) group of Germanic tribe.

“The Belgae were a group of tribes living in northern Gaul, on the west bank of the Rhine, in the 3rd century BC, and later also in Britain, and possibly even Ireland. They gave their name to the Roman province of Gallia Blgica, and very much later, to the modern country of Belgium.
Although the name “Belgica” is now reserved for Belgium, before the division of the Low Countries into a southern and a northern half in the 16th century, the name referred to the entire Low Countries. The Seventeen Provinces of the Low Countries were then divided into the independent Belgica Foederata or the federal Dutch Republic (Devashcha?) and the Belgica Regia (Belgica Rajya?)or the royal Southern Netherlands under the Habsbourgi Crown. For example, several contemporary maps of the Dutch Repulic, which consisted of the Northern Netherlands, and therefore has almost no overlap with the country of Belgium, show the Latin title Belgium Foederatum.
Link to Belgae

Now Look how Belgic tribes connected with Istvaeones or Iscaevones (Ikshvakuvanshis).

Following Link clearly mentions that The Istvaeones or Iscaevones were dwelling in modern day Netherlands, Belgium and northern France) as well as the Rhine and Weser river systems from perhaps 500 BCE, until the differentiation of localized Teutonic (Tri hari?or Tehri?) tribes (Chatti, Hessians, Franks) in that region circa 250 CE. The area was called Gaul .

Gaul / Gwyddel / guerre = war, garder = ward /Ganga Dwar

Gaul (Latin: Gallia, French: Gaule, Dutch: Gallië) was a region of Wasten Europe during the Iron Age and Roman era, encompassing present day France, Luxembourg and Belgim, most of Switzerland, the western part of Northern Italy, as well as the parts of the Netherlands and Germany on the left bank of the Rhine. The Gauls were the speakers of the Gaulish Language (an early variety of Celtic) native to Gaul. According to the testimony of Julius Caesar, the Gaulish language proper was distinct from the Aguinian langauge and the Belgic Lanauge. Archaeologically, the Gauls were bearers of the La Tene Culture, which extended across all of Gaul, as well as east to Rhaetia,Noricum ,Pannonia and southwestern Germania.
During the 2nd and 1st centuries BC, Gaul fell under Roman rule: Gallia was conquered in 203 BC and Gallia Narbonensisin 123 BC. Gaul was invaded by the Cinbri (Now we Know Kumaon ) and the Teutons (Now we know TRihari garh) after 120 BC, who were in turn defeated by the Romans by 101 BC. Julius Caesar finally subdued the remaining parts of Gaul in his Campaigns of 58 to 51 BC. Roman Control of Gauls lasted for five centuries, until the last Roman Rump state, the Domain of Soissons, fell to the Franks in AD 486. During this time, the Celtic culture had become amalgamated into a Gallo oman culture and the Gaulish language was likely extinct by the 6th century.
The Greek and Latin names for Gaul are ultimately derived from the Celtic ethnic or tribal names *Kel-to and Gal(a)-to-. Some modern linguists have suggested that the two variant Greek Keltoi and Galatai have a common origin.
Josephus claimed the Gauls were descended from Gomer, the grandson of Noah. Hellenistic Etiology connects the name with Galatia (first attested by Timaeus of Tauromenion in the 4th c. BC), and it was suggested the association was inspired by the “milk-white” skin .
The English Gaul and French: Gaule, Gaulois are unrelated to Latin Gallia and Galli, despite superficial similarity. They are rather derived from the Germanic term Walha, “foreigner, Romanized person”, an exonym applied by Germanic speakers to Celts, likely via a Latinization of Frankish *Walholant “Gaul”, literally “Land of the Foreigners/Romans”, making it partially cognate with the names Wales and Wallachia), the usual word for the non-Germanic-speaking peoples (Celtic-speaking and Latin-speaking indiscriminately). The Germanic w is regularly rendered as gu / g in French (cf. guerre = war, garder = ward), and the diphthong au is the regular outcome of al before a following consonant (cf. cheval ~ chevaux). Gaule or Gaulle can hardly be derived from Latin Gallia, since g would become j before a (cf. gamba > jambe), and the diphthong au would be unexplained; the regular outcome of Latin Gallia is Jaille in French which is found in several western placenames.
The name Gaul is sometimes erroneously linked to the ethnic name Gael,which is derived from Old Irish Goidel (borrowed, in turn, in the 7th century AD from Primitive welsh Guoidel – spelled Gwyddel in Middle welsh and Modern welsh – likely derived from a Brittonic root *W?delos meaning literally “forest person, wild man”); the names are, thus, unrelated. The Irish word gall, on the other hand, did originally mean “a Gaul” i.e. an inhabitant of Gaul, but its meaning was later widened to “foreigner”, to describe the VIkings, and later still the Normans. The words gael and gall are sometimes used together for contrast, for instance in the 12th century book Cogad Gaedel re Gallaib..
Link to Gaul

Note: In Indian Scriptures some mentions it Like Ganaga Dwar too.

Now let us check Istvaeones facts.

The Istvaeones and Belgae

The Istvaeones, also called Istaevones, Istriaones, Istriones, Sthraones, Thracones, Rhine Germans and Weser-Rhine Germans (Istwäonen, Weser-Rhein-Germanen in German), were a West Germanic cultural group or proto-tribe. Their name was recorded in Germania by Tacitus, a 1st century Roman historian, who categorized them as one of the tribes of the sons of Mannus ( Look Pural form of Manu. Indian Scripture says that There 13 Manus… !2 Manu happened to be in Himalaya and 13th Manu Founed Ayodhya after Jal Pralay. So they are right in their plural form..”Mannus” ) and labelled them as those tribes who were neither Ingvaenos ( Agnivanshis) nor Irminones (Yamvanshis ) (India Scripture says that Yama was Brother to Manu and Agni was Friend of Manu…Is it not Sanatan?).
The Istvaeones were the tribe of Istaev, son of Mannus. They dwelt around the Atlantic coast (modern day Netherlands, Belgium and northern France) as well as the Rhine and Weser river systems from perhaps 500 BCE, until the differentiation of localized Teutonic tribes (Chatti,Hessians,Franks) in that region circa 250 CE; Istvaeonic, or Low Frankonian, is the grouping that includes Dutch and related languages in Friedrich Maurer’s classification.. There is also evidence some of them merged with the North Sea Germans (Ingvaeones).
Jacob Grimm in the book “”Deutsche Mythologie urged that Iscaevones was the correct form, partly because it would connect the name to an ancestor figure in Norse Mythology named Ask, and partly because in Nennius where the name Mannus is corrupted as Alanus, the ancestor of the Istaevones appears as Escio or Hisicion. There the sons of this figure are, fantastically, from Frankish tradition, Francus, Romanus, Alamanus, and Bruttus, the supposed ancestors of the Franks,Latins ,Germans and Britons. This seems to reflect Frankish desire to connect the Franks with the people they ruled.
Link to Istvaeones

The above link says that Belgic is Istvaeones or Iscaevones tribes. Now there should be no confusion who Named Briezh (Bahraich –Geographical name of Awdh- Awadh was Poetic name given by poets), Who named Thames (River Tamas –On the bank of river Tamas Lau –Kush borned. Now it is alo clear that Pandava were calling their provinces County and Suryavansi were calling their provinces Deutchey (Devashch)

Now ,can you not search out Suryavanshi tribes in India yourself? Will you not take that much toil to Know Lau –Kush and Bharatrvanshi clans on Indian soils ? I think that is possible for you….If you wish . After all we are worshipers of Ram. So I prefer to keep Silence on Suryavanshi Clans in Bharatvarsha. You please carry your search on Indian soil.

Virat Swarup of Shri Ram

But now it is high time to Clear “Virat Swarup of Shri Ram”. Without Lau –Kush and Bharatvanshis ( Possible previous Surya vanshi Clans of India too) , it is impossible to understand Virat Swarupa of Shri Ram. They still remember their Ayodhya. But they can not cross hurdles in their Path. In Bharatvarha nobody is ready to look at Lau and Kush vanshi. We people of India remembered Ram but forget Lau –kush and Bharatvanshis. They ever followed their ancestral path of Sacirfices. But We people of India are not ready to consider their Sacrifices. They are the people who saved and expanded Kingdom of Bharatvarsha. Our Mind and Eyes are not ready to look at their Sacrifices.

To understand Virat Swarup of Ram Pl. visit following site and Surf. Until now you Know that Netherland ,Belgium and France is land of Istvaeones or Iscaevones.Surf the site to understand Virat Swarup of Shri Ram.
You pl. try to Understand term Istvaeones, Chatti (Hessian Frank), Chattuari Frank (Is it Chitotri of India?), Ripurian Franks, Salian Frank , Sicambri Frank.

They are the people who are accepted as “Deutsche” (Devashch) In Europe. They Came to India in form of “Deutsche East India Compny” as well as “ French East India company” But we failed to read “Devashch”in the word“Deutsche”. Surprisingly
We never looked at their company’s Coat of Arm. There was “Trishul dhari Shiv and Parvati” in Caot of Arms of the company. Nobody from us tried to Look at it.

Link to vishal swarup of Shri Ram

Pran jaye par vachan na jai….

Among above Suryavanshi Groups I most sympthise towards Salian Frank and their Capetian Branch. They were of Robertian clan (Raw Bharat) and their last king Louis XVI was Executed after French revolution.

My soul says that he was innocent young man ..became prey of Circumstances.

Read the name carefully. it is Louis (Lawishch)..that is not enough? His ancesters declared themselves Capetian...(Capisa -Gate w of India ) that is not enough ?

No history says that he was womanish and lavish or extravegant in that way…..Entire world know that he had ancestral palace of his own. As a King of France he might be having enough cloths. During that era there was no planes and no Cars . He had Horses and chariots . Then how he could be lavish in his lifestyle?

Yes,treasury debt was cause of everything and that happened during his father’s ruling time. Young Louis XVI could not explained cause of huge treasury debt, that was his only fault . …and he was executed. Nobody know ..or nobody tried to understand that where the treasury money spent by his father? He was last absolute king.

You pl. look at historical chronology. You look at war of Plassey (1757) and Buxar(1764) . You pl look at American revolution (1763) . Louis XV died (1774) after that his son Louis XVI Coronated in 1775.At last Bharatvanshi Louis XVI became the prey of so called French revolution(1789 – 99). In this chain of events I can see that Bharat sacrificed himself but Ram was saved.


Louis 16 was devided between two..war for new found land America and war for Ayodhya..

Read carefully his name. His name was Louis ( German form :Lawishch). Ayodhya was liberated but Bharat died. He could not explained everything. Even today I can not explain and If I explain the things people will not believe it. World doubt crucification event of Christ. They doubt whether Christ was crucified or not? But we can not doubt execution of Lawishch . Now another person was executed openly…recorded in world history….. and this time his name was Louis (Lawishch)… !


Capisa and Capetian

When Capisa – the gate of India was falling . Ancestors of Louis 16 declrared that they are Capetian. They detemined to carry Historical tradition of Capisa ( The gate way of India) . That ancestral path of Sacrifce lead Louis XVI towards Gullotine. He could not explain anything to anybody and executed by people of France.

Last words of Luois -16 ...

“I die innocent of all the crimes laid to my charge; I Pardon those who have occasioned my death; and I pray to God that the blood you are going to shed may never be visited on France”. (As reported by the English priest Henry Essex Edgeworth who accompanied the King to his execution.)

Luois 16 left behind the best example of “ Pran Jaye par Vachan na jai”

Robertson also mentioned French king in his book “kafirs of Hindukush”. He writes…

“I have heard a man threaten Imra. The individual referred to had a little
son grievously ill and likely to die. Talking to me
about the child’s condition, he spoke of the feasts he
had given in Imra’s name and the sacrifices he had
made in his honour. “Yet,” he complained, “I have
lost twelve sons by sickness.” Then he shouted out,
“If this little one dies I shall turn Musalmiiu.” The
child did die eventually, but the father did not change
his faith, though, like the French king, he ever after-
wards felt that God had behaved ungratefully, after all
he had done for him. “(P -183 –Kafirs of Hindukush-Link given above)

Read the link

Paris (Gaul) / Pauri (garhwal)

Now we also know that Paris (Gaul) named  after Parissi tribe..the tribe had roots in Pauri (Garhwal).
The Land of Pauri Garhwal is blessed with splendid view of snow-bound peaks of Himalayas, scenic valleys & surround ings, meandering rivers, dense forests and hospitable people with a rich culture. Diverse in topography, the district of Pauri Garhwal varies from the foothills of the ‘Bhabar’ areas of Kotdwara to the soul-lifting meadows of Dhudatoli, sprawling at an altitude of 3,000 meters. Which remains snow-bound during the winter months. Filled with places of tourist interest, most locations in Pauri Garhwal offer a breathtaking view of the snow laden Himalayan Splendour.

.Pauri is a city and a Municipality Board in Pauri Garhwal distrit in the Indian state of Uttaakha
Link to Pauri Garhwal

Look Effil tower in Pauri Garwal

Link to Pauri Garh

Link to French revolution

Link to Louis 15

Link to Louis 16

Link to American revolution

Virat Swarup

Yes ,They were Istvaeones or Iscaevones. They had names like Louis (Lavishch) and Robert (Raw Bharat). Lau was in centre of their culture. They formed Group of Low (Lau)countries.

The Low Countries ( Dutch: Lage Landen) are the historical lands around the low-lying
delta of the Rhine , Scheldt ( It is Dutch version of river name Escaut) and Meuse rivers, including the modern countries of Belgium ,The Netheerlands ,Luxombbourg and parts of northern France and western Germany. The term is more appropriate to the era of the Late Middle Ages and Early Modern Europe when strong centrally governed nations were slowly forming and territorial governance was in the hands of a noble or of a noble house.
Link to Low contries

Heiliges Römisches Reich

Latter on those Low countires were driving force behind creation of ’Heiliges Römisches Reich “(800 Bc). Look at historical chronology. In Bharatvarsha Shankracharyaji was reviving Sanatan religion while they revived Ram (Römisches) in Europe.

The Holy Roman Empire (HRE; German: Heiliges Römisches Reich (HRR), Latin: Imperium Romanum Sacrum (IRS), Italian: Sacro Romano Impero (SRI)) was a German empire that existed from 962 to 1806 in Central Europe. It was ruled by the Holy Roman Emperor. Its character changed during the Middle Ages and the Early Modern period, when the power of the emperor gradually weakened in favour of the princes. In its last centuries, its character became quite close to a union of territories.
The empire’s territory was centered on the Kingdom of Germany, and included neighboring territories, which at its peak included the Kingdom of Italy and the Kingdomof Burgundy. For much of its history, the Empire consisted of hundreds of smaller sub –units,principalities , Duchies ,Counties ,free Impirial Cities and other domains.
In 962 Otto was crowned Holy Roman Emperor (German: Römisch-Deutscher Kaiser), although the Roman imperial title was first restored to Charlemagne in 800.
The Empire was formally dissolved on 6 August 1806 when the last Holy Roman Emperor Francis II (from 1804, Emperor Francis I of Austria) abdicated, following a military defeat by the French under Napoleon (see treaty of Pressburg). Napoleon reorganized much of the Empire into the Confederation of The Rhines , a French Satellite. Francis’ House of Habsburg –Lorraine survived the demise of the Empire, continuing to reign as Emperors of Austria and King of Hungary until the Habsburg empire’s final dissolution in 1918 in the aftermath of world war I.

Link to Heiliges Römisches Reich

You see..with the execution of Louis 16 “ Heiliges Römisches Reich“ collapsed.

And lastly Link to Belgium Monarhy
Gour is second Kafir group that is Clue to Suryavanshi ( and Coonection with Netherland )clan that faught at Gate way of India for 1000 years. We shall discuss it latter on.

Ram in Vanvas

The connection between Britain’s ancient Catuvellauni tribe ,Katir tribe who defended gate way of India for 1000 years as well as Katyuri or Kuninda Clan of Uttarakhand says that Lau vanshis in Vanvas.
Now Ashkun tribe who defended Gate way of India for 1000 years and thier connection with Regneses tribe of Ancient Britain as well as their connection with Istvaeones (Ikshvakuvanshi) Group of Tribes in europe says that our Kushvanshis also in Vanvas.

Kumaon History says that there were following Kingdoms there .

1.Baijnath Katyuri
7.Sui (kali Kumaon)

Link to KUmaon history

These Kingdoms are clue to United kingdoms. The united kingdom should be searched properly.

Still few remaining Kafir tribes will be discussed here to complete research work.Otherwise our search for Ram and Pandava is over here.
At the end of The research....

We find full proof evidences that connects Belgic tribes with Lau nandan. Now we know that Europe accept them as “Devashch” . Count and County stand for Mother Kunty ..that is clue to Pandav vanshis.Duchy and Duke stand for Suryavanshis that stands for Lau –Kush and Bharat Vanshis(Brother of Shri Ram).
Now we shall look how Brussels connects with “Bhabhar”- The Lower region of Himalaya. The name Bhabhar is derived from a local tall growing grass, Eulaliopsis binata used for manufacture of paper, and rope.

Terai and Bhabhar

The Kumaon region consists of a large Himalyan tract, together with two submontane strips called the Terai and the Bhabhar. The submontane strips were up to 1850 an almost impenetrable forest, given up to wild animals; but after 1850 the numerous clearings attracted a large population from the hills, who cultivated the rich soil during the hot and cold seasons, returning to the hills in the rains. The rest of Kumaon is a maze of mountains, part of the Himalaya range, some of which are among the loftiest known. In a tract not more than 225 km in length and 65 km in breadth there are over thirty peaks rising to elevations exceeding 5500 m.
Link to Kumaon Geography

Bhabhar Belt

Bhabhar is the region south of the Lower Himalayas and the Siwalik Hills It is the alluvial apron of sediments washed down from the Siwaliks along the northern edge of the Indo-Gangetic Plain.

The name Bhabhar is derived from a local tall growing grass, Eulaliopsis binata used for manufacture of paper, and rope.

Bhabhar is the gently-sloping coarse alluvial zone below the Siwalik Hills (outermost foothills of Himalaya) where streams disappear into permeable sediments. The underground water level is deep in this region, then rises to the surface in the Terai below where coarse alluvium gives way to less permeable silt and clay.
Being at the junction of Himalayas and the Indo-Gangetic Plain, Bhabhar contains almost all the important trade and commerce hubs of Uttarakhand state. Due to the top-soil replenishment every monsoon, is also a fertile area with large yields per unit area.
Link to Bhabhar Belt

Second Link to Bahbhar Belt


Brissels ,a capital of old Brabant, now of Belgium, of Germanic origin, from brocca “marsh” sali “room, building,” from L. cella It arose 6c. as a fortress on an island in a river. As a type of carpet, from 1799; as a type of lace, from 1748. Brussels sprouts (Brassica oleracea gemmifera) attested from 1748 (first written description is from 1580s).


Link to etymology to Brussels

House of Leuven

Now we know that Brussels was Capital of Old Brabant.Brabant is clue Bhabhar and Suryavanshis.House of Leuven will tell tell you story of Lauvanshis , Kushvanshis and Bharatvanshis…!

Link to House of Leuven

The Dutchy of Brabant or Bhabhar?

The Dutchy of Brabant was formally erected in 1183/1184. The title “Duke of Brabant” was created by the German Emperor Frederick Barbarossa in favor of Henry I, son of Gofrey III of Leuven (who was Duke of Lower Lotharingia at that time). The Duchy of Brabant was a feudal elevation of the since 1085/1086 existing title of Landgrave of Brabant. This was an Imperial fief which was assigned to Count HenryIII of Leuven shortly after the death of the preceding Count of Brabant, Count Palatine Herman II of Lotharingia († September 20, 1085). Although the corresponding county was quite small (limited to the territory between the rivers Senne and Denger) its name was applied to the entire country under control of the Dukes from the 13th century on. In 1190, after the death of Godfrey III, Henry I also became Duke of Lotharingia. Formerly Lower Lotharingia, this title was now practically without territorial authority, but was borne by the later Dukes of Brabant as an honorific title.
In 1288, the Dukes of Brabant became also Duke of Limburg. The title fell to the Dukes of Burgandy in 1430. Later on, it followed with the Burgundian inheritance until the French Revolution, although the northern part of the territory of Brabant was actually governed by the United Province during the 17th and 18th century.

Link to Dutchy of Brabant

Robertians (Bharatanshi)
Duke of Burgundy ( duc de Bourgogne) was a title borne by the rulers of the Duchy of Burgundy, a small portion of traditional lands of Burgundians west of river Saone which in 843 was allotted to Charles the Bald’s Kingdom of west Francks . Under the Ancient Regime, the Duke of Burgundy is the premier lay peer of the kingdom of France.
Beginning with Robert IIof France, the title has been held by the Capetians, the French royal family. It was granted to Robert’s younger son, Robert, who founded the House of Burgundy. When the senior line of the House of Burgundy became extinct, it was inherited by John II of France through proximity of blood. John granted the duchy as an appanage for his younger son, Philip the BOld. The Valois Dukes of Burgundy became dangerous rivals to the senior line of the House of Valois. When the male line of the Valois Dukes of Burgundy became extinct, it was confiscated by Louis XI of France. From then on, the title was never given again to a younger son.
Today, the title is used by the House of Bourbon as a revived courtesy title.

Link to Duke of Burgandi

Bharatvanshi (Sunline)
The House of Bourbon is a European Royal House, a branch of the Capetian dynasty. Bourbon kings first ruled Navarre and France in the 16th century. By the 18th century, members of the Bourbon dynasty also held thrones in Spain, Naples ,Sicily and Parma. Spain and Luxembourg currently have Bourbon monarchs.
Bourbon monarchs ruled Navarre (from 1555) and France (from 1589) until the 1792 overthrow of the monarchy during the French Revolution. Restored briefly in 1814 and definitively in 1815 after the fall of the First French Empire, the senior line of the Bourbons was finally overthrown in the July Revoltion of 1830. A Cadet bransh, the House of Orleans, then ruled for 18 years (1830–1848), until it too was overthrown. The Prince of Conde (Bourbon-Condé) were a cadet branch of the Bourbon-Vendômes and, in turn, were senior to the Pince of Conti (Bourbon-Conti). Both these lines became extinct in the early nineteenth century.
Link to House of Bourborn

Now we get perfect clue to Lau nandan and Kush as well as Bharatvanshis.Belgic tribes of Europe is clue to defender of Sanatan religion. No doubt Group of Lau(Low) countries were
driving force behind establishment of Romeshch Reich (Holy Roman Empire). There was Ram.

About Chandrakant Marwadi

Researching ancint history.Have found that original name of London is Lav nanda. The fact shocked me. At end of research....that is thesis...anti theses and synthesis..I have following historical facts. Halahal / Holy I have found that We Sanatan dharmi people lost connection with Halahal tradition of Shiva. We turned Amrut seekers only. Rome and Greece has origin in Mahismiti ancient capital of Avantika. Mycenaean civilisation of Crete has origin in Mahishmati...Capital of Avantika . We have forgotten our savior Dharmapal or Gaurdians of Halahal. How can we recognise Paul and Paletine Hills of Rome ? To understand History of Trilokpati Ram and Shiva we have to go deeper in to History of Anhilwad (Gujarat) , Vallabhi - Oinwara ( Bihar) and England (Wales). All three kingdoms has origin in same root...same Skand. Go deep into the realm of Kritikas and Crete..Valli and Wales... Avantika and Aventicum and find eternal connection between Gaud / God......Halahal and Holy. Turk /Tarakasur Today's Indian history don't discuss much Turks....first invaded India. We could not spread our ancinet Scripture message...That Turks are Tarakasur. With this first folly... Then we could not recognise Lav nandan and Kartikeya too... Our real saviours. The jew lot in disguise started Azadi movement started quit india movement with Khilafat support of Turkish khilafat. Our this act broken heart of Kartyikeya and Lavnandan.
This entry was posted in A Book - There was Ram. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.