CHAPTER:12 :CAPISA / KAPISA / KASYAP PURA / KAFIRISTAN…! LAST CRY OF KAFIRS … ONLY CLUE BETWEEN LAV NANDAN AND LONDON? RAMDASI SIKHS EVER REMAIN SHOULDER TO SHOULDER WITH LAV NANDAN

“The Katirs in the Bashgul valley informed me that
they came from the west, and were once part of a numcroiis tribe which divided into two parties.One division, consisting of all the wealthy and other notable persons, went to London, while the other, comprising menials only, settled in Kafiristan. This depreciation of themselves is in the true spirit of Oriental politeness. They warned me not to trust the Kam, or to believe them for an instant if they declared that they and I were descended from a common ancestor ; for it was notorious that it was the Katirs, and not the Kam, who were of my race, the Kam being really more akin to the Russians. This also indicated that the Kafirs of the Bashgul Valley know something of the antagonistic sentiments with which the English and the Russians are supposed to regard one another in the East. (page 160)

“The Káfirs of the Hindu-Kush”
-Sir George Scott Robertson

Book link

The “Above Sentences” are pillars of present research. Frankly speaking ..fair complexion of Kafir warriors and above alarming clue WORDS became Keynotes to present research.At the end of research I also become Kafir. Kafirs had no books, they had no time to show you evidences . They were just fighting. But blessings of “Internet –Dev” helped me to UNFOLD KAFIR’S LAST CRY BEFORE YOU…IF YOU CAN LISTEN.

Today we forget Kafirs and their Gods. But Robertson mentioned them all in his preface to the book . He mentions that….

“But Gish, the war god, is dead. It was his worship
which kept Ktifiristan free for so many generations.
His blood-saturated shrines are demolished.”

An English man was aware about Kafir’s Gods “Gish” , “Moni” and “Imra”. We forget them all. We forget Kafirs and their Gods too. Ram took note of everything. He knew why Kafir’s war God “Gish” was dead at the gate way of India itself. At the end of research I am in position to give you clue to Kafirs God Moni (Tamil God Muneeswarar) and Imra (Yamadev)…but War God “ Gish” is really dead. Even Internet-dev don’t help me to Search “Him” out . Ram painfully declared him dead, so how can I find “Him” ?

Link to Muneeswarar

Link to Imra (page 142)

Kafir’s Signals towards London

Kafir of Bashgul valley says that one wealthy group went to London. Yes he says….

“One division, consisting of all the wealthy and other notable persons, went to London, while the other, comprising menials only, settled in Kafiristan.”

We never looked at those kafirs who faught for 1000 years at gate way of India. But can we trust their last words? Kafir knew that his second group went towards London. He clarified it before “Ram” and “Ram” also testify kafir’s words at concluding para. These words do not create curiosity in your mind ?

London / Lau-nandan

These curiosity was base of this research. In previous chapters we have seen all hanging truth of Europe and Anatolia .But the facts about Afghanistan connects Kafirs and Ram. I do believe in Last words (or Last shricks) of Kafir warriors. Why and how – a sinking Kafir could speak lies?After long research I believe that London stand for Lau –nandan , Britain..Brizh stand for Baijnath and Bahraich(The geographical name of Awadh).Belgic tribes that reached Britian in antiquity carry history of Balond Badri..Chalta badri..Badrinath. Gulliver’s travel is nothing but “Gurhwali’s safar”. Raj Barah of Almora are still intact in form of 12 Olypmpians.United Kingdom (UK) nothing but replica of Utarakhand (UK) .

Link to Lau-nandan(London)

Link to Hastinapur(Hasting)

Link to Stonehenge

Now let us check facts about Kafirs and struggle of Ram to reach them. Let us check straight facts…………

LIBERTION OF AYODHYA

ya, they begin with liberation of Ayodhya. Victory of Robert (Raw Bharat) clive in the battle of Plassey( 1757A.D.) and Buxar ( 1764 A.D.) liberated Ayodhya . Thereafter “Ram “ had to spend long 100 years to reach Capisa. Meanwhile the course of history turned Capisa ( Gate way of India) into Kafiristan. During the course they took control of Delhi . There after they moved towards Capisa .Look to the historical facts – how Ram had to struggle to reach his ardent Bhakt Kafirs to whom entire country forgot.

Henry Walter Bellew the india born British army medical officer ,narrates the events that lead East India company to Afghanistan. In his book named ,”The races of Afghanistan -being a brief account of the principal nation inhabiting that country. “(1880) he narrated everything.

Book link (Races of Afghanistan)

Author mentions that “Tymur died in 1793. War of succession brought Zaman (Blind) in Ludhiana. He Lived there as British pentioner . Zaman shah appointed Runjitsjngh as ruler of Lahore.
Book link

In1803 – the year, East India company took new Delhi. Tymur’s another son Shuja-ul-Mulk captured Kabul.Mr. Bellew further says that ,” In 1809 first treaty signed with Durani soverein to protect Shuja from persian and Nepoleon’s invasion.It was first British engagement with Afghan.Shuja defeated by Fatahkhan and came to Ludhiana with Zaman as British pentioner.
Durani dynasty colapsed and in 1826 suddenly Dost Mahmad became ruler of Kabul(Firdt Amir) and his brother Sherdil held Kandhar. Shahi ends and rule of Amir begins.

In 1834 – Shuja marched towards Afghanistan to recover his lost kingdom with army but defeated.Came back to Ludhiana. He took refuge with Ranjitsingh. At that juncture Shuja gave precious and historical Kohinoor diamond to Ranjitsingh.

Meantime persian seige of Herat and Sikh defeat againt Afghan caused anxiety in British Govt. Russian acted mysteriously. British took side of Shuja. Decided to restore him on throne.Triparty treaty signed between Shuja, Ranjit and East India Company. The seeds of Afghan war lies in these events.These were the events that brought East india company near Capisa.

First Afghan war (1839–1842 )

(Remember, the war faught before Indian Mutiny of 1857))
British wanted pro-British ruler in Afghanistan. To restore Shah suja’s rule in Afghanistan .Tri- party treaty reached between Shah suja, East india company Ranjitsingh, and thereafter simla menifesto was declared.

As per Simla treaty (1939 )SHUJA marched with British Army . An army of 21,000 British and Indian troops under the command of Sir John Keane (subsequently replaced by Sir Willoughby Cotton and then by William Elphinstone) set out from Punjab in December 1838. By late March 1839, the British forces had reached Quetta, crossed the Bolan Pass and begun their march to Kabul. They took Kandahar on April 25, 1839.

On July 22, in a surprise attack, they captured the until-then impregnable fortress of Ghazni, the rule of Shah suja were restored in Kabul. Thereafter the majority of the British troops returned to India (only 8,000 remained in Afghanistan), but it soon became clear that Shuja’s rule could only be maintained with the presence of a greater number of British forces. The Afghans resented the British presence and the rule of Shah Shuja.

Dost Mohammad unsuccessfully attacked the British and their Afghan protégé, and subsequently surrendered and was exiled to India in late 1840.

Meantime reduced pention of Afghan sardars created sparks.Afghan tribes invaded Kabul and in January 1842 British army reteated towards India.

“By October 1841, disaffected Afghan tribes were flocking to support Dost Mohammad’s son, Mohammad Akbar Khan, in Bamian. In November 1841, a senior British officer, Sir Alexander ‘Sekundar’ Burnes, and his aides were killed by a mob in Kabul. .On 1 January 1842, following some unusual thinking by Elphinstone, an agreement was reached that provided for the safe exodus of the British garrison and its dependants from Afghanistan.

Five days later, the withdrawal began. The departing British contingent numbered around 16,000, of which about 4,500 were military personnel, and over 12,000 were civilian camp followers. The military force consisted mostly of Indian units and one British battalion, 44th Regiment of Foot.”

Link to First Afghan war

Tragic Retreat

“Despite the safe-passage the British had been granted, they were attacked by Ghilzai warriors as they struggled through the snowbound passes.

Dr.William Brydon reached Jalalabad

16000 retreated from Kabul, only Dr.William Brydon reached Jalalabad to say the story of all dead


The ground was frozen, the men had no shelter and had little food for weeks. Of the remaining weapons possessed by the survivors, there were approximately a dozen working muskets, the officers’ pistols and a few swords. The remnants of the 44th were all killed except Captain James Souter, Sergeant Fair and seven soldiers who were taken prisoner. The only Briton to reach Jalalabad was Dr. William Brydon.”
Link to Dr.William Brydon

Story of Sacrifice
Yes ,out of 16000 persons only single person Dr.Willian Brydon could reached Jalalabad on horse to say the story of dead warriors and civilians. We have to remember that even Indian Sypoys lost their lives in massacre. But nobody from us ever try to keep record of those unknown brave soldiers, who went there to die. Yet ,Afghan Chuch of Bombay still keeping the record of those Brave soldiers who lost their life on Afghan Soil. Even their sacrifices could not create Sensitivity in our hearts. Perhaps only Maharaja Dulip remained sensitive and sensible towards them .

Link to Afghan church

Link to Dulipsingh

Now let us check above story with different historical Shade effects.

Kohinoor and Kafiristan

Now we know that Simla manifesto was key to Afghanistan war path .The Tri- party Simla agreement (1839)was reached but Ranjit Singh died in 1839 itself. Britishers took the leadership of first Afghan war at their own. After Ranjitsingh”s death his kingdom began to fall into disorder.In 1945 only single heir Duleepsingh remained. Ranjitsingh recognized Britishers but what about sikh peoples? Sikhs were not knowing Britishers.
“When Ranjit Singh died in 1839, there was a succession of short-lived rulers at the central Durbar (court), and increasing tension between the Khalsa and the Durbar. circumstances lead towords the first Anglo -sikh war.”

“The First Anglo-Sikh War was fought between the Sikh Empire and the British East India Company between 1845 and 1846. It resulted in partial subjugation of the Sikh kingdomn. The Treaty of Lahore on 9 March 1846, the Sikhs were made to surrender the valuable region (the Jullundur Doab) between the Beas River and Sutlej River. In a later separate arrangement (the Treaty of Amritsar), the Raja of Jammu, Gulab Singh, purchased Kashmir from the East India Company for a payment of 7,500,000 rupees (75 lakh) and was granted the title Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir.Maharaja Duleep Singh remained ruler of the Punjab and at first his mother, Maharani Jindan Kaur, remained as Regent.”

“The Second Anglo-Sikh War took place in 1848 and 1849, between the Sikh Empire and the British East India Company. It resulted in the subjugation of the Sikh Empire, and the annexation of the Punjab and what subsequently became the North-West Frontier Province by the East India Company.The infant Maharaja Duleep Singh of the Sikh Empire was allowed to retain his throne, but a British Resident, Sir Henry Lawrence, controlled the policy of the Durbar. Duleep Singh’s mother, Maharani Jind Kaur, continually tried to regain some of her former influence as Regent and was eventually exiled by Lawrence. This victory brought diamond Kohinoor in British crown.On March 29, 1849, the British raised their flag on the citadel of Lahore and the Punjab was formally proclaimed to be part of the British Empire in India. The Treaty of Lahore, the legal agreement formalised the legal possession of Kohinoor by Queen of England.”
History of Kohinnor Diamond
Nadirshah took Kohinnor with him. But after the assassination of Nader Shah in 1747, the stone came into the hands of Ahmed Shah Abdali of Afghanistan. In 1830, Shah Shuja, the deposed ruler of Afghanistan, managed to flee with the Kohinoor diamond. He then came to Lahore where it was given to the Sikh Maharaja (King) of Punjab, Ranjit Singh; in return for this Maharaja Ranjit Singh won back the Afghan throne for Shah Shuja-ul-Mulk.”
Link to Kohinoor

Maharaja Dalip Singh(born: 6 September 1838 in Lahore,)was the last Maharaja of the Sikh Empire. He was the youngest son of the legendary “Lion of the Punjab” Maharaja Ranjit Singh and Maharani Jind Kaur, and came to power after a series of intrigues, in which several other claimants to the throne and to the Koh-i-Noor diamond killed each other. After his exile to Britain at age 13 following the British annexation of the Punjab, he was befriended by Queen Victoria.
Dalip Singh was much admired by Queen Victoria who is reported to have written “Those eyes and those teeth are too beautiful” about the Punjabi maharajah. She was also the godmother to several of his children.
Today he is considered as Britain’s first Sikh settler, having been exiled to its shores in 1854, after being dethroned and having his country annexed by the British Raj in 1849.
Dalip Singh died in Paris in 1893 at the age of 55.A life-size bronze statue of the Maharajah showing him on a horse was unveiled by HRH the Prince of Wales in 1999 at Butten Island in Thetford, a town which benefited from his and his sons’ generosity
Dalip Singh married twice, first to Bamba Müller and then to Ada Douglas Wetherill. He had eight children in total, six from his first marriage to Bamba.All the eight children died without legitimate issue, ending the direct line of the Sikh Royalty.

Indian Mutiny of 1857

Meanwhile in 1857 there was Mutiny against British rule in India. The people who considered victory of Robert clive in battle of Plassey…was liberating process of Ayodhya , might not jopined mutiny.
.While those ,who considered Clive’s victory as beginning of subjugation , might have took part in mutiny.
The rebellion began on 10 May 1857 in the town of Meerut when a group of sepoys, native soldiers employed by the British East India Company’s army, mutinied because of perceived race-based injustices and inequities.
The immediate result of the mutiny was a general housecleaning of the Indian administration. The East India Company was abolished in favour of the direct rule of India by the British government.

Crossing all these hurdles Britain further geared up to reach Capisa.

Link to Indian Mutiny

Second Afghan war (1878)

After tension between Russia and Britain in Europe ended with the June 1878 Congress of Berlin, Russia turned its attention to Central Asia. In the summer of 1878 Russia sent an uninvited diplomatic mission to Kabul, setting in motion the train of events that led to the Second Anglo-Afghan War. Sher Ali tried to keep the Russian mission out but failed. The Russian envoys arrived in Kabul on July 22, 1878, and on August 14 the British demanded that Sher Ali accept a British mission. Sher Ali had not responded .

The British presumably considered this as an insult, but more likely it was viewed at the highest levels as a fine pretext for implementing the Forward Policy and taking over most of Afghanistan. The British delivered an ultimatum to Sher Ali, demanding an explanation of his actions. The Afghan response was viewed by the British as unsatisfactory, and on November 21, 1978, British troops entered Afghanistan at three points. Sher Ali, having turned in desperation to the Russians, received no assistance from them. Appointing his son, Yaqub, regent, Sher Ali left to seek the assistance of the tsar. Advised by the Russians to abandon this effort and to return to his country, Sher Ali returned to Mazare Sharif, where he died in February 1879.
With British forces occupying much of the country, Yaqub signed the Treaty of Gandamak in May 1879 to prevent Britsh invasion of the rest of Afghanistan. According to this agreement and in return for an annual subsidy and loose assurance of assistance in case of foreign aggression, Yaqub agreed to British control of Afghan foreign affairs. yes,Control on foreign affairs of Afghanistan was outcome of second Afghan war.

The second British venture into Afghanistan resulted in about 2500 British and colonials killed with some 1500 Afghans killed.

Link to second Afghan war

Kafir warriors

During these wars Britishers came into the contact of Kafiristan and chitral. The vedic people of both the region were fighting against invaders since one thousand years. Britisher tried their level best to protect and save them. British Army surgeon Henry Walter Bellew ‘s book “The races of Afganistan being a brief account of the principal nations” also gives detailed account of different Afghan tribes and their gradual forceful conversion. The details in the book gives signal of large scale migration of same tribes in antiquity towards west. Giving signal of pakhtun and Afridi migration from the area towards west he mentions that-” In time of Herodotus this very country was called Pactiya or Pactiyiea. There is very remarkable coincident that Herodotus mentions one ohther country of htis name in Armenia provence. And it is not difficult to trace ancient Pictavium or modern Poitiers in France,and then Picts in Britain.
In this Pakhtun-kwa country Pacts and Scyth inhabitants inhabitit ,while Picts and Scots in England . Large section of Afridi people called Kambar-khel or and Kamari togather with Logari or Loga parallel with Cambarian or Logarin of ancient Britain.”(PAGE 57) He further says that Afridi were previously Budhist or Fire worshiper. (P.81 )

Henry Walter Bellew’s detscription in the book conveys the sense as if he was knowing all these tribes till late antiquity.

Book link to “The Kafirs of the Hindu Kush: Art and Society of the Waigal and …, Volume 1” By Max Klimburg

The Man Who Would Be King

Meanwhile Rudyard Kipling wrote a short story “The Man Who Would Be King . The theme of the story based upon the kafirs warriors of Kafiristan. In 1975 film adapted from the Rudyard Kipling’s short story of the same title. It was adapted and directed by John Huston and starred Sean Connery, Michael Caine, Saeed Jaffrey, and Christopher Plummer as Kipling (giving a name to the short story’s anonymous narrator).The film follows two rogue ex-non-commissioned officers of the British Raj who set off from 19th century British India in search of adventure and end up as kings of Kafiristan.

A film -The Man Who Would Be King

In 1975 Director John Huston adapted and directed Film named "The man who would be king"

Without reading the short story, you will not understand pain of Ram for their Kafir brethern ,who were fighting at Gate way of India for 1000 years and entire country forget them. The story will remind you of Ashokvatika where Sitaji and Rama met after Ram’s victory.
Link to The story
I am providing you link to the story. The story says pain of Kafirs, unknown fighters of Hindukush,Who recognised struggle of Ram to reach them. They were waiting their Ram in Ashokvatika.
.Nobody in the country recognizing or remembering them and they continued their fight.It was situation full of dilema. In this complicated struggleful situation unrecognized Ram was standing before his ardent Bhakt. Read The book – “Kafirs of Hindukush”- and short story – “The Man Who Would Be King” with full sensitivity .I gaurantee you that now you can recognize Ram.

Pl. don’t miss single line of the story. It is story about kafiristan , last shricks of Kafirs and struggling Ram to reach them. Don’t miss single word.

Link to the short stroy by Kipling

A Book :kafirs of Hindukush

Gilgit agency surgeon George Scott Robertson did the best research work about kafirs.. He asked the Government of India for permission to attempt the journey, and by October 1889 was on his way, departing from Chitral in northwest Pakistan in the company of several Kafir headmen of the Kam tribe. His journey lasted just over a year, ending in 1891, and providing Robertson with first-hand experience of the strange customs and colorful people of Kafiristan. But before the publication of his book kafirs were forcibly converted in year year 1895 to Islam by Abdur Rahman Khan, the Emir of Afghanistan (1880 to 1901). This ended the millenia of old primitive religion of the Kafiristani people which was thence-after replaced by the radical Islamic culture now known as Nuristani culture.The new name of kafiristan is Nuristan.
The detailed account of Robertson’s tour throughout Kafiristan was originally published in London in 1896 by Lawrence & Bullen, LTD. The name of the book was Kafirs of Hinndukush.”
The Nuristanis exhibit European-like physical characteristic of light hair, blue eyes, and white skin. These physical features are mainly due to a preservation of the characteristics from the initial migration of Indo-Iranian (Kamboja) peoples into the region (likely in the 2nd Milenia B.C.). At last kafiristan became Nuristan. With that Capisa-The gate way of India sank.
Robertson was the last eyewitness of kafir culture. He was last person , who saw kafirs of Capisa .Very few people took note of kafirs of Hindukush.

In his book description one can smell that he was not just writting book but worshiping great warriors of kafiristan. He might have written account with his weeping eyes.
– On page no. 75 of the book author classified kafir warrior tribes as under….

(1) Katirs – siahposh
(2) Madugal – siahposh
(3) Kashtan or kashtoz – siahposh
(4)Kam – siahposh
(5) Istrat or gourdesh -siahposh

(6) Presungulis or viron – safedposh
(7) Wai gulis -safedposh
(8)Ashkun -safedposh

He notes that ..”It is probable that numerically , the katirs are more important than all the remaining tribes of kafiristan put togather.”

on page 76 of the book he mentions sub katir tribe
namely (1) kamoz (living in bashgul valley) ,(2) kti or katwar (residing in kti valley) , (3) kulam(4) Ramgilis or gabariks, they are also called ramgul kafir (5) kamtoz

while talking about presun or viron tribe he says that
they are simple , peaceful and industrious people. He mentioned that

priestly clan “ Utahdari “ resided at village named Agaru . while bilezhedari clan of kam people reside at Agasti village.

on page -21author mentions kafir’s supeme war god – shrine of gish. and moni.kafirs were worshipping their supreme deity “ Imra( Yama), the creator of all things in heaven and cartli. (page 38) “ (even wikipedia says it is hindu god yama) .he also mentoins that nominally higher grade than the ordinary
Jast is called by the Kam Kafirs “ Mir,” by which they
mean king.(page -472)

Yes people of Bashgul valley and Kam Valley faught for Bharatvarsha for 1000 years. I think nobody from us can challange their love for Bharatvarsha.The unknown soldiers of Bashgul Valley knew that their Ram is in London (Page -160 Kafirs of Hindukusha).The facts on page-472 also signals who Russians are. Yes they are clue to Kam valley. And we don’t know anything about? Is Kam valley is clue to worshiping Imra (Yama) too. To undrstand realtion between Kam valley of Kafiristan and Kama river of Russia..one has to read Okha Haran.Okha haran is clue to that migration historty.

Horned Dance
Author also gave description how Kafir women danced before God of war “Gish” with wearing Horn Dress. Horn dress is ancient tradition of vedic Sindhu culture.The Harapan Pashupatinath had also two horns.In Ancient gaul there was also tradition of worshiping “Horned God”.George Scott Robertson mentions that ….

All the horns are about an inch in diameter at the base, and are made of the same material as the pad. At the front of the pad, resting on the brow of the woman, is an ornamented square iron bar five inches in length and about a third of an inch in thickness, and immediately below this is a spiral iron ornament, three inches and a half from side to side and one inch in diameter.”(page -513)

Mentioning weapons of kafirs author mentions “ Kafir weapons are the dagger, bows and arrows, spears, and matchlocks. The arrow-head is of a peculiar shape. It is three-sided, and has three sharp edges which meet at the point, and are peculiar from the fact that their other extremity is prolonged backwards from a quarter to half an inch beyond the base of the bayonct-sliapcd arrow-head. This must make the arrow very difficult to extract from a wound. (page -574)
Three pronged arrow heads

If we see the record of “Three pronged arrow heads” then in the book “Classical Hindu mythology: a reader in the Sanskrit Puranas”Cornelia Dimmitt, Johannes Adrianus Bernardus Buitenen mentions that constellation Pusya,the three cities were joined together in a row. And Hara , the three eyed master of the three strides,immediately shot his three -pronged arrow made of the three deities at Tripura.(page -197)”
Means Three pronged arrow head has its origin in ancient Indian tradition and the World knows that three pronged arrow heads reached Europe.

It is not Coat of Arms of

It is not Coat of Arms of French East India Company only but Heart of Sunline Capetian(Robertian) kings of France

In previous post we seen that Coat of Arms of Dutch (Devashch?) east India company carry picture of Shiva with Trishul in his hand .Now look at symbol of French East India Company.The symbol will remind you of three pronged Arrow. Is it clue to Ram ?

KASYAP PURA AND kALSA RAJA

THE LINK WILL EXPLAIN YOU CONNECTION BETWEEN kASHYAPAPURA AND kISHTWAR….NOW DONT UNDERSTAND THESE LEGENDES ONLY…LAV NANDAN
(TURN EVERYTHING INTO REALITY. THE LINK WILL SAY YOU ABOUT KASYAPPURA AND ITS KING kALSA….

( STILL YOU CAN NOT UNDERSTAND KALAS PROVINCE AND KALASH TRIBE? WHO STILL DEFEND GATE WAY OF INDIA?)

LINK TO KISHTWAR ANCIENT HISTORY

Last cry of sinking “Sita”

In fact Rudyard kipling and George Scott Robertson told us the sotry of “The last cry of sinking of Sita”. Kafirs , the protectoers of gate way of india were fighting since 1000 years with full trust on “Ram”. Unfortunately during turmoilic period of 1000 years ,entire country forgot Capisa and its warriors. Only unrecognised Ram was present there (In the form of Britishers and French) to listen to last cry of sinking Sita. .Entire country forgot the kafir warriors of Capisa . The movement started by Gorakhnath on the Bank of jhelam was also forgotten.. Everybody , yes, virtualy everybody forgot Capisa and its last Brahmin king Kallar. Last kashtriya king left Kapisa gave command of Capisa to Brahmin King and departed for Long war. Nobody remembers that last Kashtriya king..No body care to search out last kashtriya king of Kabulshahi..Only he is carying soul of Bharatvarsha.

At last “Ram”was present to listen to the last cry of sinking people of Capisa. By 1896 kafiristan became Nuristan.

After this catastrofic event of Indian history , there was drought and famine in India.The 1899 famine, took 4.5 million life.
Druaght and famine further detorieted the situation . But in 1919, gearing up with its full strength , British troops entered Afghanistn for the third time .

Third Anglo-Afghan War (1919)

(1919 : Turning point of History)

“ The Third Anglo-Afghan War) began on 6 May 1919 and ended on 8 August 1919. While it was essentially a minor tactical victory for the British in so much as they were able to repel the regular Afghan forces, in many ways it was a strategic victory for the Afghans. For the British, the Durand Line was reaffirmed as the political boundary between Afghanistan and British India and the Afghans agreed not to foment trouble on the British side. In the aftermath, the Afghans were able to resume the right to conduct their own foreign affairs as a fully independent state.
If we look at Durandline , then we can see that Durandline runs between Kafiristan and chitral. on one side of Durand line there is chitral while on another side there is Nuristan (Kafiristan). I want to say that Third Afghan war made possible Durand line and that way Kalash people(In border of present Pakistan)people made safe from Afghan invaders.

Link to Third Afghan war

Link to Durand line

Khilafat Movement (!919)

Ram was struggling hard for his Kafir Bhakt. But opposition slogans started in India . Unfortunately those opposition movement paved way for “Khilafat Movement “in the same year (1919).Khilafat Movement got support in the Land of Ram ,and so called Britishers could not do anything for Kafiristan thereafter. “The Khilafat movement (1919-1924) was a pan-Islamic, political campaign launched by Muslims in British India to influence the British government and to protect the Ottoman Empire during the aftermath of World War I.”

Link to Khilafat movement

who will save Chitral ?
when Amir of Afghanistan created Nuristan out of Kafiristan , escaping peopoles took shelter in neighbouring Chitral valley (Present Pakistan). The British rule prevailed there.On the highest peak of Hindukush “Tirichmir”indeginious kalash people are dweling since antiquity.

“The Kalasha or Kalash, are indigenous people of the Hindu Kush mountain range, residing in the Chitral District of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan. They speak the Kalasha language, from the Dardic family of the Indo-Iranian languages, and are considered a unique tribe among the Indo-Aryan population
The culture of Kalash people is unique and differs drastically from the various ethnic groups surrounding them. They are polytheists and nature plays a highly significant and spiritual role in their daily life. As part of their religious tradition, sacrifices are offered and festivals held to give thanks for the abundant resources of their three valleys. Kalash mythology and folklore has been compared to that of ancient Greece, but they are much closer to Indo-Iranian (Vedic and pre-Zoroastrian) traditions. kalash people have also European look. when some asks about their look they have no escuse but to say that they are descendants of Alexander the Great’s soldiers. But Hindukush know that they are indigenous people living on highest pick of Hindukush named Tirichmir.
The three main festivals of the Kalash are the Joshi festival in late May, the Uchau in autumn, and the Caumus in midwinter.
Joshi is celebrated at the end of May each year. The first day of Joshi is “Milk Day”, on which the Kalash offer libations of milk that have been saved for ten days prior to the festival.
The most important Kalash festival is the Chawmos (cawmos, ghona chawmos yat, Khowar “chitrimas” from *caturmasya, , which is celebrated for two weeks at winter solstice at the beginning of the month chawmos mastruk. It marks the end of the year’s fieldwork and harvest. It involves much music, dancing, and the sacrifice of many goats. It is dedicated to the god Balimain who is believed to visit from the mythical homeland of the Kalash, Tsyam (Tsiyam, tsíam), for the duration of the feast. Food sacrifices are offered at the clans’ Jeshtak shrines, dedicated to the ancestors.

Link to Chitral

Link to Kalash people

Khilafat V/S last cry of Kafirs (1919)

Unfortunately the people of India , who were not listening to the last cry of Kafir warriors ( the warriors of the gateway of India)but opted to listen to the cry of Khalifat of Istambul .It was turning point for destiny of ancient Bharatvarsha. It happened after 1000 years.Unique idea of supporting khilafat movement emeged after 1000 years..! until that juncture people of India were fighting against invaders. The death of war God “Gish” failed to create feelings of anguish and pain into heart of Indian people ,instaed they see miracle in new idea of supporting Khilafat movement of Istambul. People spell bound with the unique idea of supporting Khilafat movement . The attraction to that miraculous Idea changed the fate of Bharatvarsha.People forgot the movement started by “Gorkhnath” ,instead they started supporting Khilafat. The people who remained sensitive to last cry of Kafirs become sensitive for khilafat cause .History of Bharatvarsha took “U Turn” without knowing unrecognised “Ram” ,his anguish and his pains. Yes, it was paradox. while Ram was behind Kafirs of Hindukush, people of the country started supporting Khilafat.

Reverse motion

“Ram” saw that people of Hindustan forgot Capisa . They are not listening to kafir’s last cry but joined hands to fight for “Khilafat” cause. After long 1000 years people of India masmarised with reverse motion. They saw like miracle in the new idiea , because “The Idiea” propagated after 1000 years. The Gorkhnath movement started by Gorakhnath and Kallar ( last Brahmin king of Kabul) mat dead end. The long 1000 years war given by the brave people of Capisa ….. all in vain. “Ram” came , but people could not recognize him. At last Ram concluded (In 1919 itself) that people of India forgot “Gate way of India” and “Ram” too.

Now we have list of Kafr tribes, who faught at Capisa -Gate way of India – for 1000 years .In coming chapters we shall try to recognize those great Kafir warrior tribes. None of us ever look towards those unknown fightrs…who gave brave fight for 1000 years but trapped at last …because people of counry took “U” turn suddenly. People of the country forget them totally. We shall check..who they were? Either they were Gods?

Link to Khilafat movement

Reminder to the history of Capisa (Jara Yad karo kurbani)
Link

Link to Nuristani people (Jara yad karo kurbani)

Link to Chitral people (Jara yad karo kurbani)
—————————————————————–
Essense of entire research

Echoes that connect Capysa and London

What Kafir mentions about London…and what Bard to King of “Isle of Man” mentioned before 2000 years…are the clues between London and Lav nandan. Is it not surprising that two person at different continents speak the same word? After spell of 2000 years? Kafirs words echoed in my ears through out research..when I come to listen to echo of Kafir’s words in to the poetry by Bard in personification of King of Isle of Man…I felt like Blast. I decided to find more and more clues. Present research is echo of those words of Kafirs only..surprising Kafirs last cries was not misleading.

Bard to King of Isle of Man says that..

“In the name of the God Trinity, exhibit thy charity ! A numerous race, of ungentle manners, ‘ Repeat their invasion of Britain, chief of isles : Men from a country in Asia, and the region of CapyS ; J A people of iniquitous design : the land is not known That was their mother. They made a devious course by sea. In their flowing garments, who can equal them ? With design are they called in,with theiir short spears, those fqes.”

Book link to “ THE MYTHOLOGY AND RITES OF THE British Druids

1919 paradox of Indian History

Until 1919 people were fighting against invaders. But suddenly some people decided to support Khilafat Movement. That was turning point of Sanatan History of India. People felt some sort of miracle in that Idea. yes it was ” U ” turn of Sanatan history of Hindustan after long 1000 years.People liked Sudden Idea of supporting Khilafat of Turkastan. It was begining of reverse process. The moment we started telling Goodby to Ram.. ! Seed of Quit India movement lies in support to Khilafat movement of Turkstan…!

What Ram Thought ?

The people did not look at warriors who faught at gate way of India ..and shading their Bloods since centuries..! People strated walking on dead Bodies of warriors…who shed their blood since centuries…and shook hands with invading forces. People lost their Intrest in martyres and theeir cause. People decided different cause and different goals.

queiton that puzzle me

Kafir verses Khilafat

The people who nevevr looked at Gate way of India and denied to listened to the last shricks and cries of Kafirs….suddenly started listening cries and shricks of Turkastan. They nevevr listen to the kafirs who were fighting at Gate way of India to defend them…but suddenly they listened to cries and Shricks of Troubled Khilafat of Turkstan..far away from Hindustan…!Why this happened ? why this happened ? This quetion puzzle me. This ” U ” turn cause of our fall? Cries of Kafirs never listened by us. we started harrasing Ram..our own Ram. Ram..Lav nandan became helpless.

(But now Last shricks are listened and echoing in our ears…that we dont want to listen since centuries…It will continue to Haunt us.)

When Ram started war Against Rawan…No manav helpled him..Only Vanar clans(Monkeys), Garuds(Eagle clans) helped him…..But in the case of his war for “Gate way of India ” … Manav and Mahamanv hindered his all the efforts.

My last straight quetion….why we nevevr listened to cries and Shricks of Kafirs..who were defending us since centuries?
Why suddenly cries and shrick of Khilafat of Turkastan reached our Ears? What sort of sensitivity we are carryin or nurturing ? If cries of Khilafat of Turkstan can be listened suddenly ? why not Srinks or cries of Kafirs never listened to? From there story of Betrayal to our own Gods begin..Robertson had to write..” War God Gish dead at Gate way of India “.. Nitzsche had to write …”WE Killed the GOds..we all are Murderers.”

History proceed further..

We opted to name our new history..with beutiful name..”Rashtrawad”….Miracle after Miracle played in Bhratvarsha. Model of Rashtrawad minus Gate way of India accepted in Ibdia..as new model….A model in which no body can talk about Gate way of India…! New MOdel of HIndutva emerged .Previuosly we were Sanatani…Sanatani minus so many things = Hindutva model accepted by India. Ram minus Lav nandan model accepted in India. People felt themselves clever and happy in these new emerging models.

Surprising, new model of “Banana eating” also emerge. It was wonderful model .In which one can eat Banana and throw skins on Lav nandan. Lav nandan became our dust bin. We created Model in which …evrything can be blamed on Lav nandan and …we can eat Banana peacefully…(simultaneouly can throw Banana skins on Lav nandan) .

Now , that dust Bin has been searched …Cries of Kafirs that we never listened to …lead us towards Lav nandan…to whom we put into dustbin and throwing skins of Banana joyfully..! WE NEVER LOOKED AT KAFIRS..WE NEVER LISTENED TO CRIES OF KAFIRS..SHOULD WE TRUST HIS LAST WORDS? NOW.. ONLY LAST WORDS OF KAFIR REMAIN ONLY CLUE BETWEEN BHARAT VARSHA AND RAM.(YA BELIEVE LAST CRY OF kAFIR DO YOU ?)

We are blaming Lav nandan for Listening to last cries of Kafirs..who were fighting at gate way of India. We punished Ram..Lav nandan for his that act.

Surprisingly new model of feelings also emerged..New model of proud and senmsitivity. Marvellous prudentness AND skills required for all these New Models ?

—————————–
Goths /Jatts

you may surprise by the event of conversion of Dulipsingh to Christianity….You read about Ranjitsingh and Dullipsingh. What Khalsa forget after long interwal of time frame..Ranjitsingh and Dulipsingh could remember.They know their origin. They also faught at gate way of India for 1000 years alongwith Lav nandan. Kafir worshiper of Imra belong to this tribe.

For thier historical connection with Manu you have to read founding History of Ayodhya.Agni , Friend to Manu came to Ayodhya and informed Manu that is Brother Yama also got saved in Jal Pralaya. Yama has reached Far west see shore. There he found so many dead bodies at see shore. He founded there two colonies…..Swarge and Narke. Dear original name of Sweden is Swarge and there is Narke province too there. They belong to Irminons group of Aryans in Europe. Think…about History of Ayodhya…when Manu founded Ayodhya his brother Yama was in far west…….There should not be two sided migration ? After all Manu and Yama were Brothers.
Read about Goths and Jat now. Both says ancient history of Talwandi.Ranjitsingh and his son Dulipsingh could recognise Lav nandan but remaining sikhs could not recognise Him.

Link to Goth people.

Link to Jat people

Link to Thervingi in Europe.

Link to Talwandi in Punjab.

Look what sikh did for thier Ram.…we also failed them.

Read The Link and Look yourself How Ramdasi sikhs gave fare well to Ram….when entire country said quit India to Lav nandan.

Look How Ramdasi sikhs ever remain With Ram..Lav nandan during his struggle for Gate way of India .

Posted in A Book - There was Ram | Leave a comment

CHAPTER:11 – CAPISA : KASYAP PURA : BURRIED HISTORY OF FOUR HUNDRED YEARS

“Arab marched through the central Iranian deserts. After long siege they took Nishapur ,( west of modern massshad) the main city of Khurasan After that Arab marched towards Sasanian in the northeast, the city of Marw. (Persian last ruler)Yazdajird third assesinated. Arab took control of plain of north and west Afghanistan including town of Bactra and Herat. Son of Yedajird (King of Heart)- Firuz came back with chinese army help. After this turmoil Arab regained Herat and Balkh by 670 A..d. then Tibetan and turk became agrresive. In the early ninth century tibetan army participated in sogadian capital Samarkand.(p.179). The califa in Bagdad ,Harun -al-rashid , personaly moved to the east, but he died near Tus in A.d. 809. His younger son Al -mamun became Governor of the east.Until that time king of kabul ,with help of Tibetan resisted mamun.Hindu and Budhist principalities in the valley of Hinukush continue to defy Arab rulers.”

– “THE AFGHAN” By Willem Vogelsang

If you want to recognize Ram then read all the following words carefully. It is history of Bharatvarsha or Hindustan. Nobody can deny that. Unfortunately History of present India does not carry these chapters. Now study those four hundred years carefully and know Ram. We buried our history. When Alexander invaded Bharatvarsha ,we did the same thing. Our habit of burying history gradually deprieve us of Ram. Now know the buried history of those four hundred years of Bhratvarsha. Capisa was in the centre of that history.

Willem Vogelsang explained the geographical location of “Capisa”, in his book –“THE AFGHAN” .He explaines that Capisa or modern site of Bagram lies at the southern enterance to the salang pass, and two major routes across the Hindukush , namely along the Ghorbandh river towards Bamyan , and along Panjshir river towards the Khak pass. ( p- 107)

Link to
Book

Willem Vogelsang mentions that Chinese pilgrim Hiuen Tsang says that Ciapislie, or Ca- pisene, was 4000 A’, or about 666 miles in circuit. If this measurement be even approximately correct, the district must have included the whole of kafiristan, as well as the two large valleys of Ghorbandh and Panjshir, as these are together not more than 300 miles in circuit. Ciapishe is further described as being entirely surrounded by mountains .
Conquest of Persia

The Islamic conquest of Afghanistan (642–870) began in the middle of the 7th century after the Islamic conguest of Persia was completed, when Arab Muslims defeated the Sassanid Empire at the battles of Walaja, Al -qadisiyyah and Nahavand. The Muslim Arabs then began to move towards the lands east of Persia and in 642 captured the city, Herat. By 667 AD the Afghan area was under invasion by the Arabs but in 683 Kabul revolted and completely routed the invading army which was led by the Governor of Seistan. It was not until 870 that Kabul and the Afghan area was brought under control by the Arabs. The complete conversion of Afghanistan to Islam was during the period of the Ghaznavids, in or about the 11th century.

Map of Gandhara

Look at burried history of Gandhara

The invasion of Persia was completed five years after the death of the Islamic Prophet Muhammad, and all of the Persian territories came under Arab control, though pockets of tribal resistance continued for centuries in the Afghan territories. During the 7th century, Arad Armies made their way into the region of Afghanistan from Khorasan with the new religion of Islam. At this point in time the area that is currently Afghanistan had a multi-religious population consisting of Hindus, Buddhists, Zoroastrians ,jews and others.
Invasion on Afghanistan

Willem Vogelsang narrates the intial story of invasion in his book “THE AFGHAN”.He says “Arab marched through the central Iranian deserts. After long siege they took Nishapur ,( west of modern massshad) the main city of Khurasan After that Arab marched towards Sasanian in the northeast, the city of Marw. (Persian last ruler)Yazdajird third assesinated. Arab took control of plain of north and west Afghanistan including town of Bactra and Herat. Son of Yedajird (King of Heart)- Firuz came back with chinese army help. After this turmoil Arab regained Herat and Balkh by 670 A..d. then Tibetan and turk became agrresive. In the early ninth century tibetan army participated in sogadian capital Samarkand.(p.179). The califa in Bagdad ,Harun -al-rashid , personaly moved to the east, but he died near Tus in A.d. 809. His younger son Al -mamun became Governor of the east.Until that time king of kabul ,with help of Tibetan resisted mamun.Hindu and Budhist principalities in the valley of Hinukush continue to defy Arab rulers.” (page 177)

Fall of Tibet

“ By mid ninth century Tibetan crumbuled under attacks from the side of chinese and other people.And road was open for Muslim rulers to occupy all the country. “(p.180)

“For longtime Arab failed to permanantly establish their power in Southeast and East Afghanistan. So called Ghazi assembled to fight them. There rised local Saffarid dynasty in midninth century. The early Islamic geogrophers regared hazarajat district as part of Hind (Hindus).” (p.180)

The people of Kabul were then, as they are now, very patriotic and seldom brooked interference from outside. They fought Arabs and other Muslim rulers from 663 A.D. to 1021 A.D. but never accepted their suzerainty.

India remained Safe

Every student of history knows that during this period of about four hundred years India remained safe from any intrusions – or invasions from the Northwest. The occupation of Kabul by Shankara Varman only led to a grim struggle, which reached its climax during the reign of Gopal Varman (902 to 904 A.D.), who succeeded Shankara Varman; and another military expedition was sent by the Kashmir ruler under a General by name Prabhakar Deva to restore order and tighten the grip. The Kashmiri General though successful did not press his victory too far. He had realized by his experience that the people of Kabul could not be kept for long under subjection. He started negotiations with them and agreed to install Lalliya’s son by name Toramana on the Kabul throne. This was done and Toramana ascended the Kabul throne under a new name or title, Kamluka, which was given to him by Prabhakar Deva. As already seen, Alberuni in his list of Kabul kings describes him as Kamlu. Henceforth, the relations between Kabul and Kashmir became very cordial and in course of time marriage relations came to be established between the ruling dynasties of the two countries, which further strengthened the mutual bonds of amity, and concord. Kshema Gupta who ruled Kashmir from 951 – 959 A.D. married the granddaughter of Bhima, who is described by Alberuni as the fourth Brahman King to rule Kabul after Lalliya. We have it on the authority of Kalhana that this Kabul King Bhima came to Kashmir and stayed there for some time and built a temple dedicated to Vishnu which was given the name of Bhima Keshava. The dedication of a temple to Vishnu would show that the Hindu Shahis of Kabul were Vaishnavites and not Buddhists as some take pleasure in describing them as such. The temple of Bhima Keshava is even now existing in a village now known as Bumzu near Mattan, though as a Muslim Ziarat, and is now known as Ziarat Bam Din Sahib.

Link to more facts

Kabul Faught

In the wake of Muslim invasions of Kabul and Kapisa in second half of 7th century (AD 664), the Kapisa/Kabul ruler called by Muslim writers Kabul Shah (Shahi of Kabul) made an appeal to the Ksatriyas of the Hind who had gathered there in large numbers for assistance and drove out the Muslim invaders as far as Bost.This king of Kapisa/Kabul who faced the Muslim invasion was undoubtedly a Ksatriya.
In AD 645, when Chinese pilgrim Hiuen Tsang was passing through the Uttrapatha, Udabhanda or Udabhandapura was the place of residence or secondary capital of emperor of Kapisa which then dominated over 10 neighboring states comprising Lampaka, Nagara, Gandhara and Varna (Bannu) and probably also Jaguda. About Gandhara, the pilgrim says that its capital was Purushapura; the royal family was extinct and country was subject to Kapisa; the towns and villages were desolate and the inhabitants were very few. It seems that under pressure from Arabs in the southwest and the Turks in the north, the kings of Kapisa had left their western possessions in the hands of their viceroys and made Udabhanda their principal seat of residence.

The first Hindu Shahi dynasty was founded in AD 870 by Kallar (see above). The kingdom was bounded on the north by the Hindu kingdom of Kashmir, on the east by Rajput kingdoms, on the south by the Muslim Emirates of Multan and Mansura, and on the west by the Abbasid Caliphate.

Fall of Kabul 671 AD

The reason why Udabhandapura was selected in preference to Peshawar is at present unknown but it is possible that the new city of Udabhanda was built by Kapisa rulers for strategic reasons.Udhabanadpura (waihind or Ohind ) in the east was held by the Dynasty called by later writers the Shahis.
In AD 671 Muslim armies seized Kabul and the capital was moved to Udabhandapura where they became known as the Rajas of Hindustan.
Link to more facts

Udabhandapura and Brahmin king

Studies in the geography of ancient and medieval India
By Dineshchandra Sircar (p-290) Know about Udabhandapura

Book link

Link to Hund or Waihind (Udabhandapura )

“Now in the following times no Muslim conqueror passed beyond the frontier of Kâbul and the river Sindh until the days of the Turks, when they seized the power in Ghazna under the Sâmânî dynasty, and the supreme power fell to the lot of Nâ?ir-addaula Sabuktagin. This prince chose the holy war as his calling, and therefore called himself al-Ghâzî (“the warrior/invader”). In the interest of his successors he constructed, in order to weaken the Indian frontier, those roads on which afterwards his son Yamin-addaula Ma?mûd marched into India during a period of thirty years and more. God be merciful to both father and son ! Mahmûd utterly ruined the prosperity of the country, and performed there wonderful exploits, by which the Hindus became like atoms of dust scattered in all directions, and like a tale of old in the mouth of the people. Their scattered remains cherish, of course, the most inveterate aversion towards all Muslims. This is the reason, too, why Hindu sciences have retired far away from those parts of the country conquered by us, and have fled to places which our hand cannot yet reach, to Kashmir, Benares, and other places. And there the antagonism between them and all foreigners receives more and more nourishment both from political and religious sources.”
Link

Then entred Pala warriors

Then Pala enters war .Following link explains who were Pala.
The initial Hindu Shahi dynasty was the House of Kallar, but in AD 964 the rule was assumed from Bhima upon his death by theJanjua emperor Maharajadhiraja Jaypala, son of Rai Asatapala Janjua and a descendant of Emperor Janmejaya. Epithets from the Bari Kot inscriptions record his full title as “Parambhattaraka Maharajadhiraja Paramesvara Sri Jayapala deva” the first Emperor of the Janjua Shahi phase. He is celebrated as a hero for his struggles in defending his kingdom from the Turkic rulers of Ghazani.
Emperor Jayapala was challenged by the armies of Sultan Sabuktgin and later by his son sultan Mahmud of Bhazani. According to the Minháj ad-D?n in his chronicle Tabaqát-i Násiri, he bears a testament to the political and powerful stature of Maharaja Jayapala Shah, “Jayapála, who is the greatest of all the rájas (kings) of Hind…” Misra wrote on Jaypala: “(He) was perhaps the last Indian ruler to show such spirit of aggression, so sadly lacking in later Rajput kings.”
Maharajadhiraj Anandpal

Prince Anandpala who ascended his father’s throne (in about March/April AD 1002) already proved an able warrior and general in leading many battles prior to his ascension. According to ‘Adáb al-Harb’ (pp. 307–10) in about AD 990, it is written, “the arrogant but ambitious Raja of Lahore Bharat, having put his father in confinement, marched on the country of Jayapála with the intention of conquering the districts of Nandana, Jailum (Jehlum) and Tákeshar” (in an attempt to take advantage of Jayapala’s concentrated effort with defence against the armies of Ghazni). “Jayapala instructed Prince Anandapala to repel the opportunist Raja Bharat. Anandapala defeated Bharat and took him prisoner in the Battle of Takeshar and marched on Lahore and captured the city and extended his father’s kingdom yet further.”

However, during his reign as emperor many losses were inflicted on his kingdom by the GhaZnavids. During the battle of Chach between Mahmud and Anandapala, it is stated that “a body of 30,000 Gakhars fought alongside as soldiers for the Shahi Emperor and incurred huge losses for the Ghaznavids”. However, despite the heavy losses of the enemy, he lost the battle and suffered much financial and territorial loss. This was Anandapala’s last stand against Sultan Mahmud of Ghazani. He eventually signed a treaty with the Ghaznavid Empire in AD 1010 and shortly a year later died a peaceful death.
It was turning point of History of Bharatvarsha.

Maharaja Trilochanpal

Prince Trilochanpála, the son of Anandapala, ascended the imperial throne in about AD 1011. Inheriting a reduced kingdom, he immediately set about expanding his kingdom into the sivalik Hills, the domain of the Rai of Sharwa. His kingdom now extended from the River Indus to the upper Ganges valley. According to Al-Biruni, Tirlochanpála “was well inclined towards the Muslims (Ghaznavids)” and was honourable in his loyalty to his father’s peace treaty to the Ghaznavids. He eventually rebelled against Sultan Mahmud and was later assassinated by some of his own mutinous troops in AD 1021-22, an assassination which was believed to have been instigated by the Rai of Sharwa who became his arch-enemy due to Tirlochanpala’s expansion into the Siwalik ranges. He was romanticised in Punjabi folklore as the Last Punjabi ruler of Punjab.
Link for Kaubulshahi facts

And history proceed…….

From the eighth century to the ninth century, many inhabitants of what is present-day Afghanistan ,pakistan and areas of northern India were converted to Sunni Islam. It is surmised from the writings of Al Beruni that some Pasthuns living in Pakhtunkhawa (present-day western Pakistan) had not been completely converted. Al Biruni, writing in Tarikh al Hind, also alludes to the Pashtun tribes of Pakhtunkhwa as Hindus.
Al Beruni mentions the Afghans once (ed Sachau, I 208)saying that “ in the western mountains of India live various tribes of Afghans who extend to the neighbourhood of the Sindh (ie Indus )valley .Thus in the eleventh century when the Afghans are first mentioned , they are found occupying the Sulaiman mountains now occupied by their descendents , the very tribes which the advocates of the exclusive claims of the Durannis will not admit to be true Afghans . Al Beruni no doubt also alludes to them in the passage (loc. Cit .p 199 ) where he says that rebellious savage races , tribes of Hindus , or akin to
them inhabit the mountains which form the frontier of India towards the west .”
“The most explicit mentioning of the Afghans appears in Al- Baruni’s Tarikh al hind (eleventh century AD) Here it is said that various tribes of Afghans lived in the mountains in the west of India . Al Baruni adds that they were savage people and he describes them as Hindus .”

“Various historical sources such as Martin Ewans, E.J. Brill and Farishta have recorded the introduction of Islam to Kabul and other parts of Afghanistan to the invasions of Mahmud of Ghazna ”
“The Arabs advanced through Sistan and conquered Sindh early in the eighth century . Elsewhere however their incursions were no more than temporary , and it was not until the rise of the Saffarid dynasty in the ninth century that the frontiers of Islam effectively reached Ghazni and Kabul . Even then a Hindu dynasty the Hindushahis , held Gandhara and eastern borders .From the tenth century onwards as Persian language and culture continued to spread into Afghanistan , the focus of power shifted to Ghazni , where a Turkish dynasty , who started by ruling the town for the Samanid dynasty of Bokhara , proceeded to create an empire in their own right. The greatest of the Ghaznavids was Muhmad who ruled between 998 and 1030. He expelled the Hindus from Ghandhara , made no fewer than 17 raids into India.”

“He encouraged mass conversions to Islam , in India as well as in Afghanistan.”

“Al -Idrisi (1100 AD -1165/1166 AD) testifies that until as late as the 12th century, a contract of investiture for every Shahi king was performed at Kabul and that here he was obliged to agree to certain ancient conditions which completed the contract .”.
“In 588 (1192) according to Farishta the army assembled by Muizz al din Muhammed b Sam consisted of Turks , Tadjiks and Afghans , and his opponent Pithorai (Prithoi Rai) assembled a force of Rajput and Afghan horsemen . Thus in this great war Mussulmans and Hindu Afghans are represented as fighting on both sides , which probably indicates that they were not yet completely converted to Islam.”

Bamiyan Budhha

Large Baudha statue erected by Kabulshahi kings at Bamiyan(Afghanistan)

“During the end of the ninth century, the Samanids extended its rule from Bukhara to as far south as the Indus River and west into most of Persia. Although Arab Muslim intellectual life was still centered in Baghdad, Shi’s Islam minated in the Samanid areas at this time. By the mid-tenth century, the Samanid Dynasty had crumbled in the face of attacks from tribes to the north and from the GazanawidsTurkic Dynasty in Afghanistan.

History of Conversion

“Arab armies carrying the banner of Islam came out of the west to defeat the Sasanians in 642 AD then they marched with confidence to the east. On the western periphery of the Afghan area the princes of Heart and Seitan
gave way to rule by Arab governors but in the east, in the mountains, cities submitted only to rise in revolt and the hastily converted returned to their old beliefs once the armies passed. The harshness and avariciousness of Arab rule produced such unrest, however, that once the waning power of the Caliphate
became apparent, native rulers once again established themselves independent. Among these the Saffarids of Seistan shone briefly in the Afghan area. The fanatic founder of this dynasty, the coppersmith’s apprentice Yaqub ibn Layth Saffari, came forth from his capital at Zaranj in 870 AD and marched through Bost ,Kandahar,Kabul,Bamyan,Balkh and Heart conquering in the name of Islam.”
– Nancy Hatch Dupree ,1971

During the eighth through the ninth centuries, many inhabitants of what is present-day Afghanistan and western Pakistan were converted to Sunni Islam. In some cases, however, people that were conquered by the Muslims would rebel and revert to prior forms of worship. The mountain areas were still not completely converted and remained largely by people of non-Muslim faiths. In a book called Hudad –Al -Alam, written in 982 CE, it mentions a village nearJalabad in Afghanistan , where the local king used to have many Hindu, Muslim and Afghan wives.
In the eighth and ninth centuries ancestors of many of today’s Turkic-speaking Afghans settled in the Hindu Kush area (partly to obtain better grazing land) and began to assimilate much of the culture and language of the Pashtun tribes
already present there…

Ghaznavids and Ghurids

Out of the Samanid Dynasty came the Ghaznavids
, whose warriors forged the first great Islamic empire from Ghazni (Afghanistan) that spanned much of the Iranian plateau, central Asia and conducted many successful raids into India during the end of the ninth century, the Samanids extended its rule from Bukhara to as far south as the Indus Rivers and west into most of Persia. By the mid-tenth century, the Samanid dynasty had crumble in the face of attacks from Turkish tribes to the north and from the Ghaznavids, a rising Turkic Muslim dynasty in Afghanistan. Besides Turkic people, large part of the Ghaznavid Empire was made up of local Muslim Afghans from what is now Afghanistan and western parts of Pakistan.
It is surmised from the writings of Al Beruni that some Afghans who lived in west of India (modern-day Afghanistan) had not been completely converted to Islam.

The most explicit mentioning of the Afghans appears in Al- Baruni’s Tarikh al hind (eleventh century AD). Here it is said that various tribes of Afghans lived in the mountains in the west of India. Al Baruni adds that they were savage people and he describes them as Hindus.
Willem Vogelsang, 2002

Al Beruni mentions the Afghans once (ed Sachau, I 208) saying that in the western mountains of India live various tribes of Afghans who extend to the neighbourhood of the Sindh (i.e.,Indus valley. Thus in the eleventh century when the Afghans are first mentioned, they are found occupying the Sulaiman Mountains now occupied by their descendants, the very tribes which the advocates of the exclusive claims of the Durannis will not admit to be true Afghans. Al Beruni no doubt also alludes to them in the passage (loc. Cit. p 199) where he says that rebellious savage races, tribes of Hindus, or akin to them inhabit the mountains which form the frontier of India towards the west.
H.A. Rose, 1997

Various historical sources such as Martin Ewans, E.J. Brill and Farishta have recorded that the complete conversion of Afghanistan, Pakistan to Islam was during the rule of Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni.
The Arabs advanced through Sistan and conquered Sindh early in the eighth century. Elsewhere however their incursions were no more than temporary, and it was not until the rise of the Saffarid Dynasty in the ninth century that the frontiers of Islam effectively reached Ghazni and Kabul. Even then a Hindu dynasty the Hindushahis ,held Gandhara and eastern borders. From the tenth century onwards as Persian language and culture continued to spread into Afghanistan, the focus of power shifted to Ghazani ,where a Turkish dynasty, who started by ruling the town for the Samanid dynasty of Bokhara, proceeded to create an empire in their own right. The greatest of the Ghaznavids was Mahmud
who ruled between 998 and 1030. He expelled the Hindus from Ghandhara, made no fewer than 17 raids into India. He encouraged mass conversions to Islam, in India as well as in Afghanistan.
Martin Ewans, 2002

Al-Idrisi testifies that until as late as the 12th century, a contract of investiture for every Shahi king was performed at Kabul and that here he was obliged to agree to certain ancient conditions which completed the contract. The Ghaznavid military incursions assured the domination of Sunni Islam in what is now Afghanistan and western Pakistan. The most renowned of the dynasty’s rulers was Mahmud of Ghazni, who consolidated control over the areas south of the Amu Darya Carried out devastating raids into India. With his booty from India, Mahmud built a great capital at Ghazani, founded universities, and patronized scholars. By the time of his death, Mahmud ruled a vast empire that stretched from Kurdistan to the entire Hindukush region as far east as the Punjab as well as territories far north of the Amu Darya. However, as occurred so often in this region, the demise in 1030 of this military genius who had expanded the empire to its farthest reaches was the death knell of the dynasty itself. The rulers of the Ghurids of Ghor in modern-day Afghanistan, captured and burned Ghazni in 1149, just as the Ghaznavids had once conquered Ghor. Not until 1186, however, was the last representative of the Ghaznavids uprooted by the Ghorids from his holdout in Lahore, in the Punjab.

Link for facts

Suming up

Hsuan Tsang was the last traveller to record Afghanistan before the coming of Islam. Up un-til his visit. “the cycle of invasion, expansion, and decline had been regular, as one empire succeeded another in the virile north, only to dissipate its resources of strength in the vast enervating plains of India,” wrote Fraser-Tytler. However while Hsuan Tsang was writing about the peaceful Kabul valley, in the middle if the seventh century, Arabs carrying the new and zealous faith of Islam reached Persia and an-other group coming from Basra reached Sistan and soon took control of large part of Western and south Afghanistan and the ruling Sassanians suffered a major defeat in 642. However from the north came equally commited Turkish Moslems and conflict grew between the two races. The approached Kabul via Kandahar and Ghazni, where they fought zealous defenders, who put up brave resistance. However Kabul was stoutly defending itself from the Moslem invaders under the leadership of a Turkish King, known by many names including Kabul Shahi, Turki Shahi or the Ratbil Shahan. The King had been partly Hinduised and fought gallantly against the Moslem invaders, resisting so strongly that their epics are recorded in Islamic literature.Kabul, mountain fortress capital of the Hindu Kush, was finally captured in 664 after a full year of siege.This clash between Arabs and Turks wasn’t settled until the middle of the eighth century under the Turkish General Abu Muslim who brought stability to the regions of the Hindu Kush. However in the next 100 years the combined influence of the Arabs and Turks succeeded in dominating the old faiths, particularly Bhuddism, except for that pocket of resistance in Kafirstan where their animist beliefs remained.A rather peaceful period followed under the Caliph Harun-al-Rashid (785-809) and his son Mamun who encouraged the arts and sciences flourished and Merv and Samarkand. There fol-lowed an unsettled period when the Saminids extended their influence across to India, but as their influence declined, Hinduism challenged the Moslem faith and appeared for the last time in the Kabul Valley. From the Kabul valley the ruler of the Punjab, Jaipal pushed his religious doctrine towards Ghazni, he met a rising Islamic dynasty which was to change the course of history. King or Sultan Mahmud. Although the Arab conquistadors had brought Is-lam to the Sind region of India some three hundred years before, it never spread.King Mahmud (Turk)of Ghazni was a strong leader and in words of Fraser Tytler, whose iconoclastic zeal was to carry fire and sword deep into Hindu India and to pave the way for the domination of his Islamic successors.But like so many rulers, on his death the dynasty faltered, and was taken over by the Turks. Then we see the short domination of the mountain people from south-east of Herat who established the House of Ghor and who dominated the twelfth century and their territory stretched well into India and ruled the much coverted Delhi.. At the beginning of the 13th century a new race came to Afghanistan from eastern shores of the Caspian Sea, they were the Khwarizm, a Turkish race.. They established a Kingdom in Bamian and from there ruled Kabul. This peaceful time didn’t last long before the heart of central Asia was ripped out by Genghis Khan and his Mongol hoardes who came from the north of China and by 1218 AD reached Central Asia.
GENGHIS KHAN – An apostle of extremes.Ghengis Khan with 100,000 mounted mehad reached Balkh by 1220 destroying everything and everyone in their wake. Jalal-ad-Din, the son of Sultan Muhammad who ruled the Kha-warizm empire, from Ghazni, managed to unite many tribes from the area and decided to defend against the invading Mongols. He advanced to the confluence of the Panjshir and Ghorband Rivers where a bloody battle ensued against Genghis Khan and his army of 30,000 skilled horsemen. Imagine the scene, 30,000 wild mongol horsemen on one side of the Panjcher River lusting for blood and on the other a more civilised army recently brought together. The beginning of the 13th century saw sweeping changes in Central Asia – not to mention Russia – for this was the time of the great Mongol migration. Unlike the Scythians, Sarma-tians, Huns and Turks who preceded them, these barbarians who erupted from the far-off borders of Manchuria were of an entirely different race. Round-headed, yellow-skinned, with slanting eyes and high cheek-bones, they were related to the peoples of northern China and Korea, although they spoke a Turkic language. They were also indescribably dirty and malodorous, for water was something they regarded as too precious to be waster on personal hygiene. They were not a hirsute people, but so infested were they with lice that their chests ap-peared to be thickly covered in hair.The astonishing conquests of Ghenghis Khan swept aside several empires and innumerable petty kingdoms, and brought all countries from the Black Sea to the Yellow Sea under direct Mongol control by the end of the first quarter of the thirteenth century. The unstoppable Mongol tide continued under his successors. Baghdad fell in 1258, the Sung capital of Hang-chow on 1276. In Europe the Mongol empire-the largest in history-extended as far as Poland and Hungary, taking in most of Russia on the way.The Mongols had been completely unlettered but now, with the help of the astute, Eastern Turks, they set about writing their own language down, using the Uighur script. This fruitful collaboration, accom-panied by intermarriage, was in time to produce a new hybrid master race and a new world leader, Tamerlane, but in the meantime a Mongol emperor sat on the illustrious throne of China and entertained curios visitors from distant Europe. Kublai Khan, grandson of Ghenghis, had become the Great Khan, or Chief of all the Mongol clans, in 1260. Karakoram, in Mongolia, was the headquarters of the huge empire, to which all clan leaders were summoned periodically etc etc. p 12Chingis Khaan Ghengis Khan Kublai Khan (grandson of Gheghis Khan)In 1218 Ghneghis Khan invades transoxiana 1227 he dies in 1996 (Christchurch Press) 2 Jan 1996, said: While other media groups were naming their man of the year, the “Washington Post” was thinking big yesterday and going right for the “Man of the Millennium”, And the winner is…Genghis Khan.the newspaper gave the nod to the 13th century Mongol conqueror as “an apostle of extremes..who embodies the half-civilised, half-savage duality of the human race.”
Link for facts

But Kafirs of Capisa Continued Their Fight

All fighters left Capisa (Gate way of India) But Fair complexioned Kafirs continued their fight against invaders. (Their Fair complexion is cause of this research).

– We find references of Kafir fighters in different historical records.
The first Muslim appellation of Kafirs occurs in 1020 CE in the writings of the historians of Mahmud of Ghazni.

– Musulman historian Ibn al-Hussain Baihaki makes second reference to (Siah-Posh) Katirs and calls them Hindus. He claims that ‘all the Hindu Katirs were brought under the rule of Sultan Masud’ (1033 CE) (Early History of India, I, p 128).
-Third reference occurs in Tuzak-i-Timuri where the Kafirs came into conflict with Sultan Timur (1399 CE). Timur found the Siah-Posh tribes (Kators and Kams) apparently holding a kingdom extending from the frontiers of Kashmir to mountains of Kabol and containing numerous villages and towns with capital at Jorkal. The ruler is stated to be Adalshu, Uda or Udasu. Timur describes the
Katirs as men of a powerful frame and fair complexion, idolaters for most part, and speaking a tongue distinct from Turki, Persian, Hindi or Kashmiri. Timur attacked the Katir strongholds .

– In fifteenth century, Sultan Mahmud, descendant of Sultan Timur lled expedition against the Siah-Poshes and thereby earned the title of Ghazi. Mahmud is originally an Arabic given name. Moghul emperor Babur notes the Panjshir Musulmans as paying tribute to their neighbors, the Siah-Posh Katirs.

– Moghul emperor Akbar sent his son Jahangir in 1581 against the Siah-Posh Kafirs of the mountains of Katir.

– Abu’l Fazl, in his history of Timur’s expeditions, speaks of the Hindúán-i-Katir, a country which is described as bounding territories of Buner, Swat and Bajaur on the north. ( Now you are well acquinted with the term Burgujjar .Burgujjar were suryavanshi Rajputs who ever fought in First rank and file.Now you should understand the term Burgundi …Broborn…. Barbarian)

1839, the Kafirs sent a deputation to Sir William Macnaghten in Jalalabad claiming relationship with the fair skinned British troops who had invaded the country. Jalalabad .”

When I was researching Afghanistan .I could not understand cause of continued fight of Kafirs against invaders at the very gate way of Bharatvarsha. And search begin. Who they were? What are their tribes? Their fair complexion diverted my search to Europe. I tried to search those tribes in Europe and suddenly amazeing Bharat Emerged. …to my surprise Ram emerged.

Equivalence to Sanskrit Kamboja

Kapisa is related to and included Kafiristan. Scholar community holds that Kapisa is equivalent to Sanskrit Kamboja. In other words, Kamboja and Kapisa are believed to be two attempts to render the same foreign word (which could not appropriately be transliterated into Sanskrit). Dr S Levi further holds that old Persian Ka(m)bujiya or Kau(n)bojiya, Sanskrit Kamboja as well as Kapisa, all etymologically refer to the same foreign word. Even the evidence from third century Buddhist tantra text Mahamayuri (which uses Kabusha for Kapisha) and the Ramayana-manjri by Sanskrit Acharya, Kshmendra of Kashmir (11th c AD), which specifically equates Kapisa with Kamboja, thus substituting the former with the latter, therefore, sufficiently attest that Kapisa and Kamboja are equivalent. Even according to illustrious Indian history series: History and Culture of Indian People, Kapisa and Kamboja are equivalent. Scholars like Dr Moti Chandra, Dr Krishna Chandra Mishra etc also write that the Karpasika (of Mahabharata) and Kapisa (Ki-pin/Ka-pin/Chi-pin of the Chinese writings) are synonymous terms. Thus, both Karpasika and Kapisa are essentially equivalent to Sanskrit Kamboja. And Paninian term Kapisi is believed to have been the capital of ancient Kamboja. Kapisa (Ki-pin, Ke-pin, Ka-pin, Chi-pin of the Chinese records), in fact, refers to the Kamboja kingdom, located on the south-eastern side of the Hindukush in the Paropamisadae region. It was anciently inhabited by the Asvakayana (Greek: Assakenoi), and the Asvayana (Greek Aspasio) (q.v.) sub-tribes of the Kambojas. Epic Mahabharata refers to two Kamboja settlements: one called Kamboja, adjacent to the Daradas (of Gilgit), extending from.

Kafiristan to south-east Kashmir including Rajauri/Poonch districts, while the original Kamboja, known as Parama Kamboja was located north of Hindukush in Transoxiana territory mainly in Badakshan and Pamirs/Allai valley, as neighbors to the Rishikas in the Scythian land.

Kafir’s Fair Complexion : Clue To Historical Thread

Yes , With full trust upon the Vanvasi Ram people of Capisa Or Kafirs fought for thousand years against invaders at the very gate of Bharatvasrsha.They had full trust in their Ram. They ever hoped that one day their Ram will come back. But meanwhile we people of India forget Get way of India and fighters who were fighting there for generations for 1000 years since Islamic invasion began. Their fair complexion is clue to history.

Yes, a little group of warriors never left their land of Capisa. And entire bharatvarsha forgot those warriors for whom they were fighting.
How a small group of people can fight for 1000 years? Because they trust the departed kabulshahi king. They ever thought that one day he will come back with his full might and will save them. They were ardent Bhakt of Their Ram.Their Ram also trusted them most. And At last Ram reached them. They recognized him….but unfortunately people of Bharatvarsha forget their Ram and fighting Kafirs too. It was Irony of fate of those unknown fighters of Capisa and their Ram….forgotten children of Bharatvarsha.

But even Ram started worshipping those Kafirs who faught for 1000 years at Gate way of India. The Kafirs became “God” in the eyes of “Ram”…… ! Ram now worship those Kafirs as “God”. Even Ram became worshiper of “God” .Perhaps we lost our Ram at that pathetic historical event .While we could not recognize Ram and his kafir warrior Gods. We worship “Ram” but now Ram worship Gods like Kafir warriors.
In the coming chater we shall look to the facts of Kafir warriors who faught for 1000 years(Until 1896) at the very gate of Bharatvarsha and struggle of Ram to reach them…. their Gods…fighting kafirs..!

Again Agni Pariksha?

Lau and Cush sang Ramayana in streets of Ayodhya.They both were first singers of Ramayana. Both brothers were also witness to “Sita Agni Pariksha”. Both brothers were witness to their Mother’s submergence in Mother Earth. Arter that We ever remembered Ram but not Lau and Kush..We never hold them up on our shoulders.They remained just like “Forgotten child” for Bharatvarsha. But Now I am going to unfold the history to connect them with Bharatvarsha. They came back to Bharatvarsha at time of Crisis and again experienced what their mother experienced Ages before.
Did our deeds harrased and devided Ram? Once we had taken “Agni Pariksha” of Sitaji. But now we have taken Pariksha of Ram..?
—————————————-
AT THE END OF THE RESEARCH

AT END OF THE RESEARCH, I HAVE FOUND SECOND SIDE OF COIN.

I COME TO KNOW THAT SAMANIDS WHO PLAYED INSTRUMENTAL ROLE IN PROCESS OF CONVERSION OF PERSIA AND AFGHANISTAN….NOW DAYS TOOK NEW NAME SWAMINARAYAN AND TAKE CARE OF THE SLAVES WHO PLAYED INSTRUMENTAL ROLE TOO.

I COME TO KNOW THAT AS MUGHALS WERE REACHING LAND OF LAV NANDAN….THIS SLAVES AND ABBASIDS TOOK NEW FORM AT TWO NED OF ASIA. THEY TOOK SHLTERS IN MISRA AS WELL AS PUNJAB. SHIEKH TOOK FORM OF SHIKH , KHILAFAT TOOK FORM OF KHALSA, TAGHLAQ TOOK FORM OF TEGH BAHADUR….AND SO ON. MOST SLAVE SOLDIERS AND ENTITY WHO PLAYED INSTRUMENTAL ROLE FOR ABBASIDS CHANGED THIER FORMS AND HIDDEN THIER TREASURE IN THEIR NEW TEMPLES ,THAT THEY LOOTED FORM LAND OF LAV NANDAN.

With my all respect to fighter kafirs of kabul , who faught for 1000 years , now I want to put forward another fold of history.

The people who invaded Kabul as habit to change their forms….

Link to my another article that shaws present form of real invaders on land of Lav nandan.

Presently they are in This forms …..say that they came from Amu Dariya and hide their real identity of Muhmmad Ghori and Qutbbin…….Samanids also has changed their form. They afraid of Mughals who was behind them

Posted in A Book - There was Ram | Leave a comment

CHAPTER -10 : CAPISA: THE GATE WAY OF INDIA :

“Where is the Shahi dynasty with its ministers, its kings & its great grandeur…The very name of the splendour of the Shahi kings has vanished. What is not seen in a dream, what even our imagination cannot conceive, that dynasty accomplished with ease.”

Kalhana’s Rajatarangini

Kalhana’s Rajatarangini

Kalhana’s Rajtarnagini is real historical document of Bharatvarsha. When Kalhan mentiones “Kabulshahi Kingdom” then there is no place to doubt that it was not Hindu culture Kingdom. Without reading “Rajtarangani” it is very difficult to understand history of ancient India and its tribes.

So first of all I am providing you link to two Books. Read it to understand ancient history of India.
(1) Kalhana’s Rajatarangini: A Chronicle of the Kings of Kasmir vol -1 By Kalhana
Book link

(2) Kalhana’s Rajatarangini: a chronicle of the kings of Kasmir, Volume 2
By Kalhana, M.A. Stein
Book link
without reading Rajtarangini it is also difficult to understand even present history.

Robert –Barhatgin – Raw Bharat
( prince of Ayodhya)

The name “Afghanistan” itself comes from “Upa-Gana-Stan” which means in Sanskrit “The place inhabited by allied tribes”. But now a days we opted to disconnect ourself from ancient history of Gandhara. We opted to foeget Sarswati –Sindhu culture ,We opted to forget history of Takshashila (Founed by Taksha –Son of Bharat).We opted to forget history of Pushkalavati (Peshawar) founded by Pushkala ,the son of Bharat (the brother of Rama).We opted to forget Kabulshahi rulers of gate way of India who ever remembered as holders of sword of Dharma. We forget everything. We have got no thread of memory in our deeper consciousness even.
We even forget that all the southern states names are once Kindom in Baluchistan. Andira , Dravida ,Pandyan were sons of Turvasu (Son of. Yayati).Sons of Turvasu ruled South India .Andhra derived its name form Andira (son of Turvasu). We forget totally our ancient history and civilization.
Yes ,we opted to forget everything because we were just witness and not creators. But think , how Bharatvanshis can forget it? How sons of Turvasu can forget it? How Ram can forget it? To understand their feelings we have to first believe that – There was Ram.If Ram was there then there was Bharat..There was Lau ….and there was Kush too.Let us try to understand history of Capisa and Gandhara and trace out clue to Bharat and Ram.

To understand ancient history of Capisa and its Kabulshahi rulers ,we have to understand Hsitory of Gandhara.

Gandhara/Waihind /Wales

Gandhara (also known as Waihind in Persian),(Read carefully,Waihind is clue to world History) is the name of an ancient kingdom (Mahajanpada), located in northern Pakistan and eastern Afghanistan).
The boundaries of Gandhara varied throughout history. Sometimes the Peshawar valley and Taxila were collectively referred to as Gandhara and sometimes the Swat valey (Sanskrit: Suvastu) was also included. The heart of Gandhara, however, was always the Peshawar valley. The kingdom was ruled from capitals at Pushkalavati (Charsadda), Taxila, Purushapura (Peshawar) and in its final days from Udabhandapura (Hund) on the Indus. According to the Puranas, they were named after Taksha and Pushkara, the two sons of Bharata, a prince of Ayodhya.
The region shows an influx of southern Central Asian culture in the Bronze Age with the Gandghra grave culture, likely corresponding to immigration of Indo -Aryan speakers and the nucleus of Vedic civilization. This culture survived till 1000 BC. Its evidence has been discovered in the hilly regions of Swat and Dir, and even at Taxila.

The name of the Gandharis is attested in the Rigveda (RV I.126.7) and in ancient inscriptions dating back to Achaemenid Persia. The Behistun inscription listing the 23 territories of King Darius I (519 BC) includes Gandhara along with Bactria and Thatagush ( Satagydia). In the book “Histories” by Herodotus, Gandhara is named as a source of tax collections for King Darius. The Gandharis, along with the Balhika (Bactrians),Angas, and the Magadhas, are also mentioned in the Atharvaveda (AV 5.22.14), as distant people. Gandharas are included in the Uttrapatha division of Puranic and Buddhistic traditions. The Aitreya Brahmana refers to king Naganajit of Gandhara who was a contemporary of Janaka, king of Videha.
During the Mahabharata period, the present-day Kandahar province of Afghanistan used to be known as Gandhar. Gandhara, the son of Arh, founded the city of Gandhar (the modern-day city of Kandahar) and made it his capital. The princess of Gandhara, Gandhari was married to Dritrashtra and was the mother of the Kauravas. The descendants of Gandhar rulers are known as Gandhars.
The ruins of the Gandhara kingdom can be found throughout Afghanistan and Pakistan. In Nowshera in the North west Frontier Province in Pakistan, there is even a barren area called the Gandhara Mound.

Gandhara had played an important role in the epic of Ramayana and Mahabhrata. Ambhi Kumar was direct descendant of Bharata (of Ramayana) and Shakuni (of Mahabharata). It is said that Lord Rama consolidated the rule of the Kosala Kingdom over the whole of the Indian peninsula. His brothers and sons ruled most of the Janapadas (16 states) at that time.
Link to Gandhara

Bharat-prince of Ayodhya:centre of Gandhara

Yes, you refer any literature ,any history , you will find that Bhratvanshis were in the centre of ancient Gandhara. The above links also narrates that the region shows an influx of southern Central Asian culture in the Bronze Age. This culture survived till 1000 BC. Its evidence has been discovered in the hilly regions of Swat and Dir, and even at Taxila. Further now we know that Sarsawti –Sindhu culture collapsed in a major disaster in 1500 BC. Migration story began with that. We also found Luwian kingdom and culture in Ancient Anatolia in 1200 BC.

Alexander’s invasion

The history of Alexander’s invasion can say us further history. Now we know that Ambhi Kumar was direct descendant of Bharata (of Ramayana) and Shakuni (of Mahabharata). Now look at description of Alexander’s invasion on Bharatvarsha. Until that period Capisa believed to be the Gate way of India.
“ Greek historians refer to three warlike peoples – the Astakenoi, the Aspasioi and the Assakenoi, living to the northwest of the river Indus, whom Alexander encountered during his campaign from Kapisi through Gandhara. The Aspasioi were related to the Assakenoi and were a western branch of them. Both the Aspasioi and Assakenoi soldiers earned the admiration of the Greeks for their fighting ability.

Bharat vanshi Ambhi – Puruvanshi Porus
In the spring of 327 BCE Alexander crossed the Hindu Kush and set out on the road to the Indus. He invited the Chieftains of the former Achaemenian Satrap of Gandhara to submit and join him. (Gandhara was the first kingdom of ancient India and is in the north of modern day Pakistan). Ambhi (Greek: Omphis), the ruler of Taxila, whose kingdom extended from the Indus to the Jhelum (Greek:Hydaspes) complied, as well as some others, Sangaeus (Sanjaya) of Peucalaotis (Pushkalavati), Cophaeus of the Kabul region and Assagetes (Ashvajit), chief of a part of west Gandhara, and Sicicottos (Shashigupta) from a hill state, south of the Hindu Kush.. However most of the highland chieftains refused to submit – including the Astekenoi, Aspasioi and Assakenoi, known in Indian texts as Hastinayanas, Ashvayanas and Ashvakayana (Ashwaka). Menas people living in the area were called Ashawaka or Komboja. The description can also give you further details of tribes who were dwelling in Gandhara and on Sindhu bank. Kamboja and Abhisara tribes are mentioned in History. We can assume from that details that same tribes also faught Against Islamic invasion too. The detail can be helpful that way.
Evidence to Rama
But single facts emerged out of above facts that Bharatvanshis were even ruling in the Bharatvarsha at time of Alexander. They were reminder to Ram …Evidence to Ram. Evidence to the history of Ayodhya….Founded by Manu after jalpralay (Natural Disaster).Secondly Porus belonged to ancient Puru dynasty. Means until Alexander’s invasion Sanatan thread prevailed in Bharatvarsha and its boundries are far away near Iran.

Link to Kamboja

Second link

Abhisara and Alexander
Abisares (or Abhisara) called Embisarus by Diodorus was an Indian king of Abhira descent beyond the river Hydapes (Jhelam), whose territory lay in the mountains, sent embassies to Alexander the Great both before and after the conquest of Porus in 326 BC, although inclined to espouse the side of the latter. Alexander not only allowed him to retain his kingdom, but increased it, and on his death in 325 BC appointed his son as his successor. The book “History of ancient India” By Rama Shankar Tripathi (p-122) also narrates Abhisara rulers.
Link to the book

Breaking of Sanatan Thread
Now we know that Bharatvanshi ruled Gandhar in form of “Ambhi” until 325 BC. But then we loose the clue. Then we have no record of Bharatvanshis. Xuanzang (or: Hsüan-tsang) (c. 602 – 664) gave account of Capisa and its rulers but unfortunately he did not mention Bharatvanshis. Even though Hsüan-tsang’s account help us to understand and solve Alberunis mysterious account of Capisa and its ruler.
Link to Hsuan –tsang)

At last, Islamic Historian Alberuni’s(11th century) historical fallacy distorted Sanatan history. The scholar mentioned Berhetgin dynasty ruled Capisa for 60 generations. The use of suffix “Gin” , Turkic culture and Tibetan origin of Kabulshahi kings mentioned by Al –Beruni diverted Sanatan thread. We lost our clue to Ram. Surprisingly nobody from us challenged Alberuni. Surprising nobody tried to search out Sanatan thread.

Now let us try connect that Sanatan thread with available historical records.
First let us know –who was Alberuni.

Al Beruni
Al Beruni (born 5 September 973 in Kath, Khwarezm, died 13 December 1048 in Ghazani), known as Alberonius in Latin and Al-Biruni in English, was an Iranian- Chorasmian Muslim scholar and polymath of the 11th century. Al-Biruni is regarded as one of the greatest scholars of the medieval Islamic era and was well versed in physics, mathematics,astronomy, and natural sciences, and also distinguished himself as a historian, chronologist and linguist. He was conversant in Chorasmian, Persian, Arabic, Sanskrit and Turkic, and also knew Greek, Hebrew and Syriac. He spent a large part of his life in Ghazni, modern-day Afghanistan, and in 1017 travelled to the Indian subcontinent. He became the most important interpreter of Indian science to the Islamic world.
Al- Beruni’s fame as an Indologist rests primarily on two texts. Al-Beruni wrote an encyclopedic work on India called “Tarikh Al-Hind” (History of India, also known as “Indica,” or simply “India”) in which he explored nearly every aspect of Indian life, including religion, history, geography, geology, science, and mathematics. He explores religion within a rich cultural context. He expresses his objective with simple eloquence: I shall not produce the arguments of our antagonists in order to refute such of them, as I believe to be in the wrong. My book is nothing but a simple historic record of facts. I shall place before the reader the theories of the Hindus exactly as they are, and I shall mention in connection with them similar theories of the Greeks in order to show the relationship existing between them (1910, Vol. 1, p. 7; 1958, p. 5)
Link to Alberuni

Al –Beruni’s cofusing account

The confused accounts of 11th century persian Muslim scholar Alberuni, (“which bear the impress of folklore for the early history of the Kabul Shahi rulers”) state that:
– the Hindu kings residing in Kabul were Turks
said to be of Tibetan origin
– that the first of them was a Barahatakin (founder of the dynasty), who came (from Tibet) into the country (Kabul), entered a cave and after a few days, started to creep out of it in the presence of people who looked upon him as a “new born baby”, clothed in Turkish dress. People honored him as a being of miraculous birth, destined to be a king. And he brought those countries under his sway and ruled under the title of Shahiya of Kabul
– the rule remained among his descendants for allegedly about sixty generations, till it was supplanted by a Hindu minister .

Link to present Capisa

In facts little historical information is available about our ancient kingdom of Capisa, the lion-gate of Hindustan. Al Beruni also mentioned folklores.Acharya Panini, chinese pilgrim Hiuen Tsang’s accounts of his visit to Hindustan and Islamic Historian ( Persian Muslim scholar) Alberuni ‘s accounts are the only availabe source of information.

YOGENDRA MISHRA rightly says in his book – THE HINDU SAHIS OF AFGHANISTAN AND THE PUNJAB A.D. 865-1026 PHASE OF THE ISLAMIC ADVANCE IN INDIA – that “the Hindus did not pay much attention to the historical order of things and were very careless in relating the chronological succession of their kings. Consequently only three of the rulers(of Capisa) are named by Alberuni in his account, viz., the founder (Barhatakin by name), one intervening monarch (called Kanik), and the last King.”(Katorman or Lagaturman). So here we are entring very obscure zone of history.Eventhough we shall try to reach upto hsitorical clues with help of whatever obscure facts available in Books and net links.

(1) Some historians even argued that Barhatigin is said to be the founder of the dynasty which is said to have ruled for 60 generations until AD 870. But if this is true, then it would take Barhatigin and the founding of the early Shahi dynasty back about 20×60=1200 years, i.e., to about 4th century BCE if we take the average generation of 20 years; and to 7th century BCE if average generation is taken as 25 years. It is well nigh impossible that a single dynasty could have ruled for 1200 (or 1500) years at a stretch. Moreover, king Kanik (if Kanishaka) ruled (AD 78-101) not over Kabul but over Purushapura/Gandhara and his descendants could not have ruled for almost 900 years as a single dynasty over Capisa/Kabul especially in a frontier region called the gateway of India. Pre Islamic Hindu and Buddhist heritage of Afghanistan is well established in the Shahi coinage from Kabul of this period.Bamiyan Buddha statue also erected during the rein of Kabulshahi dynasty nearby in seventh century.

Coins

Information about coins of ancient Capisa is also interesting. Coins depict the bust of the king , wearing a crown in shape of wolfs head( A sign of turkic descent) On the everse there is divinity with flames , with a Pahalavi inscription , copied after the coins of sasanian king KHUSRAW SECOND ( 591 -681)(The ancient geography of India” CHARLES WILLIAM WASON (p-39 )

(2) Brahmin vazir
In spite of all this confusing accounts , truth remains truth . The people of Capisa believed them the true defender of Gate way of India, and it is fundamental truth.Brahmins were their vazirs is seconde fundamental truth. People of Capisa were witness of their victory over Hun ,Shakas and Macedonia. People of Capisa were true believer of Ram and they had special eyes and vision to recognize their Ram in his all forms.
In fact Capisa was leader of the world history.Even Alberuni ‘s folklore like absured and confusing records also help us to unfold the mystery he created.Now let us unfold the mystries..
(3) Hindu kings residing in Kabul had Turkish culture .

– The detail of the chapter “ First Blood” helps us to unfold this mystery. The details of the chapter clarifies the point. It clarifies why the king of Capisa had Turkic culture in the eyes of Alberuni. and eventhough people of Capisa honouring the king as hindu king. The description of Alberuni and Hiuen Tsang unmistakebly proves that the king of Capisa was there in Asia Minor , besides his ally Bithynia.

(4) No Turkstan existed

Furthermore We have to look into the facts that Galatia and Bithynia were in Asia Minor or Anatolia(and not in Turkastan). Turkic tribes and Turkastan did not exist at that time in Asia minor when said Baratgin founed kabulshahi dynasty. In fact invading turkic tribes adopted the culture of asia Minor or Anatolia.

I want to convey that when Alexander invaded Capisa and “Ram” departed for “vanvas” ,there were no turkic tribes dwelled there in Asia minor or Anatolia. During “vanvas “ Ram encounterd the language and culture of Anatolia and came back. Later on invader turkic tribes who arrived in Anatolia in 10th or 11th century AD ,adopted the same culture of Anatolia.Yes when Alberuni wrote in 11th century , turks were there in Aisa minor. But Turks were not there in Anatolia(present Turkastan) when said Barhatgin founded Hindu –Baudh kabulshahi at Capisa.So it was historical fallacy occured by Al Biruni . Correct fact is Bahrhatgin hold the culture of Anatolia and not of Turkstan.

Turkic tribes reached Anatolia ( ANARTA KINGDOM THEY REMEMBERED) in 11 th century

In fact the Turkic migration reached the territory of what is now Turkey, by the 11th century. The Turkomen, Oghuz Turks who had been converted to Islam, were the main component of Turkic migration into Anatolia.[citation needed] The process was accelerated after the Battle of Manzikert victory of Seljuk Turks against the Byzantines; Anatolia would be called Turchia in the West as early as the 12th century.[85] The Mongols invaded Transoxiana, Iran, Azerbaijan and Anatolia; this caused Turkomens to move further to Western Anatolia.[86] In the case of the migrations, the Turkic peoples assimilated some of the Indo-European peoples encountered; Tocharian as well as the numerous Iranian speakers across the Asiatic steppe were switched to the Turkic language, and ultimately Greek, the majority language of Anatolia, declined in favour of Turkish.

Link to Turkstan

The above facts says that Alberuni’s folklorelike account of Kabulshahi rulers is misleading. It do not lead us anywhere. Still nobody tried to correct it.

Who can rule over Kamboja for 60 generations?

So we have little facts to establish that Bharatvanshis founded Kabulshahi dynasty in Capisa and they ruled Capisa till 870 AD. But Kamboja are real clue. Kamboja were present in area when Alexander invaded. When Kamboja are hindu clan then ruler Barhatgin should be Bharat. Otherwise how one dynasty could ruled over Sanatan Dharmi Kamboja for 60 generations? Presence of Kamboja or Ashwakani in Capisa is real clue to history. Any Sanatani can say that only Bharatvanshi can rule over Kamboja for long 60 generations. Means Kamboja , Abhisara were ally tribes dwelling in Afghanistan.

Further now we know history of Anatolia.History of Anatolia explain us why Barahat who founded Kabul shahi dynasty had culture of Anatolia. Their Brahmin vazirs are clue to true story. At the time of Islamic invasion again Bharatvanshis gave kingdom to their Brahman Vazir and went to Vanvas.Thereafter nobody from us ever try to search and know ..where Bharatvanshis are. Even Al –Biruni’s confusing account help us to correct the history.

In Defence of Bharat

– I agree with Alberuni that Barhat Dynasty ruled Capisa for 60 generation. Means Barhat founded kabulshahi dynasty in 2nd or 1st BC. After war against Macedonia (which I mentioned in the chapter –First Blood)

– I agree with Alberuni that Barhat dynasty kings hold culture of Anatolia . But I disagree with him that they were holding Turkic culture.Because Turkic people reached that region hardly in 10th or 11th century AD. I doubt that turkic people even not entered Afghanistan before 6th or 7 th century.

– Even Huen –Tsang record syas that Kshatriya ruler ruled over Capisa.

– Brahmin Vazir is major Clue. Alberuni mentioned it.Means Barhat belong to hindu clan. Ancient Brahmins only support real royal blood.

– If we check history of Alexander’s invasion then we can get record of people living in the province. Barhat ruled Kamboja,Abhisara and other ally tribes. Don’t you think that only Bharat can rule over Kamboja and Abhisar for 60 Generation?Al-beruni was scholar but not Hindu. He came from Iran , a country converted before 400 Years. How can he recognise Ram and Bharat? Alberuni used contemporary Turkic “Gin” suffix.The suffix was outcome of contemporary period. In 2nd century Bc nobody knew suffix “Gin”

– Even Rajtarngini lament for Kabulshahi rulers. Why?

– I firmly believe that Bharatvanshi ruled Capisa until 870 AD. When Bharatvarsha geared up for long time war. They gave responsibitity of Kabul to Brahmin Vazir and gone for longtime war or Vanvas.There after we never try to search them out. They are there somewhere….may be before our eyes somewhere.. but we deny to recognize them. That is Irony of fate.
Again in Vanvas

Yes when ever Bharatvarsha put in trouble Ram used to go in Vanvas.Because He was Ram.The history of Anatolia says the same history. Even Islamic Historian Alberuni endorsed that fact mysteriously.He tell us that Barhat Dynasty rulers had culture of Anatolia (Turkastan). That way Al-Beruni endorsed the facts I narrated in the chapter of book- “First Blood Of India”.So at the time of Islamic invasion Ram again go for vanvas putting responsibility of Kabul on the shoulder of his Brahmin Vazir. Then we never recognised him.

More facts about Kabulshahi

“The Shahi (Devanagari ) , Sahi , also called Shahiya dynasties ruled one of the Middle kingdoms of India which included portions of the Kabulistan and the old province of Gandhara (now in northern Pakistan), from the decline of the Kushan Empire in the 3rd century to the early 9th century. The kingdom was known as “Kabul Shahi” (Kabul-shahan or Ratbél-shahan in Persian ) between 565 and 879 CE when they had Kapisa and Kabul as their capitals, and later as “Hindu Shahi” when they moved their capital to Udabhandapura in Waihind (Hund).
The Shahis of Kabul/Gandhara are generally divided accordingly to two eras into the so-called Buddhist-Shahis and the so-called Hindu-Shahis, with the change-over thought to have occurred sometime around AD 870.

The first references to Kapisa appear in the writings of fifth century BCE Indian scholar Achariya Panini. Panini refers to the city of Kapisi, a city of the Kapisa kingdom. Panini also refers to Kapisayana, a famous wine from Kapisa. The city of Kapisi also appeared as Kavisiye on Graeco-Indian coins of Appolodotus/Eucratides.Archeology discoveries in 1939 confirm that the city of Kapisa was an emporium for Kapisayana wine, discovering numerous glass flasks, fish-shaped wine jars, and drinking cups typical of the wine trade of the era. The grapes (Kapisayani Draksha) and wine (Kapisayani Madhu) (The word Kapisayani not remind you of Capetian king of France?)of the area are referred to by several works of ancient Indian literature. The scholar of Mahabharata also noted the common practice of slavery in the city.
According to the scholar Pliny, the city of Kapisi (also referred to as Kaphusa by Pliny’s copyist Solinus and Kapisene by other classical chroniclers) was destroyed in the sixth century BCE by the Achaemenian emperor Cyrus (Kurush) (559-530 BC).
In later times, Kapisa seems to have been part of a kingdom ruled by a Buddhist Kshatriya king holding sway over ten neighboring states including Lampaka, Nagarahara, Gandhara and Banu, according to the Chinese pilgrim Hiuen Tsang who visited in 644 AD. Hiuen Tsang notes the Shen breed of horses from the area, and also notes the production of many types of cereals and fruits, as well as a scented root called Yu-ki.

Capisa- Kapisayana and French Capetian Kings

Above facts reveal that we never tired to search out Bharatvanshis who ruled Gandhara since Ramayana. That way we lost clue to Sanatana religion.

But Capetian Kings of France determined to carry history of Capisa. Yes,now we know that Bharatvanshis went in exile (In vanvas) in 870 AD. They gave kingdom to Brahmin king Kallar.

India Gears up

One can see that Hindustan was bubling before Islamic invasion. At all fronts People were preparing for long time war.People knew that “Vanvas of Ram” means war for Hindustan. Yes Ruler of Capisa , were the defender of the gate way of India. Nath cult of Gorakhnath also emerged and flourished during this period.
YOGENDRA MISHRA in his book given the full description of new Hindu movement. He mentions in his book that , “The reign of Lalliyas (Brahmin king of Kabul) synchronised with a period of great religious activity in Hinduism. It saw the growth and development of the Natha cult through the sadhana and preachings of Gorakshanatha (popularly called Gorakhnath) who is said by competent authorities to have flourished in the tenth century of the Vikrama era (circa A.D. 845-945, in round figures). His birthplace was Peshawar or Tila (Jhelum District, West Punjab). As both these places were in the Sahi dominians, we may say that the Sahi kingdom must have been the scene of his early activity. Gorakhnath born in a Brahmana family, was a Buddhist in the beginning, but turned to the Natha cult of Saivism later. He has rightly been regarded as the greatest figure after Sankaracharya (A. D. 788-820).s (P-16,17)
we should aware about the fact that Raja Bhaarthri , the elder brother of the king Vikramaditya also took sanyas and joined Nath cult during this period. India sensed the coming storm and determined and geared up to meet It.

France gears up

If we look at parallel history then the Sunline king of France Hugh Capet (c. 939 – 24 October 996), founded the Capetian dynasty in france. .Hugh was born in 939. His paternal family, the Robertians, were powerful landowners in the Île-de-France.The direct Capetians, or the House of Capet, ruled France from 987 to 1328; thereafter, the Kingdom was ruled by collateral branches of the dynasty. All French kings through Louis Philippe, and all royal pretenders since then, have belonged to the dynasty.
Nobody ever questions – what promped Robertian Sunline king Hugh Capet to hold the title ” Capetian “…. ,When Capisa-The gate way of India was at verge of falling ? Yes he showed determination to carry history of Capisa…. By holding the title .He determined to carry history of his ancecstral throne. This event connect – Bharat :prince of Ayodhya , So called Bathatgin dynasty of Capisa and Robertian King Hugh Capet of France.We have to remember that Hugh Capet was member of Holly Roman Empire.

Hugh founded Capetian dynasty in France , when “Capisa”, the gate way of India was invaded. It explains the story of determination of Hugh and his succsessors. History of Galetia (Asia Minor) even mentions that people from Gual came to Galetia (Asia Minor) and invaded Macedonia. France is part of ancient Gaul or Gandhara?

Family founder Robert (Rao Bharat ?)

Family founder of Hugh is Robert , and so his family is called Robertian . If we ever tried to undrstand the meaning of the word Robert , then there might be a different history. But our little mistake changed the whole route of history. Yes French Robertian Sun line rulers were carrying tradition of “Bharata” sunline dynasty of India. In sunline tradition of Bharatvarsha the younger brothers of the king are called Raws. As per this tradition the younger brother of shri ram was called “Raw Bharat” , and the name Robert implies the same meaning .The wabesite “Behindthename.com” explains the meaning of the name Robert.

ROBERT

Gender: Masculine
Usage: English, French, Scandinavian, German, Dutch, Czech, Polish, Russian, Slovene, Croatian, Romanian, Ancient Germanic

Pronounced: RAH-bert (English), ro-BER (French), RO-bert (German), RO-bert (Dutch), RAW-bert (Polish), RO-byert (Russian), RO-beert (Russian).
From the Germanic name Hrodebert meaning “bright fame”, derived from the Germanic elements hrod “fame” and beraht “bright”. The Normans introduced this name to Britain, where it replaced the Old English cognate Hreodbeorht. It has been a very common English name since that time.
The name has been borne by two early kings of France, two Dukes of Normandy, and three kings of Scotland, including Robert the Bruce who restored the independence of Scotland from England in the 14th century. The author Robert Browning (1812-1889) and poets Robert Burns (1759-1796) and Robert Frost (1874-1963) are famous literary bearers of this name. Other bearers include Robert E. Lee (1807-1870), the commander of the Confederate army during the American Civil War, and American actor Robert Redford (1936-).
This explanation suggets that Suryvanshi of Ayodhya were ruling France when Capisa ( The gate way of indi) was invaded. “ Bharat” in the form of Hugh Capet determined to carry the tradition of Capisa -the Gate way of India.

Yes ,the history of France proves that Barhatgin Dynasty mentioned by Albiruni was in fact Bharat Dynasty. The history of France proves the record , what no other historical account can prove. Yes ,Hugh Capet and history of Capetian (Or Kapisayana ?) dynasty gives us evidence to believe that rulers of Capisa were Bharatvanshis.

And Histoy proceed further…..

Hugh Capet (c. 939 – 24 October 996), called in contemporary sources “Hugh the Great” (Latin: Hugo Magnus), was the first King of France of the eponymous Capetian dynasty from his election to succeed the Carolingian Louis V in 987 until his death.

Most historians regard the beginnings of modern France with the coronation of Hugh Capet. This is because, as Count of Paris, he made the city his power center. The monarch began a long process of exerting control of the rest of the country from what became the capital of one of Europe’s most powerful and important nations, a major producer of ideas and ideals that have had global impact.

Descent and inheritance
The son of Hugh the Great, Duke of France, and Hedwige of Saxony, daughter of the German king Henry the Fowler, Hugh was born in 939. His paternal family, the Robertians, were powerful landowners in the Île-de-France. His grandfather had been King Robert I and his grandmother Beatrice was a Carolingian, a daughter of Herbert I of Vermandois. This makes him the great-great-great-great-great grandson of Charlemagne through both of his parents, through Louis the Pious and Pepin of Italy. King Odo was
his grand-uncle and King Rudolph the son-in-law of his grandfather, King Robert I. Hugh was born into a well-connected and powerful family with many ties to the reigning nobility of Europe.
Link to Capetian dynasty

Legacy

He is regarded as the founder of the Capetian dynasty. The direct Capetians, or the House of Capet, ruled France from 987 to 1328; thereafter, the Kingdom was ruled by collateral branches of the dynasty. All French kings through Louis Philippe, and all royal pretenders since then, have belonged to the dynasty.

Members of the Capetian dynasty are still the heads of state of the kingdom of Spain (in the person of the Bourbon Juan Carlos) and of the grand-duchy of Luxembourg, making it the oldest continuously reigning dynasty in the world. As one of the founders of what became the French state, Capet’s legacy contributed to creating a country that, in many respects, has led the world in the field of humanitarian thinking, rights, political liberty and human solidarity.

In coming chapters we shall also look to the facts, how Capetian dynasty of France carry tradition of Capisa –The gate way of India.

British Bard mentioned Capys
Still you Don’t believe then listen to the voice of the ancient British Bard (Royal poet). EDWARD DAVIES, RECTOR OF BISHOPSTON, IN THE COUNTY OF GLAMORGAN, mentioned it in his book named “ THE MYTHOLOGY AND RITES OF THE British Druids” .His book whispered that “King to Isle of Man”(Island of Manu) belonged to Capys in Asia. Royal Bard to the king announce this fact before 2000 years, in his poetic personification to King of Isle of Man ( Island of Manu).

“Y MARWAR LLVDD.—Bychan:
Yn enw Duw Trindawd, cardawd cyfnvys!
Llwyth lliaws, anuaws eu henwerys,
Dygorescynnaa Prydain, prif fan ynys;
Gwyr gwlad yr Asia, a gwlad Gafys;”

Writer also explain its meaning. Poet clearly mentioned the word “Marwar”. If you search the meaning of “Bychan” then it implies “Vishnu” or “Bishno”. You read the meaning of Washington , it will lead you to Bishno – Bychan. “LLVDD” clearly signals Lau. Remember, Bard said it in poetic personification of King of “ Isle of Man” (Island of Manu). Poetic lines explained in following way and mentions Capys in Asia. Bard begin with God Trinity.

isle of Man or Island of Manu?

Bard to king of Isle of Man mentioned that king belonged to Capys in Asia.

“In the name of the God Trinity, exhibit thy charity ! A numerous race, of ungentle manners, ‘ Repeat their invasion of Britain, chief of isles : Men from a country in Asia, and the region of CapyS ; J A people of iniquitous design : the land is not known That was their mother. They made a devious course by sea. In their flowing garments, who can equal them ? With design are they called in,with theiir short spears, those fqes.”
Link to the Book

Wales/ Waihind

Yes you can find this explanation in preface to book it self. Writer explains meaning of Poetic persofication with help of of Wales Language .Means Cymru people dwelling in Wales know Capisa/Capys. Do Wales language has something to do with language of Gandhara?
Then who are Symru people and what wales stands for? The answer is cule to real Ram.
Let us solve that problem today..And here itself. Now we know that Udabhandapura Waihind Was second seat of Capisa kingdom. Wales has something to do with Waihind?
To understand “Wihind” pl read following Book link…..
“Studies in the geography of ancient and medieval India”
By Dineshchandra Sircar (P-290) will tell you something about Waihind.
Book link

Waihind history

It is also very remarkable that Kalhana c 12th century the author of Rajatarangini written in 1147 49 AD also refers to the Shahis and does not maintain any any difference or distinction between the earlier Shahis RT IV 143 and the later Shahis or does not refer to any supplanting of the dynasty at any stage as Alberuni does in his Tarikh al Hind Furthermore Kalhana takes the dynasty of the ancestors of the Hindu Shahi rulers Lallya Kallar Kamala Toramana Bhimadeva Jaipala Anandapala Trilochanpala Bhimapala etc unbroken to as far as or earlier than 730 AD It is also remarkable that Rajatrangini and all other sources refer to the Shahi rulers of Udabhandapura Waihind as belonging to the Kshatriya lineage in contrast to Alberuni who designates the earlier Shahi rulers as Turks and the later as Brahmins The system of naming the kings of the so called Turki Shahi dynasty and the Hindu Shahi dynasty is also similar for which reason it is very likely that the caste of the two might also have been same i e Ksatriya Thus if we follow Kalhana then the ancestors of Shahi kings Lallya Toramana Kamalu Bhimadeva Jaipala Anandapala Trilochanapala etc may be traced back to the Ksatriya ruler of Kapisa Kabul 644 45 AD mentioned by Hiuen Tsang and also probably to prince Guna Varman 424 AD a princely scion of the Ksatriya rulers ruling at the start of 5th century in Kapisa Ki pin as mentioned in the Chinese Buddhist records In addition one ancient inscription and several ancient Buddhist manuscripts found from Gilgit area between upper Indus and river Kabul shed some light on three kings who ruled in Gilgit region in 6 7th c AD They also wore Shahi titles and their names are mentioned as Patoladeva alias Navasurendradiyta Nandin Srideva alias Surendra Vikrmadiyta Nandin and Patoladeva alias Vajraditya Nandin It is very relevant to mention here that each of the Shahi rulers mentioned in the above list of Gilgit rulers has Nandin as his surname or last name It is more than likely that the surname Nandin refers to their clan name It is also very remarkable that the modern Kamboj tribe of northern Punjab still has Nandan Nandi.
Link for further Information

Know wales
Wales ( Cymru) is a Country that is Part of the United Kingdom and the island of Great Britain, Bordered by England to its east and the Atlantic Ocean and Irish Sea to its west. It has a population of three million, and a total area of 20,779 km2 (8,023 sq mi). Wales has over 1,200 km (750 mi) of coastline, including its Offshore Islands; the largest, Anglesev, is also the largest island in the Irish Sea. Wales is largely mountainous, with its highest peaks in the north and central areas, especially in Snowdonia, which contains snowdown, its highest summit.

The Anglo –Saxon word for ‘foreign’ or ‘foreigner’ was Waelisc and a ‘foreign(er’s) land’ was called W?alas. The modern English forms of these words with respect to the modern country are Welsh (the people) and Wales (the land), respectively.
Historically in Britain the words were not restricted to modern Wales or to the Welsh but were used indiscriminately to refer to anything that the Anglo-Saxons associated with Celtic Britains, including other foreign lands (e.g., Cornwall), places once associated with Celtic Britons (e.g., Walworth in County Durham and Walton in West yorkshire), the surnames of people (e.g., Walsh and Wallace) and various other things that were once new and foreign to the Anglo-Saxons (e.g., the walnut). None of these historic usages is necessarily connected to Wales or the Welsh.
The Anglo-Saxon words are derived from the same germanic root (singular Walh, plural Walha), applied to Italic and celtic peoples and places, that has provided modern names for continental lands (e.g.,Wallania and Wallachia) and peoples (e.g., the Vlachs via a borrowing into Old church Slavanic), none of which has any connection to Wales or the Welsh.
(Now you should understand Vallace people who faught against Macedonia after Alexander’s Invasion on Indian borders.Once they were called King of India…It is History and not myth.)

Link to wales

Walha/Walh people are real clue to Capisa. They know their ancient Seat Waihind. The sirname “Abbott” is clue to “Udabhandapura”. They know it. They know it…..!
I appeal you to believe that they were our saviours and not Invaders.
Our “Jai Hind” “Jai Hind” shoutings put “Wahe Hind” “Wahe Hind” in deep Margins.

—————————————
At the end of reasearch

Present British dynasty
Ruler of Kabul Hindushahi

Now we know that Kuninda and Katyuri rulers of Devbhumi ruled up to Kabul and Kandhar . “Barhat” who founded Kabulshahi Hindushahi dynasty was Burhaditya….! Deity of Katarmal sun temple. Because now we know that the word ” Saxon ” ( Sah ) has connection with Kabul . Shah rulers also ruled Dhar and Devbhumi. That saxons have roots in name of Indra … “Saksanaye”. Evrything proves that present British dynasty is ancient ruler of Kabul …and Almora. Look when Kabulshahi dynasty departed they gave kingdom to Brahmin ruler “Kallar” and they departed .When Katyuris departed from Almora they also gifted land of Almora to Gujarati Bhrahmin Shri chand Tiwari. The Katyuri Dynasty founded by Vasudevrai. Kabulshahi and Almora both had same dynasty rulers.

One site mentions that Original name of Kapisa was Kasyapapura…Most Indian claim that they belong to Kashyap Gotra.

Link that explains Kasyapapur /Kapisa

BOOK LINK TO “Encyclopaedia of Ancient Indian Geography: Kasî – Z, Volume 2″
edited by Subodh Kapo (Page 367-68) WILL explain you the term. Then the term Caspian ?

Vasudevrai came in form of Viceroy

Means Almora ,Kabul and Britain had same ruling line. European history says that the people who faught against Macedonia and Greece ..reached up to Britain . Means Kabul and Almora faught against Macedonia . The defender of Bharatvarsha reached upto Britain and Came to their motherland in time of Crisis?We did not recognise our Sanatan defenders..who has history of Sheding Blood for cause of Bharatvarsha . Even nobody from us looked at similarity Between Goddess Britania and Bharatmata. They created replica of Bharat..ancient DEvbhumi on Britishland ..but none of us could recognise that replica .language problem ever put hurdles in their way. We believed them Robbers…and History took ” u ” turn. We closed the doors behind them . In fact we nenver looked at history of our Devbhumi.

The present British Dynasty is called windsor Dynasty…the word has roots in Wettin ..and that way ancient Wyrtgeorn dynasty of England (Indra land). Do you know what “Wyrtgeorn” or “Vrtraghne” means ? Indra was called “Vrtraghne” after he slained Vritra ,son of mother Danu . OR THEY REMEMBER WAIGUL VALLEY?

Link to my another article that explains everything about “Wyrtgeorn” / “Vrtraghne” /Widsor …!

Link to my another article

Believe me they are true defenders of Bharatvarsha . Not only that..They are Sanatan defenders of Bharatvarsha . By throwing them out now, ourselves disconnected with our owm history.

Surprisingly nobody from us ever tried to search out Kabulshahi ruler ,the true defender of Gate way of India. We forgot him in Turmoil and even after that nobody from us tried to search him out. True Bharatvarsha is only there in the soul of kabulshahi ruler. He Faught …faught and ..faught ! But We forget him as we forget Gate way of India ..Bomboret too.

We peole of India forget rulers of Almora and Kabul..but half of the world know the truth. So Nitsche’s madmen shouted ” God is dead ..we evrybody killed Him..!

Who betrayed whom ?

Now I can not resist to ask you quetion ? Who betrayed whom ? God beteyed us or we betrayed Gods? Vasudevrai betrayed us ? or We betrayed Viceroy (Vasudevrai )?

Posted in A Book - There was Ram | Leave a comment

Chapter -9 : First blood (The Missing Chapter) – Balond Badri / Chalta badri / Bolgios – Brennus / Anadhra VIshnu

“Despite serious loses , they resisted strongly until Brennus fell wounded.They retreated stubbornly , killing their wounded rather than leaving them to the mercy of the Greeks. The earth is said to have trembled again that night.Celtic losses amounted to over 25000 dead. In despreation Brennus took his own life.”

– Stephen Allen (Lords of battle: the world of the Celtic warrior )

Link to Book

We know that Alexander’s Invasion on Borders of Bharatvarsha had changed the course of Indian History.Largescale migrations took place during that period.In the coming chapter “Capisa” we shall also look at the story of “coming back of Vanvasi Ram”from Anatolia to Capisa . Vanvasi Ram came back to Capisa (After Fall of Macedonia and Greece )with the culture of Anatolia (present Turkistan). People of Capisa were aware of this History. That ancient history was forgotten with the fall of Capisa . And now we have forgotten Capisa too. But Islamic Invador’s historian Al-biruni’s accont of Kabulshahi dynasty still help us to unfold the ancient historical truth . In coming chapter about “Capisa” – The kabulshahi Hindu kingdom we shall check this fact.

To begin with, let us look at the historical facts about Alexander’s invasion on Indian border and how Indian origin warrior clans reacted to it.

Alexandr’s Invasion (320 B.C.)

Noted Historian J.P.Mittal gives narraive account of Alexander’s invasion. Mittal mentions in his book “History of ancient India From 4250 b.c. to 637 A.d.” that.. “During the period of Gautamiputra Satakarni Hala ( 341 B.c. to 310 B.c.) Alexander invaded India.Alexander was the son of Philip, the king of Macedonia, in the north of Greece. Alexander ascended the throrne in 335 B.C. He conquered Asia Minor, Syria and Egypt. He defeated Persia and Iran. Then he conquered Bactria and Afghanistan. In 320 B.C.Alexander invaded India.
Alexander attacked Hasti the ruler of Gandhar. His capital was Pushklavati,which was in ancient times founded by Pushkar the son of Bharat , the younger brother of shri Rama on the confluence of rivers Kubha ( Kabul) and Suvaster (Swat). Alexander laid the siege of Pushkalavati for full 2o days till it was captured.Hasti was killed while fighting.Ambhi was the ruler of Takshila (Rawalpindi) which was founded by Taksha the son of Bharat , the younger brother of shri Rama. Ambhi accepted the suzerainty of Alexander and helped him to cross river Sindhu (Indus).

Puru(Porus) was the ruler of Kaikaya, which comprised the region of Gujarat, Shahpur and Jhelam (Punjab region of Pakistan). Puru faced Alexander on the opposite bank of the river Vitasta (Jhelam). Alexander attacked Puru from behind. History is not clear that whether Puru was defeated or not .Puru”s daughter married to Ajaysingh, the ruler of Jammu. Ajaysingh fought pitched battle but killed. Puru accepted the suzerainty of Alexander.”Our historical record do not give perfact historicalpicture. In fact Indian history has got missing chapters since Alexander’s invasion.

Mittal further mentions that….
“After Kaikey there was the Kingdom of Madra. It was between the rivers chandrabhaga (chenab) and payusni ( Ravi). Bijaysingh , son of Ajaysingh the ruler of Jammu accepted the suzerainty of Alexander.
Afler Madra was the kingdom of Bahlika. It was between the rivers Payusni (Ravi) and vipasa (Beas).Alexander then crossed the river Ravi and defeated rulers of Bahlika.
When the armies of Alexander reached the river Beas , they refused to proceed further.His soldiers felt home sick. Many soldiers had already lost their lives. The opposition in Punjab gave them the foretaste of what they were likely to face after crossing the river Beas. Guatamiputra Satvahan Hala was the most powerful emperor of Magadha. Alexander’s army got afraid of the power of this Magdha Emperor.They retreated towards their home country Greece in 326 B.C.

Thereafter Hala not only restored the fallen fortunes of his dynasty but also brought under his rule vast territories. He had been described as the destroyer of Sakas , Yavanas and Pahlavas.”

Link to Mittal’s book

Sons of Turvasu

Mittal also mentions that Andhra , Dravida , Chola, Pandya and Kerala States were in Baluchistan (Pakistan), The descendnts of Turvasu ruled these states. Yavana defeated them. But they did not accept their suzerainty and shifted to the south India and founded these states there.Malyadhwaja the ruler of Pandya Dynadty participated in the Mahabharat war on the side of Pandava.(p-421). Minakshi was daughter of Malyadwaja. Panyan build Minakshi temple in Madurai.
This is the historical account of invasion and victory story of Alexander who also sacked Capisa , the Gateway of India. Bharatvanshis were the rulers of Capisa.

Now let us look at the historical events, not narrated by any historians. It is the story of First Blood of Bharatvarsh.Who ever lived and died for the cause of Bharatvarsh.Fall of Capisa , the gateway of India means crisis for India. Alexander’s invasion compeled the Bharatvanshi ruler of Capisa to go for “Vanvas” (Exile). It is the story of sufferings and grief of “vanvasi Ram”.

The vanvasi “Ram” latter on called Barbarian”in European history. Since then , Ram and Bharat served the cause of Bharatvarsh without saying single word about thier sufferings..Bharatvarsh ever boubled in their veins. Even Islamic invader’s historian Al- Biruni gave us some clues but we nevevr tried to search the further facts.Yes,.Al -biruni said that Hindu ruler of Kabul were Turks of Tibetan Origin. It is mysterous record.
Al-birenu’s clue suggest “Ram” went for vanvas in Anatolia( Asia Minor). In fact Turkic tribes reached present Turkastan hardly before thousand years . So, when Al –Birenu wrote history there was Turkstan there . But in fact hwen Bharatvanshi(Kabulshahi ruler) went and come back to Capisa with Culture of Anatolia No turkic tribes dwelled in Anatolia. Before 2300 years no turkic tribes reached there.

Vanvas in Anatolia – Ionia -Yavana
The history of Anatolia says, how differnt ancient Indian warrior migrant tribes had their colonies and kingdoms at the border of Macedonia and Greece. History of Anatolia says how their European ally tribes helped them in the time of crisis before 2300 years.History of Anatolia says facts about ,who were their ally tribes and how did ally tribes helped them in time of crisis.
The account can fill you with pathos and grief. This missing chapter of history are clue to “Ram” and his long time sufferings. Without disclosing this missing chapters it is very difficult to recognise “Vanvasi Ram.”
Now let us go towards straight facts.

link to my previous article now explain meaning of Ionia ( Aai= word for mother in kathiyawad. Anatolia is reminder to our ancient kingdom Anarta..Anarta was very large kingdom beyond our imagination)

First of all let us try to understand the term Anatolia – Ionia – Yavana .

Yavana Kingdom

Yavana or Yona is grouped under western countries along with Sindhu, Madra, Kekeya, Gandhara and Kamboja as per the descriptions in the epic Mahabharata. In later history, this word was used to indicate the Greeks and the Arabs, leading to much confusion.
Yavanas were described to be beyond Gandhara. There was another country mentioned in the epic as Parama Yona, in the far west of Yavana. This could be the Ionia of Greece, somehow related to Indian Ionians or Yavanas. The name Yavana could be the Sanskritized form of the name Ionia. Some believes that the name Ionia originated from the Sanskrit word Ayonija meaning one who born not from a (human) womb or people with extra ordinary origins. Yavanas, Sakas, Pahlavas and Hunas were sometimes described as Mlechhas. Sometimes along with them, the Madras, Kambojas, Kekeyas, Sindhus and Gandharas were included. This name was used to indicate their cultrural differences with the Vedic culture, prevailed in the Kuru-Panchala Kingdoms.
Link to Yavana Kingdom

the Vedic society acknowledged their extra ordinary skills, but kept them as outcasts. An account in the epic depicts Yavanas as the descendants of Turvusu, one of the cursed sons of king Yayati. Only the fifth son Puru’s line was considered to be the successors of Yayati’s throne, as he cursed the other four sons and denied them kingship. Pauravas inherited the Yayati’s original empire and stayed in the Gangatic plain who later created the Kuru and Panchala Kingdoms. They were the followers of proper Vedic culture.
Yavana was the name of one of the sons of Maharaja Yayati whowas given the part of the world today known as Turkey to rule. The Yavanas were therefore kshatriyas, and later on, by giving up the brahminical culture, they became mleccha-yavanas. Descriptions of the Yavanas are in the Mahabharata (Adi-parva 85.34). Another prince called Turvasu was also known as Yavana, and his country was conquered by Sahadeva, one of the Pandavas. The western Yavana joined with Duryodhana in the Battle of Kurukshetra under the pressure of Karna.
wikipedia clearly says that yavana kingdom had relation with the sons of Tarvasu. The name of the Taurus Mountain and Haley river is also suggestive. It suggests that sons of Tarvasu were ruling the Anatolia from were the rivers Euphrates and Tigris originates. The Troy colony was in Anatolia. Anatolia is the meeting point of Europe and Asia.

It suggests clear connection between the rulers of south India Andhra , Dravida , Chola, Pandya and Kerala (All sons of Tarvasu), Hala satvahan and colonies of Anatolia.
It is also possible that after drying up of Sarswati they might had migrated towards far west.

Geographical name as clue

Taurus Mountains

Taurus Mountains (Turkish: Toros Daglari) are a mountain complex in southern Turkey, from which the Euphrates and Tigris descend into Iraq. It divides the Mediterranean coastal region of southern Turkey from the central Anatolian Plateau.
The system extends along a curve from Lake Egirdir in the west to the upper reaches of the Euphrates and Tigris in the east. The Taurus complex is divided into four ranges.

Haihaya in India

The Haihayas were an ancient confederacy of five ganas (clans), who claimed their common ancestry from Yadu. According to the Harivamsha (34.1898), Haihaya was the great grandson of Yadu and grandson of Sahasrajit. In the Vishnu Purana (IV.11), all the five Haihaya clans are mentioned together as the Talajanghas. The five Haihaya clans were Vitihotra, Sharyata (mentioned elsewhere in the Puranas as the descendants of Sharyati, a son of Vaivasvata Manu), Bhoja, Avanti and Tundikera. The Haihayas migrated from the west to the present-day Malwa region of Western Madhya Pradesh). The Puranas style the Haihayas as the first ruling dynasty of Avanti.

Foundation of Mahishmati
In the Harivamsha (33.1847), the honour of founding their future capital city of Mahishmati (present-day Maheshwar) was attributed to the Haihaya king Mahishmant, son of Sahanja. But according to the Padma Purana (VI.115), the city was actually founded by a certain Mahisha.
Probably, during the rule of the later Vitihotras, the whole Avanti region developed into two realms, divided by the Vindhyas, having principal cities at Mahishmati and Ujjayini (present day Ujjain). According to the Matsya Purana (5.37), Pulika, one of the ministers of Ripunjaya, the last Vitihotra king of Ujjayini killed his master and made his son Pradyota new king
A number of early medieval dynasties, which include the Kalachuris and the Mushakavamsha of Kerala, claimed their descent from the Haihayas.[13] The Haihayas of eastern India fought against Islamists invaders in medieval times.

In previous posts we have checked presence of Pala , Pandyan ,Haihaya, Zala (Ancient ruling clans of Bharatvarsha) in Anatolia (1300 B.C.)
Trouble Zone Anatolia

Now let us go straight to the history of Alexander’s invadion.
when Alexander invaded Hindustan there emrged kingdom like Bithynia and Galatia in Anatolia.There were ancient kingdoms named Pontus , Phrygia,Paphlagonia ,Cappadocia in Asia Minor. History of Anatolia mentions presence of Cocani and Mariyandi tribes there in Anatolia.Their Germanic and celtic allly tribes tell us the story of their love towardsf Bharatvarsh and its soverenity. The missing chapter says us the story of timetested First blood of Bharatvarsh.Here “you can recognise “Ram” who took leadership of Great Raid on Macedonia and Greece. Here you can understand why “Bharatvanshis” of Kubulshahi dynasty(Capisa) had the culture of Anatolia.Yes history of Anatolia says the history of “Ram” and “Bharat” and Hastinapur.

Strabo’s “Geography”

Strabo’s “Geography” gives us clues to our First blood. He mentions that..“Now as one sails into the Euxine Sea from the Propontis, one has on his left the parts which adjoin Byzantium (these belong to the Thracians, and are called “the Left-hand Parts” of the Pontus), and on his right the parts which adjoin Chalcedon. The first of these latter belong to the Bithynians, the next to the Mariandyni (by some also called Caucones), the next to the Paphlygonians as far as the Halys River, and the next to the Pontic Cappadocians and to the people next in order after them as far as Colchis. All these are called the Right-hand Parts of the Pontus. Now Eupator reigned over the whole of this seacoast, beginning at Colchis and extending as far as Heracleia, but the parts farther on, extending as far as the mouth of the Pontus and Chalcedon, remained under the rule of the king of Bithynia. But when the kings had been overthrown, the Romans preserved the same boundaries, so that Heracleia was added to Pontus and the parts farther on went to the Bithynians.”

Mariandyni tribe
History of Anatolia says that this tribe lived to the northeast of the country and were not submitted to the Bithynians, when they conquered the country.

Mariandyni (Mariandunoi, Mariandenoi, or Maruandunoi), an ancient and celebrated tribe in the north-east of Bithynia, between the rivers Sangarius and Billaeus, on the east of the tribe called Thyni or Bithyni. According to Scylax, they did not extend as far west as the Sangarius, for according to him the river Hypius formed the boundary between the Bithyni and Mariandyni. Strabo (vii. p. 295) expresses a belief that the Mariandyni were a branch of the Bithynians, a belief to which he was probably led by the resemblance between their names, and which cannot be well reconciled with the statement of Herodotus (iii. 90), who clearly distinguishes the Mariandyni from the Thracians or Thyni in Asia. In the Persian army, also, they appear quite separated from the Bithyni, and their armour resembles that of the Paphlagonians, which was quite different from that of the Bithyni.

In the book “The Deipnosophists, or, Banquet of the learned of Athenaeus, Volume 3 “By Athenaeus (of Naucratis.), Charles Duke Yonge also mentions Mariandyni tribe.

“Will you not bring me here some black dried figs?
Don’t understand? Among the Mariandyni,
that barbarous tribe, they call these black dried figs
their dishes.”

Link

Mariandinos town
Mariandinos (Mariandyni) was a Thracian town of Bittynia between the rivers Sangarios and Billaeus, to the east of the tinios or bitinios. Segúns Scylax the Hypius river was the one that formed the limit between bitinios and mariandinos. . Both towns comprised of III satrapía Persian and the country was Mariandinia call Mariandynia.
In previous posts we checked facts about Sea of Marmara as well as Marmara Region of even present day Turkastan.

After Mariandyni tribe now let us look at Kaukauni tribes settled in Anatolia .
Caucauni and Heneti tribe
Cauconians or Kaukani or Cauconiatae is the name of an ancient tribe in Anatolia mentioned by Strabo.By his time he writes that they were extinct. Strabo says that “As for the Cauconians, who, according to report, took up their abode on the seacoast next to the Mariandyni and extended as far as the Parthenius River, with Tieium as their city, some say that they were Scythians, others that they were a certain people of the Macedonians, and others that they were a certain people of the Pelasgians. “the Cauconians were led by the noble son of Polycles— they who lived in glorious dwellings in the neighborhood of the Parthenius River, ”for, he adds, the Cauconians extended from Heracleia and the Mariandyni to the white Syrians, whom we call Cappadocians, and the tribe of the Cauconians round Tieium extended to the Parthenius River, whereas that of the Heneti, who held Cytorum, were situated next to them after the Parthenius River, and still today certain “Cauconitae” live in the neighborhood of the Parthenius River.”

The above facts reveals that Indian Mariandyni, Kaukani and Heneti tribes reached Anatolia at the time of crisis.. Strabo also gives us detailed information about these tribes.

The word Konkani derives from kum, meaning ‘Mother Earth’ and kana, meaning ‘piece/part’ thereby meaning a strip of land along the western Indian coast beyond the Western Ghat mountains called as Konkan. The language they speak as well as the people itself take the name from the region where it originated.

Link to more facts
Mariandyni and Bythians
Strabo in the book “The geography of Strabo, Volume 2” mentions that“There is not ,however, the same argument among writers with regard to Mariandyni and Caucones.For they say that Heracleia is situated among Mariandyni, and was founded by Milesians. But who they are or where they come from , nothing is said. There is no
diffrence in language ,nor any other apperant national distinction beetween them and the Bythians, whom they resembles in all respect. It is probable therefore the Mariandyni were thracian tribe.
Theopompus says that Mariandynies who governed the part of Paphlagonia, which was subject to many Masters,invaded and and obtained possession of the Bebryces , and then he gave his own name to the territorry which he had before occupied.
The Caucones who according to history inhabitates line of sea cost which extends from the Mariandyni as far as Perthenius , and to whom belongs the city Tieium and said by some writters to be Scythians , by others a tribe of Macedonia, and by others the tribe of Pelasgi.”.(p- 287)

Strabo also mentions Thracians (Bythynia), Pontus, Chalcedon Cappadocians, Galatians in his book. In fact these all people assembled for cause of Bharatvarsh . Without knowing them one canot recognise the true First blood of India.
There is reason to believe that they all had their Origin in Bharatvarsh .
History of Anatolia tells the story about how First blood of Bharatvarsh gears up after Invasion by Alexander . The description also tells us the story of how other so called European tribes geared up for the cause. Tracians and Celtic tribes migrated from Gaul and Denube to Asia Minor and created colonies at very border of Macedonia. The Great Raid and its heroes are cule to their Indian Origin. Tracians and Celts migrated to Anatolia from europe,gave shalters to Immigrants tribes like Mariandian and Cocani and faught against Macedonia gives us proof of their Indian Origin. Means until that time Zone warrior clans of India as well as of Anatolia and Europe had bondages. They were ready to live and die for eachother.
Strabo mentions that “The brave son of Polycles led the Caucones,
Who inhabited the well-known dwellings about the river Parthenius,”p page [287]

Link to Coucani

Chalcedon and Heracleia (Chalykya and Haricula?)

Surprisingly we find Satkani Hala in India and Heracleia there.

Giving geographical description of Anatolia Strabo’s “Between Chalcedon (Clue to Chalykya)and Heracleia are several rivers, as the Psillis, the Calpas, and the Sangarius, of which last the poet makes mention. It has its source at the village Sangias, at the distance of 150 stadia from Pessinus. It flows through [289] the greater part of Phrygia Epictetus, and a part also of Bithynia, so that it is distant from Nicomedia a little more than 300 stadia, where the river Gallus unites with it. The latter river has its source at Modra in Phrygia on the Hellespont, which is’ the same country as the Epictetus, and was formerly occupied by the Bithynians.
further mentions that…
Heneti tribe
“Next is the river Parthenius, flowing through a country abounding with flowers; from these it obtained its name. Its source is in Paphlagonia. Then succeeded Paphlagonia, and the Heneti. It is a question what Heneti the poet means, when he says,
“the brave Pylamenes led the Paphlagonians out of the country of the Heneti, where they have a race of “wild mules;”
Zenodotus writes the verse in this manner, “From Heneta,” and says that it means the present Amisus.The Heneti were the most considerable tribe of the Paphlagonians; that Pylaemenes was descended from it; that a large body of this people accompanied him to the Trojan war; that when they had lost their leader they passed over to Thrace upon the capture of Troy and in the course of their wanderings arrived at the present Henetic territory.”

The Taurus Tribe -Sons of Turvasu?
Strabo also mentions The taurus tribe. He mentions that….“The boundary of the Paphlagonians to the east is the river Halys, which flows from the south between the Syrians and the Paphlagonians; and according to Herodotus, (who means Cappadocians, when he is speaking of Syrians,) discharges itself into the Euxine Sea. Even at present they are called Leuco-Syrians, (or White Syrians,) while those without the Taurus are called Syrians. In comparison with the people within the Taurus, the latter have a burnt complexion; but the former, not having it, received the appellation of Leuco- Syrians (or White Syrians).”

Persian allies

“ After the river Parthenius is Amastris, bearing the game name as the princess by whom it was founded. It is [291] situated upon a peninsula, with harbours on each side of the isthmus. Amastris was the wife of Dionysius, the tyrant of Heracleia, and daughter of Oxyathres, the brother of the Darius who fought against Alexander. She formed the settlement out of four cities, Sesamus, Cytorum, Cromna, (mentioned by Homer in his recital of the Paphlagonian .

Meanwhile Cramer, J. A. (John Anthony :1793-1848) aldo helps us to understand the course of History. In his book “Geographical and historical description of Asia Minor” he explains the origin of word Asia. He mentions that ,”As EARLY as the time of Herodotus we find the name of Asia employed to designate the vast continent situated to the east of Europe, and almost entirely subject at that period to the Persian dominion. The Greeks, as we learn from that historian, pretended that it was derived from Asia, the wife of Prometheus, but the Lydians, on the other hand, affirmed that its origin was to be sought for in their country. John Anthony also tells the story of great migration. He mentions that, “it will be seen at once that the descendants of Noah, after their dispersion in the plains of Mesopotamia, would, from their proximity to Asia Minor, have had time, not only to occupy its nearest provinces, but to spread over the whole country, before their more northern brethren could reach the Bosphorus by the slow and circuitous journey round the Palus Mseotis and the shores of the Euxine.” (p-15)
John Anthony also helps us to understand the different ally tribes like Thracian ,Mariandyni,Caucones,Pandion,The Amazons etc
Book link (“Geographical and historical description of Asia Minor”)
What Homer says

I have stated already, that according to the concurrent testimony of antiquity we must admit the European origin of several extensive tribes in Asia Minor. Of these, the earliest and most nu merous appear to have been the Phrygians, who, as we learn from Herodotus, on the authority of traditions preserved by the Macedonians, once dwelt in their country under the name of Bryges ; but having crossed into Asia at a period of which we cannot now form any accurate notion, they changed that appellation to the form under which it was ever after known.(p-19)

On such evidence it seems impossible to deny the fact of a migration of these Thracian Bryges into Asia at an uncertain epoch, but certainly prior to the Trojan war, since the Phrygians are clearly mentioned by Homer as a people of Asia Minor.

Thracian-Mariandyni

Amongst these must not be forgotten that of Homer, who brings together the Carians, Leleges, Pelasgi, and Caucones, people all apparently of Thracian origin, and of wandering habits. (II. K. 480.) Next in order to the Carians are the Lydians, or, as they are more anciently called, the Maeones (;p-21)
Link to Mariandyni

To the great Thracian family belong- also the Mariandyni, Bebryces, Doliones, Cavicones, and other early and obscure tribes, which once had a separate political existence on the shores of the Propontis and Euxine, but became merged afterwards in the general nomenclature of Mysians and Bithynians. (Strab. XII. p. 542.) P-23) ”
Second Link to Mariandyni

Amazons
Pindar says that “the Amazons commanded a Syrian band, armed with spears with broad iron heads;”

The Amazons -Apsara – Abhisarika?

The Amazons (Greek: Amazónes) are a nation of all-female warriors in Classical and Greek mythology. Herodotus placed them in a region bordering Scythia in Sarmatia (modern territory of Ukraine). Other historiographers place them in Asia Minor, Libya, or India.
Notable queens of the Amazons are Penthesilea, who participated in the Trojan War, and her sister Hippolyte, whose magical girdle, given to her by her father Ares, was the object of one of the labours of Hercules. Amazonian raiders were often depicted in battle with Greek warriors in amazonomachies in classical art.
There are various accounts of Amazon raids in Asia Minor. From the Early Modern period, their name has become a term for woman warriors in general.
Link to Amazons
Amazons formed an independent kingdom under the government of a queen named Hippolyta or Hippolyte (“loose, unbridled mare”). Herodotus called them Androktones (“killers of men”), and he stated that in the Scythian language they were called Oiorpata, which he asserted had this meaning.”

Amazones were Warrior band of Women

In India we got Apsara -Abhisarika culture -In Anatolia same Amezone culture


In fact Combodian mythology and artwork can help us to understand the term Amezon female warriors. Indian ancient story of “Chitrangda and Arjun” also gives us clue.

Yes, in cambodian artwork one can find Apsara warrior having shield in her hand . The term “Oiorpata “ also gives clue in this direction.We can trace out similarity between “The Amezon” and ancient Indian “Apsara” culture .There was river Apsara in Anatolia. Shakuntla was also the daughter of Apsara Menaka.
Link to Amazons

Abhisarika – Apsara culture
A book “Aphsuaa” By George B. Hewitt is clue to Abhisarika (Apsara culture.)George B. Hewitt mentions that, “ This lost hypothesis finds some justification in the topohymns of both ancient Anatolia and western and south-western Georgia ,which might contain traces of an Abkaazo-Adyghean presence. The oldest name of the river “Chorokh” in Ajaria (south west Georgia) and north-eastern Turkey, namely “Apsara”, earlier called “Akampsis”, and the name of the city “Apsarous” in Byzantine Lazica.

Book link (Aphsuaa)

They still remember their Warrior ally “Abhisarika “ or “ Amezons” and named a province in America. Still they respect Abhisarika culture. It is clue to ancient culture of Bharatvarsha. Even Arjuna took help of Apsara warriors during his carrier as warrior. How can we forget Chitrangada?

The Chaldoi – Chola or Chalukya?
The Chalybes or Chaldoi were a tribe of Classical Antiquity credited with the invention of ferrous metallurgy.
They settled in north Anatolia known as Chaldia near the shores of the Black Sea, from the Halys to Pharnakeia and Trabzon in the east and as far south as Eastern Anatolia.
The main sources for the history of the Chaldoi are accounts from classical authors, including Homer, Strabo, and Xenophon. The Chaldoi/Chalybes, Mossynoikoi, and Tubal/Tabal/Tibareni, are counted among the first ironsmith nations by classical authors. In Roman times, the Chaldaei (homonymous but unrelated to the Semitic Chaldeans) and Chalybes are mentioned by Plutarch

(Lucull. c. 14) as settling in Pontic Cappadocia, or the Pontus Cappadocicus section of the Roman province of Pontus.
, the tribe’s name in Greek, means “tempered iron, steel”, a term that passed into Latin as chalybs, “steel”. Sayce derived the Greek name Chalybe from Hittite Khaly-wa, “land of Halys”.
In the book “WORLD VEDIC HERITAGE A HISTORY OF HISTORIES ( Volume II )”, P. N. OAK , the founder President Institute For Rewriting World History speculate Chaolas culture precence in europe. He mentions that, “
like a broken sentence with missing words, scattered bits of evidence indicate that a Sanskrit-speaking Chola dynasty ruled the world (or a very large part of It) In the post-Mahabharat era. In Dm But fin Malaysia) we have Kuala Lumpur which derives a name from the Cholas (as exploined earlier). In the British lain is Cholomondeley, also commemorating the away of the Choles. Sno “Ch” Is pronounced as “K” and also bj ‘Kh’ It should br apiMirrnl that the Kelt s and Kholdeans alias Chaldeans also signify Choldltm and CholUc people I, e. those of the Chola kingdom. The Chola. a Sanskrit -speaking Indian dynasty of known ancient history seems lo bo a luler sprout or remnant of on earlier Chola dynasty which h«ld worldwide sway.” (page – 737)

Link to the P.N.Oak’s Book

Their Allies from so called European land

After looking at the story of migrated Indian tribes, now let us look at their ally tribes, migrated from gaul and Danube to help in the time of crisis. To begin with let us look at the facts , what citizens of Heracleia did for the neighbouring Mariandynis.

George Grote mentions in his book “History of Greece, Volume 9” that ,”The citizens of Heracleia had reduced in to dependence considerable portion of the neighbouring Mariandynis , and held them in relation resembling that of the natives of Esthonia and Livonia to the German colonies in the Baltic.”(p- 165)

Yes, their first ally was the kingdom of Bithynia. Bithynia took leadership of Great Raid and it is clue to present day Britain.

Bithynia
Nigel Guy Wilson in his book “Encyclopedia of ancient Greece” says that, “Bithynia , the Region of northwest Asia Minor
Bordering the sea of Marmara,the straits of Bosporus, and the southern Shores of the Black sea,and situated opposite Constantinople (Istanbul),Bithynia is today part of Turky , and welknown for its Byzantine fortifications and churches. Though mountainous and densely forested ,it was one of the most prosporous region of Asia Minor.It was blessed with fine harbours,fertile valleys,and suplies of marble.As a corridor between Europe and inner Anatolia ,Bithynia was situated in a strategic yet vulnerable position between east and west.”

Bithynia in Anatolia

Bythynia took leadership of War against Macedonia and Greece


“Bithynia was named after the Bithyni, one of the warlike indo-European tribes that had immigrated from Thrace during the latter part of second mellanioum B.c. In 560 B.C. the land was conquered by the king of Lydia ,but it fell under the hands of Persians when they latter coquered Lydia four years latter. It was occupied by Alexander the Great in 334 B.C. But Bithynians regained their indipendence under leadership of Zipoetes in the early third century B.C. His son Nicomedes 1 established the first dynasty of Bithynian kings and ruled from 278 to 250 B.C. He founded Nicomedia (modern Izmit) and made it his capital.”

Link to Book (“Encyclopedia of ancient Greece)

Nicomedes invited into Anatolia the warlike celts who were subsequently setteled in Galatia. This led to turbulent conditon in the land for many years thereafter. These kings founded cities and promoted Greek culture. Its notable rulers were Prusias 1( 237 -192 B.C.), Prusias 2 ( 192 -148 B.C.),Nicomedes 2 ( 142 – 91 B.C.),Nicomedes 3 ( 91-74 B.C.). The last mentioned was close ally of Romans , and on his death he bequearthed his kingdom to Rome.

Link to Bythinia

Bithynia and Constantine
Bithynia was home of some well-known scientists and writters, such as Hipparchus of Nicaca and Arrian of Nicomedia. It was also the temporary residence of the Latin author Catullus and Suctonius,as well as the younger Pliny. Helena the mother of Emperor Constantine , came from Bythia.The Octophorus or eightman litter,was particulajly assotiated with the Bithynian Kings.
Link to Bithynia

Here we have to remember that Constantine was the first Roman king who adopted Christianity. They might have lost the hope that Hindutva will come back in Bhratvarsha again.

Celts in Britain

Charles Arnold-Baker also gives historical facts about Celts. In his book “The companion to British history”Charles mentions that ,”Romans and Greek writers used word celt for several interrelated tribes inhabiting Transalpine Europe and Peninsula (Galetia) . They or their aristocracy were tall , strong and blonde. They invaded Italy in 400 B.C. and settled Po valley, thereafter called Cisalpine Gaul. They sacked Delphi in 297 B.C. and colonised northern Asia Minor (Galatia) in 276 B.c. Early in the 1st centu. B.c. teutonic pressure drove many across Rhyne; there was extensive migration to Britain, which by Caeser’s time was a Celtic spesking country with , in some parts , local branches of the Celtic tribes.”( p-260)

“Celtic Britain” the book by Lloyd Robert Laing narrates the story of Celtic miggration in Asia Minor.
Book mentions that , “During the 4 th century B.c. celts raided the carpathians. Alexander the Great recieved envoys from the celts of the Danube -and soon after raids were reported in Bulgaria and Macedonia.The celts were unbeatable in Balkans. In 297 B.c. they devastated Macedonia , which only half a century previously had been the hub of the greatest Empire the ancient world had known,and under Akishorius and another Brennus penetrated Tessaly. At Thermopylae they mat the Athenians just as the Persians had done over two centuries before.Their advance was not halted, and the warlike “Volcae Tectosages” pillaged Delphi, the sacred shrine of Apollo and Pythoness.
Celts now hired themselves out as mercenaries to any to hellenistic princeling who could afford their price. Celtic soldiers became common place in Greek armies. King Nikomedes of Bythinia ( now in Turkey) invited 20000 celts into Asia Minor, but the plan get awry, for these celts imposed a rule of terror on the Greek cities.In 270 B.c. celts were given territory near Ankara. This became the kingdom of Galatia (note : the name is similar to Galatia of spain)
Arianism

Celtic terrorism in the eastern Mediterranean came to an end around 244 B.c.,when they were defeated first by Antigonas Gonatas in Macedon and then by Attalos of Pergamon in Turkey.”(p- 7-8)

Link to Baker’s Book

Yes, Ankara became capital of Galatia.The city was then known as Ancyra. It is being said that though paganism was probably tottering in Ancyra in Clement’s day, it may still have been the majority religion. During the middle of the 4th century, Ancyra was involved in the complex theological disputes over the nature of Christ, and a form of Arianism seems to have originated there.

Now let us see what wikipedia says about Galatia.

Celtic Galatia
Their second ally was celtic Galatia.An ancient country of central Asia Minor in the region surrounding modern Ankara, Turkey. Settled by Celtic tribes in the third century B.C., it became a Roman province in 25 B.C. They migrated from Europe at invitation of king of Bithynia.

Bull symbol of Galatia

Galatia and Kalachuri both had “Vrishbha” as their emblem. They were worshiper of Bull

“Ancient Galatia was an area in the highlands of central Anatolia in modern Turkey. Galatia was named for the immigrant Gauls from Thrace (cf. Tylis), who settled here and became its ruling caste in the 3rd century BC, following the Gallic invasion of the Balkans in 279 BC. It has been called the “Gallia” of the East, Roman writers calling its inhabitants “Galli” (“Gauls”).

The Galatians were in their origin a part of the great Celtic migration which invaded Macedon, led by Brennus. The original Celts who settled in Galatia came through Thrace under the leadership of Leotarios and Leonnorios circa 270 BC. Three tribes comprised these Celts, the Tectosages, the Trocmii, and the Tolistobogii.

The invaders came at the invitation of Nicomedes I of Bithynia, who required help in a dynastic struggle against his brother. Three tribes crossed over from Thrace to Asia Minor. They numbered about 10,000 fighting men and about the same number of women and children, divided into three tribes, Trocmi, Tolistobogii and Tectosages.
There is another Galatia in spain too. wikipedia mentions that “The name Galicia comes from the Latin name Gallaecia, associated with the name of the ancient Celtic tribe the Gallaeci or Callaeci .

Callaeci tribe or kalachuris?
The name Galicia comes from the Latin name Gallaecia, associated with the name of the ancient Celtic tribe that resided above the Douro river, the Gallaeci or Callaeci in Latin, and Kallaikói in Greek (as mentioned by Herodotus). Gallaic was the archaic Q-Celtic language spoken by Gallaeci of the Hallstatt culture.
The name has been related to the Celtic goddess Cailleach, so the ancient Galicians were described as “worshippers of Cailleach”.

Link to Gatatia

Second link
to Galacian history

Historians have pointed out that several Kalachuri kings were related to Chalukyas and Rashtrakutas by matrimonial alliances and had ruled from places like Tripuri, Gorakhpur, Ratnapur, Rajpur.Their emblem was Suvarna Vrishabha or the golden bull. (wikipedia)
Galatia and Kalachuri both had “Vrishbha” as their emblem.
Does it implies that Portugul- Spain(Iberia) was the land of Pandiyan and Kalachuris?
Galicia (Spain)
pronunciation: [ga’lija) is an autonomous community in northwest Spain, with the status of a historic nationality. It is constituted under the Galician Statute of Autonomy of 1981. Its component provinces are A Coruña, Lugo, Ourense and Pontevedra.
The Gallaeci or Callaeci were a Celtic people[1] who inhabited Gallaecia, the region roughly corresponding to what is now Galicia, North of Portugal and Western Asturias, from the Iron Age and through the Roman period. They spoke a Q-Celtic language related to Celtiberian, usually called Northwestern Hispano-Celtic,[2] and probably also Lusitanian or some other Indo-European languages.[3]
Archaeologically, they were the descents of local Atlantic Bronze Age peoples (1300–700 BC). During the Iron Age they received several influences, from Central and Western Europe (Hallstatt and, to a lower extend, La Tène culture), and from the Mediterranean (Phoenicians and Carthaginians). The Gallaeci dwelt in hill forts (locally called castros), and the archaeological culture they developed is called “Castro culture” (Hill-forts culture). They were finally anexed by Caesar Augustus during the Cantabrian Wars, war which oppened a period of assimilation into a Gallaecian-Roman culture.

The Third ally of migrating Indian tribes were Pontus.

Pontus or Pandyan?

“Pontus or Pontos is a historical Greek designation for a region on the southern coast of the Black Sea, located in modern-day northeastern Turkey. The name was applied to the coastal region in antiquity by the Greeks who colonized the area, and derived from the Greek name of the Black Sea: Pontos Euxeinos (“Hospitable Sea”), or simply Pontos. Having originally no specific name, the region east of the river Halys was spoken of as the country en Pontôi, “on the Pontos”, and hence acquired the name of Pontus, which is first found in Xenophon’s Anabasis. The extent of the region varied through the ages, but generally it extended from the borders of Colchis (modern Georgia) until well into Paphlagonia in the west, with varying amounts of hinterland. Several states and provinces bearing the name of Pontus or variants thereof were established in the region in Hellenistic, Roman and Byzantine times.” (Wikipedia)
B. C. McGing gives us some information about Pontus kingdom .In his book “The foreign policy of Mithridates VI Eupator, King of Pontus”. He says that. ““The Hellenistic Kingdom of Pontus which Mithridates Eupator inherited from the ancestors spanned much of the south coast of the black sea from Amastris in the west at least as far as Pharnaceia in the east. It was bounded inland by Armenia Minor in the east. Strabo gives its name as “Pontus” or Cappadocia on the Pontus, while its neighbour to the south was known as Cappadosia on the Taurus.”

Yes ,There was Pandiyan Dynasty in south India .The word Pandya is derived from the Tamil word “Pandi” meaning bull. Ancient Tamils, considered the bull as a sign of masculinity and valor. Pandya became the epithet of the first Pandyan king of Madurai, Kulasekharan Pandya as he was built like a bull. It was used as an epitome of masculinity. His son, the second king of Madurai, the legendary Malayadwaja Pandya who sided with the Pandavas and took part in the Kurukshetra is described as follows in Karna Parva.
“Although knowing that the shafts(arrows) of the high souled son of Drona employed in shooting were really inexhaustible, yet Pandya, that bull among men, cut them all into pieces”

One can look at the similarity between Pontus and Pandiyan kings of south India. There is logical support for this sort of presumption. Pandi means Bull in tamil tradition, and the tradition of bull -fighting has its roots in Pandian tradition. And tradition of Bull -fighting still prevails in Portugul and Spain. This tradition does not give us clue to understand the missing chapter of History?
Rome -Italy
Latter on celtis tribes migrated from Anatolia to Italy and established their kingdom there.Hallstatt and their La Tene Cultures of switzerland, Mediolanum (modern Milan) and Piedmont kingdom of ancient Italy tells us further story of migration.

Full text of “Pontus and Its Neighbours: The First Mithridatic War” , the book by S. A. COOK, and F. E. ADCOCK also Gives detailed accont of Pontus and its culture..
Book mentions that…“There is the eastern interior, which has for its home waters the landlocked Black Sea, once an Iranian, Scytho-Persian lake, and which looked to the East and lived the life of the neighbouring Oriental monarchies 1 . Of this part (which also included Armenia, Commagene, Galatia, Lycaonia and a part of Phrygia) Pontus or Pontic Cappadocia, the nucleus of the Mithridatic empire, and Great or Tauric Cappadocia form the western sector.
Even after Alexander, these Eastern-Anatolian fragments of the Persian empire remained closely connected with the East, with the Seleucid empire and also with that of Parthia, and absorbed very little Greek life and civilization.”
Book mentions that there was temple of “Ma” in Pontus.

Link to cook’s Book

The Taurians ( The sons of Tarvasu?)

Herodotus provided a brief description of the territory occupied by the Taurians tribe. In his words, this mountainous area projects into Pontos (Black Sea) and is located in between of Kerkinitis and Rocky Chersonesos, that is to say, if one uses modern toponyms, between the city of Yevpatoriya and Kerch peninsula.
here are few hypotheses for the origins of the ethnonym Taurians and toponym Taurica (as the Crimean peninsula was called in the Classical period), and none of them can be considered proven. For a long time, Mikhail Rostovtsev’s hypothesis was dominating, according to which Taurians was a Graecized form of some indigenous word with similar pronunciation. In other words, the Greeks heard how the Taurians called themselves. This word sounding reminded them their own, Greek word tauroi (literally “bulls”), and the population of the peninsula received their Greek name in this way.

Note– There was Taurus mountain, Origin of River Tigris and Ufratis as well as Troy (Truva) colony in Anatolia. It suggests the strong presense of Turvasu , The son of Yayati.
There is similarity between the words like -Taurus, Bull, Pandiyan and Pontus. The symbolic words reminds us of Pandian kingdom of South India .

In fact The history of Herodotus, Volume 2 By Herodotus tells us the true story of Affinities between all these tribes.Narrating contigents of the army of XerXes Herodotus mentions that ..

“ The Indians who wore Garments of cotton and had bows and arrows of cane pointed with iron were commanded by Pharnazathers the son of Artiabates. …The Parthians, Chorasmians, sogadians, Gandarians and Dadicae appeared in the same arms and clothings.”(p- 151)
Link to history of Herodotus
“ Eastern Ethopians (for two kinds serveed in the expedition) were stationed with Indians , and did not at all differ from the others in forms but in their language and in their hair.They were clothed in skins of lion and panthers.”(p-152)

“The Paphlagonians wore woven helmets, and carried small shields and large spears. On their foot they wore shoes after the manner of their country. The ligyes, Mitieni and the Mariandyni , with those Syrians who by the Persians are called Cappadocians marched into the same dress as Paphlagonians. ”(p-153)
“Thracians marched with their heads covered with a cap made of skin of Foxes and around thier bodies they wore tunics. They have gone under the name of Bythinians eversince they crossed over to Asia. These Asiatic Thracians were commanded by Bassaces the son of Artabanus.”(p-153)
“The Chalybes carried small bucklers composed of untanned hides, and each had two Javelins fit for hunting wolves, and a helmet of brass, having the ears and horns of the ox of the same metal. They have an oracle of Mars in their country.”(p-154)

“A classical dictionary: containing an account of the principal proper names” By Charles Anthon also says that, “Ligyes, the people of Asia , mentioned by Herodotus. Historian informs ud that the Ligyes , the Matieni, the Mariandyni and the Cappadocians had the same kind of arms, and that the Ligyes, Mariandyni and Cappadocians as forming part of the army of Xerxes , where under the same commander.”(p-744)

link to Charles Anthon’s Book

These were the migrated Indian teribes as well as their allies who migrated on European land previously. But we cannot finish here without mentioning graeat Warrior and Heroes of the campaign against Macedonia and Greece.

Brennus

“Celtic Warrior: 300 BC-AD 100” also gives accont of fierce celtic warriors and their Wars. Author Stephen Allen mentions in the book that , “ It is known that Alexander the Great established friendly relations with celts in the Balkan before embarking upon his campaign in Asia, and that he recieved celtic delegation in Babylon after the defeat of the persians. What encouraged the celts to continue their mass migration into Macedonia in the early 3rd B.c. is uncertain .Possibly it was turmoil that followed the break up of Alexander’s empire.The Greek author Pausanias hints at this :
“It was that Brennus strongly urged campaign against Greece, enlarging on the weakness of the Greece at the time ,on the wealth of greek states and on the even greater wealth in the sanctuaries.”
Brennus won the arguments and led his army to plunder Delphi, the greatest of all the Greek sanctuaries. Shortly afterwards three celtic tribes crossed the Hellespont in to Asia Minor where they settled in the area around now what is now Ankara.”(p-6)
Book link (“Celtic Warrior: 300 BC-AD 100”)

Bolgios,Brennus ,the great warriors and “Volcae Tectosages”, the confederation of Celtic tribes are worth mentioning.Without paying elegy to these people the chapter will remain empty.

Although Celtic bands probably had penetrated into northern Italy from earlier times, the year 400 BC is generally accepted as the approximate date for the beginning of the great invasion of migrating Celtic tribes whose names Insubres, Boii, Senones, and Lingones were recorded by later Latin historians. Rome was sacked by Celts about 390, and raiding bands wandered about the whole peninsula and reached Sicily. The Celtic territory south of the Alps where they settled came to be known as Cisalpine Gaul (Gallia Cisalpina), and its warlike inhabitants remained an ever-constant menace to Rome until their defeat at Telamon in 225.Dates associated with the Celts in their movement into the Balkans are 335 BC, when Alexander the Great received delegations of Celts living near the Adriatic, and 279, when Celts sacked Delphi in Greece but suffered defeat at the hands of the Aetolians. In the following year, three Celtic tribes crossed the Bosporus into Anatolia and created widespread havoc. By 276 they had settled in parts of Phrygia but continued raiding and pillage until finally quelled by Attalus I of Pergamum about 230. In Italy, meanwhile, Rome had established supremacy over the whole of Cisalpine Gaul by 192 and, in 124, had conquered territory beyond the western Alps—in the provincia (Provence).

“Volcae Tectosages”
The Volcae were a tribal confederation constituted before the raid of combined Gauls that invaded Macedon in the 270s BCE and defeated the assembled Greeks at the Battle of Thermopylae in 279 BCE.
Harry Mountain narrates the story of their bravery in his book “The Celtic Encyclopedia, Volume 1”, Harry Mountain says that ,”Warriors of Volcae Tectosages from the old homeland were a part of Brennu’s army when they sacked Delphi in B.c. 279.Volcae Tectosages were also a part of the Celtic- Illyrian force that hired out to Nicomdes , king of Bithynia , in his fight against Anticochos the Seleucid.The celtic army was made up of 20000 male and female horse warriors. they were working for themselves until they were defeated in B.c. 270 by Antochos of Syria , who was using war elephants.”

Bolgios and Brennus

The identity of army and soldiers of Brennus and Bolgios who invaded Delphi and Macedonia should be researched in detail to understand “the first Blood “ Of Bharatvarsh.
Link to Facts
History narrates that,”Along with Bolgios ,Brennus (d. 279 BC)was the legendary leader of the Celts on thier invasion of Macedonia in the second century BCE. Though Bolgios led the invasion of Macedonia Brennus succeeded in crossing his whole army over the river Sperchios into Greece proper, where he laid seige to the town of Heraclea and, having driven out the garrison there, marched on to Thermopylae where he defeated an army raised by a confederation of Greek cities.
Brennus then avanced across Greece, where he decided to go on to Delphi, which was reported as the treasure house of Greece. Brennus and his army of 30,000 set off to attack the temple of Apollo, the ultimate goal of his expidition. Here it is said that Brennus was defeated by earthquakes and thunderbolts that reduced the soldiers to ashes; snow storms, showers of great stones, and “ancient heroes appearing from the heavens”. In the midst of this snowstorm, Brennos and his men were attacked near the Parnassus mountains. The Celts were soundly defeated and Brennos was mortally wounded. As he lay dying, he gave the order for all of the wounded to be killed, and all the booty to be burned, as the army would never make it home if they had to carry the wounded warriors and their plunder. After giving the order, Brennos drank some wine and then took his own life.”
Bolgios and Belgae

John T. Koch menttons in his book “Celtic culture: a historical encyclopedia, Volumes 1-5” that,Beli may derive from the old celtic name which is attested as both Bolgios and Belgius, and was borne by the chieftain who led the Gaul invasion of Macedonia in 280 -279 B.C. It is poddible that this great leader Bolgios/Belgius came to be regarded as the namesake and ancestor of the powerful British and Gaulish tribal group of the final pre -Roman period known as the Belgae ; hence the doctrine that Beli /Belgeos was the ancestors of tribal Dynasties in Britain. (p.200)
Book link (John t.Koch)

Stephen Allen in his book “Lords of battle: the world of the Celtic warrior” gave touchy and heartthrobbing description of war fought in leadership of Brennus against greek and Macedonia.Stephen Allen says that..
“ The Greek claim that the Sanctuary at the Delphi was saved from the depredation of the barbarians is disputed by other ancient authors, who believed that it had been plundered by the Celts before they were defeated….Despite serious loses , they resisted strongly until Brennus fell wounded.They retreated stubbornly , killing their wounded rather than leaving them to the mercy of the Greeks. The earth is said to have trembled again that night.Celtic losses amounted to over 25000 dead. In despreation Brennus took his own life.”(p-52)
Link to “Lords of battle: the world of the …

Porus –Puru –Prausi tribe from Pannonia

Brennus (or Brennos) (died 279 BC) was one of the leaders of the army of Gallic invasion of Balkans, defeated the assembled Greeks at Thermopylae, and is popularly reputed to have sacked and looted Delphi, although the ancient sources do not support this.
In 280 BC a great army, comprising about 85,000 warriors coming from Pannonia and split in three divisions, marched south in a great expedition to Masedonia and central Greece. The division led by Brennus and Acichorius moved against Pajonians.
Some writers suppose that Brennus and Acichorius are the same person, the former being only a title and the latter the real name. Variations on Brennus (including the Brennus who led the sack of Rome, and the Gaelic Brian, as in Brian Boru) are found throughout the Celtic world as the title for a king, or general.
The other two divisions were led by Cerethrius and by Bolgios, moving against the Thracians and Triballi, and against the Macedonians and Illyrians, respectively.
Brennus is said to have belonged to an otherwise unknown tribe called the Prausi. These Gauls had settled in Pannonia because of population increases in Gaul, and sought further conquests.
The Boii (Bhoja ?)and Volcae were two large Celtic confederacies who generally cooperated in their campaigns. Splinter groups moved south via two major routes: one following the Danube river, another eastward from Italy. According to legend, 300,000 Celts moved into Italy and Illyria. By the 3rd century, the native inhabitants of Pannonia were almost completely Celticized. La Tene finds are found widely in Pannonia, but finds westward beyond the Tisza river and south beyond the Saya are rather sparse.

Link to Brennus and his Prausi tribe

Link to Prausi tribe

second link to Prausi tribe

Link to word count = Sons of Mother Kunti

And the history procced further…..

Merovingian dynasty of France
The Merovingians (also Merovings) were a Salian Frankish dynasty that came to rule the Franks in a region (known as Francia in Latin) largely corresponding to ancient Gaul from the middle of the 5th century. Their politics involved frequent civil warfare among branches of the family. During the final century of the Merovingian rule, the dynasty was increasingly pushed into a ceremonial role. The Merovingian rule was ended March 752 when Pope Zachary formally deposed Childeric III.Zachary’s successor, Pope Stephen II, re-confirmed and crowned Pepin the Short in Childeric’s place in 754 beginning the Carolingian monarchy and early introduction of the Holy Roman Empire.
They were sometimes referred to as the “long-haired kings” (Latin reges criniti) by contemporaries, for their symbolically unshorn hair (traditionally the tribal leader of the Franks wore his hair long, as distinct from the Romans and the tonsured clergy). The term “Merovingian” comes from medieval Latin Merovingi or Merohingi (“sons of Merovech”), an alteration of an unattested Old West Low Franconian form, akin to their dynasty’s Old English name Merewiowing.
Clotaire’s son Dagobert I (died 639), who had sent troops to Spain and pagan Slavic territories in the east, is commonly seen as the last powerful Merovingian King.”

Great Britain

“In 1066, the Normans invaded and conquered England. There was much civil war and battles with other nations throughout the Middle Ages. The Kingdom of England was a sovereign state until the reign of Richard I who made it a vassal of the Holy Roman Empire in 1194. In 1212 during the reign of his brother John Lackland the Kingdom instead became a tribute-paying vassal of the Holy See until the 16th century when Henry VIII broke from the Catholic Church. During the Renaissance, England was ruled by the Tudors. England had conquered Wales in the 12th century and was then united with Scotland in the early 18th century to form the Kingdom of Great Britain. Following the Industrial Revolution, Great Britain ruled a worldwide Empire, the largest in the world. Following a process of decolonization in the 20th century the vast majority of the empire became independent; however, its cultural impact is widespread and deep in many countries of the present day.”

Belgium

Beli (in the form Bolgios) was the titular deity of the Belgae tribe and his name survive today in Belgium (literally, ‘Land of he Bolgios’). As Beli Mawr (Beli the Breat), a god of death, he survives in Cymric (Welsh) myhology as the father of all the Welsh deities and the purported ancestor of all the greal Welsh lineages. Still you can not understand? A war hero Bolgios become their God. It is clue to Rama. In previous post we have seen that Bagula of Mayurgiri(Nasik) has conection with Balgae tribe. Invasion on Macedonia was that much important for their history. Secondly Bithynia never subdued to any power ,not even to Alexander. I have already mentioned that Cymric migrated from Sarswati river after Natural catastrophe , which dried up river Sarswati. They are clue to Ram.
Complete Link

Portugal

“During the Christian Reconquista (Reconquering), the County of Portugal was settled, as part of the Kingdom of Galicia. With the establishment of the Kingdom recognized in 1143 and the stabilization of its borders by 1249, Portugal claims to be the oldest European nation-state. In the 15th and 16th centuries, as the result of maritime exploration, Portugal established a global empire that included possessions in Africa, Asia, Oceania and South America. In 1580, after a succession crisis it was united with Spain for a period called the Iberian Union; however in 1640 it re-established full independence during the Portuguese Restoration War that resulted in the establishment of a new dynasty and a return to the previous separation between the two empires.” ( wikipedia)

Spain

“ The year 1492 also marked the arrival in the New World of Christopher Columbus, during a voyage funded by Isabella. That same year, Spain’s Jews were ordered to convert to Catholicism or face expulsion from Spanish territories during the Spanish Inquisition. A few years later, following social disturbances, Muslims were also expelled under the same conditions.As Renaissance New Monarchs, Isabella and Ferdinand centralized royal power at the expense of local nobility, and the word España, whose root is the ancient name Hispania, began to be commonly used to designate the whole of the two kingdoms. With their wide-ranging political, legal, religious and military reforms, Spain emerged as the first world power.” (wikipedia)

switzerland
Helvetia is the female national personification of Switzerland, officially Confœderatio Helvetica, the “Helvetic Confederation”.
The allegory is typically pictured in a flowing gown, with a spear and a shield emblazoned with the Swiss flag, and commonly with braided hair, commonly with a wreath as a symbol of confederation. The name is a derivation of the ethnonym Helvetii, the name of the Gaulish tribe inhabiting the Swiss Plateau prior to the Roman conquest.
The Helvetia figure first appears in 1672, in a play by Johann Caspar Weissenbach, as a symbol of unity of the Old Swiss Confederacy in the face of the denominational disputes initiated by the Swiss Reformation. Identification of the Swiss as “Helvetians” (Hélvetiens) becomes common in the 18th century, particularly in the French language, as in François-Joseph-Nicolas d’Alt de Tieffenthal’s very patriotic Histoire des Hélvetiens (1749–53) followed by Alexander Ludwig von Wattenwyl’s Histoire de la Confédération hélvetique (1754). Helvetia appears in patriotic and political artwork in the context of the construction of a national history and identity in the early 19th century, after the disintegration of the Napoleonic Helvetic Republic, and she appears on official federal coins and stamps from the foundation of Switzerland as a federal state in 1848.
Aventicum.

Aventicum was the largest town and capital of Roman Switzerland (Helvetia or Civitas Helvetiorum). Its remains are beside the modern town of Avenches.
The city was probably created ex nihilo in the early 1st century AD, as the capital of the recently conquered territory of the Helvetii, across the road that connected Italy to Britain, built under Claudius. Under the rule of Emperor Vespasian, who grew up there, Aventicum was raised to the status of a colonia in 72 AD, whereupon it entered its golden age. The town wall was 5.6 km (3.48 miles) long.
Avenches is built on the site of the Roman town Aventicum.

Avanti was an ancient Indian janapada (realm), roughly corresponded to the present day Malwa region. According to the Buddhist text, the Anguttara Nikaya, Avanti was one of the solasa mahajanapadas (sixteen great realms) of the 6th century BCE. The janapada was divided into two parts by the Vindhyas, the northern part had its capital at Ujjayini and the southern part had its centre at Mahishmati.
According to the Puranic accounts, the Haihayas were the earliest rulers of Avanti, who captured the region from the Nagas. Initially, they ruled from Mahishmati. Later the whole janapada was divided into two parts with the capitals at Mahishmati and Ujjayini. The Haihayas were a confederation of five clans, the Vitihotras, the Bhojas, the Avantis, the Tundikeras and the Sharyatas. Later, the Haihayas were better known by their dominant clan – the Vitihotras. Ripunjaya, the last Vitihotra ruler of Ujjayini was overthrown by his amatya (minister) Pulika, who placed his son, Pradyota on the throne

Time line
War hero Leonnorius
Leonnorius was one of the leaders of the Celts in their invasion of Masedonia and the adjoining countries. When the main body under Brennus marched southwards into Macedonia and Breece (279 BC), Leonnorius and Lutarius led a detachment, twenty-thousand strong, into Thrace, where they ravaged the country to the shores of the Hellespont, compelled the city of Byzantium to pay them tribute, and made themselves masters of Lycimachia. While Leonnorius was still before Byzantium, Nicomedes, king of Bithynia, being in want of support in his war with his brother and Antiochus, agreed to take him and his troops, as well as those of Lutarius, into his pay, and furnished them with the means of passing over into Asia (278 bc). They first assisted him against his rival brother, Zipoites II, in Bithynia; after which they made plundering excursions through various parts of Asia; and ultimately established themselves in the province, called thenceforth from the name of its conquerors, Galatia (region before known as part of Phrygia). No farther mention is made of either of the leaders after they had crossed into Asia.

Link

Galatia

The invaders came at the invitation of Nicomedes I of Bithynia, who required help in a dynastic struggle against his brother. Three tribes crossed over from Thrace to Asia Minor. They numbered about 10,000 fighting men and about the same number of women and children, divided into three tribes, Trocmi, Tolistodogi and Tectosages. They were eventually defeated by the Seleucid king Antiochus, in a battle where the Seleucid war elephants shocked the Celts. While the momentum of the invasion was broken, the Galatians were by no means exterminated.
Link
More Links to Macedonia invasion
Link -1

Link -2

Link -3

Link -4
Link -5

La tene or Dash Rajan culture?

Gallic groups, originating from the various La tene chiefdoms, began a south-eastern movement into the Balkan peninsula from the 4th century BC. Although Celtic settlements were concentrated in the western half of the Carpathian basin, there were notable incursions, and settlements, within the Balkan peninsula itself.
From their new bases in northernIllyria and Pannonia, the Gallic invasions climaxed in the early 3rd century BC, with the invasion of Greece. The 279BC invasion of Greece proper was preceded by a series of other military campaigns waged toward southern Balkans and against the Kingdom of Macedonia, favoured by the state of confusion ensuing from the intricated succession to Alexander. A part of the invasion crossed over to Anatolia and eventually settled in the area that came to be named after them, Galatia.

Great expedition of 279 BC
281 BCE marks the turning point of the Celtic military pressure southward in the Balkans, and towards Greece. The collapse of Lasimachus’ successor kingdom in Thrace opened the way for the migrationThe cause for this is explained by Pausanians as greed for loot, by Justin as a result of overpopulation, and by Memnon as the result of famine. According to Pausanians, an initial probing raid was led by a Cambaules which withdrew when they realized they were too few in numbers. In 280 BCE a great army, comprising about 85,000 warriors, coming from Pannonia and split into three divisions, marched South in a great expedition to Macedon and central Greece. 20,000 of those, headed by Cerethirus, moved against the Thracians and Triballi. Another division, led by Brennus and Acichorius moved against Pajonians while a third division, headed by Bolgios, aimed for Macedonians and Illyrians.

Some of the survivors of the Greek campaign, led by Comontoris (one of Brennus’ generals) settled in Tharce, founding a short-lived city-state named Tyle. Another group of Gauls, who split off from Brennus’ army in 281, were transported over to Asia Minor by Nicomedes I to help him defeat his brother and secure the throne of Bithynia. They eventually settled in the region that came to be named after them as Galatia. They were defeated by Antiochus I, and as a result, they were confined to barren highlands in the center of Anatolia.

Link to La Tene

Parallel Historical event in Bharatvarsha
Kalinga War (262-261 BC )

Kalinga War was a war fought between the Maurya Empire under Ashoka the Great and the state of Kalinga, a feudal republic located on the coast of the present-day indian state of Orrissa. The Kalinga war, the only major war Ashoka fought after his accession to throne, is one of the major battles in the history of India. Kalinga put up a stiff resistance, but they were no match for Ashoka’s brutal strength. The bloodshed of this war is said to have prompted Ashoka to adopt Buddhism. However, he retained Kalinga after its conquest and incorporated into the Maurya Empire..

Ashoka’s response to the Kalinga War is recorded in the Edicts of Ashoka. The Kalinga War prompted Ashoka, already a non-engaged Buddhist, to devote the rest of his life to Ahmisa (non-violence) and to Dharma-Vijaya (victory through Dharma). Following the conquest of Kalinga, Ashoka ended the military expansion of the empire, and led the empire through more than 40 years of relative peace, harmony and prosperity.

You read the following Link carefully. Rani Padmavati took leadership of Kalinga.
Link to Kalinga war

Historical Clue Tara Tarini

Tara Tarini Hill Shrine (Orrissa) says the story of Kalinga and its capital Sampa. Tara Tarini was Ishtdevi of Kalinga. According to available historical sources the fall of Kalingan Empire and its capital Sampa (Samapa) in the Kalinga war around 2300 years ago by Mauryan Emperor Ashoka, strengthened the grip of Buddhists in this part of India. The then Sampa capital of the Kalingan empire, was hardly 4 km away from Taratarini Hill Shrine. So, scholars believe that Tara Tarini might be the principal deity (Ista-Devi) of the mighty Kalinga Empire.
Link -1

Link -2
With Kaing war Hinduism collapsed in Bharatvarsha itself. Budhisam prevailed in India for long 1000 years. Only Graet Philosopher and Saint Shankaracharyaji revived Hinduisam in India in 9Th century .It was Darrk Age of Hindutva.

Shakracharyaji

Adi Shankara (788 CE – 820 CE), also known as Sankara Bhagavatpadacharya and Adi Shakaracharya was an Indian Guru from Kalady of present day Kerala who consolidated the doctrine of Advaita -Vedanta. His teachings are based on the unity of the Atman and brahman— non-dual brahman, in which brahman is viewed as Nirgun brahman, brahman without attributes.
At the time of Adi Shankara’s life, Hinduism was increasing in influence in India at the expense of Budhism and Jainism. Hinduism was divided into innumerable sects, each quarreling with the others. The followers of Mimamsa and Sankhya philosophy were atheists, insomuch that they did not believe in God as a unified being. Adi Shankara, along with Madhvacharya and Ramanujacharya, was instrumental in the revival of Hinduism. These three teachers formed the doctrines that are followed by their respective sects even today.

Link to Shankracharyaji

You Look at European history . Until 1000 A.D. , Dark age also prevailed in europe.

Mysterious Kaling in Europe

For your kind information I found Kaling and Tara Tarini in Europe. It strengthen my belief of presence of Ramavanshis and Pandav vanshis in Europe.
Let us go for straight facts.

Tallinn – Kolyvan – “Taani-linn(a)”

Tallinn (Estonian) is Capital and largest city of Estonia (Estdevi?). It is situated on the northern coast of the country, on the banks of the Gulf of Finland, 80 km (50 mi) south of Helsinki, east of Stockhome and west of Saint Peersburg. Tallinn’s Old Town is in the list of Unesco World Heritage Sites. It is ranked as a Global city and has been listed among the top 10 digital cities in the world. The city was a European Capital of Culture for 2011, along with Turku, Finland.

The earliest names of Tallinn include Kolyvan known from East Slavic chronicles, the name possibly deriving from the Estonian mythical hero Kalev.
Up to the 13th century the Scandinavians and Henry of Livonia in his chronicle called the town Lindanisa: Lyndanisse in Danish, Lindanäs in Swedish, also mentioned as Ledenets in Old East Slavic. According to some theories the name derived from mythical Linda, the wife of Kalev and the mother of Kalevipoeg. who in an Estonian legend carried rocks to her husband’s grave that formed the Toompea hill.
The origin of the name “Tallinn(a)” is certain to be Estonian, although the original meaning of the name is debated. It is usually thought to be derived from “Taani-linn(a)” (meaning “Danish-castle/town”; )after the Danes built the castle in place of the Estonian stronghold at Lindanisse. However, it could also have come from “tali-linna” (“winter-castle/town”), or “talu-linna” (“house/farmstead-castle/town”). The element -linna, like Germanic – Burg and Slavic – Grad / Gorod, originally meant “fortress” but is used as a suffix in the formation of town names.
Link to Tallinn

Tharapitha

Taara (variations of the name include Tooru, Tharapita and Tarapitha) is a god in Estonian mythology.
The Chronicle of Livonia mentions Tharapita as the superior god of Oeselians (inhabitants of Saaremaa island), also well known to Vironian tribes in northern Estonia. According to the chronicle, when the crusaders invaded Vironia in 1220, there was a beautiful wooded hill in Vironia, where locals believe Oeselian god Tharapita was born and from which he flew to Saaremaa. The hill is believed to be the Ebavere Hill (Ebavere mägi) in modern Lanne –Viru county.

Taara was known by the Tavastian tribe of Finland. At an old cult place now known as Laurin Lähde (Lauri’s Fountain) in the county of Janakkala, Tavastians (Believers of Goddess Tara ?)worshipped Taara there as late as the 18th century and the church had to close the place.
Tharapita may have been known among the Slavs of the island of Rugen (Rushikulya?), where Danish crusaders destroyed a pagan idol named Turupit in 1168.

Link to Tharapith

For further detail pl look into photo gallery section of this website
Link

Means warrior band from Kalinga also part of Great Raid on Mecadonia and Greece? Otherwise How Taratarini ,Rushikulya and Kalinga remembered in Europe ? This facts make the event more pathetic. I am not sure but I read Kalinga in Finnish epic poem “Kalevala”.Epic lament for “Sampo- The world Pillar ”

Sampo : The world Pillar

The Sampo is a pivotal element of the plot of the Finnish epic poem Kalevala, compiled in 1835 (and expanded in 1849) by Elias Lonnort based on earlier Finnish Oral tradition.
In the expanded second version of the poem, the Sampo is forged by IIMairnen, a legendary smith, as a task set by the Mistress of Pohjola in return for her daughter’s hand.

n 1959 the joint Soviet-Finnish Film production Sampo (titled The Day the Earth Froze when released in the United States) adapted the Kalevala to the big screen. Directed by Risto Ojko and Aleksandr Ptushko, and written by Vaino Kaukonen and Viktor Vitkovich, the movie somewhat alters the circumstances surrounding the Sampo’s creation; Louhi kidnaps Ilmarinen’s sister Annikki to compel him to build a Sampo for her. However, the movie remains reasonably true to the original tale in broad outline, and the Sampo’s fate is the same.

Link to Sampo

Read above site that says history of our Kalinga. Sampa was capital of Kainga..near Tara Tarini in Orissa..(Ural?)

Listen to their lamenting voice

Even today cry for Sampo prevail there . Listen to their Lamanting epic “ Kalevala”.
A book named “Kalevala mythology”
By Juha Pentikäinen (p32) narrates that lamenting voice. Feel their lamenting voice before the voice freeze completelly in snow.

Link to Book

Researchers should research in this direction and dig further. But I want to give you hint. I found Tavastian (Tara pujak)Vironian tribes in Finland .I also found Viron tribes In Capisa .The tribe fought for Thousand years at Gate way of India . Viron tribe of Capisa was follower of vedic rituals .We shall check facts in coming chapter “Capisa” .

Link to Translated version of Epic Kalevala

( At the end of research we found that Garhwal – Gwydel – Gaul and Galatia are synonym words.)
________________________________________________________
At the end of research
Thracian / Tharu /Thai

Now we know “Thracian” of Bithynia look leadership of war against Macedonia. Without understanding Thracian tribes in wider historiacl perspective we can not understand Ram.

Link to Thracians history

Link to Thracian Bithynia

European History says that Thracians belong to Indo – European Group . After long research History of Deutschland (Germany) connects with Devbhumi and History of Gaul connects with Garhwal. European history also says that todays Britain is outcome of ancient Bythinia. So naturally Thracian history remind us of Tharu people of Uttarakhand.

Now read about Tharu people of ancient Uttarakhand

Link to Tharu people of Devbhumi

Link to Tharuvati Holi

MOre facts of Nepali Tharu

With above facts hsitory of Ayuthaya of Thailand ( Thai people) and History of Lau nandan (London) connected. Tharu people of Devbhumi connects history. Means Golu Devata reached far west and Sam devta of Uttarakhand reached up to ancient Siam (Present Thailand).
Link to Thar Parkar desert says the story of Drying up of Sarswati river. The event is clue to largescale migration from ancient India.

Link for More facts for Tharu people

Yes there are two streams of Tharu tribe. One Indian Look and second Nepali Look….Mystry should be resolved.

—————————————-
Then I have found further facts

Anarta / Anatolia / Atlantic

We have found lost Atlantis (Anarta )

At the end of research we find that Anatolia was carrying history of ancient Anarta kingdom of Bharatvarsha. That Shryati founded in present day Gujarat. capital city of Anarta was Kushasttali. Kushasthali ..capital of Anarta..was beneath ocean. Now is clear Atlantis..the lost Island in ocean was Anarta kingdom founded by Sharyati..son of Ikshvaku in present land of Gujarat. Shri Krishna reached Anarta from Mathura and build Dwarka on Kushsthali. Now we find that original root word of Crete was Kursawar or Kussattar. .Shryati happened to be prior to Ram and river Saryu was named after Sharyati. Pl read The detail I mention in the chapter 7(1)

lINK TO THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH ON KUSHSTHALI

lINK TO THE BOOK OF HELENE PETROVNA BLAVATSKY ( I WANT TO REMIND YOU THAT HELENE CARRY HISTORY OF HALAR THAT NOBODY UNDERSTAND..SHE HAS (NOT SOMETHING BUT EVERYTHING) TO DO WITH KRISHNA AND PURTICULARLY WITH BALDEVA DIRECTLY)READ PAGE- 259)

Kakudmi Still Live and Rule

Kakudmi (sometimes also called Kakudmin, or Raivata, son of Revata) was the King of Kusasthali, a kingdom beneath the ocean. He was the father of Revati, who married Balrama. Within Hinduism, his account is given within a number of Puranic texts such as the Mah?bh?rata, the Devi Bhagavatam and the Bhagvata Purana.

Link to Kakudmi lastsunline ruler of Anarta

You search out deeply…Kakudmi dynasty still rule in the heart of people. ya go deeper into the history of Cognomen and you will find Kukudmi there.

Link to Cognomen..the clan which rule vetican

Now if we find all these indian Royals in Anatolia..then it is not matter of Surprise.they were carrying their traditions only.

PL READ DETAILS IN CHAPTER – 7(1) of Book section

———————————————————
Last cry

Balond Badri / Bolgios

I want remind you that king of Uttarakhand are called “Balond Badri “….Chalta Badri..!(p- 102). The book link will say you tradition of Balond Badri. Then read about Bolgios ,who took leadership of war against Macedonia…They did not came back from war ground of Europe because we became Baudh and forget Ram. Bolgios then entered Britain and named Lav nandan (London)and river Tamas (Thames)…on bank of river Tamas Lav -kush bormed in Valmiki ashram.

Book link to “Encyclopedia of Shavisam”that will say you about Balond Badri.

Link to Galia Belgica (Garhwal of Balond Badri) ,will say you further story of Chalta Badri.

Link to Bolgios , who took leadership of war against Mavedonia.

Brennus : Andhra vishnu

Means Bolgios who took leadrrship in war against Against Macedonia..has connction with Balond Badri..Chalta badri….while Brennus who lost his life in war of Delfi..belong to Andhra vishnu ? It is not presumption…but research in this direction should be carried further. I appeal to historians to carry research in this direction…Sanatan religion need research.

Neitzsche’s Madman

NOw I understand what Neitzsche’s madman says..

Neitzsche’s madman Lit a lantern in bright morning hours,ran to the market place and cried incessantly…~” I sick God..I sick God..”. He provoked laghter among people. The madman jumped into their midst and pierced them with their eyes. “You ask me where is God? I will tell you. We have Killed him – you and I .All of us his murderer.”
Link to Neitzsche’s Madman ( Pl read name of site…it is fourdham uni..(forget chardham dear?)

Posted in A Book - There was Ram | Leave a comment

Chapter : 8 – Tri hari Garh/ Teamhrach (Tara Hill ) / Tramira samghata/ Tuatha de Dannan:Roots in Sarswati civilization : ThadAdagai (Minakshi Devi) / Tamizharga….Damela….Tuticorin/ Teutonic …Thothukudi / Tautha de Danan

“The name Saraswati came from “saras” (meaning “flow”) and “wati” (meaning “she who has …”), i.e. “she who has flow” or can mean sara meaning “essence” and swa meaning “self”. So, Saraswati is symbol of knowledge; its flow (or growth) is like a river and knowledge is supremely alluring, like a beautiful woman. She is depicted as beautiful fair Goddess with Four arms, wearing spotless white saree and seated on white lotus. She is also known as “Sharada”, “Vani” and “Vagdevi” (both meaning “speech”).”

Goddess Sarswati and Its Godatraya (Indra) Culture connects..
Tri hari Garh (Uttarakhand / Tramira samghata South India) / Teanhrach (Tara Hill ) /Tuatha de Dannan (Ireland)

Teanhrach (Tara Hill )

First know about Teamhrach (Tara Hill ) of Ireland. Tautha da dannan reached there in antiquity. “Teanhrach ” still exist in form of “Tara hill” in Ireland.
Link to Hill of Tara will say you history.

Now we shall check connection between Tri hari Garh ,Teamhrach and Tramira Samghata.

Link to Titans order..sons of Gaia.….Tadath Gai…

We have checked migration story of classical Indian Ruling clans towards west. But cause of large scale migration is still unknown. Did Single natural disaster compelled them to migrate towards east and west?

(1) Migration in 500 BC

Draught in India (500 BC)
We have seen that there was 100 year draught period in India. Goddess Shakambari gifted Sambhar Sarovar (Lake) before 2500 years to people of present day Rajasthan and particularly people of Sikar region to save them from draught.. Surprisingly Germanic tribes reached exactly before 2500 years ago at Denube bank . One of Germanic tribes named Sicambri , and founding of Vindobana in Pannoni province gives us clue to migration story. We get some clues to migration history of 500 BC,through Sicambri tribe of Europe and Goddess Shakambari.

But one question still remain . What was cause of large scale migration in 1500 B.C.? The real clue to world history lies there. Now a days we have lost archaelogical evidences of Dwarka ,Lanka (and Ayodhya too). Why? We lost clues to that events. We don’t keep records of major events . So in every case we have to take help of mythologies. Now a days some researchers found out archeological evidences of submerged Dwarka. Some researchers also working on Sarswati –Sindhu culture. Those facts are major clue to world history and history of Indian sub continent too.

We found Indian ruling clans in Anatolia in 1500 BC and onwards. Even Cymaric or Cymru tribes stared enetring Anatolia during that time period. Cymru are tribes in present Wales. This tribe contributed in development of Midland.They named Tamas (Thames) , Britain (Bahraich). Then Cymru stands for Sarsvati or Sindhu? They also named one river Severne.

(2) Drying of Sarswati in 1500 BC

So there should be a major natural catastrophe which ruined Indian sub continent . Some researchers say that shifting of Tectonic Plates may have changed or dried up course of Sarswati. As Sarswati dried up, we lost so many large settlements on bank of River Saraswati . Same time we also loose clues to everything written in our ancient scriptures.We became clueless. A catastrophic events dried Sarswati and drawn Dwarka . Now think about Ayodhya. Ayodhya was even more ancient city than Dwarka.

goddess-saraswati

Goddess-saraswati and river civilazation is clue to Tuatha De Dannan ( Ireland), TRi hari garh (Tehri Garhwal) and Tramira Samgatha of south India ruling culturer

We found Indian Royal clans in Anatolia during that time Zone.Shifting of Tectonic Plate might have changed geography of most of the continents. European history says that once north sea did not exist and British Islands are connected with main European land. River Thames and Rhyne had single flow. There was single flow .Natural catastrophe devided rivers flows in Europe too.

History of Anatolia says that Indian ruling clans reached Masapotamia ,Syria and Summer during that time period. Sarswati –Indu civililaztion ruined during natural catastrophe. Most rivers changed its route and Geography of Indian sub continent changed.Mountain Aravali also changed its position. Definately that natural catastrophe is clue to migration stories of Indian clans in East and west.

One sided migration concept

We ever think with help of onesided migration concept .we ever go ahead with theory that migrated people who entered in so called Indian borders are become Indian .In that way we forget our brethren who migrated to other directions in time of crisis. The people migrated in other directions remember Catastrophes and we forget the events and peoples too.Our this complex concept at last deprived us of Ram. Gradually Ram gone into minority and today we are here. In fact no migration take place single sidedly. Migration ever occure in all the directions. That’s why now a days we find Ayutthaya in Thailand and London (Lau nandan) in Britain. After Collapse of Sindhu –Sarswati culture in Catastrophic event , the people who developed Meru Culture , reached so called Masapotamia and developed Sumeru culture. I want to say emphatically that ,same people developed then Ameru (Root word of America) culture.

If you read about French sun dynasty (original Robertian dynasty) and Bangkok Ram dynasty. Then both remained connected politically. We shall go deep in these facts.

First let us look at biggest catastrophical event on Indian sub continent that compelled people to migrate far away in search of source of Water.

Saraswati Dried up in 1500 BC

The river Sarswati had flowed for millennia originating from the Har-ki-dun glacier, in the Bandarpunch mass of W.Garhwal of the Himalayas flowing through Kurukshetra, Kalibangan, Ganweriwala (in Bahawalpur province, Pakistan), Rann of Kutch (close to Dholavira) and through the Nall lake into the Gulf of Khambat (close to Lothal). The river had dried up in 1500 B.C. in many stretches.

The reasons for this drying up are: river capture and aandhi (sandstorms).
Yamuna (erstwhile Chambal) which is a tributary of the Ganga, captured the Saraswati source at Paontasaheb (where there is a famous Sikh shrine in Punjab); thus the popular belief of Sangam at Prayag is based on groundtruth: the Yamuna captured Saraswati and took her to join Ganga at Prayag, near Allahabad. Thus, due to river capture, Saraswati was deprived of the perennial source of molten glaciers from the Himalayas. The aandhi phenomenon also accounted for the submergence of the river bed by sandstorms. As the river started drying-up, people starting migrating eastwards towards the Ganga-Yamuna doab (e.g. Alamgirpur and Kunal) and southwards towards the Godavari river, traversing the Arabian sea-coast. (Daimabad is a cognate archaeological site located on the banks of Pravara river which is a tributary of the Godavari river, near Nasik).

Impact of Saraswati’s demise on the population

Saraswati had such an impact on the lives, even after her disappearence, that many rivers were later renamed after her. River Argandab (now in Afghanistan) was named Saraswati. The lower channels of the river Luni in Gujarat were also renamed as Saraswati. Another river born in the Himalayas, (one of the sources of Vedic Saraswati) but flowing down in Assam is also called Saraswati.
The demise of Saraswati, was near fatal for the Saraswati civilization. The scarcity of water forced people to migrate. Saraswati – Sindhu civilization did not vanish. There was a shift of population after the economy around the Saraswati river collapsed. People moved to east to the Ganga-Yamuna plains, west, northwest and south to Godavari plains. (Yes so Sarswat bhrahmin clans migrated on bank of Godawari in south India.)
Link for more facts

Second
link to research

Sarswati river

The Sarasvati River (sárasvati nadi) is one of the chief Rigvedic rivers mentioned in ancient Hindu texts. The Nadistuti hymn in the Rigveda (10.75) mentions the Sarasvati between the Yamuna in the east and the Sutlej in the west, and later Vedic texts like Tandya and Jaiminiya Brahmanas as well as the Mahabharata mention that the Sarasvati dried up in a desert. The goddess Sarsvati was originally a personification of this river, but later developed an independent identity and gained meaning.
The identification of the Vedic Sarasvati River with the Ghaggar –Hakra river was accepted by Chritian Lassen , Max Muller , Marc Aurel Stein ,C.F. Oldham and Jane Macintosh
Sarasvati is the Devi feminine of an adjective sarasvant- (which occurs in the Rigveda as the name of the keeper of the celestial waters), derived from proto –Indo -Iranian *sáras-vant-i meaning ‘marshy, full of pools’.
Sanskrit sáras means ‘pool, pond’; the feminine sarasa means ‘stagnant pool, swamp’.Like its cognates welsh hêl, heledd ‘river meadow’ and Greek hélos ‘swamp’, the Rigvedic term refers mostly to stagnant waters, and Mayrhofer considers unlikely a connection with the root *sar- ‘run, flow’.
Sarasvati is an exact cognate with Avestan Haraxvati, perhaps originally referring to Aredvi Sura Anahita (modern Ardwisur Anahid), the Zoroastrian mythological world river, which would point to a common Indo-Iranian myth of a cosmic or mystical Sáras-vant-i river. In the younger Avesta, Haraxvati is Arachosia, a region described to be rich in rivers, and its Old Persian cognate Harauvati, which gave its name to the present-day Harut River in Afghanistan, may have referred to the entire Helmand drainage basin (the center of Arachosia).

Link to river river Sarswati

Defy Aryan invasion theory

Keep above facts in mind and read following site . Site explains that there is no evidence of an Aryan homeland outside of India mentioned anywhere in the Vedas. On the contrary, the Vedas speak of the mighty Sarasvati River and other places indigenous to India. To date, no evidence for a foreign intrusion has been found, neither archaeological, linguistic, cultural nor genetic.
• There are more than 2,500 Archaeological sites, two-thirds of which are along the recently discovered dried up Sarasvati River bed. These sites show a cultural continuity with the Vedic literature from the early Harrapan civilization up to the present day India.
Link to site

yes , now I am not agree with Aryan invasion theory at all. We have concrete evidences now. In fact Aryan Migrated to East and west when Sarswati river bed dried up. In fact tectonic plate shifting ruined Sindhu and Sarswati civilization. Migration of Lau and kush and Pandav vanshi towards west rectify our history.

Shifting of Tectonic plate
following link syas that…..

Shifting of tectonic plates changed the Course of rivers. Was it the reason for great migration? Read the research paper patiently.

Link ot research document

Goddess Saraswati and Cymru /Wales

In Hinduism Saraswati is the goddess of Knowledge, Music, arts and science. She is the consort of Brahma, also revered as His Shakti.
The name Saraswati came from “saras” (meaning “flow”) and “wati” (meaning “she who has …”), i.e. “she who has flow” or can mean sara meaning “essence” and swa meaning “self”. So, Saraswati is symbol of knowledge; its flow (or growth) is like a river and knowledge is supremely alluring, like a beautiful woman. She is depicted as beautiful fair Goddess with Four arms, wearing spotless white saree and seated on white lotus. She is also known as “Sharada”, “Vani” and “Vagdevi” (both meaning “speech”).

Saraswati, known as Sraosha in Zoroastrianism is the guardian of earth. Sraosha (“obedience”) is also the wife and messenger of Ahura Mazda, and her role as the “Teacher of Daena”, Daena being the hypostasis of both “Conscience” and “Religion”. She also guides the souls of the deceased to find their way to the afterlife. Her symbolic animal is the peacock, whose crowing calls the pious to their religious duties. She is also called Durga for fighting off Drug (Drug, the name for female demon in ancient Veda, from the Sanskrit root druh “to be hostile”)

Link to Goddess Sarswati

Above site explains the meaning of goddess Sarswati .Now I am producing those facts (with evidences) about the people who named Launandan (London),Tamas (Thames) , Bahraich( Britain) ,Raghav (Reghede).yes, the people ,who developed Sarswati –Sindhu culture named lau nadan and Wales (Vitrahara)..Yes I am talking about people of Wales …!

Yes Cymru tribe(Which is classified as Brithonic celtic Tribe) who dwell in Welsh ,named Britain (Baharaich) , Lau nandan ( London), named river Tamas(Thames) –where lau and kush borned as well as Vitrahara (Indra ) has connection with river Sarswati and Sindhu. Now you should also understand the term “Brothonic” .Then Wales stand for Waihind ? Waihind is persian version of Gandhar,The Gate way of India? Some facts lead us towards present Kumaon . We shall search that facts and possibility in coming chapter. Cymru people also named river Severn . There is Sharda river in uttaranchal too.

Sharda – Sarswati -Sraosha or River Severn ?

There was ancient sarswati river. The tribe reached Devbhumi named river Sharda. In Zarthostrian literature Sarswati was known as Sraosha. While in Britain river named Severn.
The River Severn is the longest river in great Britain, at about 354 kilometres (220 mi), but the second longest on the British isles, behind the River Shannon (Shonn river of India?).

The name Severn is thought to derive from a Celtic original name *sabrinn-â, of uncertain meaning. That name then developed in different languages to become Sabrina to the Romans, Hafren in welsh., and Severn in English. A folk etymology later developed, deriving the name from a mythical story of a nymph, Sabrina, who drowned in the river. Sabrina is also the goddess of the River Severn in Brythonic mythology. The story of Sabrina is featured in Milto’s Comuns. There is a statue of ‘Sabrina’ in the Dingle Gardens at the Quarry, Shrewsbury. As the Severn becomes tidal the associated deity changed to Noadu (Romanized as Nodens – (or Nadi?)), who was represented mounted on a cseashorse, riding on the crest of the Severn Bore.

The Explanation lead us to explain word ( Nadu of Tamil nadu) Read deffrent named of river Sarswati ,I am sure you will realise that Shropshire and Shrpburry also stand for river Sarswati. Persian terminology for river Sarswati is clue to Shropshire

Link to river severn

The following site talk about three rivers including river Severn..
Site says that
“There is a gentle nymph not far from hence, That with moist curb sways the smooth Severn stream…”
Milton, ‘Comus’

“High in the Black Mountains, on the windswept slopes of Mount Plynlimon, three sistrs met to discuss the weighty problem of what was the best way to the sea – for, being water spirits, they were fond of the oceans. The first decided to take the direct route, and headed westward. She became the river Ystwith, and was the first to mingle with salty waters. The second sister had a taste for landscape, and made her way through purple hills and golden valleys – her name was Wye. The remaining sister decided against short-cuts and it took her 180 miles to reach the sea. The Severn, it appears, wished to visit all the fairest cities of the kingdom and never stray far from the haunts of men.”

Second Link to river Severne

Look at Sarswati and Cry
Still you don’t believe that Cymru migratwed from Sarswati belt?? Then open following link and look. Read the site….. and cry..! Cry….!
please open the link .. Look at it .Then …then procceed further.

OPEN THE LINK

The following link to the Book “Words and Places Or Etymological Illustrations of History, Ethnology and …”
By Isaac Taylor (p -157 -Cymaric) will give further detail about Cymaric people.
Book Link

Ayutthaya in East – Lau nandan in west

Yes ,shifting of tectonic plate ,and drying up of Sarswati river was root cause of largescale migration towards east and west. Ramvanshis developed Ayutthaya in Thailand and Lau nandan (London)in Britain (Baharaich)

Look at facts of Ayutthaya of Thailand..
Ayutthaya (Anachak Ayutthaya, also Ayudhyawas a Siamese kingdom that existed from 1350 to 1767. Ayutthaya was friendly towards foreign traders, including the Chinese ,Vietnamese (Annamese), Indians, Japanese and Persians, and later the Portuguese,Spanish,Dutch and french permitting them to set up villages outside the walls of the capital, also called Ayutthya.. In the sixteenth century, it was described by foreign traders as one of the biggest and wealthiest cities in the East. The court of King Narai (1656–88) had strong links with that of King Louis XIV of France, whose ambassadors compared the city in size and wealth to Paris.
By 1550, the kingdom’s vassals included some city-states in the Malay Peninsula, Sukhothai, and parts of Cambodia.
In foreign accounts, Ayutthaya was called Siam (shri ram?), but many sources say the people of Ayutthaya called themselves Tai, and their kingdom Krung Tai, ‘Tai Kingdom’.
According to the most widely accepted version of its origin, the Siamese state based at Ayutthya in the valley of the Chao phraya river rose from the earlier, nearby kingdoms of Lavo (at that time still under the Khmer control) and Suphannaphoom (Suvarnabhumi). One source says that, in the mid-fourteenth century, due to the threat of an epidemic, King U thong moved his court south into the rich floodplain of the Chao Phraya on an island surrounded by rivers, which was the former seaport city of Ayothaya, or Ayothaya Si Raam Thep Nakhon, the Angelic City of Sri rama. The new city was known as Ayothaya, or Krung Thep Dvaravadi Si Ayothaya. Later it became widely known as Ayutthaya, the Invincible City.

Link to Ayutthya

Ayutthya and Louis XIV of France

Yes ,the court of King Narai (1656–88) had strong links with that of King Louis XIV(Lawishch ) of France., whose ambassadors compared the city in size and wealth to Paris. Louis XIV of France belonged to “Robertian dynasty.(Clue to Raw Bharat of Ramayana).In european histrory he was called sun line ruler too.

Louis XIV of France
Louis required every noble to spend some time at the palace at Versailles. There he would stage elaborate performances and rituals designed to show the nobility both his power and his benevolence. In these displays of monarchical power he assumed the role of “Sun King.” Neoplatonic philosophers of the Renaissance and seventeenth century argued that the sun, as the source of light, was the proper symbol for god and wisdom. Louis adopted the Neoplatonic symbol for God to symbolise his own role as God’s monarchical representative.

Link to Louis XIV
Second link to Louis XIV

Yes Ayutthya of Thailand and Lau nandan (London) of Britain both are clue to Ram.
Again I want your permission to change book name from – There was Ram – to – There is Ram. I will not change book name without your consent.

“Sabrina fair,
Listen where thou art sitting
Under the glassy, cool, translucent wave,
In twisted braids of lilies knitting
The loose train of thy amber-dropping hair;
Listen for dear honour’s sake,
Goddess of the silver lake,
Listen and save.”

John Milton ( Masuqe Comus)

Link to Ludlow castle

Link to the Book ” History of the kings of Britain” by Manmouth Geoffery

Link to Sarswati

—————————————————

At the end of the research

Daena / Dannan / Tamil term Damila

Dravid (Dravid = Drrtavratya = worshiper of Indra- Drashtawati river beside Sarswati)

“Teacher of Daena”
Yes, Sarswati river and natural disaster that dried up Sarswati river is clue to Great Migration world over. History says that Dravidian people migrated to Tamilnadu in 1500 BC. Means Sarswati river dried up in 1500 BC. History is perfect .Now we shall Link world history with that event. Now we Know that

“Saraswati, known as Sraosha in Zoroastrianism is the guardian of earth. Sraosha (“obedience”) is also the wife and messenger of Ahura Mazda, and her role as the “Teacher of Daena”, Daena being the hypostasis of both “Conscience” and “Religion”. She also guides the souls of the deceased to find their way to the afterlife. Her symbolic animal is the peacock, whose crowing calls the pious to their religious duties. She is also called Durga for fighting off Drug (Drug, the name for female demon in ancient Veda, from the Sanskrit root druh “to be hostile”)”

Accompanied by Lakshmi and other associates, the chatur-vyuha (Four Expansions) headed by Lord Vasudeva ( Yes I mean Viceroy here)are manifest in the eight directions, beginning with the east. In the directions beginning with the southeast, the palaces of Lakshmi, Saraswati, Rati, and Kanti, respectively, are situated.

According to Vedanta, she is considered to be the feminine energy and knowledge aspect (Shakti) of Brahma, as one of many aspects of Adi Shakti.

Link to Goddess Sarswati

The term Avesthan term ” Teacher of Daena” is clue to world history.

Sarswati / Sraosha and “Teacher of Daena”

Book link that explains Danua Brahmins

“Sraosha is the Avesthan language name of the Zoroastrian divinity of “Obedience” or “Observance”, which is also the literal meaning of his name.
In the Middle Persian commentaries of the 9th-12th centuries, the divinity appears as S(a)rosh. This form appears in many variants in New Persian as well, for example Perso –Arabic Sorush. Unlike many of the other Yazatas (concepts that are “worthy of adoration”), Sraosha has the Vedic equivalent to Sarswati.
Sraosha is also frequently referred to as the “Voice of Conscience”, which overlaps with both “Obedience” and as his role as the “Teacher of Daena”, Daena being the hypostasis of both “Conscience” and “Religion”.

Yes ancient persia remebered ancient Sarswati river tradition of Trihari (Three craftsmans). And its root in the word “Teacher of Daena”.Burmese term for River Sarswati was ” Thurathadi “. The Burmese word suggest that “Thiruvananthpuram ” is clue to Sarswati river civilizatin. The Irish word ” Tuatha De Danna has roots in this words. Now remember ancient Trinovants tribes of Britain . TRinovants Tribe clue to Trivendram? Thiruvanvnth Puram?

Link to Sraoisha (Sarswati)

Link to Denube and Link to Denmark will say you further History. Danu (Danan) people reached There.

Link to Goddess Dunagiri and Dunagiri Area of Uttarakhand

Almora / Olympians
Gerry Champawat /Greeck
In above link about Dunagiri you can see word like river Gaga .The area belong to Almora district. Now read history of Gerry champawat area of Almora. At the same time read about Olympian Mythological Gods. You will find Zalarai here and Zeus there , you will find Halarai here and Heralce (Hercules) there..You will find Golu Devata here and God there. Golu Devata like ringing of the Bells.Golu Devata Kaudevta of Kumaon tribes.

– Tamil trem – Tramira samghata and Damila-rattha

Link to Tramira Samghata (Tamil tetrm )

Link for Damila -Rattha (Tamil Term)

– Irish term – Tuatha de Dannan -Tri de Dana (“three gods of craftsmanship”)

Link to Tuatha de Dannan of Ireland

– Tri hari Garh – Tehri Garhwal

Link to Tri hari Garh of Uttarakhand

– Teamhrach –Tara hill of Ireland (Replica of ancient Trihari garh at the bank of Holy river Bhagirathi stii exist)

Link to Hill of Tara of ireland

has roots in the term “Teacher of Daena”. And all three terms says the history of tribes pf Sarswati Vallry river civilasation.Amorite tribes (Tribes of Amarawati) are in the centre of world history still.

How? we shall check here. Today we are in position to prove that Viceroy stand for Vasudevrai. Today we are in position to prove that Aryan invasion theory is fack assumption. The dravid tribes migrated from Sarswati river to south India in 1500 BC ,with drying us of Sarswati .Harappa and Sindhu were carrier of Amorite culture (TRibes of Amarawati).The tribes migrated from Sarswati river still carry that culture and history.

Found Tuatha de Dannan -Tri de Dana in India

Yes Sarsawti river civization link , Kuldevta tradition of Gowda and Shanta Kuldevta of Lingayat tradition help me to find all the three “Dannan”(That reached In Ireland) in India. The link to Tautha De Dannan mentions that (1) Goibniu/ Gon-nu / Govera -The thrower of Axe (2) Creyana /Creidhne and (3) Luchtaine / Luchta were “three gods of craftsmanship”.
Link mentions that
“A poem in the Book of Leinster lists many of them, but ends “Although [the author] enumerates them, he does not worship them.” Goibniu, Creidhne and Luchata are referred to as Trí Dé Dána (“three gods of craftsmanship”), and the Dagdas’s name is interpreted in medieval texts as “the good god.” Even after they are displaced as the rulers of Ireland, characters such as Lugh, the Morrigan, Aengus and Manannan Mac Lir appear in stories set centuries later, showing all the signs of immortality. They also have many parallels across the Celtic world: Nuada ( Clue to Dravid word Nadu or Naidu) is cognate with the British god Nodens; Lugh is a reflex of the pan-Celtic deity Lugus; Tuireann is related to the Gaulish Taranis; Ogama to Ogamis; the Dadb to Catubodua.”

Now let us Look at Three Gods
(1) Goibniu = Gowda

How ? Look following links

Link to First God Goibniu (one of the three God)

Now Look at following link. The Link abou Gowada talks about Samskrit and Brahmnai Langiage that is clue to ancient Brythonic Lalguage of Britain. The same language was also spoken in Uttarakhand.

Link to Govala / Goula / Gowda (Clue to one of the God)

Gokarn Math

Link to Gokarna math will lead you the word “Theertha “ That clue to Irish word “Tautha
Link to Gokarnmath will say you further story.

Link to Kavale math ( Look axe into the hand)

(2) Creidhne / Creyana = Shinoy /Sinai

Link to Creidhne / Creyana

Link Shinoy /Sinai

Link to Chitrapur math

Link
(3) Luchtaine / Luchta = Lingayat

Link to Luchtaine / Luchta

Now read about Lingayat ….Lingyata carry priest tradition ,who has Bell in his Hand. Secondly ancient Irish manuscript also carry word Like “Vachana”.

Link to Lingayat people who ruled Karnataka

Look Ligayata also ruled Karnataka (Then who were Tuatha de Dannan?

Then Nolamba Dynasty is clue to Ui Neil dynasty of Ireland?

Link to Dattatreya -Trinity

Link to Tripura rahsya (Knowledge given to Parshuram from Dattatreya -Trinity

ThadAdagai / Tuatha De Dannan

Panyan History connects everything. Link says Pandyan were mentioned by Sugriva in Ramayana. Means it is very ancient dynasty of India. Scondly Sangam Literature mentiones them as ” Pattu Paatu”…Clearly connect Pandyans with Portugul and Pittigul Valley at Gate way of India. Now we know Presun Viron tribe taht faught at Gate way of India alongside Katir (Lav nandan) Tribe.This facts help us to connect MInakshi Devi and Tuatha de Danan. Ya In Tamil term Minakshi devi (Goddess) is called ThadAdagai….Now undersand Tuatha de Dannnan…? ThadAdagai and Tuatha De Dannan both has roots in Sarswati river civilization.

Link to ThadAgai facts (Minakshi Devi)

Link to Tuatha De Danan who reached Ireland

The Garuda / Kurma /Chatur Vyuha

The following facts about Goddess Sarswati opens up world history. I have provided my essense of present research in the brackets. Check my version of narration yourself. The version proves that Viceroy and Vasudevrai is same entity.

In some Puranas (like Skand Purana), she is the sister of Shiva (Shivaanujaa).
The original (spiritual) forms of Devas including Saraswati are present in the spiritual world:
In the center reside the deities of Fire ,Sun and Moon, Kurma-avatara ( My own version pl : Kumaon tribe of Uttarakhand, Cymru tribes of Wales and Cumbria of Britain , and Kurumbas tribes of South India), Ananta Sesha, and Garuda (My own version pl. Ramayan talk about Garuda clan of south India ,Sarswati river civilization also talk about Garuda tribe..The tribe still exist..Amorite tribes –Tribes of Amarawati know them.Garuda tribes are master of Three vedas), the master of the three Vedas. The Vedic hymns and all sacred Mantras also stay in that holy place, which is made of all the Vedas and which is known in the Smriti-sastra (Scriptures of Remembrance) as the yoga-pitha (Sanctuary of Union). (Padma Purana Uttara-khanda 256.23)
Accompanied by Lakshmi and other associates, the chatur-vyuha (Four Expansions) headed by Lord Vasudev ( My own version to Chatur Vyuha and Lord Vasudev pl :In Britain we find Catyuvelluni headed by Viceroy– Katyuri clan of Uttarakhand headed by Vasudevrai and Kattunayakan who developed Karnataka culture) are manifest in the eight directions, beginning with the east. In the directions beginning with the southeast, the palaces of Lakshmi, Saraswati, Rati, and Kanti, respectively, are situated.
According to Vedanta, she is considered to be the feminine energy and knowledge aspect (Shakti) of Brahma, as one of many aspects of Adi Shakti.

Read this link for facts about Goddess Sarswati of ancinet civilization

For your ready referense to study facts I narrated in brackets…I am providing you following links

Links For Chatur vhuh leader Vasudevrai

-Kattunayaka = Vasudevrai of Karnataka ,who devloped Karnataka.
-Catuvelluni = Vasuraidev turned Viceroy in Britain
-Katir = Kafir tribe that fought for 1000 years at gate way of India
-Katyuri dynasty = Vasudevrai of Kumaon -Garhwal

Link for Kattunayakan tribe of South India

Link to Catuvellauni British tribe

Link to Katir kafir tribes who faught at Gate way of India for 1000 years

Link to Katyuri dynasty of Uttarakhand

Garuda tribes

Suprna / phoeix / phoenicians

Garuda tribes in India are called Suprnas tribes. In west Phoenix is clue to this tribes. Ya , Phoenicians tribes are clue to world history of Eagle tribes (Garuda tribes) world over. The following link will say you history of Garuda (Eagle) tribes..ally tribes of Indra..Vasudevrai in all the eight directions .

Link for Suparnas Garud (Eagle tribes)

Link to Garuda tradition in India

Link Phoenix mythology

Link to Phoenica kingdom (they helped David to build temple of Solomon (Shaligram – stone availed durng Samudramanthan -the process of ocean churning)
Link to Phoenix (the link says that Phoenix = Garuda tribes -Eagle tribes.. that helped Rama after Sita haran- Jatayu is clue to this tribe)

Kurma tribes -Ally of Vasudevrai

Sarswati civilization says about Chatur vyuha for eight direction in leadership of Vasudevrai.
Kurma (connection with samudramanthan) were ally tribe of Vasudevrai.

-Kumaon in Uttarakhand
– Kurumbas of Nilgiri mountains and Karnataka
– Cimbri or Cymru tribes of wales and cumbria
– some kafir tribes that faught at gate way of India alondwith Katir (Vasudevrai tribe).now in Afghanstan

Link to Kumaon tribes of Uttarakhand

Link to Kurumbas tribe of south India

Link to Cimbri or Cymru tribes of wales and Cumbria of Britain

My study says that Satvahan dynasty of Amarawati , Pallava , Chalukya and Rashtrakuta most dynasty of India are clue to world history.

Link to Satvahan dynasty of Amarawati (They were worshiper of Indra)

Link to Pallava dynasty

Link to Rashtrakuta dynasty

Link to Indra worship tradition of Tamilnadu

History is clear. Goddess Sarswati and its ancient civilization connects Viceroy and Vasudevrai who founded Katyuri dynasty of Almora.

For more book reference

(Note : (1) One of My twitter friend suggest me to read the book –” Rigveda and Avesta : the final evidence” by Shrikant G.Talageri
Link to Book PDF form. The Book prove that India is homeland of Indo -Eurpeans
(2) One of my facebook friend Vikramsingh Bhadoria once suggested me to read ” Vayam Raksami” by Acharya Chatursen too. I am not getting this book on the net .If you get somewhere can read for Evidences. He told me that Hind pocket book’s edition of the book is available on Wheel Book stall.. –Thank you)

Are we rude towards research also?

Ya we are rude towards even research for sarswati civilization. The following link will say you history of reasearch about Sarswati river civilization.

Link to reasearch about Sarswati river civilization in India

I think Tamil or Telugu language still carry roots to the term “Tautha da dannan” . If somebody will help me to decode the term..we shall be very near the Truth.

Ya, Tamils who reached south from Sarswati river belt still carry terminology. Most probably we shall find answer to the Tautha Da Dannan who reached Ireland and founded. I have some concrete reason to believe this..The Term “Tamil” it self near to “Tramira”.
Link to Tamil people facts.

Link to Dravidian Language facts.

Tamilarka Damella

Now we find clue in Tramira Samnghata.
Tamil people are called Tamilarka , Tamizhara…Damela / Dameda.

The map in the following link is land of four tribes of Teamhrch (Tara Hill). They are clue to Tautha De Danan who reached Irish land founded Teamhrch…Tara hill. I am confident now that all four tribes mentioned in Tara hill belong to Sarswati civilization..from where migration story of Vasudevrai and Tamilarka began.O”rugallu …O’regan…Regini..Regan belong to Tamilarka ,Telugu..Ekshila.

Link to Tamil People will say you further story.

Tuticorin / Teutonics / Titans/sons of Minakshidevi..Gais

Ya Tuticorin keep history of Teutonic race..who reached Europe…Titans(Old Gods..Prior to Ram)) has roots in this race. Thothukudi keep history of Tautha De danna who established Tara Hill..in present Ireland.

Link to Tirunveli disstrict.

Link to Thothukudi ( Tuticorin)district will say you history of Tautha De Danan…and Teutonic race.

Link to Teutonic order of Europe.

Teutonics has root in Titans..sons of Gais…TadathGai..Goddess Minakshi. Link to Titans...Sons of Minakshi devi.

Posted in A Book - There was Ram | Leave a comment