“Where is the Shahi dynasty with its ministers, its kings & its great grandeur…The very name of the splendour of the Shahi kings has vanished. What is not seen in a dream, what even our imagination cannot conceive, that dynasty accomplished with ease.”
Kalhana’s Rajtarnagini is real historical document of Bharatvarsha. When Kalhan mentiones “Kabulshahi Kingdom” then there is no place to doubt that it was not Hindu culture Kingdom. Without reading “Rajtarangani” it is very difficult to understand history of ancient India and its tribes.
So first of all I am providing you link to two Books. Read it to understand ancient history of India.
(1) Kalhana’s Rajatarangini: A Chronicle of the Kings of Kasmir vol -1 By Kalhana
(2) Kalhana’s Rajatarangini: a chronicle of the kings of Kasmir, Volume 2
By Kalhana, M.A. Stein
without reading Rajtarangini it is also difficult to understand even present history.
Robert –Barhatgin – Raw Bharat
( prince of Ayodhya)
The name “Afghanistan” itself comes from “Upa-Gana-Stan” which means in Sanskrit “The place inhabited by allied tribes”. But now a days we opted to disconnect ourself from ancient history of Gandhara. We opted to foeget Sarswati –Sindhu culture ,We opted to forget history of Takshashila (Founed by Taksha –Son of Bharat).We opted to forget history of Pushkalavati (Peshawar) founded by Pushkala ,the son of Bharat (the brother of Rama).We opted to forget Kabulshahi rulers of gate way of India who ever remembered as holders of sword of Dharma. We forget everything. We have got no thread of memory in our deeper consciousness even.
We even forget that all the southern states names are once Kindom in Baluchistan. Andira , Dravida ,Pandyan were sons of Turvasu (Son of. Yayati).Sons of Turvasu ruled South India .Andhra derived its name form Andira (son of Turvasu). We forget totally our ancient history and civilization.
Yes ,we opted to forget everything because we were just witness and not creators. But think , how Bharatvanshis can forget it? How sons of Turvasu can forget it? How Ram can forget it? To understand their feelings we have to first believe that – There was Ram.If Ram was there then there was Bharat..There was Lau ….and there was Kush too.Let us try to understand history of Capisa and Gandhara and trace out clue to Bharat and Ram.
To understand ancient history of Capisa and its Kabulshahi rulers ,we have to understand Hsitory of Gandhara.
Gandhara (also known as Waihind in Persian),(Read carefully,Waihind is clue to world History) is the name of an ancient kingdom (Mahajanpada), located in northern Pakistan and eastern Afghanistan).
The boundaries of Gandhara varied throughout history. Sometimes the Peshawar valley and Taxila were collectively referred to as Gandhara and sometimes the Swat valey (Sanskrit: Suvastu) was also included. The heart of Gandhara, however, was always the Peshawar valley. The kingdom was ruled from capitals at Pushkalavati (Charsadda), Taxila, Purushapura (Peshawar) and in its final days from Udabhandapura (Hund) on the Indus. According to the Puranas, they were named after Taksha and Pushkara, the two sons of Bharata, a prince of Ayodhya.
The region shows an influx of southern Central Asian culture in the Bronze Age with the Gandghra grave culture, likely corresponding to immigration of Indo -Aryan speakers and the nucleus of Vedic civilization. This culture survived till 1000 BC. Its evidence has been discovered in the hilly regions of Swat and Dir, and even at Taxila.
The name of the Gandharis is attested in the Rigveda (RV I.126.7) and in ancient inscriptions dating back to Achaemenid Persia. The Behistun inscription listing the 23 territories of King Darius I (519 BC) includes Gandhara along with Bactria and Thatagush ( Satagydia). In the book “Histories” by Herodotus, Gandhara is named as a source of tax collections for King Darius. The Gandharis, along with the Balhika (Bactrians),Angas, and the Magadhas, are also mentioned in the Atharvaveda (AV 5.22.14), as distant people. Gandharas are included in the Uttrapatha division of Puranic and Buddhistic traditions. The Aitreya Brahmana refers to king Naganajit of Gandhara who was a contemporary of Janaka, king of Videha.
During the Mahabharata period, the present-day Kandahar province of Afghanistan used to be known as Gandhar. Gandhara, the son of Arh, founded the city of Gandhar (the modern-day city of Kandahar) and made it his capital. The princess of Gandhara, Gandhari was married to Dritrashtra and was the mother of the Kauravas. The descendants of Gandhar rulers are known as Gandhars.
The ruins of the Gandhara kingdom can be found throughout Afghanistan and Pakistan. In Nowshera in the North west Frontier Province in Pakistan, there is even a barren area called the Gandhara Mound.
Gandhara had played an important role in the epic of Ramayana and Mahabhrata. Ambhi Kumar was direct descendant of Bharata (of Ramayana) and Shakuni (of Mahabharata). It is said that Lord Rama consolidated the rule of the Kosala Kingdom over the whole of the Indian peninsula. His brothers and sons ruled most of the Janapadas (16 states) at that time.
Link to Gandhara
Bharat-prince of Ayodhya:centre of Gandhara
Yes, you refer any literature ,any history , you will find that Bhratvanshis were in the centre of ancient Gandhara. The above links also narrates that the region shows an influx of southern Central Asian culture in the Bronze Age. This culture survived till 1000 BC. Its evidence has been discovered in the hilly regions of Swat and Dir, and even at Taxila. Further now we know that Sarsawti –Sindhu culture collapsed in a major disaster in 1500 BC. Migration story began with that. We also found Luwian kingdom and culture in Ancient Anatolia in 1200 BC.
The history of Alexander’s invasion can say us further history. Now we know that Ambhi Kumar was direct descendant of Bharata (of Ramayana) and Shakuni (of Mahabharata). Now look at description of Alexander’s invasion on Bharatvarsha. Until that period Capisa believed to be the Gate way of India.
“ Greek historians refer to three warlike peoples – the Astakenoi, the Aspasioi and the Assakenoi, living to the northwest of the river Indus, whom Alexander encountered during his campaign from Kapisi through Gandhara. The Aspasioi were related to the Assakenoi and were a western branch of them. Both the Aspasioi and Assakenoi soldiers earned the admiration of the Greeks for their fighting ability.
Bharat vanshi Ambhi – Puruvanshi Porus
In the spring of 327 BCE Alexander crossed the Hindu Kush and set out on the road to the Indus. He invited the Chieftains of the former Achaemenian Satrap of Gandhara to submit and join him. (Gandhara was the first kingdom of ancient India and is in the north of modern day Pakistan). Ambhi (Greek: Omphis), the ruler of Taxila, whose kingdom extended from the Indus to the Jhelum (Greek:Hydaspes) complied, as well as some others, Sangaeus (Sanjaya) of Peucalaotis (Pushkalavati), Cophaeus of the Kabul region and Assagetes (Ashvajit), chief of a part of west Gandhara, and Sicicottos (Shashigupta) from a hill state, south of the Hindu Kush.. However most of the highland chieftains refused to submit – including the Astekenoi, Aspasioi and Assakenoi, known in Indian texts as Hastinayanas, Ashvayanas and Ashvakayana (Ashwaka). Menas people living in the area were called Ashawaka or Komboja. The description can also give you further details of tribes who were dwelling in Gandhara and on Sindhu bank. Kamboja and Abhisara tribes are mentioned in History. We can assume from that details that same tribes also faught Against Islamic invasion too. The detail can be helpful that way.
Evidence to Rama
But single facts emerged out of above facts that Bharatvanshis were even ruling in the Bharatvarsha at time of Alexander. They were reminder to Ram …Evidence to Ram. Evidence to the history of Ayodhya….Founded by Manu after jalpralay (Natural Disaster).Secondly Porus belonged to ancient Puru dynasty. Means until Alexander’s invasion Sanatan thread prevailed in Bharatvarsha and its boundries are far away near Iran.
Link to Kamboja
Abhisara and Alexander
Abisares (or Abhisara) called Embisarus by Diodorus was an Indian king of Abhira descent beyond the river Hydapes (Jhelam), whose territory lay in the mountains, sent embassies to Alexander the Great both before and after the conquest of Porus in 326 BC, although inclined to espouse the side of the latter. Alexander not only allowed him to retain his kingdom, but increased it, and on his death in 325 BC appointed his son as his successor. The book “History of ancient India” By Rama Shankar Tripathi (p-122) also narrates Abhisara rulers.
Link to the book
Breaking of Sanatan Thread
Now we know that Bharatvanshi ruled Gandhar in form of “Ambhi” until 325 BC. But then we loose the clue. Then we have no record of Bharatvanshis. Xuanzang (or: Hsüan-tsang) (c. 602 – 664) gave account of Capisa and its rulers but unfortunately he did not mention Bharatvanshis. Even though Hsüan-tsang’s account help us to understand and solve Alberunis mysterious account of Capisa and its ruler.
Link to Hsuan –tsang)
At last, Islamic Historian Alberuni’s(11th century) historical fallacy distorted Sanatan history. The scholar mentioned Berhetgin dynasty ruled Capisa for 60 generations. The use of suffix “Gin” , Turkic culture and Tibetan origin of Kabulshahi kings mentioned by Al –Beruni diverted Sanatan thread. We lost our clue to Ram. Surprisingly nobody from us challenged Alberuni. Surprising nobody tried to search out Sanatan thread.
Now let us try connect that Sanatan thread with available historical records.
First let us know –who was Alberuni.
Al Beruni (born 5 September 973 in Kath, Khwarezm, died 13 December 1048 in Ghazani), known as Alberonius in Latin and Al-Biruni in English, was an Iranian- Chorasmian Muslim scholar and polymath of the 11th century. Al-Biruni is regarded as one of the greatest scholars of the medieval Islamic era and was well versed in physics, mathematics,astronomy, and natural sciences, and also distinguished himself as a historian, chronologist and linguist. He was conversant in Chorasmian, Persian, Arabic, Sanskrit and Turkic, and also knew Greek, Hebrew and Syriac. He spent a large part of his life in Ghazni, modern-day Afghanistan, and in 1017 travelled to the Indian subcontinent. He became the most important interpreter of Indian science to the Islamic world.
Al- Beruni’s fame as an Indologist rests primarily on two texts. Al-Beruni wrote an encyclopedic work on India called “Tarikh Al-Hind” (History of India, also known as “Indica,” or simply “India”) in which he explored nearly every aspect of Indian life, including religion, history, geography, geology, science, and mathematics. He explores religion within a rich cultural context. He expresses his objective with simple eloquence: I shall not produce the arguments of our antagonists in order to refute such of them, as I believe to be in the wrong. My book is nothing but a simple historic record of facts. I shall place before the reader the theories of the Hindus exactly as they are, and I shall mention in connection with them similar theories of the Greeks in order to show the relationship existing between them (1910, Vol. 1, p. 7; 1958, p. 5)
Link to Alberuni
Al –Beruni’s cofusing account
The confused accounts of 11th century persian Muslim scholar Alberuni, (“which bear the impress of folklore for the early history of the Kabul Shahi rulers”) state that:
– the Hindu kings residing in Kabul were Turks
said to be of Tibetan origin
– that the first of them was a Barahatakin (founder of the dynasty), who came (from Tibet) into the country (Kabul), entered a cave and after a few days, started to creep out of it in the presence of people who looked upon him as a “new born baby”, clothed in Turkish dress. People honored him as a being of miraculous birth, destined to be a king. And he brought those countries under his sway and ruled under the title of Shahiya of Kabul
– the rule remained among his descendants for allegedly about sixty generations, till it was supplanted by a Hindu minister .
Link to present Capisa
In facts little historical information is available about our ancient kingdom of Capisa, the lion-gate of Hindustan. Al Beruni also mentioned folklores.Acharya Panini, chinese pilgrim Hiuen Tsang’s accounts of his visit to Hindustan and Islamic Historian ( Persian Muslim scholar) Alberuni ‘s accounts are the only availabe source of information.
YOGENDRA MISHRA rightly says in his book – THE HINDU SAHIS OF AFGHANISTAN AND THE PUNJAB A.D. 865-1026 PHASE OF THE ISLAMIC ADVANCE IN INDIA – that “the Hindus did not pay much attention to the historical order of things and were very careless in relating the chronological succession of their kings. Consequently only three of the rulers(of Capisa) are named by Alberuni in his account, viz., the founder (Barhatakin by name), one intervening monarch (called Kanik), and the last King.”(Katorman or Lagaturman). So here we are entring very obscure zone of history.Eventhough we shall try to reach upto hsitorical clues with help of whatever obscure facts available in Books and net links.
(1) Some historians even argued that Barhatigin is said to be the founder of the dynasty which is said to have ruled for 60 generations until AD 870. But if this is true, then it would take Barhatigin and the founding of the early Shahi dynasty back about 20×60=1200 years, i.e., to about 4th century BCE if we take the average generation of 20 years; and to 7th century BCE if average generation is taken as 25 years. It is well nigh impossible that a single dynasty could have ruled for 1200 (or 1500) years at a stretch. Moreover, king Kanik (if Kanishaka) ruled (AD 78-101) not over Kabul but over Purushapura/Gandhara and his descendants could not have ruled for almost 900 years as a single dynasty over Capisa/Kabul especially in a frontier region called the gateway of India. Pre Islamic Hindu and Buddhist heritage of Afghanistan is well established in the Shahi coinage from Kabul of this period.Bamiyan Buddha statue also erected during the rein of Kabulshahi dynasty nearby in seventh century.
Information about coins of ancient Capisa is also interesting. Coins depict the bust of the king , wearing a crown in shape of wolfs head( A sign of turkic descent) On the everse there is divinity with flames , with a Pahalavi inscription , copied after the coins of sasanian king KHUSRAW SECOND ( 591 -681)(The ancient geography of India” CHARLES WILLIAM WASON (p-39 )
(2) Brahmin vazir
In spite of all this confusing accounts , truth remains truth . The people of Capisa believed them the true defender of Gate way of India, and it is fundamental truth.Brahmins were their vazirs is seconde fundamental truth. People of Capisa were witness of their victory over Hun ,Shakas and Macedonia. People of Capisa were true believer of Ram and they had special eyes and vision to recognize their Ram in his all forms.
In fact Capisa was leader of the world history.Even Alberuni ‘s folklore like absured and confusing records also help us to unfold the mystery he created.Now let us unfold the mystries..
(3) Hindu kings residing in Kabul had Turkish culture .
– The detail of the chapter “ First Blood” helps us to unfold this mystery. The details of the chapter clarifies the point. It clarifies why the king of Capisa had Turkic culture in the eyes of Alberuni. and eventhough people of Capisa honouring the king as hindu king. The description of Alberuni and Hiuen Tsang unmistakebly proves that the king of Capisa was there in Asia Minor , besides his ally Bithynia.
(4) No Turkstan existed
Furthermore We have to look into the facts that Galatia and Bithynia were in Asia Minor or Anatolia(and not in Turkastan). Turkic tribes and Turkastan did not exist at that time in Asia minor when said Baratgin founed kabulshahi dynasty. In fact invading turkic tribes adopted the culture of asia Minor or Anatolia.
I want to convey that when Alexander invaded Capisa and “Ram” departed for “vanvas” ,there were no turkic tribes dwelled there in Asia minor or Anatolia. During “vanvas “ Ram encounterd the language and culture of Anatolia and came back. Later on invader turkic tribes who arrived in Anatolia in 10th or 11th century AD ,adopted the same culture of Anatolia.Yes when Alberuni wrote in 11th century , turks were there in Aisa minor. But Turks were not there in Anatolia(present Turkastan) when said Barhatgin founded Hindu –Baudh kabulshahi at Capisa.So it was historical fallacy occured by Al Biruni . Correct fact is Bahrhatgin hold the culture of Anatolia and not of Turkstan.
Turkic tribes reached Anatolia ( ANARTA KINGDOM THEY REMEMBERED) in 11 th century
In fact the Turkic migration reached the territory of what is now Turkey, by the 11th century. The Turkomen, Oghuz Turks who had been converted to Islam, were the main component of Turkic migration into Anatolia. The process was accelerated after the Battle of Manzikert victory of Seljuk Turks against the Byzantines; Anatolia would be called Turchia in the West as early as the 12th century. The Mongols invaded Transoxiana, Iran, Azerbaijan and Anatolia; this caused Turkomens to move further to Western Anatolia. In the case of the migrations, the Turkic peoples assimilated some of the Indo-European peoples encountered; Tocharian as well as the numerous Iranian speakers across the Asiatic steppe were switched to the Turkic language, and ultimately Greek, the majority language of Anatolia, declined in favour of Turkish.
Link to Turkstan
The above facts says that Alberuni’s folklorelike account of Kabulshahi rulers is misleading. It do not lead us anywhere. Still nobody tried to correct it.
Who can rule over Kamboja for 60 generations?
So we have little facts to establish that Bharatvanshis founded Kabulshahi dynasty in Capisa and they ruled Capisa till 870 AD. But Kamboja are real clue. Kamboja were present in area when Alexander invaded. When Kamboja are hindu clan then ruler Barhatgin should be Bharat. Otherwise how one dynasty could ruled over Sanatan Dharmi Kamboja for 60 generations? Presence of Kamboja or Ashwakani in Capisa is real clue to history. Any Sanatani can say that only Bharatvanshi can rule over Kamboja for long 60 generations. Means Kamboja , Abhisara were ally tribes dwelling in Afghanistan.
Further now we know history of Anatolia.History of Anatolia explain us why Barahat who founded Kabul shahi dynasty had culture of Anatolia. Their Brahmin vazirs are clue to true story. At the time of Islamic invasion again Bharatvanshis gave kingdom to their Brahman Vazir and went to Vanvas.Thereafter nobody from us ever try to search and know ..where Bharatvanshis are. Even Al –Biruni’s confusing account help us to correct the history.
In Defence of Bharat
– I agree with Alberuni that Barhat Dynasty ruled Capisa for 60 generation. Means Barhat founded kabulshahi dynasty in 2nd or 1st BC. After war against Macedonia (which I mentioned in the chapter –First Blood)
– I agree with Alberuni that Barhat dynasty kings hold culture of Anatolia . But I disagree with him that they were holding Turkic culture.Because Turkic people reached that region hardly in 10th or 11th century AD. I doubt that turkic people even not entered Afghanistan before 6th or 7 th century.
– Even Huen –Tsang record syas that Kshatriya ruler ruled over Capisa.
– Brahmin Vazir is major Clue. Alberuni mentioned it.Means Barhat belong to hindu clan. Ancient Brahmins only support real royal blood.
– If we check history of Alexander’s invasion then we can get record of people living in the province. Barhat ruled Kamboja,Abhisara and other ally tribes. Don’t you think that only Bharat can rule over Kamboja and Abhisar for 60 Generation?Al-beruni was scholar but not Hindu. He came from Iran , a country converted before 400 Years. How can he recognise Ram and Bharat? Alberuni used contemporary Turkic “Gin” suffix.The suffix was outcome of contemporary period. In 2nd century Bc nobody knew suffix “Gin”
– Even Rajtarngini lament for Kabulshahi rulers. Why?
– I firmly believe that Bharatvanshi ruled Capisa until 870 AD. When Bharatvarsha geared up for long time war. They gave responsibitity of Kabul to Brahmin Vazir and gone for longtime war or Vanvas.There after we never try to search them out. They are there somewhere….may be before our eyes somewhere.. but we deny to recognize them. That is Irony of fate.
Again in Vanvas
Yes when ever Bharatvarsha put in trouble Ram used to go in Vanvas.Because He was Ram.The history of Anatolia says the same history. Even Islamic Historian Alberuni endorsed that fact mysteriously.He tell us that Barhat Dynasty rulers had culture of Anatolia (Turkastan). That way Al-Beruni endorsed the facts I narrated in the chapter of book- “First Blood Of India”.So at the time of Islamic invasion Ram again go for vanvas putting responsibility of Kabul on the shoulder of his Brahmin Vazir. Then we never recognised him.
More facts about Kabulshahi
“The Shahi (Devanagari ) , Sahi , also called Shahiya dynasties ruled one of the Middle kingdoms of India which included portions of the Kabulistan and the old province of Gandhara (now in northern Pakistan), from the decline of the Kushan Empire in the 3rd century to the early 9th century. The kingdom was known as “Kabul Shahi” (Kabul-shahan or Ratbél-shahan in Persian ) between 565 and 879 CE when they had Kapisa and Kabul as their capitals, and later as “Hindu Shahi” when they moved their capital to Udabhandapura in Waihind (Hund).
The first references to Kapisa appear in the writings of fifth century BCE Indian scholar Achariya Panini. Panini refers to the city of Kapisi, a city of the Kapisa kingdom. Panini also refers to Kapisayana, a famous wine from Kapisa. The city of Kapisi also appeared as Kavisiye on Graeco-Indian coins of Appolodotus/Eucratides.Archeology discoveries in 1939 confirm that the city of Kapisa was an emporium for Kapisayana wine, discovering numerous glass flasks, fish-shaped wine jars, and drinking cups typical of the wine trade of the era. The grapes (Kapisayani Draksha) and wine (Kapisayani Madhu) (The word Kapisayani not remind you of Capetian king of France?)of the area are referred to by several works of ancient Indian literature. The scholar of Mahabharata also noted the common practice of slavery in the city.
According to the scholar Pliny, the city of Kapisi (also referred to as Kaphusa by Pliny’s copyist Solinus and Kapisene by other classical chroniclers) was destroyed in the sixth century BCE by the Achaemenian emperor Cyrus (Kurush) (559-530 BC).
In later times, Kapisa seems to have been part of a kingdom ruled by a Buddhist Kshatriya king holding sway over ten neighboring states including Lampaka, Nagarahara, Gandhara and Banu, according to the Chinese pilgrim Hiuen Tsang who visited in 644 AD. Hiuen Tsang notes the Shen breed of horses from the area, and also notes the production of many types of cereals and fruits, as well as a scented root called Yu-ki.
Capisa- Kapisayana and French Capetian Kings
Above facts reveal that we never tired to search out Bharatvanshis who ruled Gandhara since Ramayana. That way we lost clue to Sanatana religion.
But Capetian Kings of France determined to carry history of Capisa. Yes,now we know that Bharatvanshis went in exile (In vanvas) in 870 AD. They gave kingdom to Brahmin king Kallar.
India Gears up
One can see that Hindustan was bubling before Islamic invasion. At all fronts People were preparing for long time war.People knew that “Vanvas of Ram” means war for Hindustan. Yes Ruler of Capisa , were the defender of the gate way of India. Nath cult of Gorakhnath also emerged and flourished during this period.
YOGENDRA MISHRA in his book given the full description of new Hindu movement. He mentions in his book that , “The reign of Lalliyas (Brahmin king of Kabul) synchronised with a period of great religious activity in Hinduism. It saw the growth and development of the Natha cult through the sadhana and preachings of Gorakshanatha (popularly called Gorakhnath) who is said by competent authorities to have flourished in the tenth century of the Vikrama era (circa A.D. 845-945, in round figures). His birthplace was Peshawar or Tila (Jhelum District, West Punjab). As both these places were in the Sahi dominians, we may say that the Sahi kingdom must have been the scene of his early activity. Gorakhnath born in a Brahmana family, was a Buddhist in the beginning, but turned to the Natha cult of Saivism later. He has rightly been regarded as the greatest figure after Sankaracharya (A. D. 788-820).s (P-16,17)
we should aware about the fact that Raja Bhaarthri , the elder brother of the king Vikramaditya also took sanyas and joined Nath cult during this period. India sensed the coming storm and determined and geared up to meet It.
France gears up
If we look at parallel history then the Sunline king of France Hugh Capet (c. 939 – 24 October 996), founded the Capetian dynasty in france. .Hugh was born in 939. His paternal family, the Robertians, were powerful landowners in the Île-de-France.The direct Capetians, or the House of Capet, ruled France from 987 to 1328; thereafter, the Kingdom was ruled by collateral branches of the dynasty. All French kings through Louis Philippe, and all royal pretenders since then, have belonged to the dynasty.
Nobody ever questions – what promped Robertian Sunline king Hugh Capet to hold the title ” Capetian “…. ,When Capisa-The gate way of India was at verge of falling ? Yes he showed determination to carry history of Capisa…. By holding the title .He determined to carry history of his ancecstral throne. This event connect – Bharat :prince of Ayodhya , So called Bathatgin dynasty of Capisa and Robertian King Hugh Capet of France.We have to remember that Hugh Capet was member of Holly Roman Empire.
Hugh founded Capetian dynasty in France , when “Capisa”, the gate way of India was invaded. It explains the story of determination of Hugh and his succsessors. History of Galetia (Asia Minor) even mentions that people from Gual came to Galetia (Asia Minor) and invaded Macedonia. France is part of ancient Gaul or Gandhara?
Family founder Robert (Rao Bharat ?)
Family founder of Hugh is Robert , and so his family is called Robertian . If we ever tried to undrstand the meaning of the word Robert , then there might be a different history. But our little mistake changed the whole route of history. Yes French Robertian Sun line rulers were carrying tradition of “Bharata” sunline dynasty of India. In sunline tradition of Bharatvarsha the younger brothers of the king are called Raws. As per this tradition the younger brother of shri ram was called “Raw Bharat” , and the name Robert implies the same meaning .The wabesite “Behindthename.com” explains the meaning of the name Robert.
Usage: English, French, Scandinavian, German, Dutch, Czech, Polish, Russian, Slovene, Croatian, Romanian, Ancient Germanic
Pronounced: RAH-bert (English), ro-BER (French), RO-bert (German), RO-bert (Dutch), RAW-bert (Polish), RO-byert (Russian), RO-beert (Russian).
From the Germanic name Hrodebert meaning “bright fame”, derived from the Germanic elements hrod “fame” and beraht “bright”. The Normans introduced this name to Britain, where it replaced the Old English cognate Hreodbeorht. It has been a very common English name since that time.
The name has been borne by two early kings of France, two Dukes of Normandy, and three kings of Scotland, including Robert the Bruce who restored the independence of Scotland from England in the 14th century. The author Robert Browning (1812-1889) and poets Robert Burns (1759-1796) and Robert Frost (1874-1963) are famous literary bearers of this name. Other bearers include Robert E. Lee (1807-1870), the commander of the Confederate army during the American Civil War, and American actor Robert Redford (1936-).
This explanation suggets that Suryvanshi of Ayodhya were ruling France when Capisa ( The gate way of indi) was invaded. “ Bharat” in the form of Hugh Capet determined to carry the tradition of Capisa -the Gate way of India.
Yes ,the history of France proves that Barhatgin Dynasty mentioned by Albiruni was in fact Bharat Dynasty. The history of France proves the record , what no other historical account can prove. Yes ,Hugh Capet and history of Capetian (Or Kapisayana ?) dynasty gives us evidence to believe that rulers of Capisa were Bharatvanshis.
And Histoy proceed further…..
Hugh Capet (c. 939 – 24 October 996), called in contemporary sources “Hugh the Great” (Latin: Hugo Magnus), was the first King of France of the eponymous Capetian dynasty from his election to succeed the Carolingian Louis V in 987 until his death.
Most historians regard the beginnings of modern France with the coronation of Hugh Capet. This is because, as Count of Paris, he made the city his power center. The monarch began a long process of exerting control of the rest of the country from what became the capital of one of Europe’s most powerful and important nations, a major producer of ideas and ideals that have had global impact.
Descent and inheritance
The son of Hugh the Great, Duke of France, and Hedwige of Saxony, daughter of the German king Henry the Fowler, Hugh was born in 939. His paternal family, the Robertians, were powerful landowners in the Île-de-France. His grandfather had been King Robert I and his grandmother Beatrice was a Carolingian, a daughter of Herbert I of Vermandois. This makes him the great-great-great-great-great grandson of Charlemagne through both of his parents, through Louis the Pious and Pepin of Italy. King Odo was
his grand-uncle and King Rudolph the son-in-law of his grandfather, King Robert I. Hugh was born into a well-connected and powerful family with many ties to the reigning nobility of Europe.
Link to Capetian dynasty
He is regarded as the founder of the Capetian dynasty. The direct Capetians, or the House of Capet, ruled France from 987 to 1328; thereafter, the Kingdom was ruled by collateral branches of the dynasty. All French kings through Louis Philippe, and all royal pretenders since then, have belonged to the dynasty.
Members of the Capetian dynasty are still the heads of state of the kingdom of Spain (in the person of the Bourbon Juan Carlos) and of the grand-duchy of Luxembourg, making it the oldest continuously reigning dynasty in the world. As one of the founders of what became the French state, Capet’s legacy contributed to creating a country that, in many respects, has led the world in the field of humanitarian thinking, rights, political liberty and human solidarity.
In coming chapters we shall also look to the facts, how Capetian dynasty of France carry tradition of Capisa –The gate way of India.
British Bard mentioned Capys
Still you Don’t believe then listen to the voice of the ancient British Bard (Royal poet). EDWARD DAVIES, RECTOR OF BISHOPSTON, IN THE COUNTY OF GLAMORGAN, mentioned it in his book named “ THE MYTHOLOGY AND RITES OF THE British Druids” .His book whispered that “King to Isle of Man”(Island of Manu) belonged to Capys in Asia. Royal Bard to the king announce this fact before 2000 years, in his poetic personification to King of Isle of Man ( Island of Manu).
“Y MARWAR LLVDD.—Bychan:
Yn enw Duw Trindawd, cardawd cyfnvys!
Llwyth lliaws, anuaws eu henwerys,
Dygorescynnaa Prydain, prif fan ynys;
Gwyr gwlad yr Asia, a gwlad Gafys;”
Writer also explain its meaning. Poet clearly mentioned the word “Marwar”. If you search the meaning of “Bychan” then it implies “Vishnu” or “Bishno”. You read the meaning of Washington , it will lead you to Bishno – Bychan. “LLVDD” clearly signals Lau. Remember, Bard said it in poetic personification of King of “ Isle of Man” (Island of Manu). Poetic lines explained in following way and mentions Capys in Asia. Bard begin with God Trinity.
“In the name of the God Trinity, exhibit thy charity ! A numerous race, of ungentle manners, ‘ Repeat their invasion of Britain, chief of isles : Men from a country in Asia, and the region of CapyS ; J A people of iniquitous design : the land is not known That was their mother. They made a devious course by sea. In their flowing garments, who can equal them ? With design are they called in,with theiir short spears, those fqes.”
Link to the Book
Yes you can find this explanation in preface to book it self. Writer explains meaning of Poetic persofication with help of of Wales Language .Means Cymru people dwelling in Wales know Capisa/Capys. Do Wales language has something to do with language of Gandhara?
Then who are Symru people and what wales stands for? The answer is cule to real Ram.
Let us solve that problem today..And here itself. Now we know that Udabhandapura Waihind Was second seat of Capisa kingdom. Wales has something to do with Waihind?
To understand “Wihind” pl read following Book link…..
“Studies in the geography of ancient and medieval India”
By Dineshchandra Sircar (P-290) will tell you something about Waihind.
It is also very remarkable that Kalhana c 12th century the author of Rajatarangini written in 1147 49 AD also refers to the Shahis and does not maintain any any difference or distinction between the earlier Shahis RT IV 143 and the later Shahis or does not refer to any supplanting of the dynasty at any stage as Alberuni does in his Tarikh al Hind Furthermore Kalhana takes the dynasty of the ancestors of the Hindu Shahi rulers Lallya Kallar Kamala Toramana Bhimadeva Jaipala Anandapala Trilochanpala Bhimapala etc unbroken to as far as or earlier than 730 AD It is also remarkable that Rajatrangini and all other sources refer to the Shahi rulers of Udabhandapura Waihind as belonging to the Kshatriya lineage in contrast to Alberuni who designates the earlier Shahi rulers as Turks and the later as Brahmins The system of naming the kings of the so called Turki Shahi dynasty and the Hindu Shahi dynasty is also similar for which reason it is very likely that the caste of the two might also have been same i e Ksatriya Thus if we follow Kalhana then the ancestors of Shahi kings Lallya Toramana Kamalu Bhimadeva Jaipala Anandapala Trilochanapala etc may be traced back to the Ksatriya ruler of Kapisa Kabul 644 45 AD mentioned by Hiuen Tsang and also probably to prince Guna Varman 424 AD a princely scion of the Ksatriya rulers ruling at the start of 5th century in Kapisa Ki pin as mentioned in the Chinese Buddhist records In addition one ancient inscription and several ancient Buddhist manuscripts found from Gilgit area between upper Indus and river Kabul shed some light on three kings who ruled in Gilgit region in 6 7th c AD They also wore Shahi titles and their names are mentioned as Patoladeva alias Navasurendradiyta Nandin Srideva alias Surendra Vikrmadiyta Nandin and Patoladeva alias Vajraditya Nandin It is very relevant to mention here that each of the Shahi rulers mentioned in the above list of Gilgit rulers has Nandin as his surname or last name It is more than likely that the surname Nandin refers to their clan name It is also very remarkable that the modern Kamboj tribe of northern Punjab still has Nandan Nandi.
Link for further Information
Wales ( Cymru) is a Country that is Part of the United Kingdom and the island of Great Britain, Bordered by England to its east and the Atlantic Ocean and Irish Sea to its west. It has a population of three million, and a total area of 20,779 km2 (8,023 sq mi). Wales has over 1,200 km (750 mi) of coastline, including its Offshore Islands; the largest, Anglesev, is also the largest island in the Irish Sea. Wales is largely mountainous, with its highest peaks in the north and central areas, especially in Snowdonia, which contains snowdown, its highest summit.
The Anglo –Saxon word for ‘foreign’ or ‘foreigner’ was Waelisc and a ‘foreign(er’s) land’ was called W?alas. The modern English forms of these words with respect to the modern country are Welsh (the people) and Wales (the land), respectively.
Historically in Britain the words were not restricted to modern Wales or to the Welsh but were used indiscriminately to refer to anything that the Anglo-Saxons associated with Celtic Britains, including other foreign lands (e.g., Cornwall), places once associated with Celtic Britons (e.g., Walworth in County Durham and Walton in West yorkshire), the surnames of people (e.g., Walsh and Wallace) and various other things that were once new and foreign to the Anglo-Saxons (e.g., the walnut). None of these historic usages is necessarily connected to Wales or the Welsh.
The Anglo-Saxon words are derived from the same germanic root (singular Walh, plural Walha), applied to Italic and celtic peoples and places, that has provided modern names for continental lands (e.g.,Wallania and Wallachia) and peoples (e.g., the Vlachs via a borrowing into Old church Slavanic), none of which has any connection to Wales or the Welsh.
(Now you should understand Vallace people who faught against Macedonia after Alexander’s Invasion on Indian borders.Once they were called King of India…It is History and not myth.)
Link to wales
Walha/Walh people are real clue to Capisa. They know their ancient Seat Waihind. The sirname “Abbott” is clue to “Udabhandapura”. They know it. They know it…..!
I appeal you to believe that they were our saviours and not Invaders.
Our “Jai Hind” “Jai Hind” shoutings put “Wahe Hind” “Wahe Hind” in deep Margins.
At the end of reasearch
Present British dynasty
Ruler of Kabul Hindushahi
Now we know that Kuninda and Katyuri rulers of Devbhumi ruled up to Kabul and Kandhar . “Barhat” who founded Kabulshahi Hindushahi dynasty was Burhaditya….! Deity of Katarmal sun temple. Because now we know that the word ” Saxon ” ( Sah ) has connection with Kabul . Shah rulers also ruled Dhar and Devbhumi. That saxons have roots in name of Indra … “Saksanaye”. Evrything proves that present British dynasty is ancient ruler of Kabul …and Almora. Look when Kabulshahi dynasty departed they gave kingdom to Brahmin ruler “Kallar” and they departed .When Katyuris departed from Almora they also gifted land of Almora to Gujarati Bhrahmin Shri chand Tiwari. The Katyuri Dynasty founded by Vasudevrai. Kabulshahi and Almora both had same dynasty rulers.
One site mentions that Original name of Kapisa was Kasyapapura…Most Indian claim that they belong to Kashyap Gotra.
Link that explains Kasyapapur /Kapisa
BOOK LINK TO “Encyclopaedia of Ancient Indian Geography: Kasî – Z, Volume 2″
edited by Subodh Kapo (Page 367-68) WILL explain you the term. Then the term Caspian ?
Vasudevrai came in form of Viceroy
Means Almora ,Kabul and Britain had same ruling line. European history says that the people who faught against Macedonia and Greece ..reached up to Britain . Means Kabul and Almora faught against Macedonia . The defender of Bharatvarsha reached upto Britain and Came to their motherland in time of Crisis?We did not recognise our Sanatan defenders..who has history of Sheding Blood for cause of Bharatvarsha . Even nobody from us looked at similarity Between Goddess Britania and Bharatmata. They created replica of Bharat..ancient DEvbhumi on Britishland ..but none of us could recognise that replica .language problem ever put hurdles in their way. We believed them Robbers…and History took ” u ” turn. We closed the doors behind them . In fact we nenver looked at history of our Devbhumi.
The present British Dynasty is called windsor Dynasty…the word has roots in Wettin ..and that way ancient Wyrtgeorn dynasty of England (Indra land). Do you know what “Wyrtgeorn” or “Vrtraghne” means ? Indra was called “Vrtraghne” after he slained Vritra ,son of mother Danu . OR THEY REMEMBER WAIGUL VALLEY?
Link to my another article that explains everything about “Wyrtgeorn” / “Vrtraghne” /Widsor …!
Link to my another article
Believe me they are true defenders of Bharatvarsha . Not only that..They are Sanatan defenders of Bharatvarsha . By throwing them out now, ourselves disconnected with our owm history.
Surprisingly nobody from us ever tried to search out Kabulshahi ruler ,the true defender of Gate way of India. We forgot him in Turmoil and even after that nobody from us tried to search him out. True Bharatvarsha is only there in the soul of kabulshahi ruler. He Faught …faught and ..faught ! But We forget him as we forget Gate way of India ..Bomboret too.
We peole of India forget rulers of Almora and Kabul..but half of the world know the truth. So Nitsche’s madmen shouted ” God is dead ..we evrybody killed Him..!
Who betrayed whom ?
Now I can not resist to ask you quetion ? Who betrayed whom ? God beteyed us or we betrayed Gods? Vasudevrai betrayed us ? or We betrayed Viceroy (Vasudevrai )?