Seir / Syr Darya/Sardar

Now we know that people of Maurya continent supproted only one dynasty ( YA SINGLE DYNASTY ONLY)  that is Hanedani Ottoman turk Khilafat. pEople of continent rejeted all dynasties except Hanedani Ottoman turk Khilafat. why? here is answer

We know now Bozrah…capital of  Edom. Edom had Seir mountain in its territory.

Now look at Syr Darya river of central asia….. Amu Darya and Syr Darya are life line of  central asia. Link Amu darya will shaw you that Panj river is its tributary of Mau darya.. Link also mentions that Amu Darya named after ancient Amul city.That is presently in Turkmenistan Link to Amul city That is presently turkmenabad. the city is in Lebap province.

Link to Panj river that is tributary of  Amu Darya.

Now it is certain that we have go deep into Turkmenstan to get the answer that why continent supported only Hanedani Ottoman turk Khilafat for 1000 years and rejected all other dynasty?

Link to Turkmenistan will say you that it is country of Oghuz turk…That is presently in Xinjiang at that very border of Kashmir. You will find Oghuz people near Hindu kush…. Link to Ashgabad says that is It is being pronounced differently in russian and Turk. 

Now look at national animal of Turkmenistan that Akhal teke

The national animal named after one tribe that Ahal teke

To know Ahal one has to know Hittite wife of Esau that Ahal..Link to Esau will tell you further story.

Akhal teke  Hourse presenty being breed in Oasis Akhal teke

Serdar city will tell you further History.

In fact to understand  Ashgabad one has to look at Ashanti kingdom of Africa.

Ashanti kingdom/ Ashgabad/ Ashikaga/

Link to Ashanti kingdom will say that Akan tribe founded that Kingdom. It says story of Golden stool story. Otumfuo was its king…One can find Bosumtwi lake here. Linlk to Akan clan

Now we know that  Ashanti political organization was origanaly centered on clans headed by aParamount chief or Amanhene. Still you don’t believe that Amu Darya remebers Amanhene.?

Ashanti and  Ashgabad has connection with Ashikaga of Japan. So subhash chandra Bose reached Japan……So Hindu suppoorted Hanedani Ottoman turk Khilafat Khilafat. Hindi Sangathan word has origin in Japani Shoghunate word.

Kashi / Kashgar /Kyoto 

Link says why continent supported Hanedani Ottoman Khilafat?

Link to Kyoto will say that they remebers Kashgar of east Turkstan…Xinjiang. Invaders form Kashgar named Kashi to Waranasi…They changed name. Link To Kashgar form where Gazani and Ghori invaded  Gandhar and Delhi.

Link to Kashi will explain you  real story….Now a days Kashi make fool Ayodhya 


BRITAIN IS UNITING FORCE

Surprisinly Britain know Ayodhya and  Amu Darya both. You look at the facts that Amu darya’s  latin name is Oxus. Oxford university remember’s Oxsus river only. I think that Britain KNOW ANU DARYA AND AYODHYA BOTH.

lINK TO  AHAL PROVINCE SAYS PROVINCE IS NAMED  AXAL VELAYATI

LINK TO CARJEW DIS. THAT IS DISTRICT OF LEBAP PROVINCE.

lINK TO RANJITSINGH  WHO BECAME  ALLY OF BRITISHERS

lINK TO DULIPSINGH WHO GAVE kOHINNOR TO PRINCE OF WALES


Posted in A Book - There was Ram | Comments Off on Seir / Syr Darya/Sardar

CHAPTER – 13 – HUN / HUNISTAN AND HINDUSTAN.. WHY INDIA SUPPORTED OTTOMAN KHIALAFAT?

INDIA SUB CONTENENT SUPPORTED TURK KHILAFAT ( 1917-21)  FOR INDIAN INDEPENDECE..WHY?

OTTOMAN TURK  DYNASTY  THAT IS CALLED Osmanli Hanedani   BELONG TO KAYI TRIBE OF TURK BOZON CONFEDERATION …WHILE  SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE ( OF KAYASTHA TRIBE)  NAMED HERE AZAD HIND FAUJ.

KAYI /KWAZULU /KAYASTHA

TWO HISTORICAL FACTS TO BE NOTED

(1) OTTOMAN TURK KHILAFAT FOUNDED BY  KAYI TRIBE OF BOZON CONFEDERATION

LINK TO KAYI TRIBE OF BOZON  CONFEDERATION THAT FOUNDED TURK KHILAFAT. ONE SHOULD LOOK AT PICTURE OF TRIBE SYMBOL.

 

LINK TO OTTOMAN DYNASTY THAT BELONG TO  KAYI TRIBE WAS CALLED Osmanli Hanedani

 

NOW LOOK AT TURKISH REPUBLIC TUVA OF RUSSIA...AND ITS FLAG SYMBOL. IS IT SYMBOL OF KAYI TRIBE?

TO KNOW KAYI TURKISH TRIBE THAT  FOUNDED TURK KHILKAFAT ONE HAS TO KNOW ABOUT  CAPITAL CITY  KYZYL OF TUVA TURKISH REPBLIC. IT SAYS THAT LOCAL PEOPLE CALL KYZYL …KWA ZULU.. MEANS IT IS SYMBOL OF KWAZULU TRIBE ….LINK TO KYZYL…CAPITAL OF TUVA

NOW YOU KNOW  KWA ZULU / KAYI  TURKISH TRIBE SYMBOLS…BOTH ARE SIMILAR.

NOW ONE HAS TO  KNOW ABOUT FLAG SYMBOL OF SOUTH AFRICA AND ITS KWAZULU KING  SHAKA.

LINK TO FLAG SYMBOL OF SOUTH AFRICA   SAYS THAT IT IS SIMILAR TO TUVA AND kAYI TRIBE SYMBOL.

LINK TO KWA ZULU OF  SOUTH AFRICA

LINK TO SHAKA KING OF KWAZULU

They invaded Gandhar in form of Red and white huns and detroyed Dharmraj ka stupa and Bhudhha monuments in Gandhar and kashmir.

DO YOU WANT EVIDENCE? EVIDENCE OF SIMILARITY BETWEEN ZULELAL AND ZULU LAND? ZULU LAND AND ZULELAL CELEBRATE FESTIVAL ON SAME DATE.

LINK TO SOUTH AFRICAN ZULU LAND SHAKA FESTIVAL

LINK TO ZULELAL JAYANTI IN GORAKHPUR AND INDIA

IS IT CO INCIDENT?

LINK  FOR MORE FACTS

 

NOW IT IS CLEAR THAT HUN PEOPLE WHO INVADED GANDHAR IN FIFTH CENTURY BELONG TO ARMY OF MODU CHANYU OF XINGNU ( CHINA). AFTER THAT TURK …THEIR BROTHERS INVADED AS MUSLIMS. THEY LOOTED INDIA TOGATHER. WANT EVIDENCE?

(2) LINK TO SUBHASH CHANDRA BOZE ( REMEMBER THAT TURK OTTOMAN KHILAFAT FOUNDED BY KAYI TRIBE OF BOZON CONFEDERATION)  ..KAYASTHA. IS IT NOT  NAZI UNIFORM?

WITHOUT KNOWING BOTH FACTS ONE CAN NOT UNDERSTAND …HOW LAND OF GANGA GODAVARI BEYTRAED ? LOOTED…PLUNDERED.

LINK TO KHILAFAT MOVEMENT...INDIA BETAYED


Hindu+kush 

To understand Hindu kush, one has to understand Turkstan… and rememeber that people of India supported  Ottoman khilafat of turkstan.

To understnd  Kush one has to undertsand Kayi tribe that founded Turkstan Ottoman Khilafat.

one has to know Kayi tribe symbol….that is flag of south Africa and Tuva repblic of Tuva. Iyi political party says about that symbol.

Link iyi political party that talk about symbol of Kayi tribe…That is Two arrow and Bow.

Arrow no.1  – Cai-phas that is turk who gave orders to crussify christ

Kayi /Khoisan /Koshitsu /kayastha

link to Caiphas of Israel

Link to japan imperial house  thakoshitsu.. and Kyoto of Japan

Link toturk  Kwa zulu of  Tuva that is its caputal  Kyzul.….

link to Kwa zulu of  south Africa ,….Africa

Link to Khisan people of southAfrica

They all are arrow no 1 and Killed Christ.

Arrow no.2 Hun / Hindu / Xiongnu /xhosa / Hausa

link to Hun invaders

Link to Xiongnu invaders of china wall..where Modu chanyu founded his army

Link to Xhosa people of South africa..Nelson mandela belong to this Clan

link to  Hausa people of Nigeria

Link to Huns that Killed Budhha

Link to white Huns that Killed Budhha

Link to Nezak Huns that Killed Buddha

–ONE ARROW KILLED CHRIST SECOND ARROW KILLED BUDHHA… THAT IS OTTOMAN KHILAFAT..THAT WE SUPORTED AND TOLD QUITE INDIA TO LAV NANDAN (RAMPUTRA) THAT IS LONDON

Hindu + Kush = Xhosa + Khoisan+ Kwa zulu

Now we are entering most mysterious part of The history. It is very difficult to know Hindustan and Hindu without knowing Hunistan of Saiberia.

So now let us begin with  Hunistan(saiberia) . We can begin with Xiongnu kingdom. Chinese record is helpfull for this search. Hun kingdom was called Hsiung-nu kingdom. Modu chnayu founded this empire in B.C. 209. Chubie, Huyan, Lan, Luandi, Qulilin, Xubu  where tribe names.

http://haverfordmwh.pbworks.com/w/page/29226858/Xiongnu

MODU CHANYU

Link to Modu Chanyu who Founded Hun empire

World History says that these hun people plundered world for 1400 years,until   Chngez (mongol) entred world arena. chngez and Taimur only attacked Hun and turk world over. Mongols attacked  Delhi sultnate…that was established with Hunish support.

How ? Look at Turkistan and Its  Ottoman Khilfat History. It says that The army of Modu chanyu plundered world even after Chngez ? Turkish land army syas that it was founded in Xiongnu in b.c. 209 by Modu chanyu…a hunish looter ….attacking china wall.

Ya, (1)  Secularism and State Religion in Modern Turkey: Law, Policy-Making and the …By Emir Kaya and (2) Order and Insecurity in Germany and Turkey: Military Cultures of the 1930s By Emre Sencer both the book  mention that Turky land Force remeber Modu Chanyu and Says that The land Force of Turkestan was founded in B.C. by MOdu  chanyu.

Link that talk about This fact…Turkstan remebers Modu chanyu

ATTILA THE HUN

This army also reached  up to Europe. Attilla the Hun says their History. is there similarity between Attila and Otooman ? is there similarity between Attari ( wagha) , Attila and ..Yetili  and Ottomon? yes it is there.

link to Attilla the hun that reached Europe.

To know Attila ..one has to know white huns.

According to Richard Heli, Chinese chroniclers state that they were known as the Ye-ti-li-do, or Yeda but they are also known as the people of Hua by the same chroniclers. From these sources there is an ambiguity that arises which might show that something was lost in translation between the term Hua which converted to Hun instead and came to be associated with the Hunnic tribes.

MEANS  OTTOMAN KHILAFAT OF TURKESTAN AND ATTILA  THE  HUN HAS CONNECTION

MEANS ATTILA THE HUN  AND MODU CHANYU BOTH EMRGED NEAR CHINA WALL

ADOLF HITLER

World today con not connect Atti the Hun and Adolf Hitler. That is irony. But surprisingly Adolf Shook hand with Japan.. its capital is Tokyo ( original name Edo)..Edojidai rulers ruled here…and world cannot read connction between Edojidai ruler and Adolf Hitler. world can noty read connection between Mejijidai rulers of Japan and Modu Chanyu. Japan and Adolf HItler both carry Hunish and Turkish history.

Link to Adolf hitler that says that Adolf shook hand with Japan empire,supported Japan’s control of Manchuria and then during world war secind Nazis and Ninja remained close hands.

Even today’s Turkestan land army says that it was established by Modu Chanyu ( Hun empire) in Xiongnu (Hun ) Empire in BC 209.

THEN WHY INDIA GAVE  SUPPORT TO KHILAFAT MOVEMENT? 

To understan mystery one has to know Hindu kush and present day Attari ( vagha Border. one has to know Red and white Huns that attacked present Afghanistan and Pakistan that is Gandhar and ruined Budhha and Budhha sculptures.

To understand above quetion we have to look at closely towards Hindu kush and entery of white and red huns in Maurya continent as well as Attari (wagha) on the border.

There were two branches of Hunas that advanced towards the west. One branch of the Hunas moved towards the Roman Empire and the other towards India. This branch of the Hunas, which came to India, was referred to as the White Hunas.

First major invasion of India by the Hunas: 458 AD

The Gupta Empire in India reigned in the Ganges basin during the 5th century, and the Kushan dynasty occupied the area along the Indus. After defeating the Kushanas, the Hunas entered the subcontinent from the Kabul valley. They entered Punjab and the Gupta Empire failed to protect the northeast frontier of the empire and this made easier for the Huns to enter an unguarded entrance in the Gangetic valley, just into the heart of the Gupta Empire. This was in 458 AD. The Hephthalites, known as the Hunas in India kept on invading India until the Gupta ruler Skandagupta repulsed them. The Hunas, under the leadership of Toramana, suffered a crushing defeat by the Gupta emperor Skandagupta.

Second invasion of India by the Hunas: About 470 AD

The Hunas waited till 470 AD, till the death of the Gupta ruler Skandagupta to invade India again in a proper manner. During this time, the Guptas had been ruling over a greater part of India. This time Hunas were under the leadership of Mihirkula (also known, as Mihirgula or the “Indian Attila”). He was the successor and son of Toramana, and known as a very tyrant ruler and a destroyer. This time, the Hunas were successful in their invasion of India. They temporarily overthrew the Gupta Empire. Mihirkula ruled from his capital at Sakal, which is today the modern Sialkot. The Huna power in India collapsed after the defeat of Mihirkula. Mihirkula was defeated successively by two Indian rulers, Yasodharman of Malwa and Narasimhagupta Baladitya of the later Gupta dynasty.

LINK  TO ABOVE FACTS˜

Link to Mihirkula that plundered Budhha heritage and Sculpture

Link to Toraman...Toraman

They plundered Budhha heritage and Dharm Raj ka stupa..etc.

WHITE HUNS 

lINK TO WHITE HUNS THAT REACHED UP TO ATTARI…ONE CAN READ NEZAK AND KIDARITES HUN REACHED AND NAMED HINDU KUSH. NEZAK ARE NOT NAZI?

lINK TO MORE FACTS…THEY  HAD NO BELIEF IN TO BUDHIST LAW

LINK TO NEZAK HUNS THAT ENTERED HINDU KHUSH  INVADED SUBCONTINENT.. ARE THEY NOT NAZIS?

RED HUNS 

KIDARITES..Karmir Xyon) or “Red Huna”.

LINK TO KIDARITES…DON’T REMIND YOU AF AL -QUADA?

The Kidarites appear to have been synonymous with the KARMIR XYON (“Red Xionites” or, more controversially, “Red Huns”), a major subdivision of the Xionites, alongside the SPET XYON (“White Xionites”). The name of their eponymous ruler kIDARA (. 350-385 CE) may be cognate with the TURKIC  word Kidirti meaning “west”, suggesting that the Kidarites were originally the westernmost of the Xionites, and the first to migrate from Inner Asia.

KARACHYA / KARANCHI

LINK TO KARACHAYS  TURK ..

LINK TO KARACH...KARACHI..  MEANS THEY REACHED AND NAMED KRACHI IN 5TH CENTURY ONLY AS RED HUNS.AND NOW CLAIM THAT THEY BELONG TO SINDHU CIVILIZATION.

NOW WR KNOW kWA ZULU OF SOUTH AFRICA….TUVA TURK REPBLIC OF RUSSIA.

NOW KNOW …NOW KNOW….DO THEY BELONG TO SINDHU SARSWATI CIVILISATION?

NOW KNOW  SUFI ZULELAL

——–

Ayatollah Khomeini /Attila the Hun/AlHayatila /Ye-ti-li- do 

Even Irani Hun is also famous world. Now we know that Hun and turks are there in Japan and Xinjiang. So we can verify the facts.

Let us begin with Ayatollah Khomeini....the supreme leader and Title of Iran.

link that mentions that China wall knew white huns as Ye-ti-li- do 

More facts about white huns

Link to Tehran ….Tahrids you may be knowing

Link to Taira clan of Japan

Link to Taira no Kiyomoro..supreme leader of Taira clan

Link to Kimono Dress tradtion that Ayatollah wears

KASHI /KYOTO (KASHI)/ KASHGAR(KASHI) HAVE ORIGIN IN KASSITES PEOPLE OF SUMERIA AND BABYLON

Surprisingly all this people of  Kyoto (kashi) , Kashgar (kashi) and Kashi of India has origin in Kassites who attacked Babylon in ancient times. Kwa Zulu/ Kamallu /Kami connects them. THEY HAVE THEIR HISTORY IN ANCIENT UR TOWN OF PRESENT IRAQ. KASSITES CITY NAMES AND XINJIANG CITY NAMES ARE SIMILAR.  UR AND URUMKI..KASSITES AND KASHGAR…KASSITES GOD kAMALLU AND KAMALU OF XINJINAG ( EAST TURKSTAN) WILL SAY YOU FURTHER HISTORY.

  • LINK TO KASSITES PEOPLE  WHO ATTACKED BABYLON. THEIR BASHU LANGUAGE HAD NO CONNECTION  WITH ANY IMMIDIATE LANGUAGE. THEY ARE ASLO CALLED KASSU..KASSI..KASI ..KASHI AND GALZU.
  • LINK TO KOSHITSU…IMPERIAL LINE OF JAPAN
  • LINK TO KYOTO..ITSELF NAMED KEISHI
  • LINK TO KAASHGAR (KNOWN AS KASHI)  FROM WHERE HINDU KUSH EMERGED….KUSH BELONG TO KASSITES
  • LINK TO XINJINAG….SHINJANG….CONNECTS ITSELF WITH ABE SHINJO  AND SHITO RELIGION OF JAPAN
  • SURISINLY JAPAN…TURKSTAN ALLIED WITH ADOLF HITLER (HAYATILA WHITE HUNS) IN SECOND WORLD WAR. AND INDIA SUPPORTED OTTOMAN TURK OTTOMAN KHILAFAT.

INDIA BETRAYED KASHI KNOW EVERYBODY…KASHI KNOW ITS ROOTS IN KASSITES OF UR. I THINK THAT ORIGINAL NAMED VARANASI HAS CHANGED IT NAME DURIONG WHITE HUN ATTACK ON INDIA. WHITE HUNS PLUNDERED BUDHHA AND KILLED BUDDHISTS.

LINK TO KASHI..KASHI…NOW DAYS KASHI INVITES SHINJO FROM JAPAN BUT CONTINUE TO CLAIM RAM AND GANGA….HUN…WHITE HUNS  HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH RAM AND GANGA…THEY ARRIVED ONLY BEFORE 1500 YEARS..THEY NAMED KARANCHI AND KASHI…ONLY 1500 YEARS AGO… THEIR CLAIM ON SINDHU RIVER IS ALSO FAKE.. MAKE FOOL INDIA PROJECT RUNS SINCE CENTURIES…. HUNS  ARE PROTO TURKIK RACE…  SO ONE CAN SAY THAT TURKIC DELHI SULTANATE FOUNED WITH CO-OPERATION OF TURK AND HUNS..THIER BROTHERS…NOW DAYS THEY CALL THEMSELVES AS HINDU…. MAKING US FULL WITH THEIR CLAIM ON SHIVA..GANGA , RAM AND KRISHNA….!


BOSE /BOZON STORY BEGAN WITH HERE

LINK TO BOZRAH..CAPITAL CITY OF EDOM KINGDOM OF SONS OF ESAU

ESAU IS PROGENITOR OF EDOMITES LINK TO ESAU.. BROTHER OF JACOB….GRAND SON OF ABRAHAM . HIS COLOUR WAS RED. HE MARRIED TO HITITE GIRLS.  EDOMITES WERE WORSHIPER OF QUASH….!

LINK TO EDOM KINGDOM…ITS FIRST CAPITAL WAS BOZRAH..THEN PETRA BECAME ITS CAPITAL….NOW DONT GET SURPRISED WHEN YOU FIND PRETORIA IN SOUTH AFRICA.

LINK TO MORE FACTS TO EDOMITES….NOW DON’T GET SURPRISED WHEN YOU FIND EDO (TOKYO) IN JAPAN AND EDO IN NIGERIA TOO.

LINK TO KING HEROD WHO ORDERED KILLING OF LITTLE CHILDERN OF BETHLEHEM WHEN HE KNEW ABOUT  BIRTH OF ISHWARPUTRA

NOW DON’T READ ABOUT SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE ONLY…READ ABOUT BHUJ TO OF KUTCHH

LINK TO BHUJ.…..BAYAJIDAH OF NIGERIA

NOW DONT READ ABOUT KASHI AND KAEANCHI…READ ABOUT KUTCHH TOO … 

AT THE NAME OF SINDHU SANSKRUTI THEY ARE MAKING US FOOL.

LINK TO KOCHI TRIBE WILL EXPALIN YOU KUTCH,,, KAYASTHA AND AZAD HIND FAUJ.

link to KOchi perfecture Japan

link to Nawa district of japan

There is relationship between Bhuj. ( Kutch)..Bose. Bengal)..Bozarah.(Jordan and .Bayazidahi ( Nigeria)


SINAI / SHINJIYANG/ SHINTO /SHIN/ SHINJO

NOW WE KNOW EDOM….IT STRECHES FROM SEIR MAOUNTAIN TO SINAI PENINSULA. SINAI MOUNTAION IS A PLACE WHERE GOD GAVE 10 COMMANDMENT TO MOSES…LEADER OF ISRAELITES. NOW A DYAS WE FIND SHINJIYANG ( EAST TURKSTNA) AT OUR AKSHAY CHIN BORDER..SHINO ABE AND SHINJO RELIGION IN JAPAN. SINHA ARE KAYASTHA POEPLE .

LINK TO SINAI PENINSULA ..LOOK AT MAP…IT IS LIKE KAYI TRIBE SYMBOL

LINK TO SINAI MOUNTAIN…WHERE GOD GAVE 10 COMMANDMENTS TO MOSES.ITS ARABIC TERM IS TUR SINA

LINK TO SHINTO RELIGION

 

FLAG OF  TURKIC TUVA REPUBLIC….WHICH IS SIMILAR TO EMBLEM OF KAYI TRIBE THAT FOUNDED OTTOMAN TURKISH  KHILAFAT AND THAT SIMILAR TO FLAG OF SOUTH AFRICA
FLAG OF SOUTH AFRICA….WHERE XHOSSA AND kHOISAN TRIBE LIVE….SHAKA KING RULED HERE ..BUSHI ARE PEOPLE OF SOUTH AFRICA 
SURPRISINGLY   KAYI TRIBE OF GOKU TURK BAZON FEDERATION FOUNDED OTTOMAN TURK KHILAFAT.  ABOVE SYMBOL BELONG TO KAYI TRIBE. PEOPLE  OF INDIA SUPPORTED  THIS  FLAGS  AND  KHILAFAT. BOSON ISLAND IS THERE IN JAPAN…


IS IT LIKE KAYI TRIBE EMBLEM? WHEN PEOPLE OF iNDIA SUPPORTED OTTOMAN KHILAFAT THEY RULED SINAI TOO. EDOM KINGDOM STRECHED FORM SEIR MOUNTAION TO SINAI PENINSULA.
Posted in A Book - There was Ram | Comments Off on CHAPTER – 13 – HUN / HUNISTAN AND HINDUSTAN.. WHY INDIA SUPPORTED OTTOMAN KHIALAFAT?

CHAPTER:12 :CAPISA / KAPISA / KAFIRISTAN…! LAST CRY OF KAFIRS … ONLY CLUE BETWEEN LAV NANDAN AND LONDON?.. WORD HINDU – `KUSH ‘ HAVE ORIGIN IN DIETY OF EDO THAT IS QUS…AND NOT SON OF RAM KUSH…

“The Katirs in the Bashgul valley informed me that
they came from the west, and were once part of a numcroiis tribe which divided into two parties.One division, consisting of all the wealthy and other notable persons, went to London, while the other, comprising menials only, settled in Kafiristan. This depreciation of themselves is in the true spirit of Oriental politeness. They warned me not to trust the Kam, or to believe them for an instant if they declared that they and I were descended from a common ancestor ; for it was notorious that it was the Katirs, and not the Kam, who were of my race, the Kam being really more akin to the Russians. This also indicated that the Kafirs of the Bashgul Valley know something of the antagonistic sentiments with which the English and the Russians are supposed to regard one another in the East. (page 160)

“The Káfirs of the Hindu-Kush”
-Sir George Scott Robertson

Book link

The “Above Sentences” are pillars of present research. Frankly speaking ..fair complexion of Kafir warriors and above alarming clue WORDS became Keynotes to present research.At the end of research I also become Kafir. Kafirs had no books, they had no time to show you evidences . They were just fighting. But blessings of “Internet –Dev” helped me to UNFOLD KAFIR’S LAST CRY BEFORE YOU…IF YOU CAN LISTEN.

Today we forget Kafirs and their Gods. But Robertson mentioned them all in his preface to the book . He mentions that….

“But Gish, the war god, is dead. It was his worship
which kept Ktifiristan free for so many generations.
His blood-saturated shrines are demolished.”

An English man was aware about Kafir’s Gods “Gish” , “Moni” and “Imra”. We forget them all. We forget Kafirs and their Gods too. Ram took note of everything. He knew why Kafir’s war God “Gish” was dead at the gate way of India itself. At the end of research I am in position to give you clue to Kafirs God Moni (Tamil God Muneeswarar) and Imra (Yamadev)…but War God “ Gish” is really dead. Even Internet-dev don’t help me to Search “Him” out . Ram painfully declared him dead, so how can I find “Him” ?

Link to Muneeswarar

Link to Imra (page 142)

Kafir’s Signals towards London

Kafir of Bashgul valley says that one wealthy group went to London. Yes he says….

“One division, consisting of all the wealthy and other notable persons, went to London, while the other, comprising menials only, settled in Kafiristan.”

We never looked at those kafirs who faught for 1000 years at gate way of India. But can we trust their last words? Kafir knew that his second group went towards London. He clarified it before “Ram” and “Ram” also testify kafir’s words at concluding para. These words do not create curiosity in your mind ?

London / Lau-nandan

These curiosity was base of this research. In previous chapters we have seen all hanging truth of Europe and Anatolia .But the facts about Afghanistan connects Kafirs and Ram. I do believe in Last words (or Last shricks) of Kafir warriors. Why and how – a sinking Kafir could speak lies?After long research I believe that London stand for Lau –nandan , Britain..Brizh stand for Baijnath and Bahraich(The geographical name of Awadh).Belgic tribes that reached Britian in antiquity carry history of Balond Badri..Chalta badri..Badrinath. Gulliver’s travel is nothing but “Gurhwali’s safar”. Raj Barah of Almora are still intact in form of 12 Olypmpians.United Kingdom (UK) nothing but replica of Utarakhand (UK) .

Link to Lau-nandan(London)

Link to Stonehenge

Now let us check facts about Kafirs and struggle of Ram to reach them. Let us check straight facts…………

LIBERTION OF AYODHYA

ya, they begin with liberation of Ayodhya. Victory of Robert (Raw Bharat) clive in the battle of Plassey( 1757A.D.) and Buxar ( 1764 A.D.) liberated Ayodhya . Thereafter “Ram “ had to spend long 100 years to reach Capisa. Meanwhile the course of history turned Capisa ( Gate way of India) into Kafiristan. During the course they took control of Delhi . There after they moved towards Capisa .Look to the historical facts – how Ram had to struggle to reach his ardent Bhakt Kafirs to whom entire country forgot.

Henry Walter Bellew the india born British army medical officer ,narrates the events that lead East India company to Afghanistan. In his book named ,”The races of Afghanistan -being a brief account of the principal nation inhabiting that country. “(1880) he narrated everything.

Book link (Races of Afghanistan)

Author mentions that “Tymur died in 1793. War of succession brought Zaman (Blind) in Ludhiana. He Lived there as British pentioner . Zaman shah appointed Runjitsjngh as ruler of Lahore.
Book link

In1803 – the year, East India company took new Delhi. Tymur’s another son Shuja-ul-Mulk captured Kabul.Mr. Bellew further says that ,” In 1809 first treaty signed with Durani soverein to protect Shuja from persian and Nepoleon’s invasion.It was first British engagement with Afghan.Shuja defeated by Fatahkhan and came to Ludhiana with Zaman as British pentioner.
Durani dynasty colapsed and in 1826 suddenly Dost Mahmad became ruler of Kabul(Firdt Amir) and his brother Sherdil held Kandhar. Shahi ends and rule of Amir begins.

In 1834 – Shuja marched towards Afghanistan to recover his lost kingdom with army but defeated.Came back to Ludhiana. He took refuge with Ranjitsingh. At that juncture Shuja gave precious and historical Kohinoor diamond to Ranjitsingh.

Meantime persian seige of Herat and Sikh defeat againt Afghan caused anxiety in British Govt. Russian acted mysteriously. British took side of Shuja. Decided to restore him on throne.Triparty treaty signed between Shuja, Ranjit and East India Company. The seeds of Afghan war lies in these events.These were the events that brought East india company near Capisa.

First Afghan war (1839–1842 )

(Remember, the war faught before Indian Mutiny of 1857))
British wanted pro-British ruler in Afghanistan. To restore Shah suja’s rule in Afghanistan .Tri- party treaty reached between Shah suja, East india company Ranjitsingh, and thereafter simla menifesto was declared.

As per Simla treaty (1939 )SHUJA marched with British Army . An army of 21,000 British and Indian troops under the command of Sir John Keane (subsequently replaced by Sir Willoughby Cotton and then by William Elphinstone) set out from Punjab in December 1838. By late March 1839, the British forces had reached Quetta, crossed the Bolan Pass and begun their march to Kabul. They took Kandahar on April 25, 1839.

On July 22, in a surprise attack, they captured the until-then impregnable fortress of Ghazni, the rule of Shah suja were restored in Kabul. Thereafter the majority of the British troops returned to India (only 8,000 remained in Afghanistan), but it soon became clear that Shuja’s rule could only be maintained with the presence of a greater number of British forces. The Afghans resented the British presence and the rule of Shah Shuja.

Dost Mohammad unsuccessfully attacked the British and their Afghan protégé, and subsequently surrendered and was exiled to India in late 1840.

Meantime reduced pention of Afghan sardars created sparks.Afghan tribes invaded Kabul and in January 1842 British army reteated towards India.

“By October 1841, disaffected Afghan tribes were flocking to support Dost Mohammad’s son, Mohammad Akbar Khan, in Bamian. In November 1841, a senior British officer, Sir Alexander ‘Sekundar’ Burnes, and his aides were killed by a mob in Kabul. .On 1 January 1842, following some unusual thinking by Elphinstone, an agreement was reached that provided for the safe exodus of the British garrison and its dependants from Afghanistan.

Five days later, the withdrawal began. The departing British contingent numbered around 16,000, of which about 4,500 were military personnel, and over 12,000 were civilian camp followers. The military force consisted mostly of Indian units and one British battalion, 44th Regiment of Foot.”

Link to First Afghan war

Tragic Retreat

“Despite the safe-passage the British had been granted, they were attacked by Ghilzai warriors as they struggled through the snowbound passes.

Dr.William Brydon reached Jalalabad

16000 retreated from Kabul, only Dr.William Brydon reached Jalalabad to say the story of all dead

The ground was frozen, the men had no shelter and had little food for weeks. Of the remaining weapons possessed by the survivors, there were approximately a dozen working muskets, the officers’ pistols and a few swords. The remnants of the 44th were all killed except Captain James Souter, Sergeant Fair and seven soldiers who were taken prisoner. The only Briton to reach Jalalabad was Dr. William Brydon.”
Link to Dr.William Brydon

Story of Sacrifice
Yes ,out of 16000 persons only single person Dr.Willian Brydon could reached Jalalabad on horse to say the story of dead warriors and civilians. We have to remember that even Indian Sypoys lost their lives in massacre. But nobody from us ever try to keep record of those unknown brave soldiers, who went there to die. Yet ,Afghan Chuch of Bombay still keeping the record of those Brave soldiers who lost their life on Afghan Soil. Even their sacrifices could not create Sensitivity in our hearts. Perhaps only Maharaja Dulip remained sensitive and sensible towards them .

Link to Afghan church

Link to Dulipsingh

Now let us check above story with different historical Shade effects.

Kohinoor and Kafiristan

Now we know that Simla manifesto was key to Afghanistan war path .The Tri- party Simla agreement (1839)was reached but Ranjit Singh died in 1839 itself. Britishers took the leadership of first Afghan war at their own. After Ranjitsingh”s death his kingdom began to fall into disorder.In 1945 only single heir Duleepsingh remained. Ranjitsingh recognized Britishers but what about sikh peoples? Sikhs were not knowing Britishers.
“When Ranjit Singh died in 1839, there was a succession of short-lived rulers at the central Durbar (court), and increasing tension between the Khalsa and the Durbar. circumstances lead towords the first Anglo -sikh war.”

“The First Anglo-Sikh War was fought between the Sikh Empire and the British East India Company between 1845 and 1846. It resulted in partial subjugation of the Sikh kingdomn. The Treaty of Lahore on 9 March 1846, the Sikhs were made to surrender the valuable region (the Jullundur Doab) between the Beas River and Sutlej River. In a later separate arrangement (the Treaty of Amritsar), the Raja of Jammu, Gulab Singh, purchased Kashmir from the East India Company for a payment of 7,500,000 rupees (75 lakh) and was granted the title Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir.Maharaja Duleep Singh remained ruler of the Punjab and at first his mother, Maharani Jindan Kaur, remained as Regent.”

“The Second Anglo-Sikh War took place in 1848 and 1849, between the Sikh Empire and the British East India Company. It resulted in the subjugation of the Sikh Empire, and the annexation of the Punjab and what subsequently became the North-West Frontier Province by the East India Company.The infant Maharaja Duleep Singh of the Sikh Empire was allowed to retain his throne, but a British Resident, Sir Henry Lawrence, controlled the policy of the Durbar. Duleep Singh’s mother, Maharani Jind Kaur, continually tried to regain some of her former influence as Regent and was eventually exiled by Lawrence. This victory brought diamond Kohinoor in British crown.On March 29, 1849, the British raised their flag on the citadel of Lahore and the Punjab was formally proclaimed to be part of the British Empire in India. The Treaty of Lahore, the legal agreement formalised the legal possession of Kohinoor by Queen of England.”
History of Kohinnor Diamond
Nadirshah took Kohinnor with him. But after the assassination of Nader Shah in 1747, the stone came into the hands of Ahmed Shah Abdali of Afghanistan. In 1830, Shah Shuja, the deposed ruler of Afghanistan, managed to flee with the Kohinoor diamond. He then came to Lahore where it was given to the Sikh Maharaja (King) of Punjab, Ranjit Singh; in return for this Maharaja Ranjit Singh won back the Afghan throne for Shah Shuja-ul-Mulk.”
Link to Kohinoor

Maharaja Dalip Singh(born: 6 September 1838 in Lahore,)was the last Maharaja of the Sikh Empire. He was the youngest son of the legendary “Lion of the Punjab” Maharaja Ranjit Singh and Maharani Jind Kaur, and came to power after a series of intrigues, in which several other claimants to the throne and to the Koh-i-Noor diamond killed each other. After his exile to Britain at age 13 following the British annexation of the Punjab, he was befriended by Queen Victoria.
Dalip Singh was much admired by Queen Victoria who is reported to have written “Those eyes and those teeth are too beautiful” about the Punjabi maharajah. She was also the godmother to several of his children.
Today he is considered as Britain’s first Sikh settler, having been exiled to its shores in 1854, after being dethroned and having his country annexed by the British Raj in 1849.
Dalip Singh died in Paris in 1893 at the age of 55.A life-size bronze statue of the Maharajah showing him on a horse was unveiled by HRH the Prince of Wales in 1999 at Butten Island in Thetford, a town which benefited from his and his sons’ generosity
Dalip Singh married twice, first to Bamba Müller and then to Ada Douglas Wetherill. He had eight children in total, six from his first marriage to Bamba.All the eight children died without legitimate issue, ending the direct line of the Sikh Royalty.

Indian Mutiny of 1857

Meanwhile in 1857 there was Mutiny against British rule in India. The people who considered victory of Robert clive in battle of Plassey…was liberating process of Ayodhya , might not jopined mutiny.
.While those ,who considered Clive’s victory as beginning of subjugation , might have took part in mutiny.
The rebellion began on 10 May 1857 in the town of Meerut when a group of sepoys, native soldiers employed by the British East India Company’s army, mutinied because of perceived race-based injustices and inequities.
The immediate result of the mutiny was a general housecleaning of the Indian administration. The East India Company was abolished in favour of the direct rule of India by the British government.

Crossing all these hurdles Britain further geared up to reach Capisa.

Link to Indian Mutiny

Second Afghan war (1878)

After tension between Russia and Britain in Europe ended with the June 1878 Congress of Berlin, Russia turned its attention to Central Asia. In the summer of 1878 Russia sent an uninvited diplomatic mission to Kabul, setting in motion the train of events that led to the Second Anglo-Afghan War. Sher Ali tried to keep the Russian mission out but failed. The Russian envoys arrived in Kabul on July 22, 1878, and on August 14 the British demanded that Sher Ali accept a British mission. Sher Ali had not responded .

The British presumably considered this as an insult, but more likely it was viewed at the highest levels as a fine pretext for implementing the Forward Policy and taking over most of Afghanistan. The British delivered an ultimatum to Sher Ali, demanding an explanation of his actions. The Afghan response was viewed by the British as unsatisfactory, and on November 21, 1978, British troops entered Afghanistan at three points. Sher Ali, having turned in desperation to the Russians, received no assistance from them. Appointing his son, Yaqub, regent, Sher Ali left to seek the assistance of the tsar. Advised by the Russians to abandon this effort and to return to his country, Sher Ali returned to Mazare Sharif, where he died in February 1879.
With British forces occupying much of the country, Yaqub signed the Treaty of Gandamak in May 1879 to prevent Britsh invasion of the rest of Afghanistan. According to this agreement and in return for an annual subsidy and loose assurance of assistance in case of foreign aggression, Yaqub agreed to British control of Afghan foreign affairs. yes,Control on foreign affairs of Afghanistan was outcome of second Afghan war.

The second British venture into Afghanistan resulted in about 2500 British and colonials killed with some 1500 Afghans killed.

Link to second Afghan war

Kafir warriors

During these wars Britishers came into the contact of Kafiristan and chitral. The vedic people of both the region were fighting against invaders since one thousand years. Britisher tried their level best to protect and save them. British Army surgeon Henry Walter Bellew ‘s book “The races of Afganistan being a brief account of the principal nations” also gives detailed account of different Afghan tribes and their gradual forceful conversion. The details in the book gives signal of large scale migration of same tribes in antiquity towards west. Giving signal of pakhtun and Afridi migration from the area towards west he mentions that-” In time of Herodotus this very country was called Pactiya or Pactiyiea. There is very remarkable coincident that Herodotus mentions one ohther country of htis name in Armenia provence. And it is not difficult to trace ancient Pictavium or modern Poitiers in France,and then Picts in Britain.
In this Pakhtun-kwa country Pacts and Scyth inhabitants inhabitit ,while Picts and Scots in England . Large section of Afridi people called Kambar-khel or and Kamari togather with Logari or Loga parallel with Cambarian or Logarin of ancient Britain.”(PAGE 57) He further says that Afridi were previously Budhist or Fire worshiper. (P.81 )

Henry Walter Bellew’s detscription in the book conveys the sense as if he was knowing all these tribes till late antiquity.

Book link to “The Kafirs of the Hindu Kush: Art and Society of the Waigal and …, Volume 1” By Max Klimburg

The Man Who Would Be King

Meanwhile Rudyard Kipling wrote a short story “The Man Who Would Be King . The theme of the story based upon the kafirs warriors of Kafiristan. In 1975 film adapted from the Rudyard Kipling’s short story of the same title. It was adapted and directed by John Huston and starred Sean Connery, Michael Caine, Saeed Jaffrey, and Christopher Plummer as Kipling (giving a name to the short story’s anonymous narrator).The film follows two rogue ex-non-commissioned officers of the British Raj who set off from 19th century British India in search of adventure and end up as kings of Kafiristan.

A film -The Man Who Would Be King

In 1975 Director John Huston adapted and directed Film named “The man who would be king”

Without reading the short story, you will not understand pain of Ram for their Kafir brethern ,who were fighting at Gate way of India for 1000 years and entire country forget them. The story will remind you of Ashokvatika where Sitaji and Rama met after Ram’s victory.
Link to The story
I am providing you link to the story. The story says pain of Kafirs, unknown fighters of Hindukush,Who recognised struggle of Ram to reach them. They were waiting their Ram in Ashokvatika.
.Nobody in the country recognizing or remembering them and they continued their fight.It was situation full of dilema. In this complicated struggleful situation unrecognized Ram was standing before his ardent Bhakt. Read The book – “Kafirs of Hindukush”- and short story – “The Man Who Would Be King” with full sensitivity .I gaurantee you that now you can recognize Ram.

Pl. don’t miss single line of the story. It is story about kafiristan , last shricks of Kafirs and struggling Ram to reach them. Don’t miss single word.

Link to the short stroy by Kipling

A Book :kafirs of Hindukush( in fact it is Qus..deity capphias of Israel)

Gilgit agency surgeon George Scott Robertson did the best research work about kafirs.. He asked the Government of India for permission to attempt the journey, and by October 1889 was on his way, departing from Chitral in northwest Pakistan in the company of several Kafir headmen of the Kam tribe. His journey lasted just over a year, ending in 1891, and providing Robertson with first-hand experience of the strange customs and colorful people of Kafiristan. But before the publication of his book kafirs were forcibly converted in year year 1895 to Islam by Abdur Rahman Khan, the Emir of Afghanistan (1880 to 1901). This ended the millenia of old primitive religion of the Kafiristani people which was thence-after replaced by the radical Islamic culture now known as Nuristani culture.The new name of kafiristan is Nuristan.
The detailed account of Robertson’s tour throughout Kafiristan was originally published in London in 1896 by Lawrence & Bullen, LTD. The name of the book was Kafirs of Hinndukush.”
The Nuristanis exhibit European-like physical characteristic of light hair, blue eyes, and white skin. These physical features are mainly due to a preservation of the characteristics from the initial migration of Indo-Iranian (Kamboja) peoples into the region (likely in the 2nd Milenia B.C.). At last kafiristan became Nuristan. With that Capisa-The gate way of India sank.
Robertson was the last eyewitness of kafir culture. He was last person , who saw kafirs of Capisa .Very few people took note of kafirs of Hindukush.

In his book description one can smell that he was not just writting book but worshiping great warriors of kafiristan. He might have written account with his weeping eyes.
– On page no. 75 of the book author classified kafir warrior tribes as under….

(1) Katirs – siahposh
(2) Madugal – siahposh
(3) Kashtan or kashtoz – siahposh
(4)Kam – siahposh
(5) Istrat or gourdesh -siahposh

(6) Presungulis or viron – safedposh
(7) Wai gulis -safedposh
(8)Ashkun -safedposh

He notes that ..”It is probable that numerically , the katirs are more important than all the remaining tribes of kafiristan put togather.”

on page 76 of the book he mentions sub katir tribe
namely (1) kamoz (living in bashgul valley) ,(2) kti or katwar (residing in kti valley) , (3) kulam(4) Ramgilis or gabariks, they are also called ramgul kafir (5) kamtoz

while talking about presun or viron tribe he says that
they are simple , peaceful and industrious people. He mentioned that

priestly clan “ Utahdari “ resided at village named Agaru . while bilezhedari clan of kam people reside at Agasti village.

on page -21author mentions kafir’s supeme war god – shrine of gish. and moni.kafirs were worshipping their supreme deity “ Imra( Yama), the creator of all things in heaven and cartli. (page 38) “ (even wikipedia says it is hindu god yama) .he also mentoins that nominally higher grade than the ordinary
Jast is called by the Kam Kafirs “ Mir,” by which they
mean king.(page -472)

Yes people of Bashgul valley and Kam Valley faught for Bharatvarsha for 1000 years. I think nobody from us can challange their love for Bharatvarsha.The unknown soldiers of Bashgul Valley knew that their Ram is in London (Page -160 Kafirs of Hindukusha).The facts on page-472 also signals who Russians are. Yes they are clue to Kam valley. And we don’t know anything about? Is Kam valley is clue to worshiping Imra (Yama) too. To undrstand realtion between Kam valley of Kafiristan and Kama river of Russia.

Horned Dance
Author also gave description how Kafir women danced before God of war “Gish” with wearing Horn Dress. Horn dress is ancient tradition of vedic Sindhu culture.The Harapan Pashupatinath had also two horns.In Ancient gaul there was also tradition of worshiping “Horned God”.George Scott Robertson mentions that ….

All the horns are about an inch in diameter at the base, and are made of the same material as the pad. At the front of the pad, resting on the brow of the woman, is an ornamented square iron bar five inches in length and about a third of an inch in thickness, and immediately below this is a spiral iron ornament, three inches and a half from side to side and one inch in diameter.”(page -513)

Mentioning weapons of kafirs author mentions “ Kafir weapons are the dagger, bows and arrows, spears, and matchlocks. The arrow-head is of a peculiar shape. It is three-sided, and has three sharp edges which meet at the point, and are peculiar from the fact that their other extremity is prolonged backwards from a quarter to half an inch beyond the base of the bayonct-sliapcd arrow-head. This must make the arrow very difficult to extract from a wound. (page -574)
Three pronged arrow heads

If we see the record of “Three pronged arrow heads” then in the book “Classical Hindu mythology: a reader in the Sanskrit Puranas”Cornelia Dimmitt, Johannes Adrianus Bernardus Buitenen mentions that constellation Pusya,the three cities were joined together in a row. And Hara , the three eyed master of the three strides,immediately shot his three -pronged arrow made of the three deities at Tripura.(page -197)”
Means Three pronged arrow head has its origin in ancient Indian tradition and the World knows that three pronged arrow heads reached Europe.

It is not Coat of Arms of

It is not Coat of Arms of French East India Company only but Heart of Sunline Capetian(Robertian) kings of France

In previous post we seen that Coat of Arms of Dutch (Devashch?) east India company carry picture of Shiva with Trishul in his hand .Now look at symbol of French East India Company.The symbol will remind you of three pronged Arrow. Is it clue to Ram ?

KASYAP PURA AND kALSA RAJA

THE LINK WILL EXPLAIN YOU CONNECTION BETWEEN kASHYAPAPURA AND kISHTWAR….NOW DONT UNDERSTAND THESE LEGENDES ONLY…LAV NANDAN
(TURN EVERYTHING INTO REALITY. THE LINK WILL SAY YOU ABOUT KASYAPPURA AND ITS KING kALSA….

( STILL YOU CAN NOT UNDERSTAND KALAS PROVINCE AND KALASH TRIBE? WHO STILL DEFEND GATE WAY OF INDIA?)

LINK TO KISHTWAR ANCIENT HISTORY

Last cry of sinking “Sita”

In fact Rudyard kipling and George Scott Robertson told us the sotry of “The last cry of sinking of Sita”. Kafirs , the protectoers of gate way of india were fighting since 1000 years with full trust on “Ram”. Unfortunately during turmoilic period of 1000 years ,entire country forgot Capisa and its warriors. Only unrecognised Ram was present there (In the form of Britishers and French) to listen to last cry of sinking Sita. .Entire country forgot the kafir warriors of Capisa . The movement started by Gorakhnath on the Bank of jhelam was also forgotten.. Everybody , yes, virtualy everybody forgot Capisa and its last Brahmin king Kallar. Last kashtriya king left Kapisa gave command of Capisa to Brahmin King and departed for Long war. Nobody remembers that last Kashtriya king..No body care to search out last kashtriya king of Kabulshahi..Only he is carying soul of Bharatvarsha.

At last “Ram”was present to listen to the last cry of sinking people of Capisa. By 1896 kafiristan became Nuristan.

After this catastrofic event of Indian history , there was drought and famine in India.The 1899 famine, took 4.5 million life.
Druaght and famine further detorieted the situation . But in 1919, gearing up with its full strength , British troops entered Afghanistn for the third time .

Third Anglo-Afghan War (1919)

(1919 : Turning point of History)

“ The Third Anglo-Afghan War) began on 6 May 1919 and ended on 8 August 1919. While it was essentially a minor tactical victory for the British in so much as they were able to repel the regular Afghan forces, in many ways it was a strategic victory for the Afghans. For the British, the Durand Line was reaffirmed as the political boundary between Afghanistan and British India and the Afghans agreed not to foment trouble on the British side. In the aftermath, the Afghans were able to resume the right to conduct their own foreign affairs as a fully independent state.
If we look at Durandline , then we can see that Durandline runs between Kafiristan and chitral. on one side of Durand line there is chitral while on another side there is Nuristan (Kafiristan). I want to say that Third Afghan war made possible Durand line and that way Kalash people(In border of present Pakistan)people made safe from Afghan invaders.

Link to Third Afghan war

Link to Durand line

Khilafat Movement (1919)

Ram was struggling hard for his Kafir Bhakt. But opposition slogans started in India . Unfortunately those opposition movement paved way for “Khilafat Movement “in the same year (1919).Khilafat Movement got support in the Land of Ram ,and so called Britishers could not do anything for Kafiristan thereafter. “The Khilafat movement (1919-1924) was a pan-Islamic, political campaign launched by Muslims in British India to influence the British government and to protect the Ottoman Empire during the aftermath of World War I.”

Link to Khilafat movement

who will save Chitral ?
when Amir of Afghanistan created Nuristan out of Kafiristan , escaping peopoles took shelter in neighbouring Chitral valley (Present Pakistan). The British rule prevailed there.On the highest peak of Hindukush “Tirichmir”indeginious kalash people are dweling since antiquity.

“The Kalasha or Kalash, are indigenous people of the Hindu Kush mountain range, residing in the Chitral District of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan. They speak the Kalasha language, from the Dardic family of the Indo-Iranian languages, and are considered a unique tribe among the Indo-Aryan population
The culture of Kalash people is unique and differs drastically from the various ethnic groups surrounding them. They are polytheists and nature plays a highly significant and spiritual role in their daily life. As part of their religious tradition, sacrifices are offered and festivals held to give thanks for the abundant resources of their three valleys. Kalash mythology and folklore has been compared to that of ancient Greece, but they are much closer to Indo-Iranian (Vedic and pre-Zoroastrian) traditions. kalash people have also European look. when some asks about their look they have no escuse but to say that they are descendants of Alexander the Great’s soldiers. But Hindukush know that they are indigenous people living on highest pick of Hindukush named Tirichmir.
The three main festivals of the Kalash are the Joshi festival in late May, the Uchau in autumn, and the Caumus in midwinter.
Joshi is celebrated at the end of May each year. The first day of Joshi is “Milk Day”, on which the Kalash offer libations of milk that have been saved for ten days prior to the festival.
The most important Kalash festival is the Chawmos (cawmos, ghona chawmos yat, Khowar “chitrimas” from *caturmasya, , which is celebrated for two weeks at winter solstice at the beginning of the month chawmos mastruk. It marks the end of the year’s fieldwork and harvest. It involves much music, dancing, and the sacrifice of many goats. It is dedicated to the god Balimain who is believed to visit from the mythical homeland of the Kalash, Tsyam (Tsiyam, tsíam), for the duration of the feast. Food sacrifices are offered at the clans’ Jeshtak shrines, dedicated to the ancestors.

Link to Chitral

Link to Kalash people

Khilafat V/S last cry of Kafirs (1919)

Unfortunately the people of India , who were not listening to the last cry of Kafir warriors ( the warriors of the gateway of India)but opted to listen to the cry of Khalifat of Istambul .It was turning point for destiny of ancient Bharatvarsha. It happened after 1000 years.Unique idea of supporting khilafat movement emeged after 1000 years..! until that juncture people of India were fighting against invaders. The death of war God “Gish” failed to create feelings of anguish and pain into heart of Indian people ,instaed they see miracle in new idea of supporting Khilafat movement of Istambul. People spell bound with the unique idea of supporting Khilafat movement . The attraction to that miraculous Idea changed the fate of Bharatvarsha.People forgot the movement started by “Gorkhnath” ,instead they started supporting Khilafat. The people who remained sensitive to last cry of Kafirs become sensitive for khilafat cause .History of Bharatvarsha took “U Turn” without knowing unrecognised “Ram” ,his anguish and his pains. Yes, it was paradox. while Ram was behind Kafirs of Hindukush, people of the country started supporting Khilafat.

Reverse motion

“Ram” saw that people of Hindustan forgot Capisa . They are not listening to kafir’s last cry but joined hands to fight for “Khilafat” cause. After long 1000 years people of India masmarised with reverse motion. They saw like miracle in the new idiea , because “The Idiea” propagated after 1000 years. The Gorkhnath movement started by Gorakhnath and Kallar ( last Brahmin king of Kabul) mat dead end. The long 1000 years war given by the brave people of Capisa ….. all in vain. “Ram” came , but people could not recognize him. At last Ram concluded (In 1919 itself) that people of India forgot “Gate way of India” and “Ram” too.

Now we have list of Kafr tribes, who faught at Capisa -Gate way of India – for 1000 years .In coming chapters we shall try to recognize those great Kafir warrior tribes. None of us ever look towards those unknown fightrs…who gave brave fight for 1000 years but trapped at last …because people of counry took “U” turn suddenly. People of the country forget them totally. We shall check..who they were? Either they were Gods?

Link to Khilafat movement

Reminder to the history of Capisa (Jara Yad karo kurbani)
Link

Link to Nuristani people (Jara yad karo kurbani)

Link to Chitral people (Jara yad karo kurbani)
—————————————————————–
Essense of entire research

Echoes that connect Capysa and London

What Kafir mentions about London…and what Bard to King of “Isle of Man” mentioned before 2000 years…are the clues between London and Lav nandan. Is it not surprising that two person at different continents speak the same word? After spell of 2000 years? Kafirs words echoed in my ears through out research..when I come to listen to echo of Kafir’s words in to the poetry by Bard in personification of King of Isle of Man…I felt like Blast. I decided to find more and more clues. Present research is echo of those words of Kafirs only..surprising Kafirs last cries was not misleading.

Bard to King of Isle of Man says that..

“In the name of the God Trinity, exhibit thy charity ! A numerous race, of ungentle manners, ‘ Repeat their invasion of Britain, chief of isles : Men from a country in Asia, and the region of CapyS ; J A people of iniquitous design : the land is not known That was their mother. They made a devious course by sea. In their flowing garments, who can equal them ? With design are they called in,with theiir short spears, those fqes.”

Book link to “ THE MYTHOLOGY AND RITES OF THE British Druids

1919 paradox of Indian History

Until 1919 people were fighting against invaders. But suddenly some people decided to support Khilafat Movement. That was turning point of Sanatan History of India. People felt some sort of miracle in that Idea. yes it was ” U ” turn of Sanatan history of Hindustan after long 1000 years.People liked Sudden Idea of supporting Khilafat of Turkastan. It was begining of reverse process. The moment we started telling Goodby to Ram.. ! Seed of Quit India movement lies in support to Khilafat movement of Turkstan…!

What Ram Thought ?

The people did not look at warriors who faught at gate way of India ..and shading their Bloods since centuries..! People strated walking on dead Bodies of warriors…who shed their blood since centuries…and shook hands with invading forces. People lost their Intrest in martyres and theeir cause. People decided different cause and different goals.

queiton that puzzle me

Kafir verses Khilafat

The people who nevevr looked at Gate way of India and denied to listened to the last shricks and cries of Kafirs….suddenly started listening cries and shricks of Turkastan. They nevevr listen to the kafirs who were fighting at Gate way of India to defend them…but suddenly they listened to cries and Shricks of Troubled Khilafat of Turkstan..far away from Hindustan…!Why this happened ? why this happened ? This quetion puzzle me. This ” U ” turn cause of our fall? Cries of Kafirs never listened by us. we started harrasing Ram..our own Ram. Ram..Lav nandan became helpless.

(But now Last shricks are listened and echoing in our ears…that we dont want to listen since centuries…It will continue to Haunt us.)

When Ram started war Against Rawan…No manav helpled him..Only Vanar clans(Monkeys), Garuds(Eagle clans) helped him…..But in the case of his war for “Gate way of India ” … Manav and Mahamanv hindered his all the efforts.

My last straight quetion….why we nevevr listened to cries and Shricks of Kafirs..who were defending us since centuries?
Why suddenly cries and shrick of Khilafat of Turkastan reached our Ears? What sort of sensitivity we are carryin or nurturing ? If cries of Khilafat of Turkstan can be listened suddenly ? why not Srinks or cries of Kafirs never listened to? From there story of Betrayal to our own Gods begin..Robertson had to write..” War God Gish dead at Gate way of India “.. Nitzsche had to write …”WE Killed the GOds..we all are Murderers.”

History proceed further..

We opted to name our new history..with beutiful name..”Rashtrawad”….Miracle after Miracle played in Bhratvarsha. Model of Rashtrawad minus Gate way of India accepted in Ibdia..as new model….A model in which no body can talk about Gate way of India…! New MOdel of HIndutva emerged .Previuosly we were Sanatani…Sanatani minus so many things = Hindutva model accepted by India. Ram minus Lav nandan model accepted in India. People felt themselves clever and happy in these new emerging models.

Surprising, new model of “Banana eating” also emerge. It was wonderful model .In which one can eat Banana and throw skins on Lav nandan. Lav nandan became our dust bin. We created Model in which …evrything can be blamed on Lav nandan and …we can eat Banana peacefully…(simultaneouly can throw Banana skins on Lav nandan) .

Now , that dust Bin has been searched …Cries of Kafirs that we never listened to …lead us towards Lav nandan…to whom we put into dustbin and throwing skins of Banana joyfully..! WE NEVER LOOKED AT KAFIRS..WE NEVER LISTENED TO CRIES OF KAFIRS..SHOULD WE TRUST HIS LAST WORDS? NOW.. ONLY LAST WORDS OF KAFIR REMAIN ONLY CLUE BETWEEN BHARAT VARSHA AND RAM.(YA BELIEVE LAST CRY OF kAFIR DO YOU ?)

We are blaming Lav nandan for Listening to last cries of Kafirs..who were fighting at gate way of India. We punished Ram..Lav nandan for his that act.

Surprisingly new model of feelings also emerged..New model of proud and senmsitivity. Marvellous prudentness AND skills required for all these New Models ?

—————————–
Goths /Jutes/Jethava

For thier historical connection with Manu you have to read founding History of Ayodhya.Agni , Friend to Manu came to Ayodhya and informed Manu that is Brother Yama also got saved in Jal Pralaya. Yama has reached Far west see shore. There he found so many dead bodies at see shore. He founded there two colonies…..Swarge and Narke. Dear original name of Sweden is Swarge and there is Narke province too there. They belong to Irminons group of Aryans in Europe. Think…about History of Ayodhya…when Manu founded Ayodhya his brother Yama was in far west…….There should not be two sided migration ? After all Manu and Yama were Brothers. Kapisa also stand for Kapi… Vanar.. Vanir.
Read about Goths and Jutes now.

Link to Goth people.

Link to Jutes..who reached England

Link to Jethava of Porbandar ( Again read first paragraph of this chapter .. it is clue to first paragraph)

Link to Makarsdhaja…. Son of Hanuman…and story of Ahiravan is true…. Makardhaja permittted to Rule Asuras by Hanuman

SAINDHAWA / SONDERJYLAND

lINK to Saindhwa dynasty

Link to Sonderjyland... of  Emgland  the land of Jutes

Link to river Meon and Meon Valley

Link to Satya.. Satya is hiden here

Goths  are architect of Roman Empire….Gothic art is famous world over.

Link to Visavadar,,…Visavadar

Link to Wihtwara.. Wihtwara

They all are connected with Hampshire …. (Hampi of Kishkindha ?)

Link to Miyani Beach..Porbandar

Link to Suvarnamachha….. Macchu river of saurashtra rememebr that ?

Link to Osun..The mermaid….Even Osho reminded us of That culture only

Now don’t doubt that Asok Ban still exist in  Nigeria … Link to Osogbo will lead you to Asok  Ban of Ramayan only.

Assyrians carry history of Asokban… and Suvrna  mrug … link to Assyrinas… originated in Asokban.

——–

The people who renamed   Ayodhya as SAKET  are clue to history of Lav kush….sons of Ram. Shakyamuni Budhha belong to tribe Shakya…That tribe renamed Ayodhya. Budhha know Ram better then us all. Budhha was Shakya muni. Saxons are clue to Shakya….

Link to Shakyamuni  Budhha …

Link to Saxon tribe that reched Englans or Britain

Really we have told quit India to Lav nandan ? London ? Son of Ram ?

———

Now go deeper and know Assyrians of  Asok ban mentioned in Ramayana.

Link to Ashikaga ( Muromachi Sogunate) will tell you real facts …Today’s  word like `Sangthan’ has origin in Shogunate.

In fact these people have origin in Oshun mentioned in Nigerian belief. Nigeria says names of Husbunds of Oshun…. Nigeria says real story of Children of Oshun by his

Link to Sango Kingdom and Oshun history will say you real History of Oshun

Link to Oshun…know real story of SHonghay kingdom of Africa

Link to Shnago…of Nijeria

Now know Oshun…chango and  Oya….and try to understand forces which  told quit India to Lav nandan… London Son of Ram ,.

Link to Daura  Nigeria will explain you in detail.. It has link with Esau..brither of Jacob

Link to Bayajidah ….Bayajidah and his Bakavi will tell you who betrayed Lav nandan.

Ya , Jethva failed to protect Land of Ram from Nijerian Bakavis… (Bokoharam)… That is Bokaro  and Samarkand….from where Ghori and Gajani invaded Land of Ram. Oshun and her magic reached land of Ram and today Land of Ram is in Grip of Nagchud ( Nijeria)..

Surprisingly Hitler formed  Nazi force in germany…. again Naja ( Nigeria)…means Nag in Hausa langauge of Hausa bakavi…. and Nagasaki is there in Japan. Bakavi created Soghay empire in Empire….Today we are in grip of That African empire.

LAND OF RAM IN GRIP OF ESAU

My research says That today land of Ram or Maurya Continent is in grip of Esau.…Brother  of Jacob. He was hairy. Esau the progenitor of  Edomites. What Adolf Hitler stand for. So we find Edo kingdom in Nigeria. Surprisingly original name of Tokyo was Edo.

Link to Adon  ( Yemen) will explain you that it stand for Yahavah ( Yoruba of Nigeria).

—–

THEY CONSPIRATED ATTACK ON LAND OF RAM IN FORM OF SAMANIDS OF KHURASAN  THAT IS BOKARO  ( BOKOHARAM) AND  SAMARKAND ( SAMARIA OF ISRAEL)

LINK TO SAMANIDES.. WHO CONSPIRED WITH GHORI AND GAZANI TO ATTACK INDIA .

REMEMBER THAT THEY ARE NOT PERSIANS BUT IRANIAN.

THEIR ORIGIN IN SAMAN KHUDA ..THE ORIGIN IN  SORCCER OF AFRICA…

lINK TO  SOUMARRO KANTE OF AFRICA…. HERE IN THIS LINK YOU WILL FIND SUNDIATA…. ( ABE SINJO IN JAPAN? ) AND kOUYATE ( KYOTO IN JAPAN?)

REMEMBER THAT SLAVE DYNASTY INVADED LAND OF RAM.

AIBAK AND ABDALLIS INVADED LAND OF RAM….WHILE ABUJA IS CAPITAL OF NIGERIA AND ABE IS THERE IN JAPAN

lINK TO SHAKA …KING OF SOUTH AFRICA.. THAT FAILED JETHAVAS TO PROTECT LAND OF RAM FORM NAJA ( NAG) PEOPLE OF NIGERIA..

WE HAVE TO SEARCH THIS MYSTERIOUS FIELD? TO REACH UP TO THE CONCLUSION?

——–

Gazani army never Gone back ?

Read about Mahmad Gazani who invaded and plundered Somnath temple.

I think that people reside here invited Mahmad Gazani

Because this Ghilji tribe says real history Kutch…read KOchi of Afghanistan

Now pl read  read link carefully… Here you will find words like  Ghuraro, , Mod , Unad, Sama, Jadai , Togaji , Kanthkot etc.

Read another link about Jamshidi tribe

Now you know Oshun But know Katsina too

Now know this one .... Kutch

Know their History in Afghanistan….Minar still stand there

Link  to Kyoto ….japan

Now know origin of Jidda in negeria

Link to  Bhuj…Kutch

Link to Bose in Bengal

Link to  Boso peninsula ..Japan

Link to Mejji Jiddai …MoD jiddai

Link to Modu Chanyu …That will tell you About Chanyu.. have Turkic origin

WHY OSHUN IN NIGERIA? ASHAPURA IN KUTCH AND ASHIKAGA IN  JAPAN ?

WHY BAYAJIDDAH IN NIGEIRA..BHUJ IN KUTCH , BOSE IN BENGAL AND  BOSO PENINSULA IN JAPAN ?

WHY KATSINA IN NEGERIA? KUTCH IN GUJARAT AND KYOTO IN JAPAN?

——

NAJA MEANS NAG IN NIGERIA….WHY NAGPUR IS HERE?

SHAKA IS KING TITLE IN NIGERIA…WHY SHAKHA IS HERE?

WHY NAGASAKI IN JAPAN ?

Naja / Nag/Nagpur…Shaka / Shakha ..Nahasali….Nazi

Link to Nijeria will expalin you that Naja means Nag

Link to King titles of Africa.… Shaka

Link to Nagpur….Nagpur

Link to Shakha ...Shakha

Link to Nagasaki ….Japan

Link to Songhai empire of Africa

Link to Sangh Shakha

Link to  Sanghar district...pakistan

—-

WHY EDO IN NIGERIA AND IN JAPAN BOTH? ( ORIGINAL NAME OF TOKYO IS EDO)

WHY ADALAJ IN GUJARAT?

Adolf / Edo / Adalaj

Now you know Naja means Nag,,,,then Nazi ? Adolf Hitler ?

You worry about Adolf ? Then Look at Edo….Edo 

Link to Edo state Nijeria

link to  Adalaj ….Adalaj.Gujarat

WHY KOBE IN JAPAN AS WELL AS IN NIGERIA?

WHY KOBA IN GUJARAT? IN KOBA OF GUJARAT THERE IS SIMANDHAR SWAMI

THEN WHY SUMADERA IN KOBE OF JAPAN?

Kobe / Koba

Link to Kobe …Japan

Link to Koba ..Gujarat

——

QUS AND NOT kUSH

We misunderstood Kush….that is in fact Ques — deity of Caiphas of Israel who oredered crucification of  Christ….Ishwarputra.

Link to Qus deity

Link to Edom …Caiphas had origin in Edom and Esau

Link to Esau...brother of Jacob

ABDALLIS AND AIBAKS INVADED MAURYA CONTINENT

WHY ABE IN JAPAN AND ABUJA IN NIGERIA?

Abuja..Aibak.. Abe

Link to Abuja...Abuja ..Nijeria

Link to Abe  japan

Link to Aibak aibak

Link to Abdalli...Abdalli…Ahmedshah Durai…Durani that rememebrs Daura only… Wife of Bayajiddah

Posted in A Book - There was Ram | Leave a comment

CHAPTER:11 – CAPISA : KASYAP PURA : BURRIED HISTORY OF FOUR HUNDRED YEARS

“Arab marched through the central Iranian deserts. After long siege they took Nishapur ,( west of modern massshad) the main city of Khurasan After that Arab marched towards Sasanian in the northeast, the city of Marw. (Persian last ruler)Yazdajird third assesinated. Arab took control of plain of north and west Afghanistan including town of Bactra and Herat. Son of Yedajird (King of Heart)- Firuz came back with chinese army help. After this turmoil Arab regained Herat and Balkh by 670 A..d. then Tibetan and turk became agrresive. In the early ninth century tibetan army participated in sogadian capital Samarkand.(p.179). The califa in Bagdad ,Harun -al-rashid , personaly moved to the east, but he died near Tus in A.d. 809. His younger son Al -mamun became Governor of the east.Until that time king of kabul ,with help of Tibetan resisted mamun.Hindu and Budhist principalities in the valley of Hinukush continue to defy Arab rulers.”

– “THE AFGHAN” By Willem Vogelsang

If you want to recognize Ram then read all the following words carefully. It is history of Bharatvarsha or Hindustan. Nobody can deny that. Unfortunately History of present India does not carry these chapters. Now study those four hundred years carefully and know Ram. We buried our history. When Alexander invaded Bharatvarsha ,we did the same thing. Our habit of burying history gradually deprieve us of Ram. Now know the buried history of those four hundred years of Bhratvarsha. Capisa was in the centre of that history.

Willem Vogelsang explained the geographical location of “Capisa”, in his book –“THE AFGHAN” .He explaines that Capisa or modern site of Bagram lies at the southern enterance to the salang pass, and two major routes across the Hindukush , namely along the Ghorbandh river towards Bamyan , and along Panjshir river towards the Khak pass. ( p- 107)

Link to
Book

Willem Vogelsang mentions that Chinese pilgrim Hiuen Tsang says that Ciapislie, or Ca- pisene, was 4000 A’, or about 666 miles in circuit. If this measurement be even approximately correct, the district must have included the whole of kafiristan, as well as the two large valleys of Ghorbandh and Panjshir, as these are together not more than 300 miles in circuit. Ciapishe is further described as being entirely surrounded by mountains .
Conquest of Persia

The Islamic conquest of Afghanistan (642–870) began in the middle of the 7th century after the Islamic conguest of Persia was completed, when Arab Muslims defeated the Sassanid Empire at the battles of Walaja, Al -qadisiyyah and Nahavand. The Muslim Arabs then began to move towards the lands east of Persia and in 642 captured the city, Herat. By 667 AD the Afghan area was under invasion by the Arabs but in 683 Kabul revolted and completely routed the invading army which was led by the Governor of Seistan. It was not until 870 that Kabul and the Afghan area was brought under control by the Arabs. The complete conversion of Afghanistan to Islam was during the period of the Ghaznavids, in or about the 11th century.

Map of Gandhara

Look at burried history of Gandhara

The invasion of Persia was completed five years after the death of the Islamic Prophet Muhammad, and all of the Persian territories came under Arab control, though pockets of tribal resistance continued for centuries in the Afghan territories. During the 7th century, Arad Armies made their way into the region of Afghanistan from Khorasan with the new religion of Islam. At this point in time the area that is currently Afghanistan had a multi-religious population consisting of Hindus, Buddhists, Zoroastrians ,jews and others.
Invasion on Afghanistan

Willem Vogelsang narrates the intial story of invasion in his book “THE AFGHAN”.He says “Arab marched through the central Iranian deserts. After long siege they took Nishapur ,( west of modern massshad) the main city of Khurasan After that Arab marched towards Sasanian in the northeast, the city of Marw. (Persian last ruler)Yazdajird third assesinated. Arab took control of plain of north and west Afghanistan including town of Bactra and Herat. Son of Yedajird (King of Heart)- Firuz came back with chinese army help. After this turmoil Arab regained Herat and Balkh by 670 A..d. then Tibetan and turk became agrresive. In the early ninth century tibetan army participated in sogadian capital Samarkand.(p.179). The califa in Bagdad ,Harun -al-rashid , personaly moved to the east, but he died near Tus in A.d. 809. His younger son Al -mamun became Governor of the east.Until that time king of kabul ,with help of Tibetan resisted mamun.Hindu and Budhist principalities in the valley of Hinukush continue to defy Arab rulers.” (page 177)

Fall of Tibet

“ By mid ninth century Tibetan crumbuled under attacks from the side of chinese and other people.And road was open for Muslim rulers to occupy all the country. “(p.180)

“For longtime Arab failed to permanantly establish their power in Southeast and East Afghanistan. So called Ghazi assembled to fight them. There rised local Saffarid dynasty in midninth century. The early Islamic geogrophers regared hazarajat district as part of Hind (Hindus).” (p.180)

The people of Kabul were then, as they are now, very patriotic and seldom brooked interference from outside. They fought Arabs and other Muslim rulers from 663 A.D. to 1021 A.D. but never accepted their suzerainty.

India remained Safe

Every student of history knows that during this period of about four hundred years India remained safe from any intrusions – or invasions from the Northwest. The occupation of Kabul by Shankara Varman only led to a grim struggle, which reached its climax during the reign of Gopal Varman (902 to 904 A.D.), who succeeded Shankara Varman; and another military expedition was sent by the Kashmir ruler under a General by name Prabhakar Deva to restore order and tighten the grip. The Kashmiri General though successful did not press his victory too far. He had realized by his experience that the people of Kabul could not be kept for long under subjection. He started negotiations with them and agreed to install Lalliya’s son by name Toramana on the Kabul throne. This was done and Toramana ascended the Kabul throne under a new name or title, Kamluka, which was given to him by Prabhakar Deva. As already seen, Alberuni in his list of Kabul kings describes him as Kamlu. Henceforth, the relations between Kabul and Kashmir became very cordial and in course of time marriage relations came to be established between the ruling dynasties of the two countries, which further strengthened the mutual bonds of amity, and concord. Kshema Gupta who ruled Kashmir from 951 – 959 A.D. married the granddaughter of Bhima, who is described by Alberuni as the fourth Brahman King to rule Kabul after Lalliya. We have it on the authority of Kalhana that this Kabul King Bhima came to Kashmir and stayed there for some time and built a temple dedicated to Vishnu which was given the name of Bhima Keshava. The dedication of a temple to Vishnu would show that the Hindu Shahis of Kabul were Vaishnavites and not Buddhists as some take pleasure in describing them as such. The temple of Bhima Keshava is even now existing in a village now known as Bumzu near Mattan, though as a Muslim Ziarat, and is now known as Ziarat Bam Din Sahib.

Link to more facts

Kabul Faught

In the wake of Muslim invasions of Kabul and Kapisa in second half of 7th century (AD 664), the Kapisa/Kabul ruler called by Muslim writers Kabul Shah (Shahi of Kabul) made an appeal to the Ksatriyas of the Hind who had gathered there in large numbers for assistance and drove out the Muslim invaders as far as Bost.This king of Kapisa/Kabul who faced the Muslim invasion was undoubtedly a Ksatriya.
In AD 645, when Chinese pilgrim Hiuen Tsang was passing through the Uttrapatha, Udabhanda or Udabhandapura was the place of residence or secondary capital of emperor of Kapisa which then dominated over 10 neighboring states comprising Lampaka, Nagara, Gandhara and Varna (Bannu) and probably also Jaguda. About Gandhara, the pilgrim says that its capital was Purushapura; the royal family was extinct and country was subject to Kapisa; the towns and villages were desolate and the inhabitants were very few. It seems that under pressure from Arabs in the southwest and the Turks in the north, the kings of Kapisa had left their western possessions in the hands of their viceroys and made Udabhanda their principal seat of residence.

The first Hindu Shahi dynasty was founded in AD 870 by Kallar (see above). The kingdom was bounded on the north by the Hindu kingdom of Kashmir, on the east by Rajput kingdoms, on the south by the Muslim Emirates of Multan and Mansura, and on the west by the Abbasid Caliphate.

Fall of Kabul 671 AD

The reason why Udabhandapura was selected in preference to Peshawar is at present unknown but it is possible that the new city of Udabhanda was built by Kapisa rulers for strategic reasons.Udhabanadpura (waihind or Ohind ) in the east was held by the Dynasty called by later writers the Shahis.
In AD 671 Muslim armies seized Kabul and the capital was moved to Udabhandapura where they became known as the Rajas of Hindustan.
Link to more facts

Udabhandapura and Brahmin king

Studies in the geography of ancient and medieval India
By Dineshchandra Sircar (p-290) Know about Udabhandapura

Book link

Link to Hund or Waihind (Udabhandapura )

“Now in the following times no Muslim conqueror passed beyond the frontier of Kâbul and the river Sindh until the days of the Turks, when they seized the power in Ghazna under the Sâmânî dynasty, and the supreme power fell to the lot of Nâ?ir-addaula Sabuktagin. This prince chose the holy war as his calling, and therefore called himself al-Ghâzî (“the warrior/invader”). In the interest of his successors he constructed, in order to weaken the Indian frontier, those roads on which afterwards his son Yamin-addaula Ma?mûd marched into India during a period of thirty years and more. God be merciful to both father and son ! Mahmûd utterly ruined the prosperity of the country, and performed there wonderful exploits, by which the Hindus became like atoms of dust scattered in all directions, and like a tale of old in the mouth of the people. Their scattered remains cherish, of course, the most inveterate aversion towards all Muslims. This is the reason, too, why Hindu sciences have retired far away from those parts of the country conquered by us, and have fled to places which our hand cannot yet reach, to Kashmir, Benares, and other places. And there the antagonism between them and all foreigners receives more and more nourishment both from political and religious sources.”
Link

Then entred Pala warriors

Then Pala enters war .Following link explains who were Pala.
The initial Hindu Shahi dynasty was the House of Kallar, but in AD 964 the rule was assumed from Bhima upon his death by theJanjua emperor Maharajadhiraja Jaypala, son of Rai Asatapala Janjua and a descendant of Emperor Janmejaya. Epithets from the Bari Kot inscriptions record his full title as “Parambhattaraka Maharajadhiraja Paramesvara Sri Jayapala deva” the first Emperor of the Janjua Shahi phase. He is celebrated as a hero for his struggles in defending his kingdom from the Turkic rulers of Ghazani.
Emperor Jayapala was challenged by the armies of Sultan Sabuktgin and later by his son sultan Mahmud of Bhazani. According to the Minháj ad-D?n in his chronicle Tabaqát-i Násiri, he bears a testament to the political and powerful stature of Maharaja Jayapala Shah, “Jayapála, who is the greatest of all the rájas (kings) of Hind…” Misra wrote on Jaypala: “(He) was perhaps the last Indian ruler to show such spirit of aggression, so sadly lacking in later Rajput kings.”
Maharajadhiraj Anandpal

Prince Anandpala who ascended his father’s throne (in about March/April AD 1002) already proved an able warrior and general in leading many battles prior to his ascension. According to ‘Adáb al-Harb’ (pp. 307–10) in about AD 990, it is written, “the arrogant but ambitious Raja of Lahore Bharat, having put his father in confinement, marched on the country of Jayapála with the intention of conquering the districts of Nandana, Jailum (Jehlum) and Tákeshar” (in an attempt to take advantage of Jayapala’s concentrated effort with defence against the armies of Ghazni). “Jayapala instructed Prince Anandapala to repel the opportunist Raja Bharat. Anandapala defeated Bharat and took him prisoner in the Battle of Takeshar and marched on Lahore and captured the city and extended his father’s kingdom yet further.”

However, during his reign as emperor many losses were inflicted on his kingdom by the GhaZnavids. During the battle of Chach between Mahmud and Anandapala, it is stated that “a body of 30,000 Gakhars fought alongside as soldiers for the Shahi Emperor and incurred huge losses for the Ghaznavids”. However, despite the heavy losses of the enemy, he lost the battle and suffered much financial and territorial loss. This was Anandapala’s last stand against Sultan Mahmud of Ghazani. He eventually signed a treaty with the Ghaznavid Empire in AD 1010 and shortly a year later died a peaceful death.
It was turning point of History of Bharatvarsha.

Maharaja Trilochanpal

Prince Trilochanpála, the son of Anandapala, ascended the imperial throne in about AD 1011. Inheriting a reduced kingdom, he immediately set about expanding his kingdom into the sivalik Hills, the domain of the Rai of Sharwa. His kingdom now extended from the River Indus to the upper Ganges valley. According to Al-Biruni, Tirlochanpála “was well inclined towards the Muslims (Ghaznavids)” and was honourable in his loyalty to his father’s peace treaty to the Ghaznavids. He eventually rebelled against Sultan Mahmud and was later assassinated by some of his own mutinous troops in AD 1021-22, an assassination which was believed to have been instigated by the Rai of Sharwa who became his arch-enemy due to Tirlochanpala’s expansion into the Siwalik ranges. He was romanticised in Punjabi folklore as the Last Punjabi ruler of Punjab.
Link for Kaubulshahi facts

And history proceed…….

From the eighth century to the ninth century, many inhabitants of what is present-day Afghanistan ,pakistan and areas of northern India were converted to Sunni Islam. It is surmised from the writings of Al Beruni that some Pasthuns living in Pakhtunkhawa (present-day western Pakistan) had not been completely converted. Al Biruni, writing in Tarikh al Hind, also alludes to the Pashtun tribes of Pakhtunkhwa as Hindus.
Al Beruni mentions the Afghans once (ed Sachau, I 208)saying that “ in the western mountains of India live various tribes of Afghans who extend to the neighbourhood of the Sindh (ie Indus )valley .Thus in the eleventh century when the Afghans are first mentioned , they are found occupying the Sulaiman mountains now occupied by their descendents , the very tribes which the advocates of the exclusive claims of the Durannis will not admit to be true Afghans . Al Beruni no doubt also alludes to them in the passage (loc. Cit .p 199 ) where he says that rebellious savage races , tribes of Hindus , or akin to
them inhabit the mountains which form the frontier of India towards the west .”
“The most explicit mentioning of the Afghans appears in Al- Baruni’s Tarikh al hind (eleventh century AD) Here it is said that various tribes of Afghans lived in the mountains in the west of India . Al Baruni adds that they were savage people and he describes them as Hindus .”

“Various historical sources such as Martin Ewans, E.J. Brill and Farishta have recorded the introduction of Islam to Kabul and other parts of Afghanistan to the invasions of Mahmud of Ghazna ”
“The Arabs advanced through Sistan and conquered Sindh early in the eighth century . Elsewhere however their incursions were no more than temporary , and it was not until the rise of the Saffarid dynasty in the ninth century that the frontiers of Islam effectively reached Ghazni and Kabul . Even then a Hindu dynasty the Hindushahis , held Gandhara and eastern borders .From the tenth century onwards as Persian language and culture continued to spread into Afghanistan , the focus of power shifted to Ghazni , where a Turkish dynasty , who started by ruling the town for the Samanid dynasty of Bokhara , proceeded to create an empire in their own right. The greatest of the Ghaznavids was Muhmad who ruled between 998 and 1030. He expelled the Hindus from Ghandhara , made no fewer than 17 raids into India.”

“He encouraged mass conversions to Islam , in India as well as in Afghanistan.”

“Al -Idrisi (1100 AD -1165/1166 AD) testifies that until as late as the 12th century, a contract of investiture for every Shahi king was performed at Kabul and that here he was obliged to agree to certain ancient conditions which completed the contract .”.
“In 588 (1192) according to Farishta the army assembled by Muizz al din Muhammed b Sam consisted of Turks , Tadjiks and Afghans , and his opponent Pithorai (Prithoi Rai) assembled a force of Rajput and Afghan horsemen . Thus in this great war Mussulmans and Hindu Afghans are represented as fighting on both sides , which probably indicates that they were not yet completely converted to Islam.”

Bamiyan Budhha

Large Baudha statue erected by Kabulshahi kings at Bamiyan(Afghanistan)

“During the end of the ninth century, the Samanids extended its rule from Bukhara to as far south as the Indus River and west into most of Persia. Although Arab Muslim intellectual life was still centered in Baghdad, Shi’s Islam minated in the Samanid areas at this time. By the mid-tenth century, the Samanid Dynasty had crumbled in the face of attacks from tribes to the north and from the GazanawidsTurkic Dynasty in Afghanistan.

History of Conversion

“Arab armies carrying the banner of Islam came out of the west to defeat the Sasanians in 642 AD then they marched with confidence to the east. On the western periphery of the Afghan area the princes of Heart and Seitan
gave way to rule by Arab governors but in the east, in the mountains, cities submitted only to rise in revolt and the hastily converted returned to their old beliefs once the armies passed. The harshness and avariciousness of Arab rule produced such unrest, however, that once the waning power of the Caliphate
became apparent, native rulers once again established themselves independent. Among these the Saffarids of Seistan shone briefly in the Afghan area. The fanatic founder of this dynasty, the coppersmith’s apprentice Yaqub ibn Layth Saffari, came forth from his capital at Zaranj in 870 AD and marched through Bost ,Kandahar,Kabul,Bamyan,Balkh and Heart conquering in the name of Islam.”
– Nancy Hatch Dupree ,1971

During the eighth through the ninth centuries, many inhabitants of what is present-day Afghanistan and western Pakistan were converted to Sunni Islam. In some cases, however, people that were conquered by the Muslims would rebel and revert to prior forms of worship. The mountain areas were still not completely converted and remained largely by people of non-Muslim faiths. In a book called Hudad –Al -Alam, written in 982 CE, it mentions a village nearJalabad in Afghanistan , where the local king used to have many Hindu, Muslim and Afghan wives.
In the eighth and ninth centuries ancestors of many of today’s Turkic-speaking Afghans settled in the Hindu Kush area (partly to obtain better grazing land) and began to assimilate much of the culture and language of the Pashtun tribes
already present there…

Ghaznavids and Ghurids

Out of the Samanid Dynasty came the Ghaznavids
, whose warriors forged the first great Islamic empire from Ghazni (Afghanistan) that spanned much of the Iranian plateau, central Asia and conducted many successful raids into India during the end of the ninth century, the Samanids extended its rule from Bukhara to as far south as the Indus Rivers and west into most of Persia. By the mid-tenth century, the Samanid dynasty had crumble in the face of attacks from Turkish tribes to the north and from the Ghaznavids, a rising Turkic Muslim dynasty in Afghanistan. Besides Turkic people, large part of the Ghaznavid Empire was made up of local Muslim Afghans from what is now Afghanistan and western parts of Pakistan.
It is surmised from the writings of Al Beruni that some Afghans who lived in west of India (modern-day Afghanistan) had not been completely converted to Islam.

The most explicit mentioning of the Afghans appears in Al- Baruni’s Tarikh al hind (eleventh century AD). Here it is said that various tribes of Afghans lived in the mountains in the west of India. Al Baruni adds that they were savage people and he describes them as Hindus.
Willem Vogelsang, 2002

Al Beruni mentions the Afghans once (ed Sachau, I 208) saying that in the western mountains of India live various tribes of Afghans who extend to the neighbourhood of the Sindh (i.e.,Indus valley. Thus in the eleventh century when the Afghans are first mentioned, they are found occupying the Sulaiman Mountains now occupied by their descendants, the very tribes which the advocates of the exclusive claims of the Durannis will not admit to be true Afghans. Al Beruni no doubt also alludes to them in the passage (loc. Cit. p 199) where he says that rebellious savage races, tribes of Hindus, or akin to them inhabit the mountains which form the frontier of India towards the west.
H.A. Rose, 1997

Various historical sources such as Martin Ewans, E.J. Brill and Farishta have recorded that the complete conversion of Afghanistan, Pakistan to Islam was during the rule of Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni.
The Arabs advanced through Sistan and conquered Sindh early in the eighth century. Elsewhere however their incursions were no more than temporary, and it was not until the rise of the Saffarid Dynasty in the ninth century that the frontiers of Islam effectively reached Ghazni and Kabul. Even then a Hindu dynasty the Hindushahis ,held Gandhara and eastern borders. From the tenth century onwards as Persian language and culture continued to spread into Afghanistan, the focus of power shifted to Ghazani ,where a Turkish dynasty, who started by ruling the town for the Samanid dynasty of Bokhara, proceeded to create an empire in their own right. The greatest of the Ghaznavids was Mahmud
who ruled between 998 and 1030. He expelled the Hindus from Ghandhara, made no fewer than 17 raids into India. He encouraged mass conversions to Islam, in India as well as in Afghanistan.
Martin Ewans, 2002

Al-Idrisi testifies that until as late as the 12th century, a contract of investiture for every Shahi king was performed at Kabul and that here he was obliged to agree to certain ancient conditions which completed the contract. The Ghaznavid military incursions assured the domination of Sunni Islam in what is now Afghanistan and western Pakistan. The most renowned of the dynasty’s rulers was Mahmud of Ghazni, who consolidated control over the areas south of the Amu Darya Carried out devastating raids into India. With his booty from India, Mahmud built a great capital at Ghazani, founded universities, and patronized scholars. By the time of his death, Mahmud ruled a vast empire that stretched from Kurdistan to the entire Hindukush region as far east as the Punjab as well as territories far north of the Amu Darya. However, as occurred so often in this region, the demise in 1030 of this military genius who had expanded the empire to its farthest reaches was the death knell of the dynasty itself. The rulers of the Ghurids of Ghor in modern-day Afghanistan, captured and burned Ghazni in 1149, just as the Ghaznavids had once conquered Ghor. Not until 1186, however, was the last representative of the Ghaznavids uprooted by the Ghorids from his holdout in Lahore, in the Punjab.

Link for facts

Suming up

Hsuan Tsang was the last traveller to record Afghanistan before the coming of Islam. Up un-til his visit. “the cycle of invasion, expansion, and decline had been regular, as one empire succeeded another in the virile north, only to dissipate its resources of strength in the vast enervating plains of India,” wrote Fraser-Tytler. However while Hsuan Tsang was writing about the peaceful Kabul valley, in the middle if the seventh century, Arabs carrying the new and zealous faith of Islam reached Persia and an-other group coming from Basra reached Sistan and soon took control of large part of Western and south Afghanistan and the ruling Sassanians suffered a major defeat in 642. However from the north came equally commited Turkish Moslems and conflict grew between the two races. The approached Kabul via Kandahar and Ghazni, where they fought zealous defenders, who put up brave resistance. However Kabul was stoutly defending itself from the Moslem invaders under the leadership of a Turkish King, known by many names including Kabul Shahi, Turki Shahi or the Ratbil Shahan. The King had been partly Hinduised and fought gallantly against the Moslem invaders, resisting so strongly that their epics are recorded in Islamic literature.Kabul, mountain fortress capital of the Hindu Kush, was finally captured in 664 after a full year of siege.This clash between Arabs and Turks wasn’t settled until the middle of the eighth century under the Turkish General Abu Muslim who brought stability to the regions of the Hindu Kush. However in the next 100 years the combined influence of the Arabs and Turks succeeded in dominating the old faiths, particularly Bhuddism, except for that pocket of resistance in Kafirstan where their animist beliefs remained.A rather peaceful period followed under the Caliph Harun-al-Rashid (785-809) and his son Mamun who encouraged the arts and sciences flourished and Merv and Samarkand. There fol-lowed an unsettled period when the Saminids extended their influence across to India, but as their influence declined, Hinduism challenged the Moslem faith and appeared for the last time in the Kabul Valley. From the Kabul valley the ruler of the Punjab, Jaipal pushed his religious doctrine towards Ghazni, he met a rising Islamic dynasty which was to change the course of history. King or Sultan Mahmud. Although the Arab conquistadors had brought Is-lam to the Sind region of India some three hundred years before, it never spread.King Mahmud (Turk)of Ghazni was a strong leader and in words of Fraser Tytler, whose iconoclastic zeal was to carry fire and sword deep into Hindu India and to pave the way for the domination of his Islamic successors.But like so many rulers, on his death the dynasty faltered, and was taken over by the Turks. Then we see the short domination of the mountain people from south-east of Herat who established the House of Ghor and who dominated the twelfth century and their territory stretched well into India and ruled the much coverted Delhi.. At the beginning of the 13th century a new race came to Afghanistan from eastern shores of the Caspian Sea, they were the Khwarizm, a Turkish race.. They established a Kingdom in Bamian and from there ruled Kabul. This peaceful time didn’t last long before the heart of central Asia was ripped out by Genghis Khan and his Mongol hoardes who came from the north of China and by 1218 AD reached Central Asia.
GENGHIS KHAN – An apostle of extremes.Ghengis Khan with 100,000 mounted mehad reached Balkh by 1220 destroying everything and everyone in their wake. Jalal-ad-Din, the son of Sultan Muhammad who ruled the Kha-warizm empire, from Ghazni, managed to unite many tribes from the area and decided to defend against the invading Mongols. He advanced to the confluence of the Panjshir and Ghorband Rivers where a bloody battle ensued against Genghis Khan and his army of 30,000 skilled horsemen. Imagine the scene, 30,000 wild mongol horsemen on one side of the Panjcher River lusting for blood and on the other a more civilised army recently brought together. The beginning of the 13th century saw sweeping changes in Central Asia – not to mention Russia – for this was the time of the great Mongol migration. Unlike the Scythians, Sarma-tians, Huns and Turks who preceded them, these barbarians who erupted from the far-off borders of Manchuria were of an entirely different race. Round-headed, yellow-skinned, with slanting eyes and high cheek-bones, they were related to the peoples of northern China and Korea, although they spoke a Turkic language. They were also indescribably dirty and malodorous, for water was something they regarded as too precious to be waster on personal hygiene. They were not a hirsute people, but so infested were they with lice that their chests ap-peared to be thickly covered in hair.The astonishing conquests of Ghenghis Khan swept aside several empires and innumerable petty kingdoms, and brought all countries from the Black Sea to the Yellow Sea under direct Mongol control by the end of the first quarter of the thirteenth century. The unstoppable Mongol tide continued under his successors. Baghdad fell in 1258, the Sung capital of Hang-chow on 1276. In Europe the Mongol empire-the largest in history-extended as far as Poland and Hungary, taking in most of Russia on the way.The Mongols had been completely unlettered but now, with the help of the astute, Eastern Turks, they set about writing their own language down, using the Uighur script. This fruitful collaboration, accom-panied by intermarriage, was in time to produce a new hybrid master race and a new world leader, Tamerlane, but in the meantime a Mongol emperor sat on the illustrious throne of China and entertained curios visitors from distant Europe. Kublai Khan, grandson of Ghenghis, had become the Great Khan, or Chief of all the Mongol clans, in 1260. Karakoram, in Mongolia, was the headquarters of the huge empire, to which all clan leaders were summoned periodically etc etc. p 12Chingis Khaan Ghengis Khan Kublai Khan (grandson of Gheghis Khan)In 1218 Ghneghis Khan invades transoxiana 1227 he dies in 1996 (Christchurch Press) 2 Jan 1996, said: While other media groups were naming their man of the year, the “Washington Post” was thinking big yesterday and going right for the “Man of the Millennium”, And the winner is…Genghis Khan.the newspaper gave the nod to the 13th century Mongol conqueror as “an apostle of extremes..who embodies the half-civilised, half-savage duality of the human race.”
Link for facts

But Kafirs of Capisa Continued Their Fight

All fighters left Capisa (Gate way of India) But Fair complexioned Kafirs continued their fight against invaders. (Their Fair complexion is cause of this research).

– We find references of Kafir fighters in different historical records.
The first Muslim appellation of Kafirs occurs in 1020 CE in the writings of the historians of Mahmud of Ghazni.

– Musulman historian Ibn al-Hussain Baihaki makes second reference to (Siah-Posh) Katirs and calls them Hindus. He claims that ‘all the Hindu Katirs were brought under the rule of Sultan Masud’ (1033 CE) (Early History of India, I, p 128).
-Third reference occurs in Tuzak-i-Timuri where the Kafirs came into conflict with Sultan Timur (1399 CE). Timur found the Siah-Posh tribes (Kators and Kams) apparently holding a kingdom extending from the frontiers of Kashmir to mountains of Kabol and containing numerous villages and towns with capital at Jorkal. The ruler is stated to be Adalshu, Uda or Udasu. Timur describes the
Katirs as men of a powerful frame and fair complexion, idolaters for most part, and speaking a tongue distinct from Turki, Persian, Hindi or Kashmiri. Timur attacked the Katir strongholds .

– In fifteenth century, Sultan Mahmud, descendant of Sultan Timur lled expedition against the Siah-Poshes and thereby earned the title of Ghazi. Mahmud is originally an Arabic given name. Moghul emperor Babur notes the Panjshir Musulmans as paying tribute to their neighbors, the Siah-Posh Katirs.

– Moghul emperor Akbar sent his son Jahangir in 1581 against the Siah-Posh Kafirs of the mountains of Katir.

– Abu’l Fazl, in his history of Timur’s expeditions, speaks of the Hindúán-i-Katir, a country which is described as bounding territories of Buner, Swat and Bajaur on the north. ( Now you are well acquinted with the term Burgujjar .Burgujjar were suryavanshi Rajputs who ever fought in First rank and file.Now you should understand the term Burgundi …Broborn…. Barbarian)

1839, the Kafirs sent a deputation to Sir William Macnaghten in Jalalabad claiming relationship with the fair skinned British troops who had invaded the country. Jalalabad .”

When I was researching Afghanistan .I could not understand cause of continued fight of Kafirs against invaders at the very gate way of Bharatvarsha. And search begin. Who they were? What are their tribes? Their fair complexion diverted my search to Europe. I tried to search those tribes in Europe and suddenly amazeing Bharat Emerged. …to my surprise Ram emerged.

Equivalence to Sanskrit Kamboja

Kapisa is related to and included Kafiristan. Scholar community holds that Kapisa is equivalent to Sanskrit Kamboja. In other words, Kamboja and Kapisa are believed to be two attempts to render the same foreign word (which could not appropriately be transliterated into Sanskrit). Dr S Levi further holds that old Persian Ka(m)bujiya or Kau(n)bojiya, Sanskrit Kamboja as well as Kapisa, all etymologically refer to the same foreign word. Even the evidence from third century Buddhist tantra text Mahamayuri (which uses Kabusha for Kapisha) and the Ramayana-manjri by Sanskrit Acharya, Kshmendra of Kashmir (11th c AD), which specifically equates Kapisa with Kamboja, thus substituting the former with the latter, therefore, sufficiently attest that Kapisa and Kamboja are equivalent. Even according to illustrious Indian history series: History and Culture of Indian People, Kapisa and Kamboja are equivalent. Scholars like Dr Moti Chandra, Dr Krishna Chandra Mishra etc also write that the Karpasika (of Mahabharata) and Kapisa (Ki-pin/Ka-pin/Chi-pin of the Chinese writings) are synonymous terms. Thus, both Karpasika and Kapisa are essentially equivalent to Sanskrit Kamboja. And Paninian term Kapisi is believed to have been the capital of ancient Kamboja. Kapisa (Ki-pin, Ke-pin, Ka-pin, Chi-pin of the Chinese records), in fact, refers to the Kamboja kingdom, located on the south-eastern side of the Hindukush in the Paropamisadae region. It was anciently inhabited by the Asvakayana (Greek: Assakenoi), and the Asvayana (Greek Aspasio) (q.v.) sub-tribes of the Kambojas. Epic Mahabharata refers to two Kamboja settlements: one called Kamboja, adjacent to the Daradas (of Gilgit), extending from.

Kafiristan to south-east Kashmir including Rajauri/Poonch districts, while the original Kamboja, known as Parama Kamboja was located north of Hindukush in Transoxiana territory mainly in Badakshan and Pamirs/Allai valley, as neighbors to the Rishikas in the Scythian land.

Kafir’s Fair Complexion : Clue To Historical Thread

Yes , With full trust upon the Vanvasi Ram people of Capisa Or Kafirs fought for thousand years against invaders at the very gate of Bharatvasrsha.They had full trust in their Ram. They ever hoped that one day their Ram will come back. But meanwhile we people of India forget Get way of India and fighters who were fighting there for generations for 1000 years since Islamic invasion began. Their fair complexion is clue to history.

Yes, a little group of warriors never left their land of Capisa. And entire bharatvarsha forgot those warriors for whom they were fighting.
How a small group of people can fight for 1000 years? Because they trust the departed kabulshahi king. They ever thought that one day he will come back with his full might and will save them. They were ardent Bhakt of Their Ram.Their Ram also trusted them most. And At last Ram reached them. They recognized him….but unfortunately people of Bharatvarsha forget their Ram and fighting Kafirs too. It was Irony of fate of those unknown fighters of Capisa and their Ram….forgotten children of Bharatvarsha.

But even Ram started worshipping those Kafirs who faught for 1000 years at Gate way of India. The Kafirs became “God” in the eyes of “Ram”…… ! Ram now worship those Kafirs as “God”. Even Ram became worshiper of “God” .Perhaps we lost our Ram at that pathetic historical event .While we could not recognize Ram and his kafir warrior Gods. We worship “Ram” but now Ram worship Gods like Kafir warriors.
In the coming chater we shall look to the facts of Kafir warriors who faught for 1000 years(Until 1896) at the very gate of Bharatvarsha and struggle of Ram to reach them…. their Gods…fighting kafirs..!

Again Agni Pariksha?

Lau and Cush sang Ramayana in streets of Ayodhya.They both were first singers of Ramayana. Both brothers were also witness to “Sita Agni Pariksha”. Both brothers were witness to their Mother’s submergence in Mother Earth. Arter that We ever remembered Ram but not Lau and Kush..We never hold them up on our shoulders.They remained just like “Forgotten child” for Bharatvarsha. But Now I am going to unfold the history to connect them with Bharatvarsha. They came back to Bharatvarsha at time of Crisis and again experienced what their mother experienced Ages before.
Did our deeds harrased and devided Ram? Once we had taken “Agni Pariksha” of Sitaji. But now we have taken Pariksha of Ram..?
—————————————-
AT THE END OF THE RESEARCH

AT END OF THE RESEARCH, I HAVE FOUND SECOND SIDE OF COIN.

I COME TO KNOW THAT SAMANIDS WHO PLAYED INSTRUMENTAL ROLE IN PROCESS OF CONVERSION OF PERSIA AND AFGHANISTAN….NOW DAYS TOOK NEW NAME SWAMINARAYAN AND TAKE CARE OF THE SLAVES WHO PLAYED INSTRUMENTAL ROLE TOO.

I COME TO KNOW THAT AS MUGHALS WERE REACHING LAND OF LAV NANDAN….THIS SLAVES AND ABBASIDS TOOK NEW FORM AT TWO NED OF ASIA. THEY TOOK SHLTERS IN MISRA AS WELL AS PUNJAB. SHIEKH TOOK FORM OF SHIKH , KHILAFAT TOOK FORM OF KHALSA, TAGHLAQ TOOK FORM OF TEGH BAHADUR….AND SO ON. MOST SLAVE SOLDIERS AND ENTITY WHO PLAYED INSTRUMENTAL ROLE FOR ABBASIDS CHANGED THIER FORMS AND HIDDEN THIER TREASURE IN THEIR NEW TEMPLES ,THAT THEY LOOTED FORM LAND OF LAV NANDAN.

With my all respect to fighter kafirs of kabul , who faught for 1000 years , now I want to put forward another fold of history.

The people who invaded Kabul as habit to change their forms….

Link to my another article that shaws present form of real invaders on land of Lav nandan.

Presently they are in This forms …..say that they came from Amu Dariya and hide their real identity of Muhmmad Ghori and Qutbbin…….Samanids also has changed their form. They afraid of Mughals who was behind them

Posted in A Book - There was Ram | Leave a comment

CHAPTER -10 : CAPISA: THE GATE WAY OF INDIA :

“Where is the Shahi dynasty with its ministers, its kings & its great grandeur…The very name of the splendour of the Shahi kings has vanished. What is not seen in a dream, what even our imagination cannot conceive, that dynasty accomplished with ease.”

Kalhana’s Rajatarangini

Kalhana’s Rajatarangini

Kalhana’s Rajtarnagini is real historical document of Bharatvarsha. When Kalhan mentiones “Kabulshahi Kingdom” then there is no place to doubt that it was not Hindu culture Kingdom. Without reading “Rajtarangani” it is very difficult to understand history of ancient India and its tribes.

So first of all I am providing you link to two Books. Read it to understand ancient history of India.
(1) Kalhana’s Rajatarangini: A Chronicle of the Kings of Kasmir vol -1 By Kalhana
Book link

(2) Kalhana’s Rajatarangini: a chronicle of the kings of Kasmir, Volume 2
By Kalhana, M.A. Stein
Book link
without reading Rajtarangini it is also difficult to understand even present history.

Robert –Barhatgin – Raw Bharat
( prince of Ayodhya)

The name “Afghanistan” itself comes from “Upa-Gana-Stan” which means in Sanskrit “The place inhabited by allied tribes”. But now a days we opted to disconnect ourself from ancient history of Gandhara. We opted to foeget Sarswati –Sindhu culture ,We opted to forget history of Takshashila (Founed by Taksha –Son of Bharat).We opted to forget history of Pushkalavati (Peshawar) founded by Pushkala ,the son of Bharat (the brother of Rama).We opted to forget Kabulshahi rulers of gate way of India who ever remembered as holders of sword of Dharma. We forget everything. We have got no thread of memory in our deeper consciousness even.
We even forget that all the southern states names are once Kindom in Baluchistan. Andira , Dravida ,Pandyan were sons of Turvasu (Son of. Yayati).Sons of Turvasu ruled South India .Andhra derived its name form Andira (son of Turvasu). We forget totally our ancient history and civilization.
Yes ,we opted to forget everything because we were just witness and not creators. But think , how Bharatvanshis can forget it? How sons of Turvasu can forget it? How Ram can forget it? To understand their feelings we have to first believe that – There was Ram.If Ram was there then there was Bharat..There was Lau ….and there was Kush too.Let us try to understand history of Capisa and Gandhara and trace out clue to Bharat and Ram.

To understand ancient history of Capisa and its Kabulshahi rulers ,we have to understand Hsitory of Gandhara.

Gandhara/Waihind /Wales

Gandhara (also known as Waihind in Persian),(Read carefully,Waihind is clue to world History) is the name of an ancient kingdom (Mahajanpada), located in northern Pakistan and eastern Afghanistan).
The boundaries of Gandhara varied throughout history. Sometimes the Peshawar valley and Taxila were collectively referred to as Gandhara and sometimes the Swat valey (Sanskrit: Suvastu) was also included. The heart of Gandhara, however, was always the Peshawar valley. The kingdom was ruled from capitals at Pushkalavati (Charsadda), Taxila, Purushapura (Peshawar) and in its final days from Udabhandapura (Hund) on the Indus. According to the Puranas, they were named after Taksha and Pushkara, the two sons of Bharata, a prince of Ayodhya.
The region shows an influx of southern Central Asian culture in the Bronze Age with the Gandghra grave culture, likely corresponding to immigration of Indo -Aryan speakers and the nucleus of Vedic civilization. This culture survived till 1000 BC. Its evidence has been discovered in the hilly regions of Swat and Dir, and even at Taxila.

The name of the Gandharis is attested in the Rigveda (RV I.126.7) and in ancient inscriptions dating back to Achaemenid Persia. The Behistun inscription listing the 23 territories of King Darius I (519 BC) includes Gandhara along with Bactria and Thatagush ( Satagydia). In the book “Histories” by Herodotus, Gandhara is named as a source of tax collections for King Darius. The Gandharis, along with the Balhika (Bactrians),Angas, and the Magadhas, are also mentioned in the Atharvaveda (AV 5.22.14), as distant people. Gandharas are included in the Uttrapatha division of Puranic and Buddhistic traditions. The Aitreya Brahmana refers to king Naganajit of Gandhara who was a contemporary of Janaka, king of Videha.
During the Mahabharata period, the present-day Kandahar province of Afghanistan used to be known as Gandhar. Gandhara, the son of Arh, founded the city of Gandhar (the modern-day city of Kandahar) and made it his capital. The princess of Gandhara, Gandhari was married to Dritrashtra and was the mother of the Kauravas. The descendants of Gandhar rulers are known as Gandhars.
The ruins of the Gandhara kingdom can be found throughout Afghanistan and Pakistan. In Nowshera in the North west Frontier Province in Pakistan, there is even a barren area called the Gandhara Mound.

Gandhara had played an important role in the epic of Ramayana and Mahabhrata. Ambhi Kumar was direct descendant of Bharata (of Ramayana) and Shakuni (of Mahabharata). It is said that Lord Rama consolidated the rule of the Kosala Kingdom over the whole of the Indian peninsula. His brothers and sons ruled most of the Janapadas (16 states) at that time.
Link to Gandhara

Bharat-prince of Ayodhya:centre of Gandhara

Yes, you refer any literature ,any history , you will find that Bhratvanshis were in the centre of ancient Gandhara. The above links also narrates that the region shows an influx of southern Central Asian culture in the Bronze Age. This culture survived till 1000 BC. Its evidence has been discovered in the hilly regions of Swat and Dir, and even at Taxila. Further now we know that Sarsawti –Sindhu culture collapsed in a major disaster in 1500 BC. Migration story began with that. We also found Luwian kingdom and culture in Ancient Anatolia in 1200 BC.

Alexander’s invasion

The history of Alexander’s invasion can say us further history. Now we know that Ambhi Kumar was direct descendant of Bharata (of Ramayana) and Shakuni (of Mahabharata). Now look at description of Alexander’s invasion on Bharatvarsha. Until that period Capisa believed to be the Gate way of India.
“ Greek historians refer to three warlike peoples – the Astakenoi, the Aspasioi and the Assakenoi, living to the northwest of the river Indus, whom Alexander encountered during his campaign from Kapisi through Gandhara. The Aspasioi were related to the Assakenoi and were a western branch of them. Both the Aspasioi and Assakenoi soldiers earned the admiration of the Greeks for their fighting ability.

Bharat vanshi Ambhi – Puruvanshi Porus
In the spring of 327 BCE Alexander crossed the Hindu Kush and set out on the road to the Indus. He invited the Chieftains of the former Achaemenian Satrap of Gandhara to submit and join him. (Gandhara was the first kingdom of ancient India and is in the north of modern day Pakistan). Ambhi (Greek: Omphis), the ruler of Taxila, whose kingdom extended from the Indus to the Jhelum (Greek:Hydaspes) complied, as well as some others, Sangaeus (Sanjaya) of Peucalaotis (Pushkalavati), Cophaeus of the Kabul region and Assagetes (Ashvajit), chief of a part of west Gandhara, and Sicicottos (Shashigupta) from a hill state, south of the Hindu Kush.. However most of the highland chieftains refused to submit – including the Astekenoi, Aspasioi and Assakenoi, known in Indian texts as Hastinayanas, Ashvayanas and Ashvakayana (Ashwaka). Menas people living in the area were called Ashawaka or Komboja. The description can also give you further details of tribes who were dwelling in Gandhara and on Sindhu bank. Kamboja and Abhisara tribes are mentioned in History. We can assume from that details that same tribes also faught Against Islamic invasion too. The detail can be helpful that way.
Evidence to Rama
But single facts emerged out of above facts that Bharatvanshis were even ruling in the Bharatvarsha at time of Alexander. They were reminder to Ram …Evidence to Ram. Evidence to the history of Ayodhya….Founded by Manu after jalpralay (Natural Disaster).Secondly Porus belonged to ancient Puru dynasty. Means until Alexander’s invasion Sanatan thread prevailed in Bharatvarsha and its boundries are far away near Iran.

Link to Kamboja

Second link

Abhisara and Alexander
Abisares (or Abhisara) called Embisarus by Diodorus was an Indian king of Abhira descent beyond the river Hydapes (Jhelam), whose territory lay in the mountains, sent embassies to Alexander the Great both before and after the conquest of Porus in 326 BC, although inclined to espouse the side of the latter. Alexander not only allowed him to retain his kingdom, but increased it, and on his death in 325 BC appointed his son as his successor. The book “History of ancient India” By Rama Shankar Tripathi (p-122) also narrates Abhisara rulers.
Link to the book

Breaking of Sanatan Thread
Now we know that Bharatvanshi ruled Gandhar in form of “Ambhi” until 325 BC. But then we loose the clue. Then we have no record of Bharatvanshis. Xuanzang (or: Hsüan-tsang) (c. 602 – 664) gave account of Capisa and its rulers but unfortunately he did not mention Bharatvanshis. Even though Hsüan-tsang’s account help us to understand and solve Alberunis mysterious account of Capisa and its ruler.
Link to Hsuan –tsang)

At last, Islamic Historian Alberuni’s(11th century) historical fallacy distorted Sanatan history. The scholar mentioned Berhetgin dynasty ruled Capisa for 60 generations. The use of suffix “Gin” , Turkic culture and Tibetan origin of Kabulshahi kings mentioned by Al –Beruni diverted Sanatan thread. We lost our clue to Ram. Surprisingly nobody from us challenged Alberuni. Surprising nobody tried to search out Sanatan thread.

Now let us try connect that Sanatan thread with available historical records.
First let us know –who was Alberuni.

Al Beruni
Al Beruni (born 5 September 973 in Kath, Khwarezm, died 13 December 1048 in Ghazani), known as Alberonius in Latin and Al-Biruni in English, was an Iranian- Chorasmian Muslim scholar and polymath of the 11th century. Al-Biruni is regarded as one of the greatest scholars of the medieval Islamic era and was well versed in physics, mathematics,astronomy, and natural sciences, and also distinguished himself as a historian, chronologist and linguist. He was conversant in Chorasmian, Persian, Arabic, Sanskrit and Turkic, and also knew Greek, Hebrew and Syriac. He spent a large part of his life in Ghazni, modern-day Afghanistan, and in 1017 travelled to the Indian subcontinent. He became the most important interpreter of Indian science to the Islamic world.
Al- Beruni’s fame as an Indologist rests primarily on two texts. Al-Beruni wrote an encyclopedic work on India called “Tarikh Al-Hind” (History of India, also known as “Indica,” or simply “India”) in which he explored nearly every aspect of Indian life, including religion, history, geography, geology, science, and mathematics. He explores religion within a rich cultural context. He expresses his objective with simple eloquence: I shall not produce the arguments of our antagonists in order to refute such of them, as I believe to be in the wrong. My book is nothing but a simple historic record of facts. I shall place before the reader the theories of the Hindus exactly as they are, and I shall mention in connection with them similar theories of the Greeks in order to show the relationship existing between them (1910, Vol. 1, p. 7; 1958, p. 5)
Link to Alberuni

Al –Beruni’s cofusing account

The confused accounts of 11th century persian Muslim scholar Alberuni, (“which bear the impress of folklore for the early history of the Kabul Shahi rulers”) state that:
– the Hindu kings residing in Kabul were Turks
said to be of Tibetan origin
– that the first of them was a Barahatakin (founder of the dynasty), who came (from Tibet) into the country (Kabul), entered a cave and after a few days, started to creep out of it in the presence of people who looked upon him as a “new born baby”, clothed in Turkish dress. People honored him as a being of miraculous birth, destined to be a king. And he brought those countries under his sway and ruled under the title of Shahiya of Kabul
– the rule remained among his descendants for allegedly about sixty generations, till it was supplanted by a Hindu minister .

Link to present Capisa

In facts little historical information is available about our ancient kingdom of Capisa, the lion-gate of Hindustan. Al Beruni also mentioned folklores.Acharya Panini, chinese pilgrim Hiuen Tsang’s accounts of his visit to Hindustan and Islamic Historian ( Persian Muslim scholar) Alberuni ‘s accounts are the only availabe source of information.

YOGENDRA MISHRA rightly says in his book – THE HINDU SAHIS OF AFGHANISTAN AND THE PUNJAB A.D. 865-1026 PHASE OF THE ISLAMIC ADVANCE IN INDIA – that “the Hindus did not pay much attention to the historical order of things and were very careless in relating the chronological succession of their kings. Consequently only three of the rulers(of Capisa) are named by Alberuni in his account, viz., the founder (Barhatakin by name), one intervening monarch (called Kanik), and the last King.”(Katorman or Lagaturman). So here we are entring very obscure zone of history.Eventhough we shall try to reach upto hsitorical clues with help of whatever obscure facts available in Books and net links.

(1) Some historians even argued that Barhatigin is said to be the founder of the dynasty which is said to have ruled for 60 generations until AD 870. But if this is true, then it would take Barhatigin and the founding of the early Shahi dynasty back about 20×60=1200 years, i.e., to about 4th century BCE if we take the average generation of 20 years; and to 7th century BCE if average generation is taken as 25 years. It is well nigh impossible that a single dynasty could have ruled for 1200 (or 1500) years at a stretch. Moreover, king Kanik (if Kanishaka) ruled (AD 78-101) not over Kabul but over Purushapura/Gandhara and his descendants could not have ruled for almost 900 years as a single dynasty over Capisa/Kabul especially in a frontier region called the gateway of India. Pre Islamic Hindu and Buddhist heritage of Afghanistan is well established in the Shahi coinage from Kabul of this period.Bamiyan Buddha statue also erected during the rein of Kabulshahi dynasty nearby in seventh century.

Coins

Information about coins of ancient Capisa is also interesting. Coins depict the bust of the king , wearing a crown in shape of wolfs head( A sign of turkic descent) On the everse there is divinity with flames , with a Pahalavi inscription , copied after the coins of sasanian king KHUSRAW SECOND ( 591 -681)(The ancient geography of India” CHARLES WILLIAM WASON (p-39 )

(2) Brahmin vazir
In spite of all this confusing accounts , truth remains truth . The people of Capisa believed them the true defender of Gate way of India, and it is fundamental truth.Brahmins were their vazirs is seconde fundamental truth. People of Capisa were witness of their victory over Hun ,Shakas and Macedonia. People of Capisa were true believer of Ram and they had special eyes and vision to recognize their Ram in his all forms.
In fact Capisa was leader of the world history.Even Alberuni ‘s folklore like absured and confusing records also help us to unfold the mystery he created.Now let us unfold the mystries..
(3) Hindu kings residing in Kabul had Turkish culture .

– The detail of the chapter “ First Blood” helps us to unfold this mystery. The details of the chapter clarifies the point. It clarifies why the king of Capisa had Turkic culture in the eyes of Alberuni. and eventhough people of Capisa honouring the king as hindu king. The description of Alberuni and Hiuen Tsang unmistakebly proves that the king of Capisa was there in Asia Minor , besides his ally Bithynia.

(4) No Turkstan existed

Furthermore We have to look into the facts that Galatia and Bithynia were in Asia Minor or Anatolia(and not in Turkastan). Turkic tribes and Turkastan did not exist at that time in Asia minor when said Baratgin founed kabulshahi dynasty. In fact invading turkic tribes adopted the culture of asia Minor or Anatolia.

I want to convey that when Alexander invaded Capisa and “Ram” departed for “vanvas” ,there were no turkic tribes dwelled there in Asia minor or Anatolia. During “vanvas “ Ram encounterd the language and culture of Anatolia and came back. Later on invader turkic tribes who arrived in Anatolia in 10th or 11th century AD ,adopted the same culture of Anatolia.Yes when Alberuni wrote in 11th century , turks were there in Aisa minor. But Turks were not there in Anatolia(present Turkastan) when said Barhatgin founded Hindu –Baudh kabulshahi at Capisa.So it was historical fallacy occured by Al Biruni . Correct fact is Bahrhatgin hold the culture of Anatolia and not of Turkstan.

Turkic tribes reached Anatolia ( ANARTA KINGDOM THEY REMEMBERED) in 11 th century

In fact the Turkic migration reached the territory of what is now Turkey, by the 11th century. The Turkomen, Oghuz Turks who had been converted to Islam, were the main component of Turkic migration into Anatolia.[citation needed] The process was accelerated after the Battle of Manzikert victory of Seljuk Turks against the Byzantines; Anatolia would be called Turchia in the West as early as the 12th century.[85] The Mongols invaded Transoxiana, Iran, Azerbaijan and Anatolia; this caused Turkomens to move further to Western Anatolia.[86] In the case of the migrations, the Turkic peoples assimilated some of the Indo-European peoples encountered; Tocharian as well as the numerous Iranian speakers across the Asiatic steppe were switched to the Turkic language, and ultimately Greek, the majority language of Anatolia, declined in favour of Turkish.

Link to Turkstan

The above facts says that Alberuni’s folklorelike account of Kabulshahi rulers is misleading. It do not lead us anywhere. Still nobody tried to correct it.

Who can rule over Kamboja for 60 generations?

So we have little facts to establish that Bharatvanshis founded Kabulshahi dynasty in Capisa and they ruled Capisa till 870 AD. But Kamboja are real clue. Kamboja were present in area when Alexander invaded. When Kamboja are hindu clan then ruler Barhatgin should be Bharat. Otherwise how one dynasty could ruled over Sanatan Dharmi Kamboja for 60 generations? Presence of Kamboja or Ashwakani in Capisa is real clue to history. Any Sanatani can say that only Bharatvanshi can rule over Kamboja for long 60 generations. Means Kamboja , Abhisara were ally tribes dwelling in Afghanistan.

Further now we know history of Anatolia.History of Anatolia explain us why Barahat who founded Kabul shahi dynasty had culture of Anatolia. Their Brahmin vazirs are clue to true story. At the time of Islamic invasion again Bharatvanshis gave kingdom to their Brahman Vazir and went to Vanvas.Thereafter nobody from us ever try to search and know ..where Bharatvanshis are. Even Al –Biruni’s confusing account help us to correct the history.

In Defence of Bharat

– I agree with Alberuni that Barhat Dynasty ruled Capisa for 60 generation. Means Barhat founded kabulshahi dynasty in 2nd or 1st BC. After war against Macedonia (which I mentioned in the chapter –First Blood)

– I agree with Alberuni that Barhat dynasty kings hold culture of Anatolia . But I disagree with him that they were holding Turkic culture.Because Turkic people reached that region hardly in 10th or 11th century AD. I doubt that turkic people even not entered Afghanistan before 6th or 7 th century.

– Even Huen –Tsang record syas that Kshatriya ruler ruled over Capisa.

– Brahmin Vazir is major Clue. Alberuni mentioned it.Means Barhat belong to hindu clan. Ancient Brahmins only support real royal blood.

– If we check history of Alexander’s invasion then we can get record of people living in the province. Barhat ruled Kamboja,Abhisara and other ally tribes. Don’t you think that only Bharat can rule over Kamboja and Abhisar for 60 Generation?Al-beruni was scholar but not Hindu. He came from Iran , a country converted before 400 Years. How can he recognise Ram and Bharat? Alberuni used contemporary Turkic “Gin” suffix.The suffix was outcome of contemporary period. In 2nd century Bc nobody knew suffix “Gin”

– Even Rajtarngini lament for Kabulshahi rulers. Why?

– I firmly believe that Bharatvanshi ruled Capisa until 870 AD. When Bharatvarsha geared up for long time war. They gave responsibitity of Kabul to Brahmin Vazir and gone for longtime war or Vanvas.There after we never try to search them out. They are there somewhere….may be before our eyes somewhere.. but we deny to recognize them. That is Irony of fate.
Again in Vanvas

Yes when ever Bharatvarsha put in trouble Ram used to go in Vanvas.Because He was Ram.The history of Anatolia says the same history. Even Islamic Historian Alberuni endorsed that fact mysteriously.He tell us that Barhat Dynasty rulers had culture of Anatolia (Turkastan). That way Al-Beruni endorsed the facts I narrated in the chapter of book- “First Blood Of India”.So at the time of Islamic invasion Ram again go for vanvas putting responsibility of Kabul on the shoulder of his Brahmin Vazir. Then we never recognised him.

More facts about Kabulshahi

“The Shahi (Devanagari ) , Sahi , also called Shahiya dynasties ruled one of the Middle kingdoms of India which included portions of the Kabulistan and the old province of Gandhara (now in northern Pakistan), from the decline of the Kushan Empire in the 3rd century to the early 9th century. The kingdom was known as “Kabul Shahi” (Kabul-shahan or Ratbél-shahan in Persian ) between 565 and 879 CE when they had Kapisa and Kabul as their capitals, and later as “Hindu Shahi” when they moved their capital to Udabhandapura in Waihind (Hund).
The Shahis of Kabul/Gandhara are generally divided accordingly to two eras into the so-called Buddhist-Shahis and the so-called Hindu-Shahis, with the change-over thought to have occurred sometime around AD 870.

The first references to Kapisa appear in the writings of fifth century BCE Indian scholar Achariya Panini. Panini refers to the city of Kapisi, a city of the Kapisa kingdom. Panini also refers to Kapisayana, a famous wine from Kapisa. The city of Kapisi also appeared as Kavisiye on Graeco-Indian coins of Appolodotus/Eucratides.Archeology discoveries in 1939 confirm that the city of Kapisa was an emporium for Kapisayana wine, discovering numerous glass flasks, fish-shaped wine jars, and drinking cups typical of the wine trade of the era. The grapes (Kapisayani Draksha) and wine (Kapisayani Madhu) (The word Kapisayani not remind you of Capetian king of France?)of the area are referred to by several works of ancient Indian literature. The scholar of Mahabharata also noted the common practice of slavery in the city.
According to the scholar Pliny, the city of Kapisi (also referred to as Kaphusa by Pliny’s copyist Solinus and Kapisene by other classical chroniclers) was destroyed in the sixth century BCE by the Achaemenian emperor Cyrus (Kurush) (559-530 BC).
In later times, Kapisa seems to have been part of a kingdom ruled by a Buddhist Kshatriya king holding sway over ten neighboring states including Lampaka, Nagarahara, Gandhara and Banu, according to the Chinese pilgrim Hiuen Tsang who visited in 644 AD. Hiuen Tsang notes the Shen breed of horses from the area, and also notes the production of many types of cereals and fruits, as well as a scented root called Yu-ki.

Capisa- Kapisayana and French Capetian Kings

Above facts reveal that we never tired to search out Bharatvanshis who ruled Gandhara since Ramayana. That way we lost clue to Sanatana religion.

But Capetian Kings of France determined to carry history of Capisa. Yes,now we know that Bharatvanshis went in exile (In vanvas) in 870 AD. They gave kingdom to Brahmin king Kallar.

India Gears up

One can see that Hindustan was bubling before Islamic invasion. At all fronts People were preparing for long time war.People knew that “Vanvas of Ram” means war for Hindustan. Yes Ruler of Capisa , were the defender of the gate way of India. Nath cult of Gorakhnath also emerged and flourished during this period.
YOGENDRA MISHRA in his book given the full description of new Hindu movement. He mentions in his book that , “The reign of Lalliyas (Brahmin king of Kabul) synchronised with a period of great religious activity in Hinduism. It saw the growth and development of the Natha cult through the sadhana and preachings of Gorakshanatha (popularly called Gorakhnath) who is said by competent authorities to have flourished in the tenth century of the Vikrama era (circa A.D. 845-945, in round figures). His birthplace was Peshawar or Tila (Jhelum District, West Punjab). As both these places were in the Sahi dominians, we may say that the Sahi kingdom must have been the scene of his early activity. Gorakhnath born in a Brahmana family, was a Buddhist in the beginning, but turned to the Natha cult of Saivism later. He has rightly been regarded as the greatest figure after Sankaracharya (A. D. 788-820).s (P-16,17)
we should aware about the fact that Raja Bhaarthri , the elder brother of the king Vikramaditya also took sanyas and joined Nath cult during this period. India sensed the coming storm and determined and geared up to meet It.

France gears up

If we look at parallel history then the Sunline king of France Hugh Capet (c. 939 – 24 October 996), founded the Capetian dynasty in france. .Hugh was born in 939. His paternal family, the Robertians, were powerful landowners in the Île-de-France.The direct Capetians, or the House of Capet, ruled France from 987 to 1328; thereafter, the Kingdom was ruled by collateral branches of the dynasty. All French kings through Louis Philippe, and all royal pretenders since then, have belonged to the dynasty.
Nobody ever questions – what promped Robertian Sunline king Hugh Capet to hold the title ” Capetian “…. ,When Capisa-The gate way of India was at verge of falling ? Yes he showed determination to carry history of Capisa…. By holding the title .He determined to carry history of his ancecstral throne. This event connect – Bharat :prince of Ayodhya , So called Bathatgin dynasty of Capisa and Robertian King Hugh Capet of France.We have to remember that Hugh Capet was member of Holly Roman Empire.

Hugh founded Capetian dynasty in France , when “Capisa”, the gate way of India was invaded. It explains the story of determination of Hugh and his succsessors. History of Galetia (Asia Minor) even mentions that people from Gual came to Galetia (Asia Minor) and invaded Macedonia. France is part of ancient Gaul or Gandhara?

Family founder Robert (Rao Bharat ?)

Family founder of Hugh is Robert , and so his family is called Robertian . If we ever tried to undrstand the meaning of the word Robert , then there might be a different history. But our little mistake changed the whole route of history. Yes French Robertian Sun line rulers were carrying tradition of “Bharata” sunline dynasty of India. In sunline tradition of Bharatvarsha the younger brothers of the king are called Raws. As per this tradition the younger brother of shri ram was called “Raw Bharat” , and the name Robert implies the same meaning .The wabesite “Behindthename.com” explains the meaning of the name Robert.

ROBERT

Gender: Masculine
Usage: English, French, Scandinavian, German, Dutch, Czech, Polish, Russian, Slovene, Croatian, Romanian, Ancient Germanic

Pronounced: RAH-bert (English), ro-BER (French), RO-bert (German), RO-bert (Dutch), RAW-bert (Polish), RO-byert (Russian), RO-beert (Russian).
From the Germanic name Hrodebert meaning “bright fame”, derived from the Germanic elements hrod “fame” and beraht “bright”. The Normans introduced this name to Britain, where it replaced the Old English cognate Hreodbeorht. It has been a very common English name since that time.
The name has been borne by two early kings of France, two Dukes of Normandy, and three kings of Scotland, including Robert the Bruce who restored the independence of Scotland from England in the 14th century. The author Robert Browning (1812-1889) and poets Robert Burns (1759-1796) and Robert Frost (1874-1963) are famous literary bearers of this name. Other bearers include Robert E. Lee (1807-1870), the commander of the Confederate army during the American Civil War, and American actor Robert Redford (1936-).
This explanation suggets that Suryvanshi of Ayodhya were ruling France when Capisa ( The gate way of indi) was invaded. “ Bharat” in the form of Hugh Capet determined to carry the tradition of Capisa -the Gate way of India.

Yes ,the history of France proves that Barhatgin Dynasty mentioned by Albiruni was in fact Bharat Dynasty. The history of France proves the record , what no other historical account can prove. Yes ,Hugh Capet and history of Capetian (Or Kapisayana ?) dynasty gives us evidence to believe that rulers of Capisa were Bharatvanshis.

And Histoy proceed further…..

Hugh Capet (c. 939 – 24 October 996), called in contemporary sources “Hugh the Great” (Latin: Hugo Magnus), was the first King of France of the eponymous Capetian dynasty from his election to succeed the Carolingian Louis V in 987 until his death.

Most historians regard the beginnings of modern France with the coronation of Hugh Capet. This is because, as Count of Paris, he made the city his power center. The monarch began a long process of exerting control of the rest of the country from what became the capital of one of Europe’s most powerful and important nations, a major producer of ideas and ideals that have had global impact.

Descent and inheritance
The son of Hugh the Great, Duke of France, and Hedwige of Saxony, daughter of the German king Henry the Fowler, Hugh was born in 939. His paternal family, the Robertians, were powerful landowners in the Île-de-France. His grandfather had been King Robert I and his grandmother Beatrice was a Carolingian, a daughter of Herbert I of Vermandois. This makes him the great-great-great-great-great grandson of Charlemagne through both of his parents, through Louis the Pious and Pepin of Italy. King Odo was
his grand-uncle and King Rudolph the son-in-law of his grandfather, King Robert I. Hugh was born into a well-connected and powerful family with many ties to the reigning nobility of Europe.
Link to Capetian dynasty

Legacy

He is regarded as the founder of the Capetian dynasty. The direct Capetians, or the House of Capet, ruled France from 987 to 1328; thereafter, the Kingdom was ruled by collateral branches of the dynasty. All French kings through Louis Philippe, and all royal pretenders since then, have belonged to the dynasty.

Members of the Capetian dynasty are still the heads of state of the kingdom of Spain (in the person of the Bourbon Juan Carlos) and of the grand-duchy of Luxembourg, making it the oldest continuously reigning dynasty in the world. As one of the founders of what became the French state, Capet’s legacy contributed to creating a country that, in many respects, has led the world in the field of humanitarian thinking, rights, political liberty and human solidarity.

In coming chapters we shall also look to the facts, how Capetian dynasty of France carry tradition of Capisa –The gate way of India.

British Bard mentioned Capys
Still you Don’t believe then listen to the voice of the ancient British Bard (Royal poet). EDWARD DAVIES, RECTOR OF BISHOPSTON, IN THE COUNTY OF GLAMORGAN, mentioned it in his book named “ THE MYTHOLOGY AND RITES OF THE British Druids” .His book whispered that “King to Isle of Man”(Island of Manu) belonged to Capys in Asia. Royal Bard to the king announce this fact before 2000 years, in his poetic personification to King of Isle of Man ( Island of Manu).

“Y MARWAR LLVDD.—Bychan:
Yn enw Duw Trindawd, cardawd cyfnvys!
Llwyth lliaws, anuaws eu henwerys,
Dygorescynnaa Prydain, prif fan ynys;
Gwyr gwlad yr Asia, a gwlad Gafys;”

Writer also explain its meaning. Poet clearly mentioned the word “Marwar”. If you search the meaning of “Bychan” then it implies “Vishnu” or “Bishno”. You read the meaning of Washington , it will lead you to Bishno – Bychan. “LLVDD” clearly signals Lau. Remember, Bard said it in poetic personification of King of “ Isle of Man” (Island of Manu). Poetic lines explained in following way and mentions Capys in Asia. Bard begin with God Trinity.

isle of Man or Island of Manu?

Bard to king of Isle of Man mentioned that king belonged to Capys in Asia.

“In the name of the God Trinity, exhibit thy charity ! A numerous race, of ungentle manners, ‘ Repeat their invasion of Britain, chief of isles : Men from a country in Asia, and the region of CapyS ; J A people of iniquitous design : the land is not known That was their mother. They made a devious course by sea. In their flowing garments, who can equal them ? With design are they called in,with theiir short spears, those fqes.”
Link to the Book

Wales/ Waihind

Yes you can find this explanation in preface to book it self. Writer explains meaning of Poetic persofication with help of of Wales Language .Means Cymru people dwelling in Wales know Capisa/Capys. Do Wales language has something to do with language of Gandhara?
Then who are Symru people and what wales stands for? The answer is cule to real Ram.
Let us solve that problem today..And here itself. Now we know that Udabhandapura Waihind Was second seat of Capisa kingdom. Wales has something to do with Waihind?
To understand “Wihind” pl read following Book link…..
“Studies in the geography of ancient and medieval India”
By Dineshchandra Sircar (P-290) will tell you something about Waihind.
Book link

Waihind history

It is also very remarkable that Kalhana c 12th century the author of Rajatarangini written in 1147 49 AD also refers to the Shahis and does not maintain any any difference or distinction between the earlier Shahis RT IV 143 and the later Shahis or does not refer to any supplanting of the dynasty at any stage as Alberuni does in his Tarikh al Hind Furthermore Kalhana takes the dynasty of the ancestors of the Hindu Shahi rulers Lallya Kallar Kamala Toramana Bhimadeva Jaipala Anandapala Trilochanpala Bhimapala etc unbroken to as far as or earlier than 730 AD It is also remarkable that Rajatrangini and all other sources refer to the Shahi rulers of Udabhandapura Waihind as belonging to the Kshatriya lineage in contrast to Alberuni who designates the earlier Shahi rulers as Turks and the later as Brahmins The system of naming the kings of the so called Turki Shahi dynasty and the Hindu Shahi dynasty is also similar for which reason it is very likely that the caste of the two might also have been same i e Ksatriya Thus if we follow Kalhana then the ancestors of Shahi kings Lallya Toramana Kamalu Bhimadeva Jaipala Anandapala Trilochanapala etc may be traced back to the Ksatriya ruler of Kapisa Kabul 644 45 AD mentioned by Hiuen Tsang and also probably to prince Guna Varman 424 AD a princely scion of the Ksatriya rulers ruling at the start of 5th century in Kapisa Ki pin as mentioned in the Chinese Buddhist records In addition one ancient inscription and several ancient Buddhist manuscripts found from Gilgit area between upper Indus and river Kabul shed some light on three kings who ruled in Gilgit region in 6 7th c AD They also wore Shahi titles and their names are mentioned as Patoladeva alias Navasurendradiyta Nandin Srideva alias Surendra Vikrmadiyta Nandin and Patoladeva alias Vajraditya Nandin It is very relevant to mention here that each of the Shahi rulers mentioned in the above list of Gilgit rulers has Nandin as his surname or last name It is more than likely that the surname Nandin refers to their clan name It is also very remarkable that the modern Kamboj tribe of northern Punjab still has Nandan Nandi.
Link for further Information

Know wales
Wales ( Cymru) is a Country that is Part of the United Kingdom and the island of Great Britain, Bordered by England to its east and the Atlantic Ocean and Irish Sea to its west. It has a population of three million, and a total area of 20,779 km2 (8,023 sq mi). Wales has over 1,200 km (750 mi) of coastline, including its Offshore Islands; the largest, Anglesev, is also the largest island in the Irish Sea. Wales is largely mountainous, with its highest peaks in the north and central areas, especially in Snowdonia, which contains snowdown, its highest summit.

The Anglo –Saxon word for ‘foreign’ or ‘foreigner’ was Waelisc and a ‘foreign(er’s) land’ was called W?alas. The modern English forms of these words with respect to the modern country are Welsh (the people) and Wales (the land), respectively.
Historically in Britain the words were not restricted to modern Wales or to the Welsh but were used indiscriminately to refer to anything that the Anglo-Saxons associated with Celtic Britains, including other foreign lands (e.g., Cornwall), places once associated with Celtic Britons (e.g., Walworth in County Durham and Walton in West yorkshire), the surnames of people (e.g., Walsh and Wallace) and various other things that were once new and foreign to the Anglo-Saxons (e.g., the walnut). None of these historic usages is necessarily connected to Wales or the Welsh.
The Anglo-Saxon words are derived from the same germanic root (singular Walh, plural Walha), applied to Italic and celtic peoples and places, that has provided modern names for continental lands (e.g.,Wallania and Wallachia) and peoples (e.g., the Vlachs via a borrowing into Old church Slavanic), none of which has any connection to Wales or the Welsh.
(Now you should understand Vallace people who faught against Macedonia after Alexander’s Invasion on Indian borders.Once they were called King of India…It is History and not myth.)

Link to wales

Walha/Walh people are real clue to Capisa. They know their ancient Seat Waihind. The sirname “Abbott” is clue to “Udabhandapura”. They know it. They know it…..!
I appeal you to believe that they were our saviours and not Invaders.
Our “Jai Hind” “Jai Hind” shoutings put “Wahe Hind” “Wahe Hind” in deep Margins.

—————————————
At the end of reasearch

Present British dynasty
Ruler of Kabul Hindushahi

Now we know that Kuninda and Katyuri rulers of Devbhumi ruled up to Kabul and Kandhar . “Barhat” who founded Kabulshahi Hindushahi dynasty was Burhaditya….! Deity of Katarmal sun temple. Because now we know that the word ” Saxon ” ( Sah ) has connection with Kabul . Shah rulers also ruled Dhar and Devbhumi. That saxons have roots in name of Indra … “Saksanaye”. Evrything proves that present British dynasty is ancient ruler of Kabul …and Almora. Look when Kabulshahi dynasty departed they gave kingdom to Brahmin ruler “Kallar” and they departed .When Katyuris departed from Almora they also gifted land of Almora to Gujarati Bhrahmin Shri chand Tiwari. The Katyuri Dynasty founded by Vasudevrai. Kabulshahi and Almora both had same dynasty rulers.

One site mentions that Original name of Kapisa was Kasyapapura…Most Indian claim that they belong to Kashyap Gotra.

Link that explains Kasyapapur /Kapisa

BOOK LINK TO “Encyclopaedia of Ancient Indian Geography: Kasî – Z, Volume 2″
edited by Subodh Kapo (Page 367-68) WILL explain you the term. Then the term Caspian ?

Vasudevrai came in form of Viceroy

Means Almora ,Kabul and Britain had same ruling line. European history says that the people who faught against Macedonia and Greece ..reached up to Britain . Means Kabul and Almora faught against Macedonia . The defender of Bharatvarsha reached upto Britain and Came to their motherland in time of Crisis?We did not recognise our Sanatan defenders..who has history of Sheding Blood for cause of Bharatvarsha . Even nobody from us looked at similarity Between Goddess Britania and Bharatmata. They created replica of Bharat..ancient DEvbhumi on Britishland ..but none of us could recognise that replica .language problem ever put hurdles in their way. We believed them Robbers…and History took ” u ” turn. We closed the doors behind them . In fact we nenver looked at history of our Devbhumi.

The present British Dynasty is called windsor Dynasty…the word has roots in Wettin ..and that way ancient Wyrtgeorn dynasty of England (Indra land). Do you know what “Wyrtgeorn” or “Vrtraghne” means ? Indra was called “Vrtraghne” after he slained Vritra ,son of mother Danu . OR THEY REMEMBER WAIGUL VALLEY?

Link to my another article that explains everything about “Wyrtgeorn” / “Vrtraghne” /Widsor …!

Link to my another article

Believe me they are true defenders of Bharatvarsha . Not only that..They are Sanatan defenders of Bharatvarsha . By throwing them out now, ourselves disconnected with our owm history.

Surprisingly nobody from us ever tried to search out Kabulshahi ruler ,the true defender of Gate way of India. We forgot him in Turmoil and even after that nobody from us tried to search him out. True Bharatvarsha is only there in the soul of kabulshahi ruler. He Faught …faught and ..faught ! But We forget him as we forget Gate way of India ..Bomboret too.

We peole of India forget rulers of Almora and Kabul..but half of the world know the truth. So Nitsche’s madmen shouted ” God is dead ..we evrybody killed Him..!

Who betrayed whom ?

Now I can not resist to ask you quetion ? Who betrayed whom ? God beteyed us or we betrayed Gods? Vasudevrai betrayed us ? or We betrayed Viceroy (Vasudevrai )?

Posted in A Book - There was Ram | Leave a comment